Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by bearlick_2000
Thanks Jerry for your helpful response to my question on your lense selection for the D60. I am wondering what your experience has been converting the raw D60
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1799 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Robert Morrison
... Oh my God, Jerry, you have committed the unthinkable utterance...bokeh rules! If you still have any leica or contax lenses you should give them to charity
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Robert Morrison
... Well there are streets and there are streets...its just an expression after all. Ever take pictures on a quite park bench...what about in a church...maybe
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Robert Morrison
... My main preference for M series is size...they are tiny in comparison to SLR lenses. Four lenses (15mm, 28mm, 50mm, 75mm) a camera and a light meter in a
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Robert Morrison
... Nope, not kidding. I don t know anyone else who thinks the image quality is better in digital...just the convenience. Robert
Re: UltraChrome 100 Hr Fade test
2002-09-07 by Dan_Honemann
Paul, The UC inks may last 75-100 years, but the Enhanced Matte paper will begin to yellow at 30 years, at least according to Royce Bair at inkjetart.com; I
Re: [Digital BW] UltraChrome 100 Hr Fade test
2002-09-07 by Martin Wesley
Paul, Thank you once again for your ongoing testing and detailed reporting. This one is going to be very interesting to follow and may have a real impact on
RE: [Digital BW] Epson quad B&W inksets for 2200,7600,9600 coming soon
2002-09-07 by Andrew Biggs
I am soooooo ready to see something groundbreaking from Epson. I just picked up a 2200 today, and the color that it produces is very nice. But I am really
RE: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Bruce
on 9/6/2002 9:45 PM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at ... My gut reaction to this is that it is BS. (the bokeh). A few months ago I attended a
Re: [Digital BW] Converting color images to grayscale
2002-09-07 by david_bookbinder@sprynet.com
In Photoshop you can use the Channel Mixer to refine your conversion to B & W. I know this only through hearsay, though, as I use Picture Window Pro, which
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 964
2002-09-07 by Bruce
on 9/6/2002 9:45 PM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at ... Austin, That s right, a single incandescent light bulb (frosted of course!) is
Converting color images to grayscale
2002-09-07 by bensongary
I ve always used the Photoshop Image- Mode command when I needed to convert a color image to grayscale, but I ve seen various references to other software used
UltraChrome 100 Hr Fade test
2002-09-07 by Paul Roark
The test of the UltraChrome inks, using matte black on EAM, has reached 100 hours in my fluorescent light fader. The light level in this tester is weaker than
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by sm7bxd
Hallo Austin and Jerry, Yes, everything has it s limits. What about the limit of this: http://www.dpreview.com/news/0209/02090601sinar22mp.asp It s a 22
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by JimD
Ah, now I understand this tempest in a tea pot. Jerry, you ve made a big mistake. You need to realize that what you see is not what you get. Geez man, do the
RE: [Digital BW] Epson quad B&W inksets for 2200,7600,9600 coming soon
2002-09-07 by Shire,Stanley
I m ready. After using IP4 on our 10000 for a year, I m sold on the rip, the fantastic support and the free profiles. John and Dan at Colorbyte will go to
Re: [Digital BW] Epson quad B&W inksets for 2200,7600,9600 coming soon
2002-09-07 by shadow22260540
RE: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by Austin Franklin
... Jerry, No one is arguing with you which is better, people are simply discussing the LIMITS of both. I know this may come as a surprise to you (that s
Re: [Digital BW] Epson quad B&W inksets for 2200,7600,9600 coming soon
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
This could be great news, when a CIS is developed for this printer. One could get the large epson cartridges and decant it into the 4 ounce bottles that the
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Austin Franklin
Jerry, ... Er, MOST if not ALL fine art photographers, and portrait photographers, and probably most any decent photographer...except photo journalists, it
RE: [Digital BW] Epson quad B&W inksets for 2200,7600,9600 coming soon
2002-09-07 by Shire,Stanley
If correct, this makes the 2200 and IP5 even more interesting. Cynic that I am, I hope it s not another Foveon and that the Epson quad inks don t orange fade.
Re: [Digital BW] The Old Posterization Problem
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Mark, are you printing an RGB image through one of Paul Roark s curves, or just a straight grayscale without one of his curves?
Epson quad B&W inksets for 2200,7600,9600 coming soon
2002-09-07 by shadow22260540
Posted what I know about this in message 19379 but forgot to put it in subject. At any rate, in a recent conversation with an Epson Beta tester he told a group
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Austin, And of course you never say the same thing over and over.... :) Austin, I don t believe anyone has ever won an argument with you. I can t recall it
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Good God Austin, who cares what an out of focus area looks like? I only learned there actually was such a thing as bokeh about a year ago. Imagine!!! 45 years
RE: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by Austin Franklin
Jerry, ... You re argument is irrelevant, no one is arguing that an inkjet print isn t sharper than a darkroom print, no matter WHAT the original image source
The Old Posterization Problem
2002-09-07 by Mark Romine
I have not been here to the list in some time but I wanted to see if there are any new remedies to the posterization problems. Using an 1160, no longer Cone
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Austin Franklin
... Anthony, Because, as I said in another post, diffuse light sources mean diffuse over the entire light source...completely even (to a degree, of course)
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Austin Franklin
... Robert, I m not quite sure what street you live on, but up here in Boston, no one would ever hear the mirror sound your SLR makes...I assure you. The
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Austin, you certainly know by now what I m talking about when I tell somebody that a D60, or D1x image printed on a 13x19 inch piece of paper will be the equal
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Austin Franklin
... Sigh, Jerry. Sharpness isn t everything to everyone, like it is to you. Fuji MF lenses are amongst the sharpest lenses available, but the out of focus
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Austin Franklin
... Well, I still say diffuse isn t necessarily diffuse. Diffuse, as far as a light source for film projection goes, MUST give a completely even field over
RE: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by Austin Franklin
... Jerry, Jerry, Jerry...you keep comparing apples and oranges. Compare a scanned negative printed on an inkjet, with a digital image printed on an inkjet.
Re: Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Bruce
on 9/6/2002 2:13 PM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at ... diffuse is diffuse. That said the size of the light source will make a large
Re: [Digital BW] Digital vs. Film... Part II
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
You actually saw pixels? The Canon 1D is only a 4 megapixel camera. 6mg would be better. But you must be speaking of huge prints to see pixelation. How big
Re: [Digital BW] Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Ross, Here are the sharpest canon lenses I know about. I own the first four in the list. #1 The 50mm Macro Canon #2 The 100mm Macro Canon #3 The 24mm Canon #4
(no subject)
2002-09-07 by shadow22260540
I had an interesting conversation with a beta tester for Epson at a seminar a few weeks ago. He said a new B&W ink set is now almost ready for release from
Re: [Digital BW] time delay with point and shoot digital
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Do the digital SLRs have more immediate shutter response? For ... Yes, the Nikon D1x and Canon D60 have an almost instantaneous shutter. An expensive testing
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Wangalb, Leica and Contax lenses once were the best in the world. That s no longer true. Today, several lenses can and do produce sharper images than Leitz.
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Jerry Olson
Humbug! Bah! Digital Rules! . Jer ... Well, of course, the output is what I m talking about. I m NOT talking about huge prints here, just 13x19 Max. Also,
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Dan_Honemann
... Oh, man, my dream camera. I d love to be able to get direct digital capture through my summiluxes. I m sick of scanning! Alas, Erwin Puts has offered
Re: [Digital BW] Scanned negatives and the Zone System
2002-09-07 by Ken Carney
I wouldn t worry too much about it. I ve got a ton of LF negs with compressed and expanded development, including N-4 compensated development. Just scan
Digital sharpness vs film- Canon D60
2002-09-07 by bearlick_2000
Hello from a lurker on this list. I am currently printing with the old piezo inks using a 1160 and primarily EAM and Photo Rag papers. I have been unhappy
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting digital vs. film
2002-09-07 by Robert Morrison
... Its not...my D1x sounds just like my F100...but I would never use my F100 for street photography...I d use one of my Rangefinders with no mirror and almost
Re: BW densities ?? The Rest of the MIS FS Story
2002-09-06 by a_pettit_jr
What got me sidetracked for several days was the ole 2000P s Metamerism tricking me into thinking that the lighter shades had a cyan bias; the deeper shades
Re: BW densities ?? The Rest of the MIS FS Story
2002-09-06 by a_pettit_jr
Did I just rediscover something well known ?? Oh well, at least I am finally learning the complexity of what is required to accomplish the fine art of B&W with
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Gen 4 Black was Ink decisions
2002-09-06 by Jerry Olson
Andy, I just sucked out all the old VM ink out of the black position bottle with a syringe. First be sure you clamp off the black tube close to the place where
Digital vs. Film... Part II
2002-09-06 by akivisuals
Wow! What a controversy! I had no idea that this line of questioning would result in this long of a thread. The reason why I ask is because my former
Re: [Digital BW] Randall workflow
2002-09-06 by Jerry Olson
Julian, So the More Z s you see the better? How many should you see should one be lucky enough to get a perfect print? Thanks... Jerry
Re: BW densities ?? The Rest of the MIS FS Story
2002-09-06 by jrandall1149
BINGO! And for quad-ink systems, only 2 shades will be printed -- black and gray (a constant mix of the 3 gray inks) unless an RGB partitioned curve set is