Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 435 of 564 · 28179 messages matched
2004-08-11 by Bakis Sirros
--- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > From: "Dieter Doepfer" > To: "Bakis Sirros" > Subject: AW: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: while we are > talking about more Buchla based things... > Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:28:14 +0200 > > > > > -----Urspr'ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Tommy DOG [mailto:mr
2004-08-10 by levka0
Just another note on polyphonic "hybrid" systems I often use a Vermona perfourmer with my A-100 It can be set-up either as monophonic, duophonic or 4-voice poly synth Since it has insert-points and seperate outs for each voice, it's easily combined with all A-100 modules Highly r
2004-08-10 by Zoran Bosnjak
My guess on this topic: it might sound pretty good with A-109 filter (like Microwave). I created complex, evolving sound, but only 1 voice. Than I overdubbed in Cubase to get the chord, and this was the only time my Doepfer started to get close to those glorious polyphonic synths
2004-08-10 by Keld Sørensen
Just to let you know. I´ve uploaded a few pics of my studio. A rather small studio but fun. My main fun axe is the A100. The JV- 1010 is more of a bread and butter thing for composing. The A3000 sampler is a new addition for sampling - and playing - polyphonic A100 patches. Keld
2004-08-10 by selfoscillate
hello zoran, when i do polyphonic patches on the a100, i use a different filter for each voice to add even more life to the sound, but i'm too lazy to do patches with more than 4 voices, so i normally end up using other gear for that. my favorite polyphonic synths vary from time
2004-08-10 by selfoscillate
> > rgds > > Pierre > > p.s. Ingo - thanks for the response about the a133 and rectification. It's > exactly these sorts of possibilities that keep me wanting more modules > rather than pretty keyboards :) hello pierre, yes, me too. i haven't bought a polyphonic synth keyboard fo
2004-08-10 by Pierre Zeeman
Hi all, Thanks for the responses - it was pretty much what I thought. I am currently testing an andromeda and as I don't have a lot of cash, if I decide to buy it, it will curtail any modular purchases for quite some time. However, after playing with the andromeda for a few days
2004-08-10 by selfoscillate
hello td, no problem at all :-) best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Tommy DOG" wrote: > You're right Bakis. Sorry Ingo. > > TD > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros wrote: > > hello tommy, > > the part of email that you include in your email is
2004-08-09 by Tommy DOG
You're right Bakis. Sorry Ingo. TD --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros wrote: > hello tommy, > the part of email that you include in your email is > ingo's email reply and not doepfer's answer. > anyway,the a152,afaik,is part of the next batch of > modules,indeed. >
2004-08-09 by Bakis Sirros
hello tommy, the part of email that you include in your email is ingo's email reply and not doepfer's answer. anyway,the a152,afaik,is part of the next batch of modules,indeed. bakis. --- Tommy DOG wrote: > > > --- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > > > > > > hello, > > > > > > > > > > the
2004-08-09 by Tommy DOG
> --- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > > > > hello, > > > > > > > > the next sou-module is probably the a152, it has > > the > > > > functionality of the toggling s/h part of the > > sou. Is this part of the next batch of modules? TD
2004-08-09 by selfoscillate
hello shawn, many thanks for the link :-) best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Modular Fan wrote: > For the most part, I agree with Josue. > > Here are some sounds and a pic of the Buchla 259 from > rick/echo7: > > http://www.abiotic.net/schism/buchla259/ > > Bye
2004-08-09 by Bakis Sirros
--- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > From: "Dieter Doepfer" > To: "Bakis Sirros" > Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Purchasing Doepfer in > the USA > Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:14:34 +0200 > > > -----Urspr'ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Robert Hoffman [mailto:robmix@earthlink.net] > > Gesendet:
2004-08-09 by Bakis Sirros
--- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > From: "Dieter Doepfer" > To: "Bakis Sirros" > Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: while we are talking > about more Buchla based things... > Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:14:33 +0200 > > > -----Urspr'ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Tommy DOG [mailto:mrsvomit@to
2004-08-09 by selfoscillate
--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Tommy DOG" wrote: > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate" wrote: > > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Tommy DOG" > > wrote: > > > Is there going to be a 3rd SOU module? > > > > > > TD > > > > > > hello, > > > > the next so
2004-08-07 by Tommy DOG
Hi Rob, I believe that the delay with Doug are now over. I'm pretty sure he has a shipment coming this week. I know this doesn't answer your question, but aside from a recent unavoidable bump I haven't experienced any problems with shipping times. I should also add that I always
2004-08-07 by Zoran Bosnjak
Hi Rob, how about Canada? I purchased my Doepfer from Technopolis in Montreal. Here is a link: http://www.generation.net/~musicr/Doepferpricelist.htm However, the web site does say "for Canadian customers only". But it does not cost too much to call and inquire about that. Regard
2004-08-07 by Zoran Bosnjak
Hi Matthew, you have just made me desire 259 style oscillator... Regards, Zoran >From: "mritenburg" >Reply-To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com >To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [Doepfer_a100] What does the Buchla 259 sound like? >Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 06:46:53 -0000 > >I
2004-08-07 by mritenburg
I have a some short samples made on an Ensoniq ASR-10 from Buchla 259s when I was in college. I will try to make the sounds available in the next day or do. I like to think of the Buchla 259 as a oscillator on LSD. It is definately a tool for those wanting to explore the stranger
2004-08-07 by Robert Hoffman
Has anyone in the USA tried ordering Doepfer modules from European suppliers ? I really like Doug at Sonic Highway, but things take a bit too long for me. I think Doug's really trying but it seems like it might be faster to order from another source for right now. Rob
2004-08-07 by ALMAGATA@telefonica.net
Hi Bakis, I`m not saying that the ems or system100 waveforms are better, I`m telling I preffer them over the A111, and also I can hear a huge difference in the raw sound. I know you are convinced about the 259 ;) Best regards, Josue. ----- Mensaje Original ----- De: Bakis Sirros
2004-08-06 by Bakis Sirros
hello josue, there is no reason to convince me,i already prefer the buchla 259 complex vco module!(and i have voted already!) anyway,about the system 100 triangle and the EMS vcs3:i have both ,so i could compare their sound to the a111 triangle.and yes, maybe they have a "better"
2004-08-06 by Modular Fan
For the most part, I agree with Josue. Here are some sounds and a pic of the Buchla 259 from rick/echo7: http://www.abiotic.net/schism/buchla259/ Bye, Shawn __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yaho
2004-08-06 by ALMAGATA@telefonica.net
Hi Bakis, A triangle waveform is not just a triangle wave, not only for the different waveshape from one VCo to other, but also for the changes between adjacent waves and chages in continous waves. About the triangle from the CEM3340 chip, I have lots of VCOs for comparing, inclu
2004-08-06 by Tommy DOG
--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "selfoscillate" wrote: > --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Tommy DOG" > wrote: > > Is there going to be a 3rd SOU module? > > > > TD > > > hello, > > the next sou-module is probably the a152, it has the > functionality of the toggling s/h
2004-08-06 by Bakis Sirros
hello josue, that's not a good comparison,in my opinion.the guitar sound is already very complicated when it leaves the guitar and then it is just distorted by the pedal. but,the triangle waveform is JUST a triangle waveform(a rather pure sound)and then it is processed via a much
2004-08-06 by Bakis Sirros
hello ingo, your idea is great! if someone could upload some recordings of the original buchla 259 complex vco,it would be great. then, these recordings could be forwarded to dieter himself ,so he can make direct comparisons and decide what to build,the 259 vco module ,or the exp
2004-08-06 by royce
hi folks, i live in chicago. looking for a 2nd hand mixer module, cv or audio. royce __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
2004-08-06 by ALMAGATA@telefonica.net
Hi Ingo, you can download the samples for the Plan-B VCO peter is making, do you think it sound the same as the A111? Do you think both A111 and planB VCO sound the same thru the a-116 or waveshaper?? Do you like the sound of PlanB? Do you think the planB Have an organic quality
2004-08-06 by ALMAGATA@telefonica.net
Sure mate, or will sound the same a 50`s stratocaster and a 100$ guitar if both them are using the same distortion pedal? Also I`d like to point to the excellent Plan-B VCO peter grenader is making, do you think it sound the same than the A111? Josue. > > So the "organic quality"
2004-08-06 by ALMAGATA@telefonica.net
> The 258 seems to be described as a vco, and the 259 as a > 'waveshaper' The 258 is a "Dual Oscillator" and the 259 is a "Programmable Complex Waveform Generator" is also dual but have a dedicated modulation VCO to the "main" oscillator. you can compare schematics for the 258 an
2004-08-06 by Julian
Can someone, in a nutshell, explain to me the difference between the 258 and 259 vcos? The 258 seems to be described as a vco, and the 259 as a 'waveshaper' , but i suspect the terminology is somewhat lax. What are the differences in application? Both seem to be a dual vco... Tha
2004-08-06 by ALMAGATA@telefonica.net
Then, As i said, the expander is only a new waveshaper.... Again, I don`t like the sound of 3340 VCOs, theese are too clinical and lack of the raw power of discrete VCOs, also we will miss a new VCO... I know would be an effort for dieter making a new VCO, (dual VCO in we want a
2004-08-06 by selfoscillate
hello josue, first of all i want to say that i like the sound of the a111. i will say more about the plan b vco when i have tried it. i know the sounds from peters homepage, but i want to lay my own hands on the vco before i'm going to say it is more organic than other vco's. i d
2004-08-06 by klinic2
I just uploaded a 258 and 259 to the photos section, look at buchla folder. Also you can see the features for the 259. Best Regards, Josue.
2004-08-06 by selfoscillate
yes, i think so. but the question is, what is most responsible for the "organic quality"? is it really the discrete triangle core? i'd really love to hear a pure 259 in action, but who has one? best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "levka0" wrote: > So the "organi
2004-08-06 by selfoscillate
i think this issue needs some more investigation. both points are valid, each solution has it's advantages. it is really difficult, because only few people have heard an original buchla 259 and know about the special behaviour of this unit. maybe we can get some raw recordings of
2004-08-06 by levka0
So the "organic quality" of a possible 259 expander depends also on any (im)perfections of the triangle source that goes in ? regards Joost --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros wrote: > > --- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > > > From: "Dieter Doepfer" > > To: "Bakis Sirros" >
2004-08-06 by Bakis Sirros
--- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > From: "Dieter Doepfer" > To: "Bakis Sirros" > Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: A133, plus > polyphonic a100 question > Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:48:49 +0200 > > > -----Urspr'ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: allanjhall [mailto:allanjhall@manx.net] > > Gese
2004-08-06 by Bakis Sirros
--- Dieter Doepfer wrote: > From: "Dieter Doepfer" > To: "Bakis Sirros" > Subject: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: New poll for > Doepfer_a100 > Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:48:48 +0200 > > > -----Urspr'ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Bakis Sirros > [mailto:synth_freak_2000@yahoo.com] > > Ges
2004-08-06 by David Salter
Ingo, a quick look at the CEM3340 data sheet at www.synthtech.com/cem/c3340pdf.pdf shows a triangle to saw converter in the block diagram. So you are probably correct. david David Salter Reuters Ltd UKI Project Management Tel. +44 207 542 2402 Fax. +44 207 542 2699 Email. david.s
2004-08-06 by Julian
----- Original Message ----- > > Do you have a dedicated +/-15V supply for it ? > Yes, its running on +/-15 volts, but I have a full G3 rack of motm, The polydac will run off 12v too. I haven't gotten around to finishing mine yet (its partially complete on the back of the desk),
2004-08-06 by ALMAGATA@telefonica.net
Are you sure the 3340 is triangle core?? I thik is saw core based as near all the VCos out there... Best Regards, Jsoue,. ----- Mensaje Original ----- De: "selfoscillate" Fecha: Viernes, Agosto 6, 2004 9:09 am Asunto: [Doepfer_a100] Re: New poll for Doepfer_a100 > > > > > > > hel
2004-08-06 by selfoscillate
can't remember where i read it, maybe on the homepage of juergen haible. i think that almost all cem vco's are triangle-core based. maybe someone else can confirm this? best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "ALMAGATA@t..." wrote: > Are you sure the 3340 is triangl
2004-08-06 by allanjhall
> How long did it take you to build the polyDAC ? about 12 hours, plus 2-3 hours to make front panel > It's not a beginners project is it ? No, its just a bare pcb, you have to source all of the parts yourself, there are more than 100 components to solder in. > Do you have a dedi
2004-08-06 by vogelscheiss
Have to agree on this. Much more pain than it's worth when compared with all the good polysynths out there. > -----Original Message----- > From: allanjhall [mailto:allanjhall@manx.net] > Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 6:23 PM > To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Doepfe
2004-08-06 by synth_freak_2000
hello list, i just uploaded some updated photos of a part of my analogue set-up. enjoy, bakis.
2004-08-06 by selfoscillate
hello josue, as far as i know the a111 is also a triangle core vco, because it is cem 3340 based. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "ALMAGATA@t..." wrote: > The A111 259 expander is a bad idea IMHO, > first, we will loose that triangle core VCO and the special
2004-08-06 by levka0
Allen How long did it take you to build the polyDAC ? It's not a beginners project is it ? Do you have a dedicated +/-15V supply for it ? regards Joost --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "allanjhall" wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > The only polyphonic midi/cv converter I know of is the
2004-08-05 by allanjhall
Hi Pierre, The only polyphonic midi/cv converter I know of is the PolyDAC http://www.modulus.synth.net/modular/polydac.shtml I've just built one in doepfer format (pix on modulus site) and it is four note polyphonic and works great, but my main use for it is in mono mode 2, where