Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 148 of 168 · 8362 messages matched
2004-01-21 by Robert van der Kamp
This whole grabbing concepts makes me want a P3 with LOTS of additional tracks, just to feed the tracks that do the grabbing. 8 tracks total just isn't enough. I guess I will have to wait for the P4 to have a 32-track machine, right?
2004-01-21 by Robert van der Kamp
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 22:51, Colin f wrote: > > Colin, the relative Xpose works nice too. :) > > Is there a place where I can set the max xpose value, > > where it resets? > > Not yet... It has an arbitrary limit of 36 (3 octaves). > I'm going to make the limit configurabl
2004-01-21 by Robert van der Kamp
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 22:47, Paul Nagle wrote: > I just did this well strange thing with a V-Synth just > now where it was transposing this strange background FX > and also throwing in random controller changes to speed > up samples, reverse them, time-freeze them and add
2004-01-21 by Robert van der Kamp
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 22:44, Paul Nagle wrote: > You can use it to make "Ghost tracks" too - just set each > step to grab its note from another and hey presto you > have a mirrored track. Then when you alter notes in the > source, the ghost(s) change(s) too. > > And then y
2004-01-21 by Paul Nagle
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:46:38 +0100, Robert van der Kamp wrote: >I'm freaking out here on a two-track piece, where track one >is both grabbing and xposing from track 2. And all that >with a nice Andromeda. I just did this well strange thing with a V-Synth just now where it was tra
2004-01-21 by Robert van der Kamp
Colin, the relative Xpose works nice too. :) Is there a place where I can set the max xpose value, where it resets? I'm freaking out here on a two-track piece, where track one is both grabbing and xposing from track 2. And all that with a nice Andromeda. Too bad there isn't any s
2004-01-21 by Paul Nagle
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:43:54 +0100, Robert van der Kamp wrote: >Thanks guys, I've got it working now. > >The note grabbing is a very powerfull tool, as it allows you >to 'punch holes' in a tune at certain steps and allow for >some variation at those points. Exactly how much varia
2004-01-21 by Robert van der Kamp
Thanks guys, I've got it working now. The note grabbing is a very powerfull tool, as it allows you to 'punch holes' in a tune at certain steps and allow for some variation at those points. Exactly how much variation can be controlled by the track the note is grabed from. A very m
2004-01-21 by Colin f
> And then you start frigging with the directions so that even though it > is grabbing notes from one track, it plays them in a different order. Huh ? It shouldn't do that, I don't think. At least I think I don't think. Colin f
2004-01-21 by Colin f
> Colin, the relative Xpose works nice too. :) > Is there a place where I can set the max xpose value, where > it resets? Not yet... It has an arbitrary limit of 36 (3 octaves). I'm going to make the limit configurable per pattern, and possibly also add a choice of whether it sho
2004-01-21 by Paul Maddox
Geeze this is getting confusing.. Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Colin f" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 7:36 PM Subject: RE: [analogue-sequencer] P3 v3.85 beta > > >The four Aux defintions A-D each have an LED and the button takes you > > >through them. Func plu
2004-01-21 by Paul Nagle
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 19:36:51 -0000, "Colin f" wrote: >If you're not in 'aux knob mode', then FUNC+ takes you to >it directly. It takes the top LED to CC and I can then tweak the knobs but I thought Aux Edit was being asked about, sorry, misunderstood. Paul --- Paul Nagle / Soft R
2004-01-21 by Paul Nagle
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 19:11:14 +0000, Paul Nagle wrote: >The four Aux defintions A-D each have an LED and the button takes you >through them. Func plus the button (mine;'s blue I think) takes you >where you wanna go... 8) Maybe I shoulda pointed out you FIRST need to be in the set
2004-01-21 by Paul Nagle
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:00:37 +0100, Robert van der Kamp wrote: >Colin, I installed the new OS. But I don't understand the >above part. The FUNC + stuff. What's the >key function? In what mode should I be when invoking this? The four Aux defintions A-D each have an LED and the but
2004-01-21 by Robert van der Kamp
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 01:40, colinfraser_com wrote: > To configure the function for each aux A to D, you no > longer use the 'aux func' softkey - it's gone. > Simply enter 'aux' edit mode using the upper function > key. Then press FUNC + . Colin, I installed the new OS. Bu
2004-01-21 by Colin f
> >The four Aux defintions A-D each have an LED and the button takes you > >through them. Func plus the button (mine;'s blue I think) takes you > >where you wanna go... 8) I've never quite got the terminology straight, probably because F1, F2 and F3 are 'function' keys too. The '
2004-01-21 by boele
on 21-01-2004 14:57, Paul Nagle at softroom@btinternet.com wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:35:46 +0000, Paul Nagle > wrote: > >> Ah, you can't beat a good old-fashioned step sequencer. Except by a >> super-duper new one like the P3. Newsflash - the P3 now streaks past >> the Notr
2004-01-21 by Paul Nagle
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:35:46 +0000, Paul Nagle wrote: >Ah, you can't beat a good old-fashioned step sequencer. Except by a >super-duper new one like the P3. Newsflash - the P3 now streaks past >the Notron and becomes the Number One step sequencer of all time. Moog >960, ARP.. for
2004-01-21 by Robert van der Kamp
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 14:35, Paul Nagle wrote: > For me the DAT comes into play here. > > >It's that bad, that I'm now looking around for a > >multitracker (like the DPS16 I once owned) to make quick > >and good recordings in 24-bit/96k without the need of > > the PC. Swit
2004-01-21 by Robert van der Kamp
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 14:31, Paul.Maddox@synth.Net wrote: > hehe, Im selling my VS1680, ok its not 24bit and its not > 96Khz, but its close :-) Wake up! ;P - Robert
2004-01-21 by Paul Nagle
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:09:10 +0100, Robert van der Kamp wrote: >Same here. When writing music I keep my PC switched off. The >PC is only used when printing to audio, mixing and >mastering is done. Me too. >But now I have a problem. I like to toy around with my new >modular system
2004-01-21 by Robert van der Kamp
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 10:34, Paul.Maddox@synth.Net wrote: > yep, it is, it really does rock, but the rate at which > the new features are being added having it on paper to > hand is essential (I dislike having my PC on whilst > writing music) Same here. When writing music
2004-01-21 by Paul Nagle
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 09:34:16 -0000 (GMT), wrote: >yep, it is, it really does rock, but the rate at which the new features >are being added having it on paper to hand is essential (I dislike having >my PC on whilst writing music) Wimp! Anyway, maybe it's best you simply ignore the
2004-01-21 by Colin f
> yep, it is, it really does rock, but the rate at which the new features > are being added having it on paper to hand is essential (I dislike having > my PC on whilst writing music) The rate of new additions won't stay so high for long. Aside from the aux events, there's not too
2004-01-21 by Paul.Maddox@synth.Net
Robert, > It's that bad, that I'm now looking around for a > multitracker (like the DPS16 I once owned) to make quick > and good recordings in 24-bit/96k without the need of the > PC. Switching on the thing would be a lot cheaper, I > know... hehe, Im selling my VS1680, ok its no
2004-01-21 by Colin f
> Colin, does the Aux edit page has its own reversed 'A' shown > in the LCD, or is that still simply a pattern edit mode? 'Aux edit' mode is just when you have the upper knob function set to CC/aux in pattern edit mode. The key function switch then cycles round the four aux funct
2004-01-21 by Colin f
> will the user guide get updated? No, never ! Bwa, ha ha haa ! Well, actually, yes. When I get round to it. Cheers, Colin f ________________________________________________ Message sent using UebiMiau 2.7.2
2004-01-21 by boele
on 21-01-2004 10:34, Paul.Maddox@synth.Net at Paul.Maddox@synth.Net wrote: > Boele, > >> Hey! Give the guy a minute! :-)))))) > > I do, but I want him to finish so I can get an R3 FREAK! > >> Although I didn't see my P3 in real-life yet, I am 110% sure that it is >> a fantastic s
2004-01-21 by boele
on 21-01-2004 10:08, Paul.Maddox@synth.Net at Paul.Maddox@synth.Net wrote: > Colin, > > > will the user guide get updated? Hey! Give the guy a minute! :-)))))) Although I didn't see my P3 in real-life yet, I am 110% sure that it is a fantastic sequencer, due to a fantastic mr. C.
2004-01-21 by Paul.Maddox@synth.Net
Boele, > Hey! Give the guy a minute! :-)))))) I do, but I want him to finish so I can get an R3 > Although I didn't see my P3 in real-life yet, I am 110% sure that it is > a fantastic sequencer, due to a fantastic mr. C. Fraser! yep, it is, it really does rock, but the rate at wh
2004-01-21 by Robert van der Kamp
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 01:40, colinfraser_com wrote: > The initial set of events are mainly there to test the > event handling routines and user interface. > Mr Nagle and I have a long list of possibilities that > will fry your brains, so I'll break them to you gently. > Th
2004-01-21 by Paul.Maddox@synth.Net
Colin, will the user guide get updated? Paul > Folks, > > I've uploaded the latest beta P3 firmware to Yahoo files. > This version adds "auxiliary events". More on this in a moment, but > first... > Despite trying to avoid doing so, I found the memory layout was > getting a littl
2004-01-20 by colinfraser_com
Folks, I've uploaded the latest beta P3 firmware to Yahoo files. This version adds "auxiliary events". More on this in a moment, but first... Despite trying to avoid doing so, I found the memory layout was getting a little bit too complicated to work with, so I have rationalised
2004-01-20 by Sayer
Awesome going Robert! Boele owes you a new pair of underwear!! :) Sayer --- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, Robert van der Kamp wrote: > On Monday 19 January 2004 17:02, Colin f wrote: > > > Very odd. There's obviously some interaction going on > > there. It could be a bre
2004-01-20 by boele
on 19-01-2004 20:05, Colin f at colin@colinfraser.com wrote: >> GOT IT! > > Cool. :-) > >> One of the pins of the IC socket of one of the multiplexers >> of the upper pot board needed a drop of solder. > > Ack. My bad. Sorry. > >> P3 now behaves as expected. :) > > Hopefully with
2004-01-19 by Robert van der Kamp
On Monday 19 January 2004 17:02, Colin f wrote: > Very odd. There's obviously some interaction going on > there. It could be a break in the power connections to > the pots, or something like that. Some time spent with > the schematics of the pot board and a continuity tester > co
2004-01-19 by Colin f
> GOT IT! Cool. :-) > One of the pins of the IC socket of one of the multiplexers > of the upper pot board needed a drop of solder. Ack. My bad. Sorry. > P3 now behaves as expected. :) Hopefully with the exception of the random modes. Cheers, Colin f
2004-01-19 by boele
on 19-01-2004 17:40, Colin f at colin@colinfraser.com wrote: I still have a XT, Q+ and Pulse (and a WAVE temporarily from Till Kopper). I am very curious if I will still like them after building up the studio again. They have to compete with an A6, P3 and Evolver now. Ha!!
2004-01-19 by Colin f
> its one of the reasons I never bought one.. Let's see you get manufacturer support on a PPG then... ;-) Colin f ________________________________________________ Message sent using UebiMiau 2.7.2
2004-01-19 by Paul.Maddox@synth.Net
Colin, > Let's see you get manufacturer support on a PPG then... ;-) hehe, thats me :-) paul
2004-01-19 by Colin f
> I have a new contender: step #11 now produces unwanted > events, while #9 and #13 are still with us. That's three > pots. Very odd. There's obviously some interaction going on there. It could be a break in the power connections to the pots, or something like that. Some time spe
2004-01-19 by Paul Nagle
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:45:17 +0100, Robert van der Kamp wrote: >One reason why I sold all my Waldorf synths. Me too.... 8-( Paul --- Paul Nagle - SoftRoom Music - www.softroom.co.uk Bogus Focus Records - www.BogusFocus.com
2004-01-19 by Robert van der Kamp
On Monday 19 January 2004 16:20, boele wrote: > on 19-01-2004 15:52, Colin f at colin@colinfraser.com > wrote: > > He Robert, > > Try this kind of support with Waldorf... One reason why I sold all my Waldorf synths. - Robert
2004-01-19 by Robert van der Kamp
Did some more research. The Velo pots of step 1-7 seem stable. They just work. Velo pot 8 is stable when the velo value is > 25. The moment it hits the 25 value, I get interrupting messages from pot #9. Weird...
2004-01-19 by Robert van der Kamp
On Monday 19 January 2004 15:52, Colin f wrote: > > If it's the pot, we would have 2 bad pots now. Both > > pot #9 and #13 are still involved. Isn't it very > > unlikely to have two bad pots? > > Yeah, it does seem a bit less likely. > Pot 9 is on 4051 input 0, and pot 13 is on i
2004-01-19 by boele
on 19-01-2004 15:52, Colin f at colin@colinfraser.com wrote: He Robert, Try this kind of support with Waldorf... :-)))) Boele >> If it's the pot, we would have 2 bad pots now. Both pot #9 >> and #13 are still involved. Isn't it very unlikely to have >> two bad pots? > > Yeah, it
2004-01-19 by Paul.Maddox@synth.Net
Hi, >>One reason why I sold all my Waldorf synths. > > Me too.... 8-( its one of the reasons I never bought one.. Paul
2004-01-19 by Colin f
> If it's the pot, we would have 2 bad pots now. Both pot #9 > and #13 are still involved. Isn't it very unlikely to have > two bad pots? Yeah, it does seem a bit less likely. Pot 9 is on 4051 input 0, and pot 13 is on input 4, which means there's only 1 bit on the address select
2004-01-19 by Paul.Maddox@synth.Net
Robert, > Did some more research. The Velo pots of step 1-7 seem > stable. They just work. > > Velo pot 8 is stable when the velo value is > 25. The moment > it hits the 25 value, I get interrupting messages from pot > #9. Weird... This smacks of a bad joint somewhere, it really
2004-01-19 by Robert van der Kamp
On Monday 19 January 2004 15:22, Paul.Maddox@synth.Net wrote: > just a thought.. > I had a problemw tih mine, it kept showing step9, as > constantly changing. I couldn't adjust any of the other > values and it just showed '9' all the time.. Looks like my problem! > I resoldered t