Re: Raster Image Processor Question
2002-07-28 by antonisphoto
Robert, A RIP is generally associated with printing page layouts from programs like Quark, using Postscript. However, because this gives you access to CMYK
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 1844 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2002-07-28 by antonisphoto
Robert, A RIP is generally associated with printing page layouts from programs like Quark, using Postscript. However, because this gives you access to CMYK
2002-07-28 by Shire,Stanley
As a longtime (MX80 and FX80 20+ years ago)and committed Epson user (1270, 3000 and 10000cf now) I understand that decisions regarding what is packaged with a
2002-07-28 by antonisphoto
Cleavis, Your methods A and B are good; C is for quick-n-dirty . You can select ranges using the Selective Color command, too, but beware what happens to the
2002-07-28 by Robert C Wittig
Hi, I m new to the group and a total newbie to the B&W Print field. I am planning on purchasing an Epson 3000 printer (used), and using MIS Quadtone inks with
2002-07-28 by Stephen Kundell, MD
A second to the Thank You, Martin and Antonis. This is a fabulous forum with a terrific group of participants. I am very grateful for the work you have put
2002-07-28 by Lawrence Smith
... Remember Mr. Reichmann also thought enough of the 2000p to make prints for sale. I would not have given them away myself. Everybody has a different idea
2002-07-28 by Austin Franklin
... Hi Herb, I won t disagree that some photos may in fact work better manipulated in PS, and there was nothing that could be done in exposure etc. to make
2002-07-28 by vinyo88
Hans, thanks for the help, I will look for it today Vinny
2002-07-28 by Steadman Uhlich
WHooa....what a post. (grin) Your mention of garish colors is gonna make me go visit just to see... S. ... From: grdglass@aol.com [mailto:grdglass@aol.com]
2002-07-28 by grdglass@aol.com
I was shocked when I read the Luminous Landscape review! Maybe that s why my b+w sample from the 2200 suffers from magenta/green metamerism. I realize now
2002-07-28 by lyonscox
I was wondering what methods people are employing when trying to adjust the contrast of a narrow tone range, say 5-20%? To state it another way...if I were to
2002-07-28 by Richard Sintchak
And a big THANK YOU to both of you for providing this forum. I only just started doing digital B&W work and only been here a couple of months but have felt
2002-07-28 by Martin Wesley
HAPPY NEW YEAR!! Yep that s right Digital B&W, The Print starts it s second year today. The last year has that surreal quality of having gone by in the blink
2002-07-28 by Robert Morrison
Post this question on the archival color list. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/archivalcolor Robert
2002-07-28 by jimhayes361
Is it really true that Epson is letting you lucky Europeans get not only a CD printer capability, but far worse- giving you the grey balancer but not to the US
2002-07-28 by Robert Morrison
I went to an Apple imaging seminar this week and saw a 2200, and 2200 output for the first time. The color output on matte papers was nice...but I don t
2002-07-28 by amateriat
... instead of a record shot. ... Goodness, I kept telling myself I wasn t going to stick my beak into this mess of a nest, but you *had* to go and drag the
2002-07-28 by Martin Wesley
To all concerned, Please update your subject lines as the topic of the thread changes. I pity anyone who ever tries to search this list for info on the Canon
2002-07-28 by hsitz
... NEVER. What I ... in PS, ... images are ... PS... ... I mistakenly had it the other way around; I really thought you were implying that if photos do need
2002-07-28 by uncljohnson
... the ... something that ... artist; it is ... seem to ... the ... artist. ... Whoooooah, back the perfect print pony up there Bob! Art is is purely
2002-07-28 by Martin Wesley
Jamie, Archival color does come up here as a topic since some people do use color ink sets to print B&W or monochrome images. However, for what you are looking
2002-07-28 by jamiedrouin
Although somewhat off-topic, I feel this is still within the focus of this group: I am looking for an archival color ink process that will match my MIS
2002-07-28 by Austin Franklin
Hi Herb, ... My only point. ... To some degree, of course. ... I don t simply throw them away, but I have enough images to deal with already...and have no
2002-07-28 by Austin Franklin
... Bob, If the creative element has entered the fray, that makes it art in my book. Photography does entail both art and science...but because it does entail
2002-07-28 by Austin Franklin
... I thought you d like it. I picked it in your honor, after all, it IS your photo contest ;-) ... Perhaps, but in reality, there was NO sky, that s fog!
2002-07-28 by Jerry Olson
Ya, It s getting a little boring now, so I think I ll call an end to it. Jerry
2002-07-27 by tomoc
Hi everyone- As I touched base with this month s group today, I learned from 2 members that they had some serious problems and cannot deliver prints in time
2002-07-27 by hsitz
... Bernie (and Roger) -- I think they re actually having fun. ;)
2002-07-27 by André Vallejo
I just read Michael Reichman review on the Epson 2200 for BW printing (http://www.luminous-landscape.com/) . Interesting. Any experiences from the people in
2002-07-27 by Robert Morrison
When I travel with my D1x I almost always take a laptop with me. This is a pain particularly for exotic or rugged locals...but it does allow me to get feed
2002-07-27 by Bernie Ess
Jerry and Austin, I´m amazed how long you can discuss about that question. The maths are not so complicated: Native resolution of the D60 is about a 6,5 x10
2002-07-27 by Jerry Olson
Roger, Lord I hoped I had made clear during my discussions with Austin that I was not talking about scientific or photojournalism. I wouldn t change them. I
2002-07-27 by Jerry Olson
... Ya, I know that. It s one of the things that always bugs me. I do use the :) ocasionally, you know. I am sometimes poking fun at you you know. Don t be so
2002-07-27 by Bob Frost
Austin, Daring to intervene in this battle of wits , it occurs to me that the photographs you are taking are perhaps NOT art. Art is surely something that is
2002-07-27 by rlsopher
Come on guys, this has devolved to the level of arguing over how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. It should be no secret that the image is in the
2002-07-27 by hsitz
... that. ... All your points are well-made and well-taken. If you ve got a shot you think is perfect without doing anything in Photoshop, then of course you
2002-07-27 by Austin Franklin
... Jerry, What YOU believe is an improvement, I may not believe is. In fact, I may believe it ruins the image. And, BTW, I have not always been satisfied
2002-07-27 by Austin Franklin
Hi Herb, ... That s somewhat true...but only in the sense that I do strive for perfect exposure, focus, lighting, framing etc. with the film...but I don t do
2002-07-27 by hsitz
... tonal curve ... tonal ... parcel of ... the ... Austin -- Haven t seen the images. I m sure they re great. It just seems like you make it a point of
2002-07-27 by Jerry Olson
Austin, it is now obvious that you will always be satisfied with your prints, and have no need or intention of improving on them. I don t care what a meter
2002-07-27 by Austin Franklin
Jerry, YOU believe it improves the picture, but for me, it does not. I simply love natural, unadulterated (sic...remember, it s a picture of a child ;-),
2002-07-27 by Austin Franklin
Hi Jerry, ... Well, I, and many thousands of other people, have no problem doing it that way...and again, my images bear that out. ... Depends on where it
2002-07-27 by Austin Franklin
But Jerry, that s in YOUR OPINION, NOT fact. Don t you understand that? I find the image perfect, as well as many other people who have seen the image. As
2002-07-27 by Jerry Olson
Yes, Austin, your images could be improved, by the tweaking of many things. I could go on for quite awhile discussing your harbor scene, there are many
2002-07-27 by Jerry Olson
Yes, you CAN do it that way if you are satisfied with less than an image could be! Fine shadow detail with the correct contrast simply cannot be had by
2002-07-27 by Jerry Olson
Hi again! ... Sorry, it just can t be done that way!! ... I mean if it had one, would you just leave it there? ... Generically speaking. I would remove ANY
2002-07-27 by Austin Franklin
Hi Jerry, ... In YOUR opinion. I believe my images are as good as they can be already. ... And I disagree...as evidenced by my prints. I have NO problem
2002-07-27 by Jerry Olson
Austin, that is the POINT of photoshop tweaks!!!!!! You PUT the catchlight there, because it would much improve the image. You would do it in a studio, you
2002-07-27 by Jeff Blum
I recently posted an article about using an iPaq Pocket PC with removable PCMCIA hard drives to store pictures while on vacation/camping/hiking:
2002-07-27 by Hans Rijnbout
... Vinny, Look for signatures in the help file of your mail client. Most e-mail programs have a separate window or dialog where you define your signature.