RE: [Digital BW] Epson3200 - Test results
2003-03-04 by Alessandro Pardi
Ernst, I agree about the focus issue: this scanner seems to have a very good DOF. As for wet mounting, I haven t noticed increased contrast in the test I made,
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 1637 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2003-03-04 by Alessandro Pardi
Ernst, I agree about the focus issue: this scanner seems to have a very good DOF. As for wet mounting, I haven t noticed increased contrast in the test I made,
2003-03-04 by Vincent Orlando <orlandovl@hotmail.com>
Alessandro, I am looking for the Kami fluid and have found a site selling SX 2001 which is a spray or SMF 2001 which is a fluid but cannot find SXL 2001 fluid.
2003-03-04 by Ernst Dinkla
... fluid. As for positioning the film, with 6x7 in the 4x5 area you have plenty of room (the only issue may be getting it vertically and horizontally aligned,
2003-03-04 by dsmithhfx <dsmithhfx@yahoo.com>
... GF, ... The simple answer is: it depends on the image. From what I ve seen, GF preserves edge information when scaling up better than PS bicubic
2003-03-04 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... relates ... No. Not according to Epson, anyway. Obviously it depends on your standards and requirements and how well you can talk yourself into believing
2003-03-04 by Julian Thomas
However they still need rgb files and it is processed in colour chemistry which is why I still class it as a colour-type paper. You cannot give them a
2003-03-04 by Michael A. Schwarz
... I don t know whether this is relevant to your quest, but my personal opinion (which of course is worthless) is that getting neutral B&W varies dramatically
2003-03-04 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: Alessandro Pardi To: Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 11:08 AM
2003-03-04 by Alessandro Pardi
Simon I think that even the most curled film would behave with the fluid. As for positioning the film, with 6x7 in the 4x5 area you have plenty of room (the
2003-03-04 by Simon Lamb
Alessandro Great! I shall get some Kami fluid and try to emulate your success. I take it that absolutley flat film is required, or does the surface tension
2003-03-04 by Alessandro Pardi
Simon, step-by-step: 1) Put the epson carrier on the glass. I think that if you skip this step the scanner may have problems in calibrating. 2) Put a few drops
2003-03-04 by mh <mh@toomanyartists.com>
... I would be fine with color paper if it had a coating that looked like fiber B&W glossy. Neither Glossy or semi-matte in Crytal Archive look right for any
2003-03-04 by mh <mh@toomanyartists.com>
... It appears that reedphoto.com does print on traditional Black and White papers with their Lightjets. This is the first company that I have seen that does
2003-03-04 by Simon Lamb
Alessandro An impressive result. I am getting some great scans from the 3200 now, especially since I swapped to Silverfast Ai and calibrated the scanner with
2003-03-04 by Alessandro Pardi
Sorry if this is a bit OT, but I thought some may be interested in the performance of this new scanner. Tests I made are not comparison with other scanners
2003-03-04 by danielstaver <daniel@petraflux.com>
... Not good. There are no workflows involving the Epson driver that will help you with metamerism in any way. At best your prints will look neutral under one
2003-03-04 by Julian Thomas
Don t forget though that lightjets/lambdas are RGB devices and even the BW is a RC colour type paper. Classic BW FB isn t possible. Still looks great though!
2003-03-04 by mh <mh@toomanyartists.com>
... Ah yes, I thought that might be what you were thinking after I posted the question. I think Dan uses piezography with good results. I imagine any of the
2003-03-04 by Martin Wesley
... From: To: Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 11:58 PM Subject: [Digital BW] Can I mix and match
2003-03-04 by Dimitri Katsaros <dcka@yahoo.com>
Hi there, Question from a serious noob here, but here it goes. From past discussions here, it seems that the Noremorecarts CIS is better in these respects:
2003-03-04 by Martin Wesley
... From: To: Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 11:12 PM Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Digital
2003-03-04 by mh <mh@toomanyartists.com>
Martin, Why do you think a 1270 could do it and an 1160 would not be up to it? -mh
2003-03-04 by mh <mh@toomanyartists.com>
I was going to get into this but decided I don t have the time or money right now. But I did a lot of research and I can tell you that most of the people who
2003-03-04 by Martin Wesley
Jeff, I concur with Paul. You want to check out the printer as it was meant to run. Anything wrong and you can just take it back to where you bought it. The
2003-03-04 by Robert <LA_Native@hotmail.com>
Peter: I am relatively new to the group, so please pardon me for not doing the requisite search on this subject. I have been reading about several RIP
2003-03-04 by Roy Harrington <roy@harrington.com>
... system sounds really cool. I noticed that the driver did not save all the settings after I changed and saved them, so maybe I just assumed they were set
2003-03-04 by murph278 <maybeck@attbi.com>
Thanks Roy - tried this as well, and it still did not work. Your system sounds really cool. I noticed that the driver did not save all the settings after I
2003-03-04 by jim hayes <jimhayes@frii.com>
... Correction: Michael Reichmann, not Andrew Raodney. Aplogies. Jim H.
2003-03-04 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... I second that. I tried sample images on my wife and some of her musician friends and most people found it quite noticable and significantly coarser than
2003-03-04 by Johnny Eades <jeades1@sc.rr.com>
Hello Robert, I might be able to shed some light on the reason for the cyan cast in your prints. I don t use an Epson printer but I think the problem exists
2003-03-04 by Martin Wesley
... From: Ken Carney To: Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 5:52 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW]
2003-03-04 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
... can t ... areas. I just posted an image to my website of an IP5 RIP image from the 2200. And there is no quesation that it s a bit coarse. This is 1.2 cm:
2003-03-04 by A. Andrew Gonzalez <a_andrew_gonzalez@ya
Mitch, I quickly scanned a couple of samples for comparison at: http://www.sublimatrix.com/html/test.html (no modifications in PS other than sizing) I ve seen
2003-03-04 by Paul Roark
Jeff, Though I have no special information or experience with it, I d run the Epson inks through the printer first to be sure everything is working and clean
2003-03-04 by Tony Terlecki
... http://www.reedphoto.com/ -- Tony Terlecki ajt@mrps.demon.co.uk
2003-03-04 by Ken Carney
... I have. As you no doubt know, this is a contact printing technique. I think success will depend on what printing method you use. If you print silver
2003-03-04 by bbstudio_photo <bbstudio_photo@yahoo.com>
I now have a 2200 but plan to use it for color only, because I don t feel I can trust a very colorful inkset to stay dead neutral under all conditions and
2003-03-04 by Jeff Korte <jeffkorte@mn.rr.com>
Sorry, I know I ve read some opinions on this but can t find it again. Is it necessary to run color Epson carts through a new 1280 before (in my case) the MIS
2003-03-04 by Peter Nelson <peter@studio-nelson.com>
You guys must be new to this group. Check the archives. This topic has been VERY heavily discussed here. The 2200 out of the box with the default Epson
2003-03-04 by Mitch Alland
For: A. Andrew Gonzalez ... I am looking at a B&W print I just made with IP5 on the 7600, and can t see what you re talking about: looking with 4x, 6, and 10x
2003-03-03 by Sue Tallon
on 3/3/03 3:10 PM, Robert at LA_Native@hotmail.com ... Hi Robert, I just recently bough the 2200 myself and have been researching
2003-03-03 by Robert <LA_Native@hotmail.com>
How neutral can you get your B&W images with the Epson 2200 printer and Premium Lustre paper? I ve been using the GreyBalancer software downloaded and
2003-03-03 by Charles Bandes <byronbulb@yahoo.com>
It works! It works! And it is so so so so cool. The curves are going to need some tweaking for my 1280, but the principle is sound, and that s the important
2003-03-03 by Doug I.
One issue I have not seen addressed with the new Cone system is regarding longevity issues due to the inherently different design of the Canon print heads. My
2003-03-03 by disch7634 <disch7634@yahoo.com>
Both of the printers are connected directly to USB ports on the computer, I probably shouldn t have used the term hub although I think that the computer only
2003-03-03 by Roy Harrington <roy@harrington.com>
... my PPD long nickname ends in Quad Tone the printer won t print at all - it tries to open a connection for a couple seconds and then aborts. If the Quad
2003-03-03 by jim hayes <jimhayes@frii.com>
What would happen if an image file were first upsampled 200% using GF, then montaged with a second file of higher native size....and then finally GF used again
2003-03-03 by Charles Bandes <byronbulb@yahoo.com>
I think I ve tracked it down to some kind of PPD error. Any time my PPD long nickname ends in Quad Tone the printer won t print at all - it tries to open a
2003-03-03 by Diane Fields
I just checked my 1280 installation paper--it says to install to a first tier USB port--if that makes any difference--I have no idea, hardware is not my forte
2003-03-03 by Truman Prevatt
On the earlier UBS controllers there were issues with the specs on the signal levels. A couple years ago I got a cheap scanner (Umax I think but anyway it was