Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Bill Morse
I don t disagree. S1 Pro is Fuji s name ;-) Bill on 1/16/02 9:09 PM, Pics4U@en.com wrote: ... Nikon mid-priced consumer frame. Not even one of their higher
Messages
Browse messages
Page 2028 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
1160 without error diffusion
2002-01-17 by Heath Sandall
Hello, I upgraded my OS to Windows 2000 pro and downloaded the new drivers for my 1160. The strange thing is that now error diffusion is no longer a choice in
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Jerry Olson
Thanks Carl, very much! I can hardly wait to try this. Jerry
Black and white for a newcomer
2002-01-17 by fred@fredila.com
Hi, I m new to this group and have been reading the postings for about 10 days. I am most impressed with the knowledge and depth of information but find most
Re: [Digital BW] MIS VM Inkset -- which Paper??
2002-01-17 by Jerry Olson
Paul, have you heard anything about Epson s rebranding the Archival Matte to Endurance Matte? I still like the paper, a real bargain price wise, but it still
Re: [Digital BW] MIS VM Inkset -- which Paper??
2002-01-17 by Jerry Olson
Peter, The Photo Matte is 230 Gsms, and is heavier than the Epson. Eclipse is 190 Gsms, but is every bit as thick and heavy as the photo matte if not moreso.
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Carl Schofield
Jerry, Here are links to the images. Out of camera, no adjustments: http://homepage.mac.com/scho/D30IR/CRW_0675.jpg RGB mode, autolevels:
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Jerry Olson
Thanks Harvey. I didn t know you had to use a memory stick for that camera. That lets it out for me, I don t want yet another format to have hassles with. I
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Derek Clarke
An 87 filter is mainly transparent to infra-red, but does allow a very small amount of red light through. It depends upon the camera just what you get. It s
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Jerry Olson
That 5.2 megapixel/zeiss lens combo sounds wonderful. I have to find out how good this lens is. Might be a good backup to my D-30. Do you know what the
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Jerry Olson
... Austin, it DOES hold up. You ll just have to try it. You have to sharpen a lot, but the D30 image can take it. Also, I use Genuine Fractals to get that
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Jerry Olson
Yes, but not in a 13x19 image from a D-30 camera! Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Jerry Olson
Mike, the D30 doesn t have a black and white mode. Is the 87 filter opaque, or deep red? I use Kai s Power Tools Equalizer sharpen tool from version 6. Use
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Jerry Olson
Carl, The search engine isn t working, do you know what page those images are on? Once you ve taken a photo with the red filter, I assume you d have a very red
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 397
2002-01-17 by Diane Fields
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:34:34 -0500 From: Austin Franklin Subject: RE: Shooting Digitally ...
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 397
2002-01-17 by ecohen5991@aol.com
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Any body miss glossy paper?
2002-01-17 by Alessandro Pardi
Roger, you mean you don t get bronzing (i.e. blacks looking metallic when viewing the print at certain agles)? Not the plastic cheap feel that I felt on Kodak
New epson 740 user
2002-01-17 by hank78212
Cousins: I am brand new to this group and want to dip my toe into digital B&W printing on my current printer, an epson 740. Can I get some advice on inks and
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Pics4U@en.com
... Mike, why f/16 for such a long exposure? Why not something more sensible like f/8 at 1 second or so? IMHO and based on previous experience, movement at
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Austin Franklin
... That IS a scanning back, and it gives you the exact same result as a back with a tri-linear sensor. ... That s not a scanning back, and that is how full
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Austin Franklin
... You are correct that scanning backs require no color interpolation, and full frame sensors do. It really isn t 3x, since color information really isn t as
Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by steven0356
I just check out his site and he has lot of Actions for the D-30 they work great. Steve
[Digital BW] Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by qdfb
The typical scan back (Dicomed, Betterlight) work in single pass mode, but have trilinear sensors, ie one set of sensors each for RGB, similar to a film
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Derek Clarke
There are several kinds of scanning backs! Some use multiple passes, and so have genuine RGB pixels at the cost of not being able to shoot moving subjects.
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Derek Clarke
... Critically, it can t meter with manual focus lenses fitted and can t autofocus AF-S lenses.
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Alessandro Pardi
Michael, I ve just ordered a Mamiya 7 II with 65mm, my first go at medium format, and am therefore very curious about your project of comparing medium and
[Digital BW] Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by qdfb
Hmm, that raises an interesting point. A scanning back operates like a film scanner, with seperate RGB sensors scanning the image. I have not thought about
RE: [Digital BW] Piezo UK style
2002-01-17 by Mahesi Caplan-Faust
I show piezo images in the S.W., Totnes actually. Adam ... From: Dickbo [mailto:Dickbo@btopenworld.com] Sent: 16 January 2002 21:31 To:
Re: [Digital BW] problems with VM curves
2002-01-17 by piotrjanowski
Jerry, that was exactly how I worked with the image. Maybe I am to picky. It is not a major issue in my prints but I see it in some areas.I also compare them
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by shashinka@aol.com
In a message dated 1/16/02 9:43:38 PM, jerryolson@rrv.net writes:
Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by tomoc
Helen- I definitely might have the two mixed up... I read an article that hinted that that was why Fred started writing the software... Whatever the reasons,
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Michael Kravit
Carl, that makes sense. On my D1x I start at f/16 for 6 seconds at EI-125 in bright sunlight. Mike ... From: scho_2000 To:
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Michael Kravit
Jerry, Like I said, I am new to digital shooting. Actually, I have not owned a 35mm camera in a couple of years. I had no idea that digital camera images
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Michael Kravit
Jerry, Obviously the quality of the lens is not what one might expect from a $2000-4000 MF lens. However, it appears that for a small P&S zoom optic in a
Re: [Digital BW] MIS VM Inkset -- which Paper??
2002-01-17 by Paul Roark
Peter, Let me add my 2 cents worth to the paper issue. ... I agree those are fine papers. Both have done well on my fade testing. The Eclipse is the only
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Austin Franklin
... Well, I take issue what that. The D-30 gives you 2160 x 1440. That means you are printing at 113 PPI to the printer (on the long side). Now, you CAN
RE: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Austin Franklin
... Hi Jerry, Digital does have grain ...but it s called pixelation. If you blow it up enough, you ll surely see it! Austin
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by SKID Photography
Ok, I ll jump in here. First, I vote for the Sonys. We have one of the smaller ones, and if we could afford it, we d get one of the top of the line models.
1160 disaster - can anyone help
2002-01-17 by frankg_photo
I just wanted to post a thank you to all the helpful folks who posted or emailed suggestions to the above plea. The issues were unfortunately never resolved
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by toomagenta@aol.com
In a message dated 1/16/2002 3:13:27 PM Eastern Standard Time, ... FWIW if you can aford the S 1, I would go for it. I don t think it has the noise issues, and
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by scho_2000
... an 87 filter in front of the lens and getting digital infrared. ... Does this work ... Jerry, The D30 will do infrared, but the metering tends to
Re: [Digital BW] problems with VM curves
2002-01-17 by Jerry Olson
Piotr, I m not sure I was clear on this: You can start out with any kind image you want. What I meant is that you wouldn t apply a Paul Roark curve to an image
Re: [Digital BW] MIS VM Inkset -- which Paper??
2002-01-17 by Jerry Olson
You should love the Eclipse Satine paper, much cheaper than somerset. It comes in 190 GSM and 300 GSM Weights. I think the 190 is thick enough for most uses,
Re: [Digital BW] CFS Systems
2002-01-17 by Jerry Olson
Hi Andre, Yes it can use the MIS quads. (hextones for the 1280). The Niagara is the nomorecarts system from dave, just rebranded Niagara. It is much more
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Jerry Olson
Austin, I have 2 prints of my cat, one with the D-30 and one with the regular EOS1n. Both were shot with the Canon 50mm Macro. The EOS 1n film was Kodacolor
Re: [Digital BW] Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Jerry Olson
... ALMOST good enough?!!! People are printing spectacular 13x19 images from this camera AND the Canon D-30! Some feel that they are fine, but I am anal but
MIS VM Inkset -- which Paper??
2002-01-17 by petervongaza
I just bought an epson 1200 with a CIS and would like to experiment with MIS Inks. After reading Paul Roarks article on Variable-Toned Inks i think i m going
Re: [Digital BW] problems with VM curves
2002-01-17 by Jerry Olson
Piotr, Your english is just fine. ... What do you mean When the image was grayscale and later converted to rgb. That is the way to do it. You have a black
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Jerry Olson
Mike, do you think that the Sonnar lens on that camera is up to Zeiss standards? It seems the price of the Sony is incredibly low with a good zeiss lens on it.
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shooting Digitally
2002-01-17 by Pics4U@en.com
... errr, not exactly a Pro Body . It s actually built on a now discontinued Nikon mid-priced consumer frame. Not even one of their higher end consumer