Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by riskdr8138
... length ... i guess what i was saying is that the chip is much smaller than the image area of a 35mm piece of film,in most consumer level digital cameras.
Messages
Browse messages
Page 2027 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by Derek Clarke
With 320 Megapixels it darn well ought to beat a digicam! However a 4000dpi scanner that can do 4x5 is also more expensive than the average digicam...
Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by riskdr8138
... 4x5 ... really ... great ... with ... red.works great with both films. when scanning it i scan in rgb. i can go to channel mixer in photoshop and tweek
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by mkravit
Larry, Typically I scan all of negs at 4,000 dpi which is the max optical resolution of my scanner. I save the files on CD and that way I never have to rescan.
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by mkravit
Alessabdro, Smile, No I did not steal a Cray , but I designed a University building to house 4 Cray s once. That was a long time ago. Mike ... removed]
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by riskdr8138
... ... why would you need 4000 dpi? i calculate you could make a 66 x53 print from a file that size. do you have large iris prints made? if so
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by mkravit
Larry, I am not sure what the point is? BTW, the new Canon digital to be released in Orlando next month is said to be a 6 megapixel camera with a 1:1 chip. So
Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by mkravit
Larry, I think the point is...I am spoiled with film. I shoot T-Max 100 4x5 and scan it on Howtek D4000 drum scanner up to 4000 dpi. I find myself comparing
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by Alessandro Pardi
Gosh... have you stealed a Craig to process that file? ... From: mkravit [mailto:michael.kravit@worldnet.att.net] Sent: venerdì 18 gennaio 2002 18.39 To:
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by mkravit
... 4,000 dpi
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by riskdr8138
... two ... the ... giving ... the lenses in a digital camera are of a much shorter focal length than in a 35 mm camera for the same angle of view. f8 in these
Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by riskdr8138
... film, but in ... resolve the ... 4x5 T-Max ... a 6 story ... at his desk ... can i chime in here. i have been using 4x5 for all of my photograph for about
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by Bob Frost
I agree with Austin; I don t yet have a digital camera because they don t give the detail that I can get from Provia 100F scanned with a LS4000 scanner. My
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by Bruce Kinch
... Hello Michael- I m also working on applying the Zone System to digital in my classes, and would love to bounce ideas off some likeminders. Could you
Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by a_pettit_jr
For Your Evaluation, Here is one of my IRs with my modest 4.3Mpix Olympus E10. The first is a low qual jpeg reduction with the image reduced to 1/5th the size
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by Derek Clarke
What dpi did you scan that 4x5 at?
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by shashinka@aol.com
In a message dated 1/17/02 12:02:34 PM, jerryolson@rrv.net writes:
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by shashinka@aol.com
In a message dated 1/17/02 6:51:56 PM, michael.kravit@worldnet.att.net writes:
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by Patrick Paulin
Just thought I d mention, there is a guy doing nice infrared work with a Canon G1 and a Heliopan filter http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=145900
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by Pics4U@en.com
Whenever I shoot something that requires that kind of DOF, I m normally shooting wide angle and the DOF just takes care of itself. Besides, I m a believer is
Re: With your last breath of ink...
2002-01-18 by lyonscox
Just in case I wasn t clear, I was thinking of what to do with all that wasted ink when changing systems. Cleavis
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by Austin Franklin
Hi, I guarantee you 16M sensor elements are not enough to reach the ability of fine grained film...but...that depends on what you mean by ability . Film
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by Michael Kravit
Austin, I found a pretty basic but fairly well written article comparing film to ccd. It seem that the author is saying that although one would need to have
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by Michael Kravit
Austin, With all due respect, a number of respected photo publications have stated publicly that the resolution of a digital capture chip must reach 16
With your last breath of ink...
2002-01-18 by lyonscox
With your last breath (ink) you...could make an image! Like Picasso s Blue (and red) Period or some of the beautiful German Expressionist work in Black and a
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by Michael Kravit
Jerry, The 87 is Opaque. ... From: Jerry Olson To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:33 AM Subject: Re: [Digital
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by Michael Kravit
Jerry, I think tha visually you are seeing an image that looks like film, but in reality the camera would need to approach 16 megapixels to resolve the finest
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by Michael Kravit
Greg, How do you get adequate DOF in a 35mm digital camera at f/8 w/o the use of movements? As a LF shooter, I get into the near/far relationships of DOF and
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by Michael Kravit
Ales, I hope to get to it this weekend. A friend is writing a book on called the Digital Zone System , and has asked me to do the testing. All I need it the
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by Austin Franklin
Hi Mike, ... By my calculations, it s just under 100M pixels, but certainly much less will give you exceptional results, as seen by the very low res digital
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-18 by Austin Franklin
Hi Alex, ... But in fact it is! ... Not in my experience. The EMI I am referring to is because the wires/circuitry of smaller arrays have less space between
Re: [Digital BW] For those debating the D-30...
2002-01-17 by Bill Morse
Hi Mark Actually, the provia detail is 25% larger, which might explain it s increased detail. However, overall I don t think these are very good images with
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Robert G. Morrison
By the time you buy two more lenses for your Mamiya...you could have just bought my D1x...where the lenses were free...that is they were the same ones I used
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by a_pettit_jr
Yes, but EMI is not normally an issue. A larger surface area would actually have greater EMI succeptability. There is higher thermal noise with larger pixels,
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Jerry Olson
Austin, I did see Marks links, and the difference in my 2 images are nowhere near that great. As I said, I do not seem to see less detail in the digital shot.
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Austin Franklin
Hi Jerry, ... ...as I ve said, the sharpest lense won t give you any advantage with a digital camera. ... Well, those that think it is, believe it is! Since I
RE: [Digital BW] For those debating the D-30...
2002-01-17 by Austin Franklin
... THANK YOU! I ll be sure to use those links when discussing this topic in the future! Regards, Austin
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Austin Franklin
... Hi Alex, Isn t that what therefore a cleaner image with less noise means? Austin
Re: [Digital BW] For those debating the D-30...
2002-01-17 by Jerry Olson
Mark, I sure don t see anywhere near that much difference between my provia 100 and my canon D-30 Shots. There s hardly any difference at all. I assume these
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Jerry Olson
Austin, then a question comes to mind. If you see in front of you 2 prints of a cat, close up, taken with the sharpest macro lens available, and you and
For those debating the D-30...
2002-01-17 by Mark Carpenter
Here is an interesting link if you haven t seen it already. It shows quite well that an image can be sharp yet not have as much detail. The overhead door shot
Re: [Digital BW] MIS VM Inkset -- which Paper??
2002-01-17 by Paul Roark
... Yes, in the fluorescent light fader rather quickly causes a yellowing of EAM, about 3 or 256 units. It then stays there. Legion is the one paper that
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by a_pettit_jr
The pixel size may have little to do with Resolution, but it sure is a Major factor in overall image Quality. The size of a pixel element determines : 1)
Re: Black and white for a newcomer
2002-01-17 by tomoc
Fred- I think everyone here would encourage you to dedicate one printer for BW and one for color. Even on the basis of cost, this makes sense. You would have
Re: [Digital BW] MIS VM Inkset -- which Paper??
2002-01-17 by tzinzunzan2000
Paul, Won t EAM also yellow with time because of brighteners. Chris Hargens ... testing. The ... Archival ... seem to ... give the ... it has a ... light ...
Re: [Digital BW] MIS VM Inkset -- which Paper (Epson 1200)??
2002-01-17 by petervongaza
Paul ... This sounds good to me. I d rather spend my time working with MIS VM Inks when i get them than worrying about paper tests (for now). Thanks, Peter
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Austin Franklin
Jerry, As I ve pointed out, you only get ~100 PPI from a D-30 for a 13x19 image. Interpolation is pretty much required to visually eliminate pixelation...but
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Austin Franklin
Hi Jerry, ... I have tried it many times...the detail is not there. That doesn t mean what s there isn t sharp mind you. ... You are right. ... That really
Re: [Digital BW] 1160 without error diffusion
2002-01-17 by Tim Spragens
I just upgraded my driver as well, looking for this illusive gamma setting, and I think that they ve only changed what they call things, not how they are
Re: [Digital BW] MIS VM Inkset -- which Paper (Epson 1200)??
2002-01-17 by Paul Roark
Peter, ... The test strips from the 1200 on EAM that I ve seen look excellent. They compare favorably to those done on the 1160. I just received a resolution