Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 69 of 307 · 15341 messages matched

Re: HOLY crap BATMAN!

2008-10-08 by stevech11

What I've read is that this is a hostile take over attempt, because Atmel's board previously rejected the offers from the two companies in pursuit (neither of which actually have the assets to consummate the deal, per the reports). Atmel has been struggling, financially, with tur

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: HOLY SHIT BATMAN!

2008-10-07 by Zack Widup

On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Leon wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "harmon,jr sicat" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 3:42 AM > Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: HOLY SHIT BATMAN! > > >> Just curious, Leon i've been reading your messages and something keeps >> popping up my

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: HOLY SHIT BATMAN!

2008-10-07 by Leon

----- Original Message ----- From: "harmon,jr sicat" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 3:42 AM Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: HOLY SHIT BATMAN! > Just curious, Leon i've been reading your messages and something keeps > popping up my mind. > Are you working for Microchip? No, but I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: HOLY SHIT BATMAN!

2008-10-07 by harmon,jr sicat

Just curious, Leon i've been reading your messages and something keeps popping up my mind. Are you working for Microchip? ----- Original Message ---- From: Leon To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, October 5, 2008 2:59:05 AM Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: HOLY SHIT BATMAN! ---

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: HOLY SHIT BATMAN!

2008-10-04 by Leon

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Parham" To: Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 7:29 PM Subject: [AVR-Chat] Re: HOLY SHIT BATMAN! >> "Microchip has a proven reputation for enabling low-risk product >> development, lower total system cost, faster time to market and >> outst

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: HOLY SHIT BATMAN!

2008-10-04 by Bruce Parham

> "Microchip has a proven reputation for enabling low-risk product > development, lower total system cost, faster time to market and > outstanding customer service for thousands of diverse customer > applications worldwide spanning the automotive, communications, > computing, con

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] new member + Re: HOLY SHIT BATMAN!

2008-10-04 by paul sinclair

Hi Zack, Thats some interesting stuff. I also enjoy photography, (digital mainly) yea, i never did like assembly, always liked c, been programming in C since i was 13 or 14, then i gout out of it for a few years, and then i decided to get back into it with the micro controllers.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] new member + Re: HOLY SHIT BATMAN!

2008-10-04 by Zack Widup

I don't know if there is a "proper" way to learn. I started working with microcontrollers some years ago. My first was the Z80. Remember the ARRL Microcontroller project? I eventually picked up the 8051 and 8085 for projects. All my programs were written in the respective assembl

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Microchip sent a proposal to acquire Atmel :(

2008-10-04 by Bob Paddock

On Friday 03 October 2008 07:37:14 pm Xiaofan Chen wrote: > And if the bid is successful, the AVR user can have a more stable > supplier and not worry about product obsolescence. In my previous > job, our German counterpart are using AVR almost exclusively > but was burned when A

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] new member + Re: HOLY SHIT BATMAN!

2008-10-04 by paul sinclair

Hi Eiric, That was one of the main reasons i got into the chips (amateur radio) but i haven't really gotten around to teaching myself the little things properly! 73 Paul - EI5GTB On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Eric Rabinowitz wrote: > Hi, > I just joined the avrchat list. It is

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] HOLY SHIT BATMAN!

2008-10-04 by Xiaofan Chen

On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Leon wrote: >> And nothing for the PIC compares to avr-gcc. > > The dsPIC and PIC24 use gcc. There is a free version of C18 for the PC18, > it's a good compiler. > No need to worry about AVR and avr-gcc. You can still use them after Microchip owns

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Microchip sent a proposal to acquire Atmel :(

2008-10-03 by Xiaofan Chen

On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Zack Widup wrote: > > There are actually a few applications where I use a PIC instead of an AVR > (the 10F200 is nice). > > IF Atmel gets bought out, it would be stupid for them to discontinue AVR's > though. When a product is selling, you don't s

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Microchip sent a proposal to acquire Atmel :(

2008-10-03 by Zack Widup

There are actually a few applications where I use a PIC instead of an AVR (the 10F200 is nice). IF Atmel gets bought out, it would be stupid for them to discontinue AVR's though. When a product is selling, you don't stop making it. Hopefully the only thing that might come out of

Thread view Attachments: 0

new member + Re: HOLY SHIT BATMAN!

2008-10-03 by Eric Rabinowitz

Hi, I just joined the avrchat list. It is great to see some hams are using the list! I am using mostly Atmega168's for automotive and amateur radio applications. fyi: I am developing with the GNU toolset on a mac. Regards, Eric Linn Rabinowitz eric.rabinowitz \_a_t_/ gmail.com 41

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] HOLY SHIT BATMAN!

2008-10-03 by Leon

----- Original Message ----- From: "David Kelly" To: Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 4:27 PM Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] HOLY SHIT BATMAN! > On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 03:40:38PM +0100, Leon wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "David VanHorn" >> To: >> Sent: Friday, October 0

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] HOLY SHIT BATMAN!

2008-10-03 by David Kelly

On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 03:40:38PM +0100, Leon wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David VanHorn" > To: > Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 3:16 PM > Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] HOLY SHIT BATMAN! > > > >> What? From the company whose tools run in a 16 bit DOS box with > >> my

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] HOLY SHIT BATMAN!

2008-10-03 by Leon

----- Original Message ----- From: "David VanHorn" To: Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 3:16 PM Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] HOLY SHIT BATMAN! >> What? From the company whose tools run in a 16 bit DOS box with >> mysterious configuration parameters hidden inside undocumented binary >> p

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] HOLY SHIT BATMAN!

2008-10-03 by David VanHorn

> What? From the company whose tools run in a 16 bit DOS box with > mysterious configuration parameters hidden inside undocumented binary > project files which have the full DOS pathname for every file you use > making the project non-portable not even to another directory on the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Procyon AVRlib website down?

2008-10-03 by bsasuxs

sm5glc thanks for the help. Love this forum. --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "sm5glc" wrote: > > A quick session with Google came up with: > http://darkice.byus.net/data/avr/avrlib.zip > http://files.smartprogramming.de/avrlib.zip > > Links are tested! > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogro

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Procyon AVRlib website down?

2008-10-03 by sm5glc

A quick session with Google came up with: http://darkice.byus.net/data/avr/avrlib.zip http://files.smartprogramming.de/avrlib.zip Links are tested! --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "bsasuxs" wrote: > > I've been trying to download the Procyon AVRlib file from > http://hubbard.eng

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] HOLY SHIT BATMAN!

2008-10-03 by David Kelly

On Oct 2, 2008, at 2:51 PM, Dave VanHorn wrote: > Seriously, it's possible that they will keep the AVR, and give us > tools that work, and real support! What? From the company whose tools run in a 16 bit DOS box with mysterious configuration parameters hidden inside undocumented

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Microchip sent a proposal to acquire Atmel :(

2008-10-02 by Bruce Parham

ON semi strikes again! I wish those people would stop trying to buy up everything... Bruce Anurag Chugh wrote: > Hey guys, > > This might not be the place for such a discussion, but still.. > > check this press release: > > http://www.microchip.com/stellent/idcplg?IdcService=SS_G

Thread view Attachments: 0

HOLY SHIT BATMAN!

2008-10-02 by Dave VanHorn

HOLY SHIT BATMAN! http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=210605267 LONDON — Microchip Technology Inc. and ON Semiconductor Corp. are combining forces in an attempt to acquire Atmel Corp. in a deal that values the latter at $2.3 billion. Microchip is leadin

Thread view Attachments: 0

Microchip sent a proposal to acquire Atmel :(

2008-10-02 by Anurag Chugh

Hey guys, This might not be the place for such a discussion, but still.. check this press release: http://www.microchip.com/stellent/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&nodeId=2018&mcparam=en537485 I hope that this doesn't happen... Atmel surely doesn't need it, I am sure its not doing

Thread view Attachments: 0

Procyon AVRlib website down?

2008-09-30 by bsasuxs

I've been trying to download the Procyon AVRlib file from http://hubbard.engr.scu.edu/embedded/avr/avrlib. The website appears to be down. Also tried http://www.mil.ufl.edu/~chrisarnold/components/microcontrollerBoard/AVR/ avrlib/avrlib.zip. No luck. Anybody got a copy?

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] AVR-GCC on Ubuntu

2008-09-28 by Dave Hylands

Hi Mike, On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 9:04 PM, brewski922 wrote: > Is anyone using AVR-GCC on a Linux computer. Better yet on a Ubuntu v. > 8.04 operating system? > > If so how did you get it setup to work. I'm using Gutsy Gibbon (7.04) and I did: sudo apt-get install gcc-avr You can

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AVR-GCC on Ubuntu

2008-09-28 by brewski922

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "brewski922" wrote: > > Is anyone using AVR-GCC on a Linux computer. Better yet on a Ubuntu v. > 8.04 operating system? > > If so how did you get it setup to work. > > I do have GCC C working. I would like to start using GCC on Ubuntu and > break

Thread view Attachments: 0

AVR-GCC on Ubuntu

2008-09-28 by brewski922

Is anyone using AVR-GCC on a Linux computer. Better yet on a Ubuntu v. 8.04 operating system? If so how did you get it setup to work. I do have GCC C working. I would like to start using GCC on Ubuntu and break my chains to Windows more. Mike Bronosky

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Communication between 2 Atmel microcontrollers

2008-09-27 by Dao Viet Dung

Some AVRs have 2 UART such as ATMEGA162, ATMEGA128. I think they are the easiest way for you. --- On Sun, 9/28/08, Yingdan wrote: From: Yingdan Subject: [AVR-Chat] Re: Communication between 2 Atmel microcontrollers To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Date: Sunday, September 28, 2008, 1:

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Communication between 2 Atmel microcontrollers

2008-09-27 by Zack Widup

Hi Yingdan, You need to learn about I2C interfaces. You can find data at the Atmel and AVRFreaks sites on this as well as other places. Zack On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Yingdan wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am new to here and this is my first post. And I am totally new to > circuitry. > >

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Communication between 2 Atmel microcontrollers

2008-09-27 by Edy Gunawan

It depends your own goal, priorities, situation, and constraints, there are many kind of interfaces AVR family provide: 1. SPI 2. TWI 3. UART 4. USB -> AT90USBxx 5. Wireless connectivity with IEEE802.15.4, ZigBee, 6LoWPAN http://www.atmel.com/products/zigbee/ Inside Atmel AVR Stu

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Communication between 2 Atmel microcontrollers

2008-09-27 by Gavin Dingley

I don't know if ATMELs AVR series have this, but I would think a CAN bus would be a good option. The coms bus its self is usually a length of coax lead terminated at the end with (usually) 50ohms to stop reflections, then any additional microcontrollers are just tagged on with (f

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Communication between 2 Atmel microcontrollers

2008-09-27 by Leon

----- Original Message ----- From: "Yingdan" To: Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 6:42 PM Subject: [AVR-Chat] Communication between 2 Atmel microcontrollers > Hi everyone, > > I am new to here and this is my first post. And I am totally new to > circuitry. > > I only had experien

Thread view Attachments: 0

Communication between 2 Atmel microcontrollers

2008-09-26 by Yingdan

Hi everyone, I am new to here and this is my first post. And I am totally new to circuitry. I only had experience of sending and receiving data between a computer and a microcontroller. I want to learn how 2 atmel microcontrollers communicate. The scenario is like this: A microco

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: 644P bootloader and uploader

2008-09-25 by stevech11

Tried BLIPS (download from AVRfreaks). It uses the same chip IDs as are stored within Atmel's XML part files that install with AVR studio. Blips searches the XML files. --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Roger Arrick" wrote: > > Getting a serial bootloader to work on the 644p has

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: 644P bootloader and uploader

2008-09-24 by John Samperi

At 08:16 AM 25/09/2008, you wrote: >Is there not any standardized serial bootloader/uploader program for >the 644P or other newer models? Possibly. Here is a longish thread about a C boot-loader. http://www.avrfreaks.net/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=60893&highlight=bo

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] 644P bootloader and uploader

2008-09-24 by John Samperi

At 07:01 AM 25/09/2008, you wrote: >However they are only accessible for newer chips in boot-loader mode. ...and of course there nothing stopping you from programming the signature bytes in yourself, just not as nice as being able to read them directly from the chip. Regards John

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] 644P bootloader and uploader

2008-09-24 by John Samperi

At 12:03 AM 25/09/2008, you wrote: >Where are the 1-byte Device Type codes listed for all the various >CPUs? I would not try and use those older type of device codes. Atmel has not issued any more for newer devices and therefore AVRPROG is no longer maintained. I think I have a l

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: 644P bootloader and uploader

2008-09-24 by Roger Arrick

> >Where are the 1-byte Device Type codes listed for all the various > >CPUs? > > I would not try and use those older type of device codes. > Atmel has not issued any more for newer devices and therefore > AVRPROG is no longer maintained. > > I think I have a list for the last lo

Thread view Attachments: 0

644P bootloader and uploader

2008-09-24 by Roger Arrick

Getting a serial bootloader to work on the 644p has been harder than writing the application code :) I'm using a modified version of Design Note #032 bootloader written in assembly and made a section for the 644P plus fixed some issues with Def file. There is no name on it, but i

Thread view Attachments: 0

Reader for Blink cards

2008-09-23 by avrx123456789

I want to build a reader for Blink cards, and other contact-less credit cards. I think they're ISO 14443 RFID compliant. I looked at AVR's web site on the subject, and I'm not clear on what frequency of radio I need, or what the development kit options are. Can anyone recommend a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: WinAVR-20080610 header Bug?

2008-09-21 by Bruce Parham

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Don Kinzer" wrote: > > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Bruce Parham" wrote: > > Is this a bug or should I keep reading? > I don't see that in my copy. Perhaps I edited it but I don't recall > doing so. > > The definitions for the vectors of the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: WinAVR-20080610 header Bug?

2008-09-21 by Don Kinzer

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Bruce Parham" wrote: > Is this a bug or should I keep reading? I don't see that in my copy. Perhaps I edited it but I don't recall doing so. The definitions for the vectors of the second UART are contained in the "else" part of a conditional wher

Thread view Attachments: 0

WinAVR-20080610 header Bug?

2008-09-21 by Bruce Parham

All, I just installed Studio 4.14 and WinAVR 20080610 on my home machine for a personal project I have in mind using an ATmega324P. I've never used WinAVR before so I've been doing a lot of reading to get up on the curve and, while reading through some of the header files, I foun

Thread view Attachments: 0

Atmega to 45DB161 Interface

2008-09-20 by Moataz Hussein

I am trying to interface 45DB161D to ATmega 16 using the SPI, I have went through many documentation and material. My problem is that I am not able to get it work, I started by sending $9F to read device ID. I checked the program and started debuging it again on AVR Studio, and n

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: OT: Beadboarding SO chips

2008-09-19 by Stefan Wimmer

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Stevej" wrote: > > One more question to some of you older guys (like me). What power > magnification do you use to be able to see the leads to solder to them? For the coarse grained parts (like SOICs, TQFPs, 1206s, etc.) I use a stereo microscope

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: OT: Beadboarding SO chips

2008-09-19 by Leon

----- Original Message ----- From: "Sander Pool" To: Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 5:34 PM Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: OT: Beadboarding SO chips > > The easiest time I ever had soldering a bunch of SMDs was when I used a > stereo microscope in the lab of the company I worked a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.