Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 33 of 329 · 16407 messages matched

Anyone had a problem with port0.3 ?

2006-04-03 by sam_pr

When port0.3 is set as output, when writing 0 to that bit the ouput goes 0 , but, when writing 1 it seems that it becomes either input or tristate so it

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] I2C speed problem.

2006-04-03 by George M. Gallant, Jr.

Does anyone know the max voltage that can be applied to a Olimex LPC2214 board. The schematic labels the input as +5V which is regulated to 3.3. Thanks, George

Thread view Attachments: 0

Not Getting Endpoint0 Interrupt

2006-04-03 by Saritha S

Hello, We are developing teh USB HID and Core driver on Olimex LPC2148 board. The USB ISR is getting the Reset and Connection Change interrupts, but the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] LPC2800

2006-04-03 by Martin Maurer

... But it seems to be a BGA... I can t solder BGAs :-( Or at least i have not tried it. Hopefully there are eval boards soon. Regards, Martin

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] LPC2800

2006-04-03 by Leon Heller

... From: slawcus To: Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 10:27 AM Subject: [lpc2000] LPC2800 ... Interesting. I d

Thread view Attachments: 0

LPC2800

2006-04-03 by slawcus

http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/news/content/file_1228.html Comments?

Thread view Attachments: 0

How to get the Machine Type?

2006-04-03 by volunteer_sysu

Hi, I am trying to write a bootloader for a development kit based on LPC2210. I have read some documents, from which I got to know I had to initialize the

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2000] Re: C Code Error Help

2006-04-03 by Michael Anton

... ... Static limits the scope of the function to the source module it is defined in. I m not sure why it would fix your problem, other than there

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2000] Re: C Code Error Help

2006-04-03 by Robert Adsett

... It sounds almost like he s got a copy of the function in a header file. Dewayne, See if you can reduce the problem to a single file of a few lines. If the

Thread view Attachments: 0

eclipse error

2006-04-03 by Wade A Smith

I used the tutorial from NewMicros on how to add C/C++ to Eclipse (ver 3.0). It worked. Something has changed over the last 6 months and now I get this error

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2000] Re: C Code Error Help

2006-04-03 by Robert Adsett

... int x( int y[]); and int x( int *y); are substantially similar. The first form allows some additional type checking and if the following form int x(int

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2000] Re: C Code Error Help

2006-04-03 by Michael Anton

... Well, you really shouldn t try to pass the array. Usually one would pass a pointer to the array. It s also possible that clear is a name already used by

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: C Code Error Help

2006-04-03 by heedaf

... error. ... is ... would ... ***************************************************** ****************************************************** I put static in

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: C Code Error Help

2006-04-02 by heedaf

... Still doesn t work. I can compile ok but it gives me an error on the bracket under the function call. Does it have anything to do with passing an array?

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2000] C Code Error Help

2006-04-02 by Michael Anton

... Make sure you have a function prototype somewhere before the function definition, and before you call it. i.e.: void clear(int, SAMPLE); I hope

Thread view Attachments: 0

C Code Error Help

2006-04-02 by heedaf

I m getting the following error in CrossWorks multiple definition of `clear when I try and run the following code. Does anyone have any suggestions?

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: assembly tutorials

2006-04-02 by Eric Engler

... Looks like a good assembler, but he doesn t support the standard ARM syntax, either :-( Eric

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] Re: assembly tutorials

2006-04-02 by clemens fischer

... have a look at http://sun.hasenbraten.de/~frank/ and from there it s: http://sun.hasenbraten.de/vasm/ this work is copyrighted, but you can download the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: a matter of taste?

2006-04-02 by clemens fischer

... in the old days USENET was transported over UUCP, which changed to NNTP over TCP/IP nowadays. SMTP has nothing to do with it. the netiquette has more to

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2000] LEGO NXT is ARM7

2006-04-02 by Paul Curtis

Hi Ralph, ... Well, I entered for the 100-off let s evaluate NXT kits, and would have been perfectly happy in producing a plug-in package for CrossWorks for

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] LEGO NXT is ARM7

2006-04-02 by Ralph Hempel

... And I guess it s not too much of a secret that I was one of the original 4 Mindstorms User Panel members. Feb 2006 Wired. I ll be able to talk more about

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] OpenOCD Data aborts

2006-04-02 by Dominic Rath

Hello, some data aborts are ok, they re just a result of GDB trying to unwind the stack information when there actually isn t a stack frame. These shouldn t

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: a matter of taste?

2006-04-02 by jayasooriah

I tend start with a top-post in this forum because of how the simple view works on the web interface. ... That is what I thought top-posting meant. I know

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] Re: a matter of taste?

2006-04-01 by Tom Walsh

... That is not correct , top-posting is out-of-context replying and difficult to figure out what you are specifically responding to. Normal netiquette is to

Thread view Attachments: 0

OpenOCD Data aborts

2006-04-01 by yugandhar_vasi

I am unable to debug the programs properly using Open OCD and Olimex cable + Olimex 2148 board. I get a lot of these messages when debugging. Sometimes it just

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: a matter of taste?

2006-04-01 by rtstofer

... The quoted material provides context. I don t receive email from any Yahoo group (by choice) and looking backwards in a thread is not convenient from the

Thread view Attachments: 0

a matter of taste?

2006-04-01 by clemens fischer

people, could you please shrub off the quoted material of previous posts? i tend to rush over this high-volume list and tag interesting messages. then i save

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2000] LEGO NXT is ARM7

2006-04-01 by Paul Curtis

...but only if you can reprogram the kit in native code (like the H8-based brick). I suspect that Lego won t close the design and will allow replacement

Thread view Attachments: 0

LEGO NXT is ARM7

2006-04-01 by rtstofer

According to an article on page 67 of the April 2006 SERVO magazine, LEGO NXT is an ARM7. This is going to make a lot of programmers very happy! Preorders

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: For C Experts

2006-03-31 by dsidlauskas1

Paul, You re not the first one to say I was nuts :-). However, it might help with my recovery if you coulld elaborate a bit. Thanks, Dave S.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] I2C speed problem.

2006-03-31 by Ake Hedman, eurosource

... I have some working code for the LPC2128 and the 24LC512 which I can mail you if you contact me off list. Also available here (eeprom.c)

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: For C novices

2006-03-31 by garycordelli

Yes, indeed. In fact, portable communications code often includes functions (or macro equivalents) that -- assuming the external comms is, like TCP, undertaken

Thread view Attachments: 0

I2C speed problem.

2006-03-31 by punkandsska123

I. I am currently developping an I2C protocol to talk with a 24LC512 memory. My problem is that I can write to memory without any problem but when I want to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] Re: For C novices

2006-03-31 by Robert Adsett

... ... Amen. Do it right, save yourself future headaches. Separate the communications format from the internal structure. Even if they happen to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.