Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by peter nelson
At 09:27 AM 2/12/2003 +0000, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com ... My idea of comparable is pretty flexible. I want a print which has a
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1664 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: Vuescan vs. Nikon software
2003-02-12 by Stephen Kobrin <skobrin@hotmail.com>
Hi Carolyn, I m sorry, I should have been more specific. Yes, I usually decide on the print size when scanning -- actually I scan a bit bigger than I want to
Re: BO vs quad
2003-02-12 by Clayton Jones <cj@cjcom.net>
Hello Charles, ... What is normal contrast ? Maybe you just haven t seen a really good print done in BO. If I send you a print will you post your honest
[Digital BW] Re: Vuescan vs. Nikon software
2003-02-12 by danielstaver <daniel@petraflux.com>
Absolutely! He s fixed two bugs already based on emails I ve sent him, and often supplies patches within days. Highly recommended.
Re: [Digital BW] Re: BO vs quad, was: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by Bob Frost
Peter, I suppose this is true if you are producing art for sale to a varied selection of people. But I take photos and make prints for MY satisfaction. They
Re: [Digital BW] Bronzing on Semi-Matte Paper
2003-02-12 by Julian Thomas
Ilford Classic Pearl. Julian ... From: To: Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:27 AM
[Digital BW] Re: Vuescan vs. Nikon software
2003-02-12 by B. Alex Pettit Jr. <a_pettit_jr@yahoo.co
And, If you have some problems with the software on a particular scanner, ( Polaroid Sprintscan45 in my case ), Ed is very quick with making patches to his
Dimage scan Multi II vs. Epson 3200
2003-02-12 by aitor Peña Inclán
Hi, I m going to buy a scanner mainly for 35mm panoramic negatives. As far as the Minolta Multi II have very good offers now. I wonder if it s a wise purchase
Bronzing on Semi-Matte Paper
2003-02-12 by craig <craygc@yahoo.com>
Cant find any satisfaction searching the archives so the question is: are there any semi-matte papers out there - preferably archival - that don t bronze using
Re: [Digital BW] Dimage scan Multi II vs. Epson 3200
2003-02-12 by Iain Kirk
I ve had the Minolta for 8 months - top piece of kit!!! With regards to the Epson, I believe that a new Canon with similar specs is about. Maybe one should
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Vuescan vs. Nikon software
2003-02-12 by Iain Kirk
Bob, I totally agree with your recommendations re Vuescan ... I still a relative novice when it comes to the differences between scanner software but even I
Re: [Digital BW] Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by Julian Thomas
A lambda or light jet - well there is a very good reason in that reciprocity failure would cause problems as would you having to give them a green file - also
Re: [Digital BW] BO vs quad, was: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing?
2003-02-12 by Charles Bandes <byronbulb@yahoo.com>
Hee. Well said Clayton. Honestly though, and I realize this may be a lack of experience thing more than anything else, I have never seen a normal contrast
Re: BO vs quad, was: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing?
2003-02-12 by Charles Bandes <byronbulb@yahoo.com>
Peter - I do apologize for the generalization (for what it s worth I am primarily a darkroom-based printer too, tho not with as much experience as you)
Re: [Digital BW] Vuescan vs. Nikon software
2003-02-12 by Carolyn Frayn
... Hi Stephen... when you say you typically scan at 360 or 400, I m assuming you mean final print size. When I used my LS2000 I scanned at 2700. My printer
: Re: Epson 2200 RIP
2003-02-12 by peter nelson
At 12:30 AM 2/12/2003 +0000, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com ... If it works, I ll spend it. Let us know!
BO vs quad, was: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing?
2003-02-12 by peter nelson
At 12:30 AM 2/12/2003 +0000, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com ... I m a darkroom printer who has been working in image processing for years. I was
Re: BO vs quad, was: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by peter nelson
At 12:30 AM 2/12/2003 +0000, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com ... GOOD. That s the key! I have no trouble seeing the dots with my naked eye from a
Re: BO vs quad, was: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by Bob_Michaels <Bob@BobMichaels.org>
... No, I didn t ask about dots. I was more interested in his view which were the better images, not dots. The man curates photo exhibits of some rather famous
BO vs quad, was: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by peter nelson
At 12:30 AM 2/12/2003 +0000, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com ... Did you ask him afterwards if he could see the dots? As I said, in my experiments
Re: [Digital BW] WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by Kevin Gulstene
Peter- Are you asking when simple reliable BW printing will be available or when it will be available using color inks on the 2200? If you insist on using the
Re: Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by peter nelson
At 12:30 AM 2/12/2003 +0000, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com ... But that wasn t a ridiculous question 2 or 3 years ago, either. Film resolution
Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by peter nelson
At 12:30 AM 2/12/2003 +0000, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com ... I suppose it depends on how colorblind the client is, but I passed the SAMPLE
: Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by peter nelson
At 06:58 PM 2/11/2003 +0000, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com ... Without the context of the discussion we were having (it had to do with printhead
Re: [Digital BW] Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by Stuart Phillips
LOL! ... From: peter nelson To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:37 PM Subject: [Digital BW] Re: WHEN will we
Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by peter nelson
At 06:58 PM 2/11/2003 +0000, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com ... Says WHO? There is no correct way to view a print anymore than there is a
Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by peter nelson
At 03:54 PM 2/11/2003 +0000, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com ... By laser printer do you mean laser printer or do you mean something like a
WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing?
2003-02-12 by peter nelson
At 03:54 PM 2/11/2003 +0000, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com ... Exactly! And that fact alone - that there are a zillion different approaches
Re: Sketch or Photo?
2003-02-12 by Clayton Jones <cj@cjcom.net>
Hello Kirk, ... sketch ... matt ... sketch-like ... Some of both. In general, digi prints have their own unique look to them because you re looking at ink,
Re: [Digital BW] Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-12 by Ken Carney
... Hello, Peter. The answer, in a word, is never. I have not read all the posts, but I take it you are interested in a digital print that will be
Re: Vuescan vs. Nikon software
2003-02-12 by Bob_Michaels <Bob@BobMichaels.org>
Just download the free trial of Vuescan (www.hamrick.com) and try it. Quick and easy. It s the full program but puts $40 all over the scan. I bet after you
Re: [Digital BW] BO vs quad, was: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing?
2003-02-12 by Clayton Jones <cj@cjcom.net>
Hello Charles, ... A few things on your few things - ... Quite true. I was surprised when several experienced Q/H-tone printers were impressed with the deep
Vuescan vs. Nikon software
2003-02-12 by Stephen Kobrin <skobrin@hotmail.com>
Somewhere in the midst of the torrent of posts about ever getting a simple B&W print, someone noted that Nikon software compresses the tonal range vis-a-vis
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 2200 RIP
2003-02-12 by Seth Rossman
Hi, John- Well, I hope it works. Heck. After Nikon charges $3500-4500 for a digital camera, THEN wants another $100 for oh, yeah, if you want to convert those
Re: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-02-12 by B. Alex Pettit Jr. <a_pettit_jr@yahoo.co
Hi Seth, I did not attend, but here is the link http://www.epsonprintacademy.com/schedule.shtml Best, Alex ... if there
Re: Woolf workflow for Epson 1270/1280
2003-02-12 by Bob_Michaels <Bob@BobMichaels.org>
Unfortunately the link on the MIS site to the Woolf 1280 workflow does not work. (the other links do work) Bob Michaels ... the Lyson ... prints ... inks. (Is
Re: Black only printing on a Canon S750
2003-02-12 by jeades947 <jeades1@sc.rr.com>
I don t use any back end settings. I have a shadowboost curve that raises the lower values from what it would be with the front end of only 15% dot gain. I
RE: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-02-12 by Seth Rossman
Alex- Was the an Epson-staffed seminar?? Best I ve seen from them is 240-300. Seems a lot depends on the printer you re talking about also. And, if there is
Re: Woolf workflow for Epson 1270/1280
2003-02-12 by Bob_Michaels <Bob@BobMichaels.org>
Keith: I ve used the VM inks with no metamerism. I m using the FSN-E inks currently as I only used the neutral tone with VM. But, I just may go back to VM as
How is Epson Smooth Fine Art Paper
2003-02-12 by Mitch Alland
Here in Bangkok it s rather difficult to find many printing papers: for example, I wanted to try Somerset Velvet for Epson but it s not imported here. Even EEM
Sketch or Photo?
2003-02-11 by foodfeak <kirk.ali@lineone.net>
Hi Just looking for some information. I have recently bought myself an Epson 1160 printer with MIS FS-N ink set and PiezographyBW. I am really impressed - I
[Digital BW] Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-11 by outlaw07480 <outlaw07480@yahoo.com>
... and hung on ... they are not ... tree falls in ... If a man says something and his wife doesn t hear him, is he still worng?
Re: [Digital BW] Woolf workflow for Epson 1270/1280
2003-02-11 by Glenn Thureson
Try http://www.inksupply.com/index.cfm?source=html/workflow.html ... From: Keith Douglas To:
Re: Epson 2200 RIP
2003-02-11 by johngeyles <jge@cs.unc.edu>
... Are you getting it mainly to see if it delivers the holy grail of easy metamerism-free B&W printing on the Epson 2200 using the OEM UltraChrome inks ?
Re: [Digital BW] BO vs quad, was: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing?
2003-02-11 by Bob_Michaels <Bob@BobMichaels.org>
I m currenly using the MIS FSN-E black but have also used the MIS VM black. So I can print equivalent prints using BO and hextone. Bob Michaels ... using ...
Re: [Digital BW] BO vs quad, was: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing?
2003-02-11 by Charles Bandes <byronbulb@yahoo.com>
So a few things - 1. To my eye most of the standard hextone curves seem designed to favor shadow detail over rich blacks. So someone looking for _black_ might
Re: [Digital BW] BO vs quad, was: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-11 by TF
... What black ink are you using for BO printing in the 1280? If you are using the stock Epson dye that could be why. You get a better dmax with more
Woolf workflow for Epson 1270/1280
2003-02-11 by Keith Douglas
I ve been lurking here for a few weeks now, learning as much as I can. For all your hard work, thanks! This is a great place. Now, I m about to buy a
[Digital BW] BO vs quad, was: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-11 by Bob_Michaels <Bob@BobMichaels.org>
I did my own BO vs. Hex test by printing (1280) four different 7.5x10.5 images twice. Once with MIS VM and Roark workflow and once black only with 1280 Epson
Re: [Digital BW] Re: WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-11 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Thanks Chuck.. That s what I and others, I think, are trying to point out.. Peter, I hate to say it, but your commentary is becoming more and more