Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 36 of 329 · 16407 messages matched

re: auto baud for HID application

2006-03-30 by Jayasooriah

Correction: the requirement is for two-phase protocol (like AT command) and not single phase as stated in the original post. Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:35:53

Thread view Attachments: 0

re: auto baud for HID application

2006-03-30 by Jayasooriah

Hello, I am looking for auto baud implementations for HID purposes that meet the most/all of the following requirements: a) single phase protocol (like AT

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] LIN on LPC2129

2006-03-29 by Duke Whisky

Hello, There is a simple tip to generate the 13-bit break without having to implement external glue logic. The LIN bus operates at know (an relatively low)

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] LIN on LPC2129

2006-03-29 by Tennessee Carmel-Veilleux

... The LPC2129 is not able to do LIN with its UART unless you use other pins and glue logic to be able to generate the BREAK signal (13 bits) and implement an

Thread view Attachments: 0

New file uploaded to lpc2000

2006-03-29 by lpc2000@yahoogroups.com

Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the lpc2000 group. File :

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: ARM halfword bugs?

2006-03-29 by brendanmurphy37

Roger, I d actually pretty much agree with most of what you say. I didn t mean to suggest there was any harm in learning assembler, just that there is no need

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: ARM halfword bugs?

2006-03-29 by roger_lynx

... I beg to differ, since the recently posted messages about writing stub for ISR handling of GNU complier may just be an argument for knowing and

Thread view Attachments: 0

LIN on LPC2129

2006-03-29 by alberto

Hi guys, Has someone developed a Local interconect network on LPC2129? There is somewhere a simple LIN stack? Thanks in advance Alberto

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] Re: ARM halfword bugs?

2006-03-29 by Peter Jakacki

Hi Brendan, Yep, that s the point I m at as I have had several other episodes in the past all revolving the halfword access. All the standard stuff with

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: ARM halfword bugs?

2006-03-29 by brendanmurphy37

Peter, Point taken. My own point was directed mroe at Jerome, who seems to want to go from an all- C environment to one with more assembler. No problem, if

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Free Forth for LPC2xxx

2006-03-29 by Stephen Pelc

... Blush! Thanks. For the last five or six years we ve done all our new manuals using a literate programming system called DocGen. All documentation be put

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: ARM halfword bugs?

2006-03-29 by Jayasooriah

Hi Peter, Your problem is interesting. I lived through a few halfword bugs similar to yours and the source in all of these cases turned out to be either

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] Re: ARM halfword bugs?

2006-03-29 by Peter Jakacki

This bit of assembler code is a very simple quick & dirty routine as far as assembler goes. I don t have any problem coding in ARM assembler or any assembler

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: ARM halfword bugs?

2006-03-29 by brendanmurphy37

Jerome/Peter, I think the example below is a very good illustration of why it s best not to bother with assembler at all, if you can avoid it. Unless you re

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] Re: contiiki for LPC

2006-03-29 by Ake Hedman, eurosource

... You are not making this a lot easier for me guys? ;-) /Ake -- ... Ake Hedman (YAP - Yet Another Programmer) eurosource, Brattbergavagen 17, 820 50 LOS,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] Re: contiiki for LPC

2006-03-29 by Ake Hedman, eurosource

... Tha sound very similar to Contiki and very good to me. Can you say anything about RAM usage? /Ake -- ... Ake Hedman (YAP - Yet Another Programmer)

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2000] Re: contiiki for LPC

2006-03-29 by Joel Winarske

... One other point, you can achieve cleaner event driven code using an RTOS. Some RTOS s leave FIQ untouched for user independent code, so it can be used to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] Re: contiiki for LPC

2006-03-29 by FreeRTOS Info

... Take a look here: http://www.freertos.org/taskandcr.html, and here: http://www.freertos.org/croutine.html. I think this covers your questions. My worry

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2000] Re: contiiki for LPC

2006-03-29 by Joel Winarske

Hi Ake, I was just typing response when Richard replied. My point was stack consumption was the biggest difference. Although I was under the incorrect

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] Re: contiiki for LPC

2006-03-29 by FreeRTOS Info

... Below are two figures obtained from the linker file using the IAR compiler. The first has all optional components removed, the second has all optional

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] Re: contiiki for LPC

2006-03-29 by Ake Hedman, eurosource

... Sorry for not responding right away but a flue caught me. :-( For most of my work I don t like to add the complexity of a RT-kernel. Something like

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] ARM halfword bugs?

2006-03-29 by 42Bastian Schick

... Even though I might sound nitpicking: It is you not u and your not ur . Reading English for non-native English-speaking is hard anyway. So please do

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] ARM halfword bugs?

2006-03-29 by jk jlkj

Hi Peter, Ur code sure looks complex with all the assembly code. To tell u the truth i cant understand a single line of it. I am currenty working on a project

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Free Forth for LPC2xxx

2006-03-29 by Eric Engler

... Wow, your documentation is the best I ve seen for any Forth system. I m sorry that I don t have time to try it now, but judging from the manual I m sure

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Free Forth for LPC2xxx

2006-03-29 by rtstofer

... In the early days of Bill Gates Basic (and many other varieties, before and after) it was common to use the interpreter as a command line calculator.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Free Forth for LPC2xxx

2006-03-29 by Stephen Pelc

... Forgot: 3) You must use REALS to enable floating point. Which leads to: a) I really must read our manuals more thoroughly, even though they are derived

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Free Forth for LPC2xxx

2006-03-29 by Stephen Pelc

... Two things: 1) bug, fixed, new version going up in ten minutes! 2) The format of floats requires numbers like 1.234e0 and you need F+ to add and F. to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] LPC2129 RAM

2006-03-28 by roby

i m 2k over, i use uVision3 from arm ... From: Joel Winarske To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 1:25 AM Subject: RE: [lpc2000] LPC2129

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] LPC2129 RAM

2006-03-28 by roby

thanks joel but before to change the processor i want to tried all ways. thanks ... From: Joel Winarske To: lpc2000@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 29,

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2000] LPC2129 RAM

2006-03-28 by Joel Winarske

... Same deal for a full J1939 implementation. LPC2292/LPC2294 has external memory bus, or the upcoming LPC23xx has more RAM. Joel

Thread view Attachments: 0

LPC2129 RAM

2006-03-28 by roby

Hello everyone, i m making a can application with CanOpen full library on LPC2129 i don t have enough RAM space. On board i don t have the bus for an extern

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2000] Something different...

2006-03-28 by Paul Curtis

Cortex-M3 is Thumb-2 yes, but more than that it s v7M. Thumb-2 has been around for a little in the GNU toolchain. Compilation is only half the story. v7M and

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.