RE: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Austin Franklin
Anthony, ... What is the source of the claim? ... It s physiology that the human eye has variable resolution, with the highest area being in the very center,
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1798 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] Epson quad B&W inksets for 2200,7600,9600 coming soon
2002-09-07 by jeffm@gis.net
... Well... I would think that there is a very large and growing market for it. Think about how many boxes of B&W paper Ilford and Kodak sell per year. -Jeff
Bokeh Defined
2002-09-07 by Martin Wesley
For those poor souls like myself going Bokeh? here are a couple of sites: http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/bokeh.htm http://www.pathcom.com/~vhchan/bokeh.html
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Anthony Atkielski
... It s human physiology. The dimensions of the cone cells in the most densely-packed areas of the retina are about 30 seconds of arc in size. Resolution is
Re: [Digital BW] Epson quad B&W inksets for 2200,7600,9600 coming soon
2002-09-07 by lawrencetrek
It would be great if this rumor was true. Then us black and white photographers could forget about spending $495 for the unproven Imageprint solution to
RE: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by Austin Franklin
... Jerry, What if the cat moves? ;-) Austin
RE: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by Austin Franklin
Jerry, I think you re in apples and oranges here... No one disagrees that the lense doesn t make a difference (in the case of the D60), of course it
RE: [Digital BW] RE: bokeh was: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Austin Franklin
... Hi Bruce, No, I didn t stop reading after the first sentence, and I am continuing reading unto this day ;-) It wasn t clear from your original comment, but
RE: [Digital BW] RE: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Austin Franklin
Jerry, ... I don t understand that comment at all. ... Not at all, in fact, it s a very important subject to many photographers. Because you never heard of it,
Re: [Digital BW] Digital vs. Film... Part II
2002-09-07 by akivisuals
yeah, there were pixels.... the prints were huge! i think they were at least 30x40 s. maybe bigger. andy ... camera. 6mg ... see ... than 20 ... noticeable
RE: bokeh was: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Bruce
on 9/7/2002 9:13 AM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at ... My point being that at first I would have been skeptical, but I now see, understand,
RE: [Digital BW] Re: bokeh :was Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Austin Franklin
Hi Bruce, ... Nope. It s intentional in the cases of Leica and Zeiss. This paper will show you what the key elements of the property are, and how they are
Re: [Digital BW] Re: UltraChrome 100 Hr Fade test
2002-09-07 by Martin Wesley
... From: Paul Roark To: DigitalB&WPrint Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 8:43 AM
Re: converting color images to grayscal
2002-09-07 by Rick Schiller
In Photoshop try looking at individual channels and/or blending 2 of them to get what you want. You then convert the one or blended channels to a grayscale.
Plug in Filters...effects
2002-09-07 by lyonscox
To all I don t have much, if any experience with plug ins. Was working on an image last night that it would be nice to give it a lot of scratches on the
Re: bokeh :was Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Bruce
on 9/7/2002 1:33 AM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at ... Pure speculation here: I think that the bokeh is not a property designed into these
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Randall workflow
2002-09-07 by Julian Thomas
I ll send it to Martin to put on the website. Julian ... From: a_pettit_jr To: Sent:
Re: [Digital BW] RE: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Austin, Don t tell Mike Kravitt he gets useless pictures with his mamiya because the lenses don t have Bokeh! What a nitpicking subject. I bet most Landscape
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Here, I ve got to say you are wrong. The images my macro lenses make are very noticeably sharper than with a couple other lenses I own that aren t that sharp.
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Sm7, Yes, I m sure that back would equal tech pan! But how much does it cost? You could probably buy a LOT of tech pan, technidol and a drum scanner for a lot
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Ross, I ran a test between the raw image and the superfine JPEG image, and can see no visible difference at all. If I need to get shadow detail and highlight
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Nikon Back Up Body
2002-09-07 by daschkenas@aol.com
I shot with F4 s for years, but I suggest that you go with a used F5, I ve had them since they came out. Focus is MUCH faster, and always nails it, also you
Re: [Digital BW] Nikon Back Up Body
2002-09-07 by Richard Sintchak
Saturday, September 7, 2002, 8:46:25 AM, rlsopher wrote: r This is definitely off list topic but what the heck... r I need a new back up for my F4. The F100
Re: [Digital BW] Nikon Back Up Body
2002-09-07 by Kip Babington
I ve never used an F4 so cannot compare it to an F100, but I can say that I love the F100. Its multiple focusing spots make it much more useful than the N90s
Re: Nikon Back Up Body
2002-09-07 by johnvphoto
... The F100 is a excellent camera...but it s nice having more than one of the same camera as you don t have to switch gears when you change cameras. John V.
Nikon Back Up Body
2002-09-07 by rlsopher
This is definitely off list topic but what the heck... I need a new back up for my F4. The F100 has been suggested as a good way to go but I can get a used F4
Re: [Digital BW] Re: UltraChrome 100 Hr Fade test
2002-09-07 by Paul Roark
Dan and Martin, It sounds like Royce was talking about a yellowing that is different than the optical brightener yellowing we ve become familiar with -- and
Freelance Digital Photographers Wanted!!!!!
2002-09-07 by citivue
CITIVUE.com is now hiring independent contracted freelance photographers. If you enjoy taking pictures of people and would like to make money doing so, this
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... BOB! I never expected such a basic error from you.. That 72 ppi figure may have been acceptable as THE rule 10 years ago on Macs.. But, even Macs have
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... oooooh! One of the neat uses for mirror lenses is those wild Bokeh ring backgrounds in out-of-focus regions.. Keith [Non-text portions of this message
RE: [Digital BW] RE: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Austin Franklin
... Bruce, What s there to be BS about? It s a fact that bokeh exists, and it s a fact that different lenses render the bokeh differently...it s just simple
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Austin Franklin
... Anthony, What s your source for that claim? What humans need for a full-frame image is entirely different than what is needed for photographic
Re: Randall workflow
2002-09-07 by a_pettit_jr
Hi Julian, How can I locate that file ?? Thanks, Alex
ImagePrint support
2002-09-07 by ruhrfoto
... dollars entitles ... and support for ... another $495 PER ... Just for the records: they have been supporting and updating/upgrading me now since 5 months
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Bob Frost
Probably something to do with it s dynamic range? Bob Frost. ... From: Austin Franklin
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Anthony Atkielski
... The physiology of human vision is extraordinarily consistent. That s how we know that 6-8 megapixels is all that anyone ever needs for a full-frame image
Re: [Digital BW] Re: ImagePrint and Custom Profiles
2002-09-07 by Bob Frost
Andy, And the rest! Reading the small print on their site, $495 dollars entitles you to use the program on one printer and receive upgrades and support for
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Bob Frost
Jerry and Anthony, Since everyone s eyes differ - their lenses will vary in many parameters (just as our camera lenses do), their retinas will differ in the
Re: [Digital BW] Converting color images to grayscale
2002-09-07 by Robert Damon
There are a couple of other ways of using Photoshop to convert color to grayscale. Look at the Russell Brown tutorial here:
Re: ImagePrint 5 PiezoTone B&W print problem
2002-09-07 by qdfb
I could see some improvement using your settings, but the black cut- in is still more aggressive than Piezo. It may well be because these inks are new, and
Re: [Digital BW] The Old Posterization Problem
2002-09-07 by lostpixels
Jerry: No, a grey scale file through the Cone Piezo driver and profiles with MIS FS inks. Previously this was giving me very good results. Now I am getting the
Re: ImagePrint 5 PiezoTone B&W print problem
2002-09-07 by qdfb
Bernd, Interesting settings! Why are you using them? Still, Ill give them a try, thanks. Quentin
Re: ImagePrint 5 PiezoTone B&W print problem
2002-09-07 by ruhrfoto
Quentin, I´m using IP5 on a Mac with the 7500. Monotor calibrated by eyeballs PS 7.0: Color setting for greyscale is Gray Gamma 1.8. Files saved as tiff with
ImagePrint 5 PiezoTone B&W print problem
2002-09-07 by qdfb
I have been trying to get decent results using ImagePrint 5 with Cone PiezoTone Selenium inks in a 7000. I have tried various settings, Piezo 1 and Piezo 11
Re: [Digital BW] Randall workflow
2002-09-07 by Julian Thomas
Well I m not using the file in the list but one Tyler made to show Austin how many tones there are in a piezo print so there should be 256 Zs - in the other
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Anthony Atkielski
... If large areas of the image are significantly out of focus, as they might be for the background of a portrait shot with a long lens, a pleasing character
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Anthony Atkielski
... Nothing is completely diffuse. Conversely, a diffuser can make anything as diffuse as a cold head. ... A cold light head is one that uses a discharge
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by Anthony Atkielski
... You must have been bitted badly if you decided to spend all that money on another digital body after being dissatisifed with the first one. ... Your budget
Re: [Digital BW] Re: UltraChrome 100 Hr Fade test
2002-09-07 by Martin Wesley
... From: Dan_Honemann To: Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:39 PM Subject:
Re: [Digital BW] Re: UltraChrome 100 Hr Fade test
2002-09-07 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: Martin Wesley To: Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 7:15 PM Subject: Re: