RE: [Digital BW] Image Density vs. Print Size
2004-04-13 by Tom Baker
Just one comment. If it LOOKS different, is IS different. So, compensate for the looks so that the different sizes look like what you want. It s all about
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 1314 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2004-04-13 by Tom Baker
Just one comment. If it LOOKS different, is IS different. So, compensate for the looks so that the different sizes look like what you want. It s all about
2004-04-13 by Glenn Barry
Hi all, I Asked some weeks ago for suggestions on B&W inksets suitable for the 3000, but before I bought any ink I wnated to test that everythng was working
2004-04-13 by hogarth
It s not just psychological. It s also physiological as well. Remember, the human eye is adaptive. The iris is always on the move, adjusting the amount of
2004-04-13 by Roger L Sopher
I agree, there is some psycho-visual thing that if you listen to it tells you when to stop going larger. When I was using a wet dark room I rarely enlarged
2004-04-13 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Actually, it s perceptual (which makes it both psychological in the traditional sense and a physical perceptual effect). This is a field of psychology my
2004-04-13 by mkitei
some of my prints look terrific. Others, especially landscapes, are a problem. Here s an example. The shot is in Big Bend Nat l Park. In the foreground are
2004-04-13 by Truman Prevatt
It probably is psychological. I remember Adams talking about the optimal size for a print for impact - bigger is not always better. I think it has to do with
2004-04-13 by Don M
Actually, image capture is on topic: Please only post messages and questions relating to making B&W (monochrome) prints using digital techniques. This may
2004-04-12 by Paul D. DeRocco
... I do it on semi-gloss, and it works for me. Since I m making test prints, I generally don t get around to making the second print until the first one has
2004-04-12 by Paul D. DeRocco
... That sounds fishy to me. There may be some psychological effect at work, but resizing an image shouldn t change the average brightness of it when printed.
2004-04-12 by Clayton Jones
Hello Jim, ... Sounds interesting. Do you have a web site where some of these images can be seen? When you say C82 with MIS do you mean the UT EZ ink set?
2004-04-12 by bobphoto
I have come to the conclusion that when making a test print you have to take a section of an image and print it full size rather than re-sizing the whole image
2004-04-12 by Paul Roark
Deane, See if the curves on my website work. See http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/UT2-curves.html Note the funky instructions on the downloading. My ISP is not
2004-04-12 by Paul Roark
Don, I ve only used the Oyster paper in the 1280 & 1290. So, I don t have any special settings or workflow for the C84. Just try it with the standard
2004-04-12 by Paul Roark
... That Canon EF 1.8 II is an amazingly good and cheap lens. And for medium telephoto, my old manual focus Tamron 90 macro beat my Canon 85 1.2 L (from 2.8
2004-04-12 by deanecurtin
I just purchased the UT2 inkset intending to use Eboni ink on Ilford Pearl paper with Paul s Photoshop curves. However, after downloading the curves folder
2004-04-12 by sp2
I think if you try on matte paper it may work, but when I have tried on semi or gloss the ink smears. ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2004-04-12 by Ernst Dinkla
... This is the rangefinder with the M mount Leica compatible lenses, not the Konica Hexar Silver with the fixed lens. http://www.robertwhite.co.uk/ So UK
2004-04-12 by Daniel Staver
... Hahnemüle Photo Rag 308gsm is available in that size. That s what I use when I make prints for sale. Ilford Smooth Pearl is also available in super A3,
2004-04-12 by Mark Hahn
heck, even a Canon Rebel with a good prime lens will shoot terrific b&w... all this talk of niche rangefinder cameras is just about what some people like
2004-04-12 by Paul D. DeRocco
... You should have no problems, especially since making a piece of paper yellowish only puts a tiny bit of ink on it, so drying time isn t an issue. I haven t
2004-04-12 by HPA
Hello, my question is about reproducing old maps. Can I scan an old blank piece of yellowed paper in RGB and print it on a 2200, then run the sheet through
2004-04-12 by Richard Smallfield
Hi, I d like to produce super A3 prints, but I ve only come across Epson in New Zealand who sell paper in this size. If anyone can suggest alternatives, I d
2004-04-12 by wolarsky
I have both the 1270 and 1280. I tested the 1270 with UT2 and found that the 1280 gives significantly better results. The problem with the 1270 and
2004-04-12 by Roger Smith
DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.comRBSmih4/12/04 8:02 AM1/03/2004DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.comrbsmith252@comcast.ne t ... This is just
2004-04-12 by Steve Kale
The manual feeder is a no-brainer push the lever down, feed the paper, push up the lever and then press the paper feed button. How hard is that? If you
2004-04-12 by Don
... choice. ... Thanks Tom, I appreciate your suggestion. Ol Don in Broken Arrow
2004-04-12 by Don
... they ve ... Thanks Paul, I m using an Epson 2200 usually in the BO mode for now. Within hours I ll be dabbling with a C-84 and EZ Neutrals. Happen to have
2004-04-12 by Don M
... OK, it s a deal. Thank you for the reply, Paul. I still have to get off the fence and buy the printer. -Don M
2004-04-12 by Mark Hahn
yes, but each film responds to different colors differently and with a CCD you get to choose (with all the inherent losses etc... I am not arguing on that
2004-04-12 by Cort Anderson
Is anyone using PiezoTone inks in a CIS/CFS in an Epson 2200? If you are how is it working? And, which CIS/CFS are you using? thanks, cort -- Cort Anderson
2004-04-12 by Roger L Sopher
Not too OT I hope, but does anyone have any experience with the Pentax *1D digital slr body? I am ready to get either a Canon 10D or the Pentax *1D. I have
2004-04-12 by Tom OConnell
It is definitely a new driver. My prints are not at all bad considering they are just using the epson driver with no corrections. They don t seem to shift much
2004-04-12 by Jon
... But Don, you would be taking away Anthony s reason for being on this list--trolling for arguments. One look through the archives will show he has never
2004-04-12 by Paul Roark
Don, ... Since the ink tone & densities are the same in each color position (unless you are mixing the neutral and warm tone carts) a color image will often
2004-04-12 by Paul Roark
Lon, ... I ve used this combination in an 1160 with very good results. ... The densities of the Piezo and UT-FSN inksets are fairly well matched, so they
2004-04-12 by Paul Roark
Don, What printer and inkset are you using? For the PremeirArt spray www.itsupplies.com was good. It looks like they ve raised their prices now unless you buy
2004-04-12 by Victor
I read on dpreview in one of the IR threads that there is someone who, for a fee, will convert your Canon 10D to a dedicated black and white camera. Evidently,
2004-04-12 by Michael Kitei
Joe, I believe that if you use the unsharp mask in RGB, then select fade luminosity in the edit menu, you ll get the same result without any loss incurred in
2004-04-12 by Truman Prevatt
Black and white photography is about intensity - it throws away frequency on purpose. That s why we do it, if I cared about frequency, I do color. However, a
2004-04-12 by chipcarterdc
I d like to ask that anyone who has a 4000 print a B&W image with a normal range of tonal values and check for neutrality and metamerism. I ask this b/c I
2004-04-12 by claudej1@aol.com
In a message dated 4/12/2004 12:06:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time, ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2004-04-12 by Jim Stathus
Greetings: I ve received much help from this group for which I am grateful. This is my first two cents worth so hope it has value. I have been shooting BW on
2004-04-12 by Alan.Huntley@cox.net
Bob, Agreed that the Leica Ms ain t cheap, but, if you ve never experienced handling one I would venture to say that you re missing an experience. Clean
2004-04-12 by donbga
Does anyone know if the new FSN UT2 from MIS will adhere to Pictorico OHP substrate? Thanks, Don Bryant
2004-04-12 by Alan.Huntley@cox.net
Richard, Definitely do not rule out the Bessa body. I have not personally used one, but have heard from longtime Leica folks--who s opinions that I
2004-04-12 by Alan.Huntley@cox.net
Richard, I did, in fact, play with a G2 for a little while. Did I give it a fair chance? Probably not, because I didn t own it and use it for an extended
2004-04-12 by Don M
... One thing to keep in mind is that Yahoo Groups archive searching is terrible, unless you enjoy punishment. Any list on a Yahoo Group is doomed to
2004-04-12 by kcooper666
Hi I ve recently put up an article covering some of my first impressions on moving from film to digital for black and white landscapes. Not a detailed
2004-04-12 by Ernst Dinkla
... To get the thread on the rail but no traveler myself. First of all; keep the Hexar lenses. Though not my ideal digital RF camera the Epson RD1 is just