Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-13 by peter nelson
At 10:30 PM 2/12/2003 +0000, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com ... This is the silliest thing I ve seen here yet. There is no such law, at least in
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1663 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-13 by peter nelson
At 10:30 PM 2/12/2003 +0000, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com ... What makes you think I don t know Photoshop? I probably know Photoshop better
Re: BO vs quad, was When will we get simple reliable BW
2003-02-13 by johngeyles <jge@cs.unc.edu>
I m a newbie to the group and to digital printing, and I m confused as hell ... I m learning a lot by following this group, and I appreciate hearing from the
: Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-13 by peter nelson
At 04:27 PM 2/12/2003 +0000, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com ... But then why do so many other people say they can t get such results even after
Inks
2003-02-13 by Jerry Olson
Hi Jimenez, The Enhanced black is the blackest ink available, unless you count Epson s DYE black ink. 75 percent pigment, 25 percent dye. Rated on the
Black ink only
2003-02-13 by Jerry Olson
Hi! I just made a direct comparison of B0 printing using MIS Generations 4 black. File was RGB. Curve was Paul s neutral. PRINTER DPI was 1440. Paper: Aspen
RE: [Digital BW] Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-13 by Seth Rossman
Sorry, Vincent, but I have been to Epson repair schools for laser, dot-matric and ink-jet. It was VERY specifically stated after a student asked that same
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 2200 RIP
2003-02-13 by Seth Rossman
Hi, John- Well, I hope it works. Heck. After Nikon charges $3500-4500 for a digital camera, THEN wants another $100 for oh, yeah, if you want to convert those
Re: B&W printing and ICC profiles
2003-02-13 by Amadou Diallo <amadiallo2001@yahoo.com>
Unfortunately, ICC is a standard that was developed specifically for color. While there is space in the format to characterize quad and hextone b/w, any
Re: BO vs quad, was When will we get simple reliable BW
2003-02-12 by Charles Bandes <byronbulb@yahoo.com>
(This is more or less cut-n-pasted from a response to off-list email from Clayton, but I thought the group would appreciate it.) I am actually right this
Re: [Digital BW] BO vs quad, was: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by Peter Palmieri
Bob--I did something very similar since my BO prints look very, very good to my eyes. Reading about metamerism, black dots and color casts made me think that I
Re: Grain (was: When WILL We etc.)
2003-02-12 by Wayne J. Cosshall
... -- Wayne J. Cosshall Director and Publisher, Digital ImageMaker International magazine and web site, www.dimagemaker.com Technical Editor, Desktop magazine
B&W printing and ICC profiles
2003-02-12 by kalahari_98 <kalahari69@yahoo.com>
It seems to me that if we had ICC profiles for inkset and paper combinations, we should be able to use any ICC aware application (such as Qimage) to see and
Re: Photography Studies College
2003-02-12 by Wayne J. Cosshall
Hey Bobbo, Yup, grain can be very useful. Sometimes not. You make many valid points here. BW is effectively an abstraction, a formal removing of some aspects
Re: Optimal DPI
2003-02-12 by Roy Harrington <roy@harrington.com>
... both ... mode ... OSX ... Classic ... I m a little confused on what you are looking for. It seems to me that every B&W workflow works just fine in OS9.
Epson C82 for Photo Print
2003-02-12 by Varza, J
Hi, Is anyone familiar with Epson C82 printer? I read an article on Luminous Landscape indicating C80 (a predecessor of C82) is a photo printer. Knowing C80 to
Re: Epson cartridge chip-- Fatal Damager?
2003-02-12 by Steven Karafyllakis <stevek@evcom.net>
... into ... am ... a ... the ... the ... Hi; The fatal damage is physical, not electrical, and quite visible: When you take the unchipped cart out, the little
Re: BO vs quad, was When will we get simple reliable BW
2003-02-12 by John/Julie Gittins
RE: Peter Nelson s, Bob Michaels and Clayton Jones recent posts about BO prints I d like to comment on a few of the things said by the above during the
Epson cartridge chip-- Fatal Damager?
2003-02-12 by dilcher <dilcher@yahoo.com>
MIS web site says: WARNING: DO NOT PUT A CARTRIDGE WITHOUT A CHIP ON IT INTO THE PRINTER - IT WILL CAUSE FATAL DAMAGE TO PRINTER !!! I may have momentarily
Polaroid SprintScan 45 Ultra
2003-02-12 by aitor Peña Inclán
Hi, What s your opinion of this scanner Regards aitor
link to Woolf workflow & curves on MIS website is fixed
2003-02-12 by Bob_Michaels <Bob@BobMichaels.org>
I ll tell you the customer service at MIS is really good. Last night I e-mailed Bob at MIS asking him to fix this broken link of his site. Now, it s fixed.
[Digital BW] Bronzing on Semi-Matte Paper
2003-02-12 by Paul Roark
... The best solution to the RC paper problem is the new vm ink that MIS will probably be selling soon. It s midtones are composed of the MIS 7600 UltraChrome
RE: [Digital BW] Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by Seth Rossman
Sorry, Vincent, but I have been to Epson repair schools for laser, dot-matric and ink-jet. It was VERY specifically stated after a student asked that same
Re: [Digital BW] What's PR Paper?
2003-02-12 by Tom Husband <thusband@sbcglobal.net>
... section ... Thanks, I should have realized this. Tom
Re: [Digital BW] Generations Enhanced Black
2003-02-12 by Jerry Olson
Hi Jimenez, The Enhanced black is the blackest ink available, unless you count Epson s DYE black ink. 75 percent pigment, 25 percent dye. Rated on the
Re: [Digital BW] Re: BO vs quad
2003-02-12 by Jerry Olson
I have some BO prints from Clayton. They REALLY look good. Jerry
Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by Vincent Orlando <orlandovl@hotmail.com>
It is against the law for Epson to try and void the warranty if you use other inks. Something like using GM gas in a GM car daaaa. Vinny
Re: [Digital BW] BO vs quad, was: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing?
2003-02-12 by Jerry Olson
... I just printed one! Was nearly identical to the full scale VM Hextone print. Jerry
Re: Optimal DPI
2003-02-12 by johngeyles <jge@cs.unc.edu>
... I got my G4 during the period when Apple was shipping with both OS9 an OSX, so ugrading is not the issue. It s just that I have everything else running
Re: [Digital BW] BO vs quad, was: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BWprinting??
2003-02-12 by Jerry Olson
Hi! I just made a direct comparison of B0 printing using MIS Generations 4 black. File was RGB. Curve was Paul s neutral. PRINTER DPI was 1440. Paper: Aspen
RE: [Digital BW] What's PR Paper?
2003-02-12 by Alessandro Pardi
Hahnemule Photo Rag, also rebranded under other names (the files section should help on this). ... From: Tom Husband
What's PR Paper?
2003-02-12 by Tom Husband <thusband@sbcglobal.net>
Clayton makes reference to printing his Black Only prints on PR. What is PR? Thanks, Tom Husband
Re: [Digital BW] WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by Kevin Gulstene
Peter- Do you do very much black and white printing. I took a look at your web site and for the most part it is all color? ... Using third party ink will not
Re: [Digital BW] Sketch or Photo?
2003-02-12 by Jerry Olson
Never heard of your printer ink combo having a Sketch quality. Your prints should look photographic, with improved highlight detail, shadow detail, and
[Digital BW] Generations Enhanced Black
2003-02-12 by Paul Roark
... It s not new. Most of the older black inks appear to have had some black dye in them. The carbon black by itself was just not dark enough. The more dye,
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Vuescan vs. Nikon software
2003-02-12 by Carolyn Frayn
Hi again Steve, if I were you I d just scan everything at your scanners limits, which is 2700, then resize with or without resampling in your image editor.
Re: [Digital BW] WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by Carolyn Frayn
... You are reading and quoting from people who are on these forums primarily because they are having problems, there are many happily printing away with these
Grain (was: When WILL We etc.)
2003-02-12 by Bobbo
May I make a confession about grain? I love it. I really love. Yet it is, essentially, noise, and I don t love noise in my audio recording. So it made me
Re: Vuescan vs. Nikon software
2003-02-12 by cschaible94111 <cschaible@cooley.com>
Steve: I said that. What I meant was that the Nikon software that comes with the 4000 arbitrarily refuses to place any value within approximately the 90-100%
Re: Vuescan vs. Nikon software
2003-02-12 by dsmithhfx <dsmithhfx@yahoo.com>
... bit order of the data reversed to each other. this is called little and big endian format and can cause some problems with file transfers between the two
Re: [Digital BW] Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by Julian Thomas
I think the only answer to all this is go to a lab who does all the various kind sof printing and pay for some samples. You ll get the best output from each
Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by Bob_Michaels <Bob@BobMichaels.org>
Peter: FWIW, my expereince was that you can load MIS VM ink carts in a 1280, use the Roark workflow and get same quality prints in the amount of time necessary
Re: [Digital BW] Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by Julian Thomas
for some reason you wanted to use a green light only - how are you controlling how the green laser reads an RGB file. As to rec. failure - all I can tell you
Re: Vuescan vs. Nikon software
2003-02-12 by craig <craygc@yahoo.com>
Dont know if this is your problem but the PC and the Mac write the bit order of the data reversed to each other. this is called little and big endian format
Re: BO vs quad, was: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by Bob_Michaels <Bob@BobMichaels.org>
Peter: I doubt it. One does not reach his level as a fine art photo critic with bad eyesight. However, the evaluation was on print quality, not dot size. I m
Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by peter nelson
At 09:27 AM 2/12/2003 +0000, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com ... Why would you have to give it a green file? A monochrome file is R=G=B. Also why
Re: BO vs quad, was: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by peter nelson
At 09:27 AM 2/12/2003 +0000, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com ... Because maybe he can t SEE them. And maybe other people who look at your photos
WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by peter nelson
At 09:27 AM 2/12/2003 +0000, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com ... I don t care if I use the 2200. I m happy to use any wide format (13 x19 or
Generations Enhanced Black
2003-02-12 by jimenez12fr <miguel.jimenez@oecd.org>
I have been using recently this black ink to complement MIS hextone inks and using Paul Roark s curves on an Epson 1290 printer. I followed the advice of Jerry
Re: Vuescan vs. Nikon software
2003-02-12 by dsmithhfx <dsmithhfx@yahoo.com>
Got a question about Vuescan -- I can t seem to open native Vuescan 48-bit TIFs (with compression) in Mac Photoshop 6 (they open but with weird rainbowy