Re: [Digital BW] museo
2002-04-10 by Robert G. Morrison
Once you coat them...blacks won t be an issue. The difference between 1.57 (Museo) and 1.67 (Hahnemuhle) doesn t even exist once they are coated...they are
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1931 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
museo
2002-04-10 by Julian Thomas
I want to try coating some prints and I ve heard from Robert that Museo is the best paper to use. Whilst I use Museo for continuous grey toned prints, I ve
Help. Question on VM inksets and Sepia.
2002-04-10 by iwasnvrhere
I have a few questions about the vm sets I hope someone out there can answer for me. First question, It seems that one would lose a portion in the density
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Optical Brighteners in Inkjet Papers
2002-04-10 by Martin Wesley
Robert, Would you care to share your workflow and ink mixtures? Thanks, Martin ... From: Richard Wolfson To:
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Optical Brighteners in Inkjet Papers
2002-04-10 by Robert G. Morrison
On 4/10/02 10:06 AM, mkravit wrote: Great, I m looking forward to seeing and testing them. Do you get them from
Re: [Digital BW] re: Yahoo
2002-04-10 by Martin Wesley
Bob, I just got my e-mail notice yesterday but others have gotten theirs quite some time ago. I suspect that they will get around to you eventually but they
Re: [Digital BW] Hahnemule William Turner
2002-04-10 by Martin Wesley
Michael, If you check the Files section of the group homepage you will find a cross reference of many of the names H. papers are sold under. There is also a
Re: [Digital BW] MIS/1200 Options? - suggestion for non-partitioned workflow
2002-04-10 by Barry Kelsall
I recently did some tests using the original MIS quad inkset and my 1160. On one print I used the Brandin partitioned workflow, & on the other I used my
Re: [Digital BW] Hahnemule William Turner
2002-04-10 by Jerry Olson
Wells River is NOT the same as william turner. It is very thin, sandpaper like, very gritty, and flakes off like crazy. VERY deep blacks, though. Royal Jazz,
RE: [Digital BW] Atlanta meeting
2002-04-10 by Jim Panzer
Hey, would anyone in the Phoenix Arizona area be interested in putting one of these user groups together, if so just e-mail off list, thanks. Jim P ... From:
RE: [Digital BW] Re: workflow with Polaroid Scanner
2002-04-10 by Mahesi Caplan-Faust
Have you tried scanning in colour slide mode and then inverting in PS. I have found this to be much better but I am using the Minolta Multi Pro Adam ... From:
Re: [Digital BW] re: Yahoo
2002-04-10 by Bob Frost
Martin, I don t seem to have this problem in the UK with Yahoo.co.uk. My account info details are still as I set them - to not send me special offers. Bob
RE: [Digital BW] MIS/1200 Options?
2002-04-10 by Paul Roark
Bill, I ve seen some excellent MIS VM 1200 test prints. The 1290 & general hextone ink distribution for MIS FS inks should also work well on the 1200. A
RE: [Digital BW] Reflexion German Paper
2002-04-10 by Tim Atherton
www.Mediastreet.com has the what seem best prices (and they sell it in 25 s) on rebadged Hanemuhle paper - their Royal Rennaisance Photo Rag tim a
Atlanta meeting
2002-04-10 by steven0356
We are having our second Atlanta area, inkjet printer users group meeting this Saturday. If interested in attending, please email me off list for directions
[Digital BW] Re: Optical Brighteners in Inkjet Papers
2002-04-10 by mkravit
Robert, I will send you a sheet of Epson Smooth Fine Art and Textured Fine Art. MIke ... gladly ... identical to ... the ... expect that ... be Crane) ...
[Digital BW] Re: Optical Brighteners in Inkjet Papers
2002-04-10 by mkravit
... gladly ... identical to ... the ... expect that ... be Crane) ... Satine Soft ... although the ... white as ... Polls and other ... messages to keep ...
Re: workflow with Polaroid Scanner
2002-04-10 by amadiallo2001
A suggestion: Scan some test negs containing a grey card, white object and black object. Experiment with the gamma gradation setting in SilverFast (hit the
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Optical Brighteners in Inkjet Papers
2002-04-10 by Robert Morrison
No, I don t have samples. If you would like to send some I will gladly test. Robert Morrison 4131 Bledsoe Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90066 It s my understanding
Hahnemule William Turner
2002-04-10 by Michael A. Schwarz
A chart I picked up along the way somewhere claims that Hahnemule William Turner is rebranded and the same paper as ConeTech Wells River, Media Street Royal
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Optical Brighteners in Inkjet Papers
2002-04-10 by Richard Wolfson
Robert, thanks for this informative post. I m trying to select a paper for an edition of b&w fine art prints, it s on point for me right now. I m using a CMYK
Re: Reflexion German Paper
2002-04-10 by chato77006
Chris: I ordered the Hahnemuhle sample pack a couple of months ago, and I found the same confusion. They are indeed Hahnemuhle papers, but a photoinkjet
Reflexion German Paper
2002-04-10 by tzinzunzan2000
Anyone familiar with the photoinkjet.com s Reflexion German papers? Are some/all of these papers Hahnemuhle papers. Their Web site is confusing -- they
MIS/1200 Options?
2002-04-10 by billy_iverson
A friend has an Epson 1200 available for B&W printing, and wants to use MIS inks. What options are there, if any, other than the freebie curves downloadable
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Optical Brighteners in Inkjet Papers
2002-04-10 by Bill Morse
Robert, have you tested either of the Epson Fine Art papers (made be Crane) for the brighteners? Thanks Bill on 4/9/02 8:05 PM, Robert G. Morrison wrote: Well,
MIS VM in a 1270 with 1280 driver... first impressions ;-)
2002-04-10 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Ok, I ll say it here first MIS and Pul should be called geniuses ... I ran two prints last night.. The first onto EAM, the second onto Hahnemuhle Torchon...
Re: [Digital BW] Final(ish) Ranges about Imaging
2002-04-10 by hsitz
... . . . ... in their ... than ... Martin -- Doesn t that make you think you might be missing something? I mean, you claim to think the page is offering a
Re: [Digital BW] Final(ish) Ranges about Imaging
2002-04-10 by royvharrington
I am sorry to say, but I really feel like I m wasting my time ... Well, Austin, I think I understand a lot more about what you are saying than you want to
Re: [Digital BW] Final(ish) Ranges about Imaging
2002-04-10 by royvharrington
... Hi Herb, I d seen that page before. I think you re going to have a hard time proving much one way or the other with this description. Like you said both
Re: [Digital BW] Final(ish) Ranges about Imaging
2002-04-10 by hsitz
Austin -- You re not making enough of it. ;) At the very least, that article is helpful to your understanding because it seems to distinguish two different
RE: [Digital BW] Final(ish) Ranges about Imaging
2002-04-10 by Austin Franklin
... Thanks, Herb...I believe that article can actually go both ways! This is the root of the confusion about what dynamic range really is...it s just so easy
Re: [Digital BW] Final(ish) Ranges about Imaging
2002-04-10 by Martin Wesley
Herb, I posted that link and definition along with some others for Austin awhile back and he dismissed it as pedestrian, vague and unscientific since it did
RE: [Digital BW] Final(ish) Ranges about Imaging
2002-04-10 by Austin Franklin
Roy, ... But that has nothing to do with dynamic range being dynamic range. That only has to do with OUR perception. We are NOT the film, we are NOT the film
Re: [Digital BW] Final(ish) Ranges about Imaging
2002-04-10 by hsitz
If you ll read the brief article at this webpage carefully, you ll see that it s in agreement with what Austin has been saying.
Re: Problems with mac curves
2002-04-10 by byronbulb
Could you please elaborate? I m new at this, and a little slow ;) Thanks! -Charley
Re: Problems with mac curves
2002-04-10 by bmyst2
Had the same problem, but made corrections using transfer function. Mark
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Optical Brighteners in Inkjet Papers
2002-04-10 by Robert G. Morrison
Well, no coated archival paper is as cheap as EAM. The 100% rag papers that have no brigheners are Museo, Eclipse Satine Soft White and William Turner. They
Re: [Digital BW] Final(ish) Ranges about Imaging
2002-04-10 by royvharrington
Austin, I really don t want to argue these little snipets of what DyR should be or shouldn t be. I think its going to be necessary for you to lay the whole
Problems with mac curves
2002-04-09 by byronbulb
Hi :) So I ve tracked down some of the problems I was having - first a bad cartridge, then a monitor that was miscalibrated so I wasn t getting an accurate
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Optical Brighteners in Inkjet Papers
2002-04-09 by Michael Kravit
Hahnemuhle William Turner As close as it gets Mike ... From: Jerry Olson To: Sent:
Re: [Digital BW] Problems with mac curves
2002-04-09 by Mike Bragg
Hi Charles- Just wanted to let you know your not alone. I ve been working with the same workflow. I am also experiencing posterization of my darker midtones
A Note on Optical Brighteners
2002-04-09 by Martin Wesley
While Optical Brightening Agents will fade out with time and likely fade to yellow, we should remember that all the big name silver fiber papers use them too.
RE: [Digital BW] Final(ish) Ranges about Imaging
2002-04-09 by Austin Franklin
Roy, ... Absolutely, but too simple, and the concept can be lost. ... This is the concept you seem to not be understanding. You can have two sounds/tones that
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Optical Brighteners in Inkjet Papers
2002-04-09 by Jerry Olson
Robert, What paper do you use that has/is: 1. No optical brightners. 2. 100 Percent Rag 3. pH. Neutral 4. Pure white 5. At least as thick as and preferably
Re: [Digital BW] Final(ish) Ranges about Imaging
2002-04-09 by royvharrington
I posted this a while ago, and it seems yahoo lost it. If it turns out as a duplicate, sorry. --Roy ... Thanks, Martin. ... Simplicity in concepts is so
Re: [Digital BW] Final(ish) Ranges about Imaging
2002-04-09 by royvharrington
... Please do write your take of the matter. I am interested how it comes out. Please also reread my statement, and realize that I have NOT purely equated
Re: Final(ish) Ranges about Imaging
2002-04-09 by royvharrington
... Thanks, Martin. ... Simplicity in concepts is so important that it must be emphasized over and over. It has to be simple in the math, simple in the
Re: [Digital BW] Optical Brighteners in Inkjet Papers
2002-04-09 by Bill Morse
Robert, have you tested EFSA and ETFA? Thanks, Bill Morse PhotoProspect Cambridge, MA 02139 on 4/9/02 11:21 AM, Jerry Olson wrote: Robert, how about eclipse
Re: [Digital BW] Fascination will cooltone prints
2002-04-09 by Pete Su
The DVD for O Brother has a neat short where they explain how the whole film was shot neutral, and then scanned and manipulated frame by frame for color
Re: [Digital BW] Fascination will cooltone prints
2002-04-09 by iwasnvrhere
So the fasination lies in being able to emote an image with the tone? Perhaps a another scientific study is in order :) Jeff