Re: sizing uncoated papers
2001-09-27 by mh@toomanyartists.com
... URL: http://www.lotusviewcamera.at/ -mh
Messages
Browse messages
Page 2124 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] sizing uncoated papers
2001-09-27 by Diana York / Hawk Meadow Morgans
Kaolin, Calcium Carbonate, Gelatin, Silica, Starch, PVA are some ingredients of inkjet coatings, of course with many other ingredients and in many different
Re: sizing uncoated papers
2001-09-27 by Tyler Boley
... I ve tried unhardened gelatin and starch, didn t work too well with dyes. Since pigs seem less tolerant of surface I suspect it won t work too well. Dan
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit histogram was Re: Bit depth, was MinoltaDiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Julian Thomas
with the 1680 it clips the black (or the white cos I scan Image) and sometimes the white point is too far in on the ps histogram. It is probably a shortcoming
4 Peter Palmer[Digital BW] Re: Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Mark Tucker
. . . http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ScanHi-End . .
RE: 4 Peter Palmer[Digital BW] Re: Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Austin Franklin
... Is that for the new Minolta? I didn t see the original message...
RE: [Digital BW] Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Austin Franklin
... They are kind of both the same thing. Typically, a system is designed such that the data you get from the A/D won t contain noise, except in the lowest
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit histogram was Re: Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Austin Franklin
... With NO gaps in the histogram? Do you mean the image may look OK on screen, or the histogram may look OK on screen? What s the it you refer to? ...
Re: sizing uncoated papers
2001-09-27 by davidhatton@totalise.co.uk
Hi, Take a look at lotusviewcamera.com (I think). They not only sell paper but the coating fluid to apply to fine art papers, Regards, DH
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit histogram was Re: Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Austin Franklin
... Well, Dan is not the holy grail either ;-) It depends on what you mean by good . Smooth means NOTHING, but without gaps means something. Gaps in a
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit histogram was Re: Bit depth, was MinoltaDiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Austin Franklin
... YES!
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit histogram /Dan Margulis' take on some ofthis
2001-09-27 by Rodolpho Pajuaba
Boy, I really LOVE Dan Margulis ;-) . Regards, Rodolpho Pajuaba www.pajuaba.com.br ... other ... are ... they
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit histogram was Re: Bit depth, was MinoltaDiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Johnny Deadman
... yeah, I leave mine at 0.01% and do the rest in Photoshop -- John Brownlow http://www.pinkheadedbug.com
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit histogram was Re: Bit depth, was MinoltaDiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Nij
Out of interest Julian, What do you find problematic with the end-point-setting? I think it works great on auto (0.05% or something, I use) but don t recall
Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Richard Sallee
And how many angels CAN dance on the head of a pin??? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit histogram was Re: Bit depth, was MinoltaDiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Julian Thomas
All this talk of histograms and end points reminds me that Ed said he d got a preview scanner histo for vuescan on his to do list. I find the end point
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit histogram was Re: Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Johnny Deadman
... no, but I might tinker what would be nice would be a live histogram within PS, not a plugin I think. -- John Brownlow http://www.pinkheadedbug.com
sizing uncoated papers
2001-09-27 by Kees Brandenburg
Who has tried sizing uncoated papers (before printing)? As a gumprinter I am sizing all my papers (mainly watercolour and rives BFK) with (formalin) hardened
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit histogram /Dan Margulis' take on some of this
2001-09-27 by Todd Flashner
... Maris, You may remember I had brought up some of these topics which we are discussing around here now on Dan s list a couple of months ago. Below is Dan s
Re: [Digital BW] Getting started -- Cone or MIS?
2001-09-27 by Martin Wesley
Frank, I would add is that there is a difference in the colorcast between the different ink sets and that colorcast varies with the paper used. Some people
Re: 4 Peter Palmer[Digital BW] Re: Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Todd Flashner
... Hear that Austin? This baby s gonna give the unmentionable one a run for the money! ;-) BTW, that scan time make me wonder. Does anyone know: is this a
Re: [Digital BW] Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Todd Flashner
Austin, You re doing a great job, I can sort of follow. BTW, this is a lot of work, thanks! I guess I wont know if I ve got this completely until we move
Re: 1160 On Mac
2001-09-27 by lon_c@hotmail.com
...
[Digital BW] Re: printer recommendations
2001-09-27 by Martin Wesley
Terry, Thanks for the tip. I assumed that they were included but I will ask before I buy. Martin ... was ... can ... lines ... identical ... ran
[Digital BW] 16-bit histogram was Re: Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Martin Wesley
Maris, I wasn t looking to get a perfect histogram; I just want a better way to see what the data is doing. I have run the exercise of manipulating an 8-bit
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit histogram was Re: Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
A good histogram is not the holy grail - a good image is, even if the histogram looks lousy. Ask Dan Margulis about histograms - you ll get an earful. Just
4 Peter Palmer[Digital BW] Re: Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Martin Wesley
Peter, I don t think that the scanner has actually hit the stores yet. I would imagine that it is probably a very fine scanner and once it is in users hands I
16-bit histogram was Re: Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Martin Wesley
... would ... Does that mean you are going to write the Plugin!?!?! :-) Martin
RE: [Digital BW] Getting started -- Cone or MIS?
2001-09-27 by Nij
Frank... It s all in the Files section of this group... http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/Ink%20data/
Getting started -- Cone or MIS?
2001-09-27 by f@frankpetronio.com
I imagine that this has been covered, but which is the best way for an experienced Mac based digital photographer to get serious about digital printmaking?
Re: [Digital BW] Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Johnny Deadman
... as in I had six pints of beer on an empty stomach and felt a bit squiffy -- John Brownlow http://www.pinkheadedbug.com
RE: [Digital BW] Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-27 by Austin Franklin
... Send me any film you want to send me. You know I have a pretty decent densitometer, and I know how to use it (when I read the cal strips, they are spot
[Digital BW] Re: printer recommendations
2001-09-27 by TerryR
Don t forget the chips! They don t come with the replacement carts and I don t think David offers them seperately. TR ... system.
Re: [Digital BW] Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-26 by mh@toomanyartists.com
Tri-X is probably one of the lighter b&w films. maybe...
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit histogram was Re: Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-26 by Johnny Deadman
... ah, now that is a GOOD question! time to download the Photoshop Plugin SDK! -- John Brownlow http://www.pinkheadedbug.com
Re: [Digital BW] Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-26 by Johnny Deadman
... something is very squiffy here, then, because it is possible to block up highlights in BW neg to the extent that my sprintscan 4000 can t get through
RE: [Digital BW] Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-26 by Austin Franklin
... It matters as far as the question that was being asked, and that was what causes the bunching up in the histogram. ... I believe I can do that pretty
Re: [Digital BW] Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-26 by mh@toomanyartists.com
... you don t get more tones if the film you are scanning is capable of being scanned on the 10bit scanner like in the case in question. -mh
RE: [Digital BW] Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-26 by Austin Franklin
... I believe the second part of my statement you get more tones, but it s not from intermediate tones, but from wider range of tones on the end(s) answered
Re: [Digital BW] Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-26 by Todd Flashner
... I give up! You dragged this out, and tested Mike, as though this carried great import. He answered it doesn t matter early on. I m still hoping you will
16-bit histogram was Re: Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-26 by Martin Wesley
... John, Imax of course. ;-) ... If I set mine that high I can t read the text. ... I wish! ... How about a 360 panorama? A 20x20 room should hold it on flat
Re: [Digital BW] Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-26 by Todd Flashner
... Thanks Mike, that states the case very clearly. The big thing I m waiting for from Austin is his answer to below. I think it ... I know I for one await
RE: [Digital BW] Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-26 by Austin Franklin
... Clearly color chromes, no doubt there, but my measurements of color negative film vs B&W negative film show that color negative film has a higher (not by
RE: [Digital BW] Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-26 by Austin Franklin
... The answer is, it depends on the scanner and the software. Viewscan DOES high bit justify the data. It really doesn t matter either way (except for
Re: [Digital BW] Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-26 by Todd Flashner
... To my mind it should be the same issue whether the determination is being made with a densitometer, condenser, coldlight, point source, LED, or eyeballs
RE: [Digital BW] Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-26 by Austin Franklin
... I did not see any distinction that you were talking about taking the entire raw data, as opposed to just the image data. Obviously, if you are talking
RE: [Digital BW] Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-26 by Austin Franklin
... Hum. I ve taken exposed/unexposed (then developed) film and measured it and the color negative film I measured has a higher density range than the B&W
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-26 by Johnny Deadman
... LOL where do you buy your 65,000 pixel-wide monitors, Martin?? mine only goes up to about 2000! you must have a big office, too.... ....at 96 dpi you have
Re: [Digital BW] Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-26 by mh@toomanyartists.com
... okay, I have a simple way to describe it. Your image on a 10 bit scanner has a range from A to B, but the scanner can capture from A to C (ABD). On a
Re: Bit depth, was Minolta DiMAGE Scan Multi PRO
2001-09-26 by Martin Wesley
Jason, You are right about the number of pixels to measure but I was thinking about drawing the on screen representation with 65,000 individual bars in the bar