Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-08 by Anthony Atkielski
... The truth of the principle does not vary by person, since it is based on objective logic. ... Really? Most people would define east as being ... the part
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1796 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
VM with Generations K
2002-09-08 by k2_chittin
I finally had a chance to try out MIS VM this weekend. I printed on EAM and Eclipse Satine bright white on an 1160. As everyone points out, the black is a
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-08 by Anthony Atkielski
... They might. They d be even more equal in 4x6 snapshots. ... Velvia is an extraordinarily poor choice for archival pictures of paintings. One of the key
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-08 by Anthony Atkielski
... Then logically the universe has always existed, since before has no meaning. ... How can the universe prior to the Big Bang have been anything? You just
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Bokeh Mojo
2002-09-08 by Robert Morrison
... I think I will name my next dog Bokeh. And I can t wait to tell my wife that I ve got bokeh mojo. My favorite bokeh lenses of late are a Voigtlander
Re: [Digital BW] Bokeh Defined
2002-09-08 by Robert Morrison
... Why see the difference...jerry...you won t believe it if you see it...just send those useless Leica lenses...do you have my mailing address? ... Well the
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-08 by tomoc
Any idea what this puppy might sell for when it s available??? Tom O Connell ... me ... expected ... (that s ... out
Re: [Digital BW] Epson quad B&W inksets for 2200,7600,9600 coming soon
2002-09-08 by tomoc
... the graphics people, with huge ink cartridges, but they don t seem to think a Photographer would also want huge cartridges. Tightwad
Banding: Roark vs. Piezo driver
2002-09-08 by Steve German
I ve recently begun printing with MIS full spectums on Royal Renaissance (photorag) 309gm. with my Epson 3000, using the Roark curve. Firstly, I would like to
OT: Big Polaroid (was digital sharpness...)
2002-09-08 by Peter Marquis-Kyle
This talk of 3ft x 6ft Polaroid has me intrigued. I knew about the little 20in x 24in one, as used by Elsa Dorfman [ http://elsa.photo.net/index.html ] and
Re: [Digital BW] Burning Skies (feathering)
2002-09-08 by Martin Wesley
... From: ricm95901 To: Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 10:03 PM Subject: [Digital
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 970
2002-09-08 by Bruce
on 9/7/2002 7:38 PM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at ... This sounds like the greenies, minus the green. This may turn out to be possible with
Burning Skies (feathering)
2002-09-08 by ricm95901
Perhaps some of you can help with a PS problem that I ve been trying to solve. I prefer to regularly feather corners/edges on practically all of my photos.
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Bokeh Defined
2002-09-08 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... And Godwin s Law once again may have raised its ugly head. It s amazing how consistent that little bugger is. Keith [Non-text portions of this message have
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-08 by Moreno Polloni
... You could always try http://www.photosol.com Follow the link for Photofinish.
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-08 by Moreno Polloni
... The last I heard a NY photographer did a series of (literally) life-sized portraits of surviving 911 firefighters and policemen. I believe Polaroid has two
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-08 by Moreno Polloni
... I think is was more like a couple of thousand. It s not the kind of camera I d want to backpack with. Most landscape photographers shooting with 20x24 and
Re: [Digital BW] The Old Posterization Problem
2002-09-08 by Martin Wesley
Mark, How long have you had the CIS installed? There have been some threads that as preventive maintenance the cartridge portion of the CIS should be replaced,
RE: [Digital BW] Re: bokeh :was Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-08 by Austin Franklin
Hi Bruce, ... My pleasure. ... You might very well be right, I have no idea... I ve designed very little optical stuff. I ll pose that to Harold (the author
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-08 by Austin Franklin
Anthony, ... discussed] ... Depth of field is not limited by the resolution of the media, that s not part of the equation. It is limited by a somewhat
Re: bokeh :was Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-08 by Bruce
on 9/7/2002 11:20 AM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at ... Thanks for the link. An interesting article. I might still suggest that is is
Re: [Digital BW] The Old Posterization Problem
2002-09-08 by Mark Romine
Hi Jerry: ... I do not believe I need a scan, which I can do on my drum scanner if need be, I am getting the flat midtones printing the Cone 21 step grey
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Bokeh Mojo
2002-09-08 by Austin Franklin
... Mark, I second that nomination. The image I provided a link to was shot with that very lense. Austin
RE: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-08 by Austin Franklin
Jerry, ... I have both. ... That doesn t negate the discussion of starting with film, and printing with digital, vs, starting with digital and printing with
RE: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-08 by Austin Franklin
Er, Jerry, I thought you only took pictures of cats? Damn. I d like to see a picture of a cat on a tripod, or a cat being used as a quadpod. Most
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-08 by Austin Franklin
... You re being a bit dramatic, there Jerry. I never said digital is crud...it is fantastic in it s application, when it s limits are understood. Oh, and by
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-08 by Austin Franklin
Anthony, ... And those sources are....??? ... No, with most people that s true, but I know that you sometimes like to make claims that simply are not correct,
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-08 by Austin Franklin
Jerry, ... I only argue about things I have somewhat intimate knowledge of. I have lost (meaning my speculations were incorrect, and I happened to learn
RE: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-08 by Austin Franklin
... Anthony, The statement doesn t say what you think it says...you re being too literal (but anyway, pixels CAN be compressed, but that s another subject). I
Re: Bokeh Defined
2002-09-08 by Mitch Alland
From: Jerry Olson ... As I wrote in another posting, there is an excellent example of a picture ruined by bad bokeh in a thread on the
Re: Bokeh Defined
2002-09-08 by Mitch Alland
To: culturalvisions ... That s true when you create washes of color, or of tones in B&W, as with the Noctilux at f/1. On the photo.net
Re: Bokeh Defined
2002-09-08 by Mitch Alland
To: Martin Wesley ... I don t know why there is so much nonsense written about bokeh: it doesn t exist , it s BS , etc. Look,
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-08 by Austin Franklin
... Jerry, I have absolutely no idea. Perhaps you ought to ask Anthony ;-) Austin
RE: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-08 by Austin Franklin
... I don t have any problem at all with sharpness...or...resolution, but thanks for the thoughts, there, Jerry ;-) Austin
RE: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-08 by Austin Franklin
... I have a 7k x 7k scanning back (that s 51,380,224 REAL pixels BTW, or over 150M bytes of data at 8 bits/color), and it gives amazing results...but that s
[Fwd: [ProNetPhoto] Photoshop 7 JPEG viewing problem]
2002-09-08 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
ADOBE blows it.. This may well explain some problems I have seen on various sites.. Add this to the Greyscale to RGB conversion bug.. Glad I didn t move to 7
Re: [Digital BW] Re: before the big bang.... (OT)
2002-09-08 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Funny thought... I really never really understood the physics of light and color until I learned about the red-shift (doppler) and the blue-shift... Then
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-08 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... HAHAHAHAHA! Although it would look awesome to see one or two.... LOL Anyone remember when the US Football receiver ran into the old CBS upright TV cam on
Re: before the big bang....OT OT,
2002-09-08 by sm7bxd
Before BiG BanG! then it was the Quad *black* everyone is looking and longing for. And it lasted for millions of years! Until *Someone* blow it and the BiG
Re: [Digital BW] UltraChrome 100 Hr Fade test
2002-09-08 by Jerry Olson
Paul, I m sticking with enhanced, I think. The VM looks pretty black until you put enhanced next to it. Besides, I don t know if the ultrachrome inks are
Re: before the big bang....
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Damn! How did you know that? I thought I was the only one interested in cosmology here. Now, what was it like a trillionth of a second before? Jerry
RE: [Digital BW] UltraChrome 100 Hr Fade test
2002-09-07 by Paul Roark
Jerry, I think the Gen Enhanced K still has a bit of an edge. However, after a few months of bright light, that might not be the case. The Ultrachrome K is
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
... All I said is the prints would be equal in quality. They would. I m sure the tech pan could go much higher. ... The museum in question had compared velvia
ImagePrint 5 PiezoTone B&W print problem
2002-09-07 by Stephen Kundell, MD
Quentin, I have been tortured trying to get ImagePrint to work right with my 7000. I am working on a pc, calibrated monitor, but feel like I have a moving
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Bo, I think with a multi pro 3000 scanner, 2 1/4 tech pan neg and an epson printer, you will be able to get sharp enough prints even Austin would like. I do
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Trick question... There was NO time before the BIG BANG... Until one has a 3 dimensional universe, atime, the fourth dimension, has no meaning.. The
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Thanks! I have a couple pair of otherwise near new white trousers that I could save. I ll try B&H first. I ve tried practically everything, and nothing seems
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Fine artists use them to show the amazing quality you can get from a huge contact print. They are quite something to see if you have never seen one! Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] UltraChrome 100 Hr Fade test
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Paul, how does the blackness of the ultrachrome black ink compare with enhanced black? Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] The Old Posterization Problem
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Mark, I don t know why you are getting flat midtones. Something isn t right though. There s so many reasons that it could be I don t know how you d track it