Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 159 of 564 · 28179 messages matched

Re: [Doepfer_a100] doepfer apps

2010-01-15 by Mark Pulver

I thought about that too :) ----- james.husted@mac.com (09:58 AM 1/15/2010) wrote: >Something different (a little simpler) than the TipTop Z-Dsp? >-J >On Jan 15, 2010, at 2:03 AM, grimshaw_stuart wrote: > >> hi group, >> >> given that apple have demonstrated how good customers ar

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] doepfer apps

2010-01-15 by james.husted@mac.com

Something different (a little simpler) than the TipTop Z-Dsp? -J On Jan 15, 2010, at 2:03 AM, grimshaw_stuart wrote: > hi group, > > given that apple have demonstrated how good customers are at working out what bizarre features they'd like for their toys, given the chance to deve

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] doepfer apps

2010-01-15 by achtung_999

Nice idea Stu, A friend of mine is already building stuff with chips like that. Not for Doepfer/eurorack yet.. but he was planning to. A module format would make it nice and easy. grtz Ernst On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 2:42 PM, wrote: > > > Damn fine idea Stu, > > I know zero about p

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Doepfer_a100] doepfer apps

2010-01-15 by david.salter@thomsonreuters.com

Damn fine idea Stu, I know zero about programming and I have no inclination to learn but an open community developing stuff is a cool idea. David * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * David Salter Senior Consultant SSG UKI Thomson Reuters O

Thread view Attachments: 0

doepfer apps

2010-01-15 by grimshaw_stuart

hi group, given that apple have demonstrated how good customers are at working out what bizarre features they'd like for their toys, given the chance to develop them themselves, i wonder if there would be interest among doepfer users in a sort of app development kit. by this i me

Thread view Attachments: 0

doepfer modules for sale // 2

2010-01-15 by jk@jasonkahn.net

hello i still have the following doepfer modules for sale: a-111 // high end vco // 180.00 euro (2 available) a-130 // linear vca // 40.00 euro a-140 // adsr // 45.00 euro all modules are in good working order and include ribbon connectors and screws. prices are firm. shipping co

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] A-111-5 separate VCO output

2010-01-14 by phono 1337

not without modification, theres a few extra output pins but osc out isnt one of them Paul On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 6:27 PM, okmog wrote: > > > Hi, > > does anybody know, if it's possible to braze a separate VCO output of the > A-111-5? > > Ollie > > > [Non-text portions of this m

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: A-111-5 separate VCO output

2010-01-14 by okmog

I've found the datasheet of CEM3394: http://www.datasheetarchive.com/datasheet-pdf/012/DSA00198797.html There is a diagramm on the last page. It seems that it's probably not possible, is it? Ollie --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "okmog" wrote: > > Hi, > > does anybody know,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: A-111-5 separate VCO output

2010-01-14 by okmog

Thank you very much! Do you maybe know which modification? Or where I could find specs to the CEM3394? Olli --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, phono 1337 wrote: > > not without modification, theres a few extra output pins but osc out isnt > one of them > > Paul > > > On Thu, Ja

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] were there any design revisions on the A-116?

2010-01-14 by phono 1337

thanks Alex Paul On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Alex Pearson wrote: > It sure is, that REALLY messed me up when I first got mine... > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:38 PM, phono 1337 wrote: > >> >> >> The one i have was new old stock when i bought it, probably a very >> early one

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: question on a108 phase relationships

2010-01-14 by okmog

Hi Tim, Hi everybody, I want to apologize for continuing this thread. I don't want to do any math here. I hope I can clarify this interesting theoretical discussion, where I have learned a lot and I hope some others as well. > tan^-1(-5*w + 3*k*w - 5*w^3 - k*w^3 + 14*w^5 + 22*w^7

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] were there any design revisions on the A-116?

2010-01-13 by Alex Pearson

It sure is, that REALLY messed me up when I first got mine... On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:38 PM, phono 1337 wrote: > > > The one i have was new old stock when i bought it, probably a very > early one. Anyway i'm only wondering since the clippling level knob > seems to act more like

Thread view Attachments: 0

were there any design revisions on the A-116?

2010-01-13 by phono 1337

The one i have was new old stock when i bought it, probably a very early one. Anyway i'm only wondering since the clippling level knob seems to act more like its polarised but the knob legend is marked 1-10. Perhaps thats just how it is, any A-116 owners around here? Paul

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: question on a108 phase relationships

2010-01-13 by grimshaw_stuart

FS: 5000 t-shirts, various colours, with caption "The (normalized) transfer function for 'stage n', n=1 to 8 (so 30dB is n=5), appears to be H(s)=1/((s+1)^n+k*(s+1)^(2n-8))" and photo of tim poking out his tongue. diavolo pizza or nearest offer. stu

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: question on a108 phase relationships

2010-01-13 by Tim

Hi Ollie, > I see, you want to get an explicit expression of the phase- > frequency relation of your filter. > I doubt that you can derive this expression directly from the > transfer function of a filter. Yes you can, as I posted before: tan^-1 im(H(wj))/re(H(wj)). (Aaargh, I se

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: question on a108 phase relationships

2010-01-13 by okmog

I see, you want to get an explicit expression of the phase-frequency relation of your filter. I doubt that you can derive this expression directly from the transfer function of a filter. Look, since s = iw + d, where w is frequency, i is imaginary unity, d is phase factor. The ph

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] doepfer modules for sale

2010-01-13 by ehrlich sebastien

Hi Jason, i'm considering to buy your a-106 and your a-119. ( 120 euros.) Do you make me the shipping for free ?(i'm living in France) Regards Sébastien On 2010/01/12, at 14:36, jk@jasonkahn.net wrote: > hello > > i have the following doepfer modules for sale: > > a-111 // high e

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: question on a108 phase relationships

2010-01-13 by Florian Anwander

Hi Tim > H(s)=(s+1)^(8-n)/((s+1)^8+k) it is ok, that someone makes me feel again like that stupid 15 year old boy back 35 years ago, sitting in the class room and understanding nothing. But posting it twice? Sorry, this is too much... ;-) Florian

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: question on a108 phase relationships

2010-01-12 by Tim

OK, so, now before anyone goes sticking this on a T-shirt, believing it to be the answer to life, the universe and everything, I think it only fair to warn you that this: > > I'm guessing it is just some funny facet of the algebra concerned. The (normalized) transfer function for

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Fun with the A111-5

2010-01-12 by rcf_vvvv

Thanks for the reply Ollie; I've not explored the feedback loop yet - but I'll definitely give it a try. Glad you're having fun with your A111-5 too ;-) I'm hoping to use the A111-5 in a mini suitcase modular when I've got the time, along with the A190-2, AS RS95e VCO, AS RS380,

Thread view Attachments: 0

doepfer modules for sale

2010-01-12 by jk@jasonkahn.net

hello i have the following doepfer modules for sale: a-111 // high end vco // 180.00 euro (2 available) a-106 // xtreme filter // 80.00 euro a-130 // linear vca // 40.00 euro a-138 // exponential mixer // 30.00 euro a-140 // adsr // 45.00 euro a-179 // light controlled cv source

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] VCA quality question

2010-01-12 by Florian Anwander

Hi Monroe > Could you tell me in what properties and roughly to what magnitude are the > Cwejman VCA's better than Doepfer's? (i.e. attenuation, noise, response > speed, etc.) I don't have papers here and I do not intend to do research on this. Neither attenuation, noise, nor res

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] VCA quality question

2010-01-11 by Monroe Eskew

Florian Could you tell me in what properties and roughly to what magnitude are the Cwejman VCA's better than Doepfer's? (i.e. attenuation, noise, response speed, etc.) Thanks, Monroe On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Florian Anwander wrote: > > > Hi Ollie > > > > I've seen that so

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: FS; MFB Seq01 Drum Sequencer

2010-01-11 by miguel

sold out thanks --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "miguel" wrote: > > in good shape, located in madrid spain > price is 120 euros, EC countries shipping 10 eur. > > miguel >

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: VCA quality question

2010-01-11 by blacet@blacet.com

Blacet uses the very high quality SSM VCAs (or the equivalent Cool Audio clone). >> > I've seen that some of you uses the A-100 in a studio. Which VCA would >> you recommend for studio applications to connect the A-100 to the >> audio interface? > >> All A100 VCAs are ok for aver

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] VCA quality question

2010-01-11 by Florian Anwander

Hi Ollie > I've seen that some of you uses the A-100 in a studio. Which VCA would you recommend for studio applications to connect the A-100 to the audio interface? All A100 VCAs are ok for average synth use, but are not comparable to the VCAs used in professional compressors lik

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: VCA quality question

2010-01-11 by okmog

Hi Florian, > > I've seen that some of you uses the A-100 in a studio. Which VCA would you recommend for studio applications to connect the A-100 to the audio interface? > All A100 VCAs are ok for average synth use, but are not comparable to > the VCAs used in professional compre

Thread view Attachments: 0

VCA quality question

2010-01-11 by okmog

Hello everybody, I'm an idiot in VCA questions. So, maybe somebody can tell me, if there are any audio quality differences between the A-131 exp. VCA and the A-132-3 dual VCA, please? As you know Dieter is on the NAMM. So I thought maybe someone of you technique freaks know it ne

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Doepfer_a100] Tone Generation (history of synths)

2010-01-11 by david.salter@thomsonreuters.com

Hi Nick, Yes that is a great series and I'm really looking forward to the next instalment. David * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * David Salter Senior Consultant SSG UKI Thomson Reuters O +44 (0)20 7542 2402X 52402 M 07990562402 david.s

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A-143-4 Quad VCLFO/VCO

2010-01-11 by david.salter@thomsonreuters.com

yes Stu, I did mean a separate module, so you can use or not if you don't want to. At it's simplest it's a 6 or 8hp module with 4 inputs (plus a through socket for each so you still have your triangle waveform available) and 8 outputs say rising ramp and falling ramp for each inp

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Fun with the A111-5

2010-01-10 by okmog

Hi Ralph, I'm also falling in love with this Doepfer synth. Actually I wanted to buy only the Dark Energy but after three days I realized the possibilities and the fun behind a A-100 modular system, brought the Dark Energy back to the dealer and bought a A-111-5 with some other m

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: question on a108 phase relationships

2010-01-10 by okmog

Hi Stu, Hi Tim, I hope you are doing well. The observations you have made about the changing phase shifts in dependence on the frequency and resonance value can be explain by Fourier-transformations which is the mathematical theory behind every kind of frequency filtering. It say

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: question on a108 phase relationships

2010-01-10 by grimshaw_stuart

> I'm guessing it is just some funny facet of the algebra concerned. The (normalized) transfer function for 'stage n', n=1 to 8 (so 30dB is n=5), appears to be > > H(s)=1/((s+1)^n+k*(s+1)^(2n-8)) > > where k is the gain in the feedback loop. If one were to be bothered to work out

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Tone Generation (history of synths)

2010-01-10 by achtung_999

That looks very interesting! Thanks so much! On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Nick wrote: > > > I have just learned that the Tone Generation series on the history of > synthesizing has been carrying on after the episodes broadcast on Resonance > FM. Here's the link for anyone els

Thread view Attachments: 0

WTB: MakeNoise QMMG

2010-01-10 by dingfutzer

Need Another QMMG: FS/FT: MFB 99 Mixer - new in box - $85 Behringer MDX 4600 Quad Comp/Lmtr - new in box - $55 http://home.ptd.net/~eyesaw/Misc/07.jpg Buyer pays shipping/ins & online fees - Bill in PA, U.S.A. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: question on a108 phase relationships

2010-01-10 by Tim

Hi Stu, > thanks tim, that's really helpful. of course, like all the best answers, it raises more questions :) > > like this one: what's so special about a cut off of 1kz and a slope of 30db that the filtered signal stays in phase with the original up the cut off frequency? Indee

Thread view Attachments: 0

Tone Generation (history of synths)

2010-01-10 by Nick

I have just learned that the Tone Generation series on the history of synthesizing has been carrying on after the episodes broadcast on Resonance FM. Here's the link for anyone else who has missed them. http://www.ianhelliwell.co.uk/tone%20generation.html# Cheers, Nick

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: question on a108 phase relationships

2010-01-10 by grimshaw_stuart

wow. thanks tim, that's really helpful. of course, like all the best answers, it raises more questions :) like this one: what's so special about a cut off of 1kz and a slope of 30db that the filtered signal stays in phase with the original up the cut off frequency? stu

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: question on a108 phase relationships

2010-01-10 by Tim

Ack! I should add that these are all at a cut-off of about 1kHz, which is where the big 'wobble' is! Tim > I've created a folder 'A-108 phase' in the files section, and > uploaded 3 gifs.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: question on a108 phase relationships

2010-01-10 by Tim

Hi Stu, > i wonder if anybody can tell me what the phases of the outputs are on this incredibly versatile module. According to my simulation, as you go up the outputs: 6dB, 12dB, 18dB, etc, the phase of each lags that of the previous output, by an amount which increases with freq

Thread view Attachments: 0

question on a108 phase relationships

2010-01-10 by grimshaw_stuart

hi group, feeding the various outputs of the a108 filter to its own cv and resonance inputs, it becomes immediately obvious that there is more difference here than just slope. i wonder if anybody can tell me what the phases of the outputs are on this incredibly versatile module.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A-143-4 Quad VCLFO/VCO

2010-01-10 by davevosh@aol.com

In a message dated 1/10/2010 2:10:42 AM Pacific Standard Time, grimshaw@stugrimshaw.com writes: i think david s. meant an additional module, is that so david? i personally would love to have little suite of circuits to turn one waveform into another. stu stu, yes, i`m sure david

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: A-143-4 Quad VCLFO/VCO

2010-01-10 by grimshaw_stuart

> in the abstarct, a nice idea but i suspect the virtue of the module is its > size / density - in the normal course of events, i can live with square / > tri only. i think david s. meant an additional module, is that so david? i personally would love to have little suite of circ

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: threaded Euro rack rails?

2010-01-09 by Nick

Hi Dennis I'm using four Doepfer DIY#1 kits. One is in place and I'm waiting for the other three to arrive. Cheers, Nick --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, dennis henderson wrote: > > what psu did you use? > > --- On Thu, 1/7/10, Nick wrote: > > From: Nick > Subject: [Doepfer_a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.