RE: [Digital BW] Re: paper for multiple book copies
2006-02-12 by John Moody
Clayton, I _can_ get a similar Dmax with MuseoMax as PR using oem ink in a 2200. It requires a RIP, or preprocessing the image data for the Epson driver in a
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 714 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2006-02-12 by John Moody
Clayton, I _can_ get a similar Dmax with MuseoMax as PR using oem ink in a 2200. It requires a RIP, or preprocessing the image data for the Epson driver in a
2006-02-12 by Eirik Berger
Hello all My name is Eirik Berger and I am from the northern part of Norway. I work with BW landscape photography (large format 4x5 and 8x10 ). I have until
2006-02-12 by Atton
Hi. I m a newcomer to this list. My name is Atsuyuki Nakanishi, from Japan. I m interested in B&W photography. I have been making my B&W photos with
2006-02-12 by Roy Harrington
... Yes, basically you need a certain total volume of ink to produce a certain density, so the first approximation is just (number of dots) x (size of dot).
2006-02-12 by Bert Katzung
Hi Howard: You ll get much more expert advice from the gurus here, but the 2400 is superior to the 2200 for both B&W and color. You made the right choice. The
2006-02-12 by Adam Maas
BO is a driver feature, the R2400 lacks it. The R2400 s prints will be smootehr tone-wise and have better highlight detail, but less lumiunous whites. -Adam
2006-02-12 by Tyler Boley
... wrote: ... enough to ... So there is an obvious math relationship between a size 40 dot grouping at 720 dpi, and a size 20 dot grouping at 1440
2006-02-12 by Clayton Jones
Hello Tim, ... That s good news, thanks. I ll look forward to trying the final stuff. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at
2006-02-12 by how786
I m curious about the 2400. I ve read in reviews that it can produce a darn good B&W print out of the box yet, evidently, it cannot do BO printing. I had
2006-02-12 by Clayton Jones
John, Eric, ... The physically toughest paper I ve tested is Museo Max. You literally cannot scratch any ink off it with a fingernail. The paper surface
2006-02-12 by Clayton Jones
Hello Brian, ... I don t have a densitometer so I can t speak to the numbers, but I can see the difference in side by side prints. Whether or not that
2006-02-12 by Roy Harrington
The Epson hardware has very specific capability. The jets themselves are capable of many drop sizes but what you can take advantage of during a single print
2006-02-12 by Tom Baker
As far as I can determine, the droplet size is not set by DPI. Colorbyte says (if I recall correctly) that at 2880 on the x800 printers, the droplet size is
2006-02-12 by Yoelis Diaz
Hello. Finally I bought epson r2400. Thank you for your advise. Now I have two more question. what means, when epson said, Ink Shelf Life 2 years from
2006-02-12 by Tyler Boley
Bruce, I don t want to get into too much trouble here. Roy and others know much more about the inner working of dithers etc.. Your assumptions below I believe
2006-02-12 by hogarth@snappydsl.net
Well, I didn t understand how the printer actually wants to work - that is, given a printer resolution, a particular dot size is used by all channels. Smallest
2006-02-12 by dlruckus
... Indeed. Total agreement with that desire. ... You didn t and even though I m not a Studioprint user I was still interested in your information. Regards
2006-02-12 by Greg
... I found it interesting, thank you. Other RIPs have had something similar to this for a while, I guess I though SP also had for some time. Though I was
2006-02-12 by Tyler Boley
... I don t know, and I don t have an informed reply to you or Roy about the value of this. Here s what I know- I was very happy before, I m even happier now,
2006-02-11 by dlruckus
Thanks Tyler. It does sound like, as Roy says, something better left to the Roys on earth, unique as they may be. It is probably the perfect way to ensure all
2006-02-11 by Roy Harrington
... I just can t imagine what benefit the user could possibly provide. There s really only one right way to do the dots and that should be builtin. But
2006-02-11 by Tyler Boley
... wrote: ... unnecessary ... transitions are ... calibrated ... I guess I m misleading people. Obvioulsy one needn t get that far under the hood if
2006-02-11 by Roy Harrington
... I must say the dot size controls sound way too complicated and unnecessary. Each printer model has fixed dot sizes available and which ones to use are
2006-02-11 by Tyler Boley
... Yes, assuming a jet is a particular ink, or tank, or... humvie wait... no. More than that, for each ink you can select any combination of 3 different dots
2006-02-11 by Paul Roark
... The next UT variable tone step will be ported to the 2200 next week. It s the first UT with a 3D space -- Lab a* and b* controls. (See my post at
2006-02-11 by dlruckus
Hi Tyler. Do I understand you correctly in that you re saying that each jet can have 1 of 3 dot sizes selected independently of the other jets? If so, I
2006-02-11 by Tim Atherton
... course, ... official ... Crane is obviously tweaking the surface of this prior to release (possibly in response to the beta testers?). I just got a new
2006-02-11 by helen_bach2003
Hi Helen, I m not sure how wise this piece of advice is, but I d seriously consider buying a second-hand 2200 if you wanted to start experiments with B&W
2006-02-11 by Tyler Boley
... use ... Bruce, I m not absolutely positive I understand what you mean by such an algorithm but if I do, I think it would be extraordinarily complex. It
2006-02-11 by rgoldman2
Ken, what ABW settings do you prefer with this Kodak paper?
2006-02-11 by hogarth@snappydsl.net
So... v12 doesn t have a working algorithm to pick which size dot to use for each ink then? I would have thought that this is part of what you pay the big
2006-02-11 by Michael Vendrell
Helen, BO = Black Only. BTW, K is the abbreviation for Black as B stands for Blue. So KO should be the abbreviation for Black Only - but that one was
2006-02-11 by Sam McCandless
My impression, Helen, mostly from pouring over this list s posts with the same question in mind, is that nearly all small-format B&W printers should consider
2006-02-11 by Helen Adams
Thanks Steve, Michael & Brian, For your input - much appreciated. I have learnt a lot already and the advice has been exactly what I needed to know. I think I
2006-02-11 by Tyler Boley
Ergosoft recently came out with an upgrade to StudioPrint with a some interesting developments for quad users. Until recently, StudioPrint was very difficult
2006-02-11 by Paul Roark
For what it s worth ... The 2000P is a classic matte paper printer, in my view. It s dmax with the Epson driver beats the 2200, and the ones I ve used didn t
2006-02-11 by Steve Kale
Take a read through this forum s posts over the last few days, particularly the discussion re the Epson R220 and Paul Roark s Latest B&W Ink Set . It doesn t
2006-02-11 by Michael Vendrell
Helen, For a really inexpensive starting point The Epson R220 with MIS UT-R2 inset would be an excellent choice and these can usually be had for less than $99
2006-02-11 by Helen Adams
Hi Steve, Thanks for your response. Right now I have an old Lexmark X84/85 all in one printer. To be honest I quite like some of the results as it has a slight
2006-02-11 by lancscott
... Just wanted to thank everyone for your input. This has been very insightful.
2006-02-11 by Steve Kale
As part of my play with the Nanochromes I reprinted some HPR images I have framed done with Epson K3 and Eboni (in lieu of Epson MK). The Epson/Eboni prints
2006-02-11 by Steve Kale
Helen What do you have at the moment? The magenta cast is not so much a printer issue but rather a workflow issue. The new Epson 2400 takes a lot of these
2006-02-11 by jennieclyne
I was just wondering if you can use an Epson R320? it looks like it uses the same cardridges as the 220. I also have a 2000P that I was just getting ready to
2006-02-11 by vmixer42
Interesting, I hadn t read that before. Does VFA have significantly more texture than EEM (or the USFA/PA 205-type papers)? I ve always heard that it had
2006-02-11 by Gary Brown
-Does anyone know of any good sources for archival clam shell boxes for -use with limited edition portfolios. Ideally I would like 11x17 but so -far I ve only
2006-02-11 by john dean
Eric, That is good to know. I haven t had the trouble with Smooth Cotton the way I did with Photorag but your point is well taken. I ve only used it so far for
2006-02-11 by Paul Roark
... Another variable that is out there is that some of our instruments read slightly differently. I ve never measured a matte paper above 1.75. So, with that
2006-02-11 by Steve Kale
Yes. I find it easier to think in a perceptually uniform scale: CIELab. The difference noted below is about 2.5 L* which is quite visually significant. But
2006-02-11 by Joe
Woops I meant epson velvet fine are paper
2006-02-11 by Joe
I have been reading the posts on epson enhanced velvet and was wondering. Other than price considerations are their any significant differences between the MIS