Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 762 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

Re: Epson 3000 microbandig

2005-12-21 by Tyler Boley

Using QTR with a quad ink set, without correctly configured ink descriptor files and curves, etc., will not help you get the most from this setup. It would be

Thread view Attachments: 0

Farm Security Administration Project:

2005-12-21 by garethjolly

Ever felt like reprinting one of the classic images from the 30s? The Library of Congress has 1000s of images available free in archival TIFFS (10-50MB or

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Re: Epson 3000 microbandig

2005-12-21 by fotojali

Thanks Paul, I d like to try the UT-FS curves... --fotojali ... front tray. ... cut a ... lay the ... so that ... 3000s seem ... as much ... of a ... from the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Epson 3000 microbandig

2005-12-21 by fotojali

I don t think it s the paper thickness because I tried this with Archival Matte. But I downloaded QuadTone RIP and tried it (first time ever) and made a few

Thread view Attachments: 0

2400 with MIS K4 inks

2005-12-21 by sburger104@aol.com

I thought I d post my first observations. I just sold Two Epson 2200 s. One had a CIS system from MIS with their Ultrachrome equivalent inks, the other 2200

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Digital Vs. Film

2005-12-21 by Tom Baker

I would doubt that the physical size of the DSLR s will drop much. They are already cramming a lot of controls on the real estate. If they were much smaller

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Digital Vs. Film

2005-12-21 by djon43

Six of one, half dozen the other: Film s visual advantages are counterbalanced by inherent digital capture visual advantages. The choice is still financial

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 3613

2005-12-21 by Peter Marshall

Yes, architectural work has never been so straightforward. One great bit of free software for PC (or at least free-ish - small donation requested) is PTLens,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Change in Kirkland glossy paper

2005-12-21 by scott_now_coming

Hold on a second! I just checked my supply. You have the new Kirkland. The lastest (and best) is 68lbs., 255 g/m2, and 10 mil. My supply is about 6 months old

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Change in Kirkland glossy paper

2005-12-21 by scott_now_coming

Man, I don t like to hear that. Is the stuff you have still made in Switzerland? What are the lot # s? I was going to switch to Kirkland for color volume

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Epson 3000 microbandig

2005-12-21 by Tyler Boley

You will get microbanding due to inacurate paper advance with the thick papers. This may or may not be what you are experiencing, but be sure and test it with

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Digital Vs. Film

2005-12-21 by Adam Maas

Interspersed. ... 100-3200 or 200-3200 for most semi-pro and pro bodies. ISO 50 is now starting to show up on pro and semi-pro bodies. 3200 is increaisngly

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Epson 3000 microbandig

2005-12-21 by Steven Karafyllakis

Hi Joe; I believe we have discussed the subject of microbanding re: the 1280; what has your experience been with the R1800? I m on my fourth one of these, and

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Epson 3000 microbandig

2005-12-21 by John Vitollo

Small world...Just wanted to give two thumbs up to Laguna s Epson service. I and my clients have used them on a number of occasions with excellent results.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Epson 3000 microbandig

2005-12-21 by Joseph Cettina

... Hi We are an authorized service center for Epson .I work on allot of 3000 s.Nozzle check should be printed on good photo paper. Nozzle pattern should be

Thread view Attachments: 0

Epson 3000 microbandig

2005-12-21 by fotojali

Hi, I am starting my b&w printing with Epson 3000 and MIS Full Spectrum Neutral Inks. After a few test prints I really like the neutral tone of the inks, and I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Change in Kirkland glossy paper

2005-12-21 by remsleep53

I finally ran out of the stock of Kirkland glossy that I had bought maybe 6 months ago, and picked up a couple of new boxes. The difference would seem to be

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] resizing

2005-12-21 by steveabrink

I did a comparison by the way of the 3 interp. techniques you mentioned below plus QI Image, and PhotoPro Zoom S-spline based came out a bit better, but enough

Thread view Attachments: 0

QTR, Print Utility questions

2005-12-21 by James Irelan

Getting back to b&w printing, this time on a 9500 with K6 and QTR, printing via an ethernet card. I have a couple of questions: I can get QTR to print, and I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 3613

2005-12-21 by claudej1@aol.com

In a message dated 12/20/2005 7:33:36 AM Pacific Standard Time, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com writes: Wrong, there s a big problem...they don t

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Digital Vs. Film

2005-12-20 by john dean

I won t matter what we prefer because: The line it is drawn The curse it is cast The slow one now Will later be fast As the present now Will later be past The

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Digital Vs. Film

2005-12-20 by rplojetz

I think the argument of film vs. digital to be impossible because it is entirely variable on the photographers usage, output choices and subject matter.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Digital Vs. Film

2005-12-20 by garethjolly

Well... As the original poster, I frankly don t think it matters much. What counts is the image. It could be digital or film. When we lose sight of that,

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Digital Vs. Film

2005-12-20 by John Moody

Sigh………. Best regards, John Moody ... From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Digital Vs. Film

2005-12-20 by Walt Mucha

... Well they have a fisheye, 14mm, 15mm, 16-35mm 17-40mm and 20mm ... Obviously you never held an EOS 1 film camera ... It s not for me ... Would that be

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Digital Vs. Film

2005-12-20 by Diane Fields

Hmmm, Canon has a 20mm lens, and a 14mm lens---and a 15mm FE, etc.---and 16-35mm zoom. All of these are the same FL on the FF bodies as they are on the film

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Epson R200 v. R220

2005-12-20 by Paul Roark

... The dark grays (C & M) are equal in density, and the light grays (LC & LM) and Y are equal. In the C86, all the grays were equal. As a practical matter,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Digital Vs. Film

2005-12-20 by djon43

... many other pros having been shooting digital for years. Of course. ... Right, they are limited. Canon has a full frame sensor so there is no wide angle

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.