Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 1844 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

Re: Raster Image Processor Question

2002-07-28 by antonisphoto

Robert, A RIP is generally associated with printing page layouts from programs like Quark, using Postscript. However, because this gives you access to CMYK

Thread view Attachments: 0

Letter to Epson - 2200 and gray balancer

2002-07-28 by Shire,Stanley

As a longtime (MX80 and FX80 20+ years ago)and committed Epson user (1270, 3000 and 10000cf now) I understand that decisions regarding what is packaged with a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Raster Image Processor Question

2002-07-28 by Robert C Wittig

Hi, I m new to the group and a total newbie to the B&W Print field. I am planning on purchasing an Epson 3000 printer (used), and using MIS Quadtone inks with

Thread view Attachments: 0

HAPPY NEW YEAR!!

2002-07-28 by Stephen Kundell, MD

A second to the Thank You, Martin and Antonis. This is a fabulous forum with a terrific group of participants. I am very grateful for the work you have put

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Canon D60 Question

2002-07-28 by Austin Franklin

... Hi Herb, I won t disagree that some photos may in fact work better manipulated in PS, and there was nothing that could be done in exposure etc. to make

Thread view Attachments: 0

Methods of Selection Narrow ranges...?

2002-07-28 by lyonscox

I was wondering what methods people are employing when trying to adjust the contrast of a narrow tone range, say 5-20%? To state it another way...if I were to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] HAPPY NEW YEAR!!

2002-07-28 by Richard Sintchak

And a big THANK YOU to both of you for providing this forum. I only just started doing digital B&W work and only been here a couple of months but have felt

Thread view Attachments: 0

HAPPY NEW YEAR!!

2002-07-28 by Martin Wesley

HAPPY NEW YEAR!! Yep that s right Digital B&W, The Print starts it s second year today. The last year has that surreal quality of having gone by in the blink

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Epson 2200

2002-07-28 by Robert Morrison

I went to an Apple imaging seminar this week and saw a 2200, and 2200 output for the first time. The color output on matte papers was nice...but I don t

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: Canon D60 Question

2002-07-28 by hsitz

... NEVER. What I ... in PS, ... images are ... PS... ... I mistakenly had it the other way around; I really thought you were implying that if photos do need

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: Canon D60 Question

2002-07-28 by uncljohnson

... the ... something that ... artist; it is ... seem to ... the ... artist. ... Whoooooah, back the perfect print pony up there Bob! Art is is purely

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Canon D60 Question

2002-07-28 by Austin Franklin

Hi Herb, ... My only point. ... To some degree, of course. ... I don t simply throw them away, but I have enough images to deal with already...and have no

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Canon D60 Question

2002-07-28 by Austin Franklin

... Bob, If the creative element has entered the fray, that makes it art in my book. Photography does entail both art and science...but because it does entail

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Canon D60 Question

2002-07-28 by Austin Franklin

... I thought you d like it. I picked it in your honor, after all, it IS your photo contest ;-) ... Perhaps, but in reality, there was NO sky, that s fog!

Thread view Attachments: 0

Epson 2200

2002-07-27 by André Vallejo

I just read Michael Reichman review on the Epson 2200 for BW printing (http://www.luminous-landscape.com/) . Interesting. Any experiences from the people in

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Canon D60 Question

2002-07-27 by Jerry Olson

Roger, Lord I hoped I had made clear during my discussions with Austin that I was not talking about scientific or photojournalism. I wouldn t change them. I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Canon D60 Question

2002-07-27 by Jerry Olson

... Ya, I know that. It s one of the things that always bugs me. I do use the :) ocasionally, you know. I am sometimes poking fun at you you know. Don t be so

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Canon D60 Question

2002-07-27 by Bob Frost

Austin, Daring to intervene in this battle of wits , it occurs to me that the photographs you are taking are perhaps NOT art. Art is surely something that is

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: Canon D60 Question

2002-07-27 by rlsopher

Come on guys, this has devolved to the level of arguing over how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. It should be no secret that the image is in the

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: Canon D60 Question

2002-07-27 by hsitz

... that. ... All your points are well-made and well-taken. If you ve got a shot you think is perfect without doing anything in Photoshop, then of course you

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Canon D60 Question

2002-07-27 by Austin Franklin

... Jerry, What YOU believe is an improvement, I may not believe is. In fact, I may believe it ruins the image. And, BTW, I have not always been satisfied

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Canon D60 Question

2002-07-27 by Austin Franklin

Hi Herb, ... That s somewhat true...but only in the sense that I do strive for perfect exposure, focus, lighting, framing etc. with the film...but I don t do

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: Canon D60 Question

2002-07-27 by hsitz

... tonal curve ... tonal ... parcel of ... the ... Austin -- Haven t seen the images. I m sure they re great. It just seems like you make it a point of

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Canon D60 Question

2002-07-27 by Jerry Olson

Austin, it is now obvious that you will always be satisfied with your prints, and have no need or intention of improving on them. I don t care what a meter

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Canon D60 Question

2002-07-27 by Austin Franklin

Jerry, YOU believe it improves the picture, but for me, it does not. I simply love natural, unadulterated (sic...remember, it s a picture of a child ;-),

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Canon D60 Question

2002-07-27 by Austin Franklin

Hi Jerry, ... Well, I, and many thousands of other people, have no problem doing it that way...and again, my images bear that out. ... Depends on where it

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Canon D60 Question

2002-07-27 by Austin Franklin

But Jerry, that s in YOUR OPINION, NOT fact. Don t you understand that? I find the image perfect, as well as many other people who have seen the image. As

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Canon D60 Question

2002-07-27 by Jerry Olson

Hi again! ... Sorry, it just can t be done that way!! ... I mean if it had one, would you just leave it there? ... Generically speaking. I would remove ANY

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Canon D60 Question

2002-07-27 by Austin Franklin

Hi Jerry, ... In YOUR opinion. I believe my images are as good as they can be already. ... And I disagree...as evidenced by my prints. I have NO problem

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Canon D60 Question

2002-07-27 by Jerry Olson

Austin, that is the POINT of photoshop tweaks!!!!!! You PUT the catchlight there, because it would much improve the image. You would do it in a studio, you

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] signature

2002-07-27 by Hans Rijnbout

... Vinny, Look for signatures in the help file of your mail client. Most e-mail programs have a separate window or dialog where you define your signature.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.