Re: [Digital BW] Foveon sensor.. ?????
2013-11-28 by David Emerick
I agree David. As an owner of an a900 and a great prime 35 mm lens I cannot see the rationale. I have not done a definitive comparison, but I would doubt the
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 54 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2013-11-28 by David Emerick
I agree David. As an owner of an a900 and a great prime 35 mm lens I cannot see the rationale. I have not done a definitive comparison, but I would doubt the
2013-11-28 by jimbo
You are right every lock has a key.. but this is a new type of lock so to speak.. In a sense the tumblers in the lock can be changed which would require a new
2013-11-28 by Paul Roark
The Foveon concept and pixel sharpness is impressive. However, LuLa commented once that the actual resolution advantage over a Bayer pattern is only about
2013-11-28 by David Kachel
It looks like it s set up to only take Sigma lenses but I ve tracked down a lens plate for Leica R lenses and their is apparently someone doing a camera rework
2013-11-28 by Paul Roark
Try re-seating the carts, cleaning the surface of the chips, and contacting the seller. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
2013-11-28 by jimbo
Thanks David, Clearly something is not right.. I went on line and they do tout the SD1 at 46 MP which is not correct.. It s 3 15 s stacked with an end output
2013-11-28 by Kip Babington
Does anybody have any thoughts about the original question - what to do about CIS carts all showing empty?
2013-11-28 by John Castronovo
You re absolutely correct about all that, but I don t think for a second that the hackers and crackers can t find a way to circumvent the need for the
2013-11-28 by Jim Goshorn
... They are marketing it on the idea that you won t have to wait for a full new version to get the newer features. They will put them out as developed. Jim
2013-11-28 by David Kachel
Ok so to get to it ...why is this set up in the closet..I just don t get why this technology has not been embraced. I am really trying to dig into this a bit
2013-11-28 by jimbo
I think maybe were all getting caught up in the muck of all this.. Maybe it s time to get above that.. One of if not the largest single primary reason for
2013-11-28 by John Castronovo
Right, so what s really different is how we pay for it. New versions in this century were ALWAYS available for download, but we had to pay a lot for them and
2013-11-28 by jimbo
Well I think the cloud thing has kinda been beat to death.. were all big boys n girls so whatever we do is just fine.. So moving over..Last week a shooter
2013-11-28 by Jim Goshorn
... The big difference, as I understand it, is that traditionally, Adobe would release a new version and then all the updates would basically be bug and
2013-11-28 by jimbo
Their are several types of updates that occur with software.. patches that resolve function issues which need to be released pretty much as soon as they get
2013-11-28 by John Castronovo
I can barely remember having to wait for an update to arrive in the mail. In the 21st century almost all of my software has been downloaded and it was ready
2013-11-28 by jimbo
Yes Mike you can process your file sin such a way as to open then in pretty much any version of PS.. jimbo ... From: Michael Prestie To:
2013-11-28 by Ernst Dinkla
... Oh, right now better than that for former Qimage Pro etc owners: http://www.ddisoftware.com/qimage-u/BlackFriday/ -- Met vriendelijke groet, Ernst Dinkla
2013-11-28 by Joseph Meyerson
Ultimately, you do not choose which CC updates are made, or when. One day, having bought some software tools from say ... Microsoft, Winky the helping
2013-11-28 by Ernst Dinkla
... Downloads for software installs, instant software upgrades, happens everywhere. The disc arriving later or no disc version exists. Subscription models
2013-11-28 by Kip Babington
I believe the theoretical (as in, yet to be proved in practice) benefit of the cloud subscription model is that an individual update can be made available to
2013-11-28 by John Castronovo
This issue of more frequent updates for the cloud version is a bogus one. The cloud version still requires us to download and install updates, just as the
2013-11-28 by Paul Roark
... Yes, definitely. I try to save the original as well as significant drafts of the files I work up. But I think that a good, as unaltered as possible 16
2013-11-28 by Paul Roark
... I just opened my CS5 and at least Tiff files opened and edited in CC, even with a layer, open fine in CS5. This is not an exhaustive test at all. I notice
2013-11-27 by Michael Prestie
Let s say for a moment that Adobe did do something as described above. Can t we export images as TIFF files (or DNG) and continue as before in some older
2013-11-27 by jimbo
Hey Jim.. I think I can provide the answer for you. What s missing is you did not say what versions of PS & LR you have.. no matter here s how it will shake
2013-11-27 by <paulmwhiting@...>
sorry for the double post... please, group moderator, feel free to delete one of them - and then this request. I m still having trouble navigating the new (not
2013-11-27 by Ernst Dinkla
... Paul, Is there not something in returning to the original, whether RAW or film, and process, edit again with newer tools and another view on the subject?
2013-11-27 by <paulmwhiting@...>
I just received a suggestion in Yahoo! mail asking if I had primed these carts. I answered no, I haven t. I m familiar with that technique, having used it when
2013-11-27 by <paulmwhiting@...>
I just received a suggestion in Yahoo! mail asking if I had primed these carts. I answered no, I haven t. I m familiar with that technique, having used it when
2013-11-27 by Jim Goshorn
... Using CS6 and CC here with no issues Jim
2013-11-27 by John Castronovo
You make a good point. I used to maintain my old lab’s SCO Unix based system. It had order entry, tracking, inventory, accounting, reporting and everything
2013-11-27 by <paulmwhiting@...>
Well, this morning (Wed) I did try and re-seat the carts per Mathew s (tech support person at MIS) suggestions, tried two or three times actually. I also
2013-11-27 by <tyler@...>
got it Paul.. the point I m sarcastically making is that I have a small one man business and the main computer has a lot of related apps from accounting to
2013-11-27 by Paul Grant
Maverick is free. Even when Apple charged for upgrades it was only in the range of $29. Paul Sent from my iPhone 📷 ... Maverick is free. Even when Apple
2013-11-27 by Leslie Tihor
I ve been using CC as well as my old CS3 for a few weeks. CS3 does not seem to be affected by the CC install. Les
2013-11-27 by <tyler@...>
my apologies, I definitely do NOT know better. I m trying to sort this out and make a decision just like everyone else, I have until 12/31. That info was
2013-11-27 by jimbo
John, Sincerely .. ok? In truth I think it is pretty easy to solve the concerns you have listed as far as they relate to Adobe goes so that you have your bases
2013-11-27 by Paul Grant
And Maverick is FREE Paul Sent from my iPhone 📷 ... And Maverick is FREE Paul Sent from my iPhone 📷 On Nov 27, 2013, at 8:30 AM, jimbo
2013-11-27 by jimbo
Yeh I saw that.. I m kinda surprised as Tyler knows better.. maybe he s simply pulling our chain.. :-).. Anyway PSCC requires OSX 10.7 or later as does LR 5.2
2013-11-27 by Groups From Yahoo
Wow, The latest Lightroom CC Version require OSX Mavericks to run??? That s funny since I m still on Mountain Lion and it runs fine, same as it runs on Lion.
2013-11-27 by John Castronovo
The difference is that in prior versions I never had to consider backward compatibility. My old versions didn’t stop working if I stopped buying them every
2013-11-27 by Kip Babington
I share JohnÆs concern that some future cloud upgrade could make prior versions of LR unusable. IÆve used the editing features of LR for a couple of years
2013-11-27 by jimbo
For me ..well I guess the whole things just simply needs to play out.. when it gets to the other side then I can make whatever decisions I need to.. In the
2013-11-27 by Fred Fischer
I would agree with all you have said. Our decision here was easy: this studio will not participate in Adobe s cloud endeavor. PS (started in 93) is the
2013-11-27 by Jim Goshorn
... I agree with your logic and that s the way that I look at it myself. The real issue causing these conversations, I feel, is that Adobe mislead people into
2013-11-27 by jimbo
Their was a guy once.... FDR if I remember correctly... ..that once said Only thing we have to fear is fear itself .. Ok that being said please let me share
2013-11-27 by <paulmwhiting@...>
Homer, Yes it is a 1400. It s a refurb, so is like new and it worked perfectly with the OEM carts that came with it. Thank you for checking! Paul ... Paul:
2013-11-27 by <homershannon@...>
Paul: Just to be clear - you are putting new cartridges in a 1400, correct? I found out the hard way that older cartridges will not work in the 1430. Some
2013-11-27 by John Castronovo
I can imagine a time in the not too distant future where people might use some new features which are only in the cc version of LR. Then if those people drop