Re: [Digital BW] Banding in blacks on BO 2200 printing
2004-04-14 by Richard Sintchak
Wednesday, April 14, 2004, 7:14:32 AM, you wrote: e Hi all... I m noticing some banding in large black areas using the BO method on a e 2200. These don t
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 1313 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2004-04-14 by Richard Sintchak
Wednesday, April 14, 2004, 7:14:32 AM, you wrote: e Hi all... I m noticing some banding in large black areas using the BO method on a e 2200. These don t
2004-04-14 by edrudolpho
Hi all... I m noticing some banding in large black areas using the BO method on a 2200. These don t seem to be missing lines of ink, as it would be if a head
2004-04-14 by Christopher Williams
Matte Black cannot be used on luster/glossy surfaces. Chris ... From: Tom Salyer Subject: [Digital BW] 2200 Black Cart Switch Waste I ve read on the list a
2004-04-14 by Tom Salyer
I ve read on the list a lot of ink is wasted switching from black matte to glossy black on the large format Epson printers ... what about with the Epson 2200 ?
2004-04-14 by Mitch Alland
Does anyone know form experience what is better to eliminate bronzing as well as to protect the somewhat delicate surface of Epson Semi-Matte prints:
2004-04-14 by Steve Kale
Yes and you can only print to a limited size. Someone clearly buys a 4000, 7600 or 9600 for the size. My post was in response to a blanket statement that it
2004-04-14 by bgs
I hate to get involved in these things but I am an 1160 UT (previously VM) user and I guess you can call me lucky. I never had those nether world clogs The
2004-04-14 by Mark Hahn
I haven t used a 1280 with VM inks so I can t say whether or not the curves you are using are as perfect as you claim, but the curves for my 1160+VM were very
2004-04-14 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... which, when used that way, effectively makes it a dedicated B&W printer, especially since you cannot turn off the color management.. ... I can say this..
2004-04-14 by Mark Hahn
When I needed perfect prints from my 1160 I often made up to 10 test prints before I was satisfied. With the last batch of prints I made on the 7660 each one
2004-04-14 by Mark Hahn
I m comparing it mainly to an Epson 1160 with MIS ink in a CFS which is negligible in cost per print once it s running, especially if you use EEM paper. The
2004-04-14 by Mark Hahn
first, I read both reviews before buying the 7660 and could not reproduce the published b&w differences between the 7660 and 7960. In my tests the dither
2004-04-14 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
I have BOTH an HP 7660 and the MIS inks running in EPSONs.. The HP prints look great until you compare them head to head with MIS prints. If you decide to go
2004-04-14 by JimD
I m one of those who have had clog problems with my 1160. I got tired of screwing around with clogs, transfer curves, and seemingly endless iterations of test
2004-04-14 by jwasiek
I m still new to B&W digital photogrpahy but I am really interested in trying Eboni BO technique. My question is: for Eboni BO priting, do I need to buy just
2004-04-14 by Mark Hahn
a simple search for clog from hell should turn up many many users that have had problems. Talk to Bob at MIS and he ll tell you straight up that you should
2004-04-14 by Mark Hahn
Learning all the techniques available to you for applying a sharpening effect to your images in Photoshop and applying the most appropriate one for the image
2004-04-14 by Andre
... are ... This is simply untrue. I have an almost four year old printer, (Epson 1160) used three different carbon pigment inksets and a CIS, been at times
2004-04-14 by Bob Michaels
Steve: I m one of those who believe two printers is the way to do both b&w and color. My 1280 (b&w) and 890 (color) cost about $400 combined. That s
2004-04-14 by Don M
Thank you. Good to know. -Don M
2004-04-14 by Mark Hahn
The Epson will be much more trouble than the HP. In fact, if you are not using the Epson every day you will have trouble... not impossible to deal with, but
2004-04-13 by altaf bhimji
i m pretty new to digital darkroom stuff - i havent been paying much attention to sharpening, but decided to do some experimenting after reading this thread -
2004-04-13 by Steve Kale
Alright this whole two-printers-is-the-only-option-movement is bugging me. It is one thing to suggest that two 1280s is an economical solution for many. For
2004-04-13 by Steve Kale
Ah hullo? No I don¹t. I scan with an Imacon 848. A great scan still requires sharpening (as discussed earlier in this thread). The question is: what is the
2004-04-13 by michael mirabito
Hi Thanks for writing--if I get an Epson, it will be dedicated to B&W work; I would use the HP for both, but more for the B&W work. Don M
2004-04-13 by Paul Roark
Bob, ... At least with the desktop Epson printers, all that I have used have at least a 0.03 density variance just from warming up during the day, and it might
2004-04-13 by photographyworks
Sure you have to dedicate a printer to b§W. Al other options are crazy. YOu have to buy a second printer for color. OK? It´s very simple, isn´t it? ... from
2004-04-13 by photographyworks
You will never get a better print than from a head of an epson 5000 or an epson 7000 or an epson 9000 or an epson 4000. If the machine is best alignet the
2004-04-13 by chipcarterdc
As a follow-up: last night I printed a more representative image from a 1Ds file converted to grayscale, printed on Epson Premium Luster, again using
2004-04-13 by photographyworks
If you have a great greyscale scan, sharpen with PS, if it isn´t a great greyscale scan, throw it away therefor you do not have to sharpen it. Look at
2004-04-13 by photographyworks
After reading again my clever comments again a fault of mine occured to me. The fault is that I have written our society . This could lead to the
2004-04-13 by Steve Kale
I use it and have found it to be very good. Download the fully functional demo and let us know what you think. They certainly go through a significant number
2004-04-13 by hogarth
Well cool. I ve never heard of them, but found this googling around from your hint.: http://www.creativepro.com/story/feature/20357.html This article pretty
2004-04-13 by Carl Schofield
I use PhotoKit sharpner for my digital camera RGB files, but not for the 16 bit grayscale scans of my 4x5 negs. Unfortunately, Photokit Sharpener will only
2004-04-13 by Steve Kale
Broadly consistent with the Photokit guys. Capture sharpening, Creative sharpening (if desired) and then Output Sharpening. From: hogarth
2004-04-13 by Don M
I don t have the answers, but your post makes me ask... Do you want the printer for just BW? Or do you want to do general printing with it as well? And to the
2004-04-13 by Steve Bell
Over the last week I ve been getting my digests listing 25 messages, but often with anything from 5 - 10 messages missing. Then this digest with no messages at
2004-04-13 by photographyworks
The link doesn´t work exactly. Here is the name of one of a very important book: Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition from Heinz
2004-04-13 by photographyworks
Sure it is a physicological issue for you and for everyone who believes-may be in certain moments-that he lives in a physiological world;-). Everybody will see
2004-04-13 by hogarth
Ummm... why not? Worst that can happen is I get flamed as a heretic. Again. This theory is not supported by house painters, however. 8-( Sharpening should be
2004-04-13 by bobphoto
Some days prints of the same image with the same adjustments and printing curves come out much denser than others. I have been experiencing this for some time
2004-04-13 by photographyworks
Very good comments! The real problem is that there doesn´t exist a perfect print with the only exeption that you see the print as a perfect print. Bernard von
2004-04-13 by bobphoto
After reading all of these thoughful replies, I concur that it may be psychological and/or physiological but I think it is physical as well as John suggests.
2004-04-13 by Don
... I agree with Sander. I d like to hear your thoughts on USM for small vs. large prints. I wrestle with that stuff every day...... Ol Don in Broken Arrow
2004-04-13 by jean verrept
Ave Ernst. Thanks for your advise. And, for that matter, you were the only poster to react. Again, many thanks. jean@verrept.be jean@verrept.be --
2004-04-13 by mbito4000
Hi I had a chance to try an HP printer with the gray cart. for B&W photos, and I m impressed with the quality of the images. My question is: I am starting to
2004-04-13 by Anthony G. Atkielski
... It s the same as traditional B&W film in the context of this particular debate. Most C-41 B&W films, though, have a very even spectral response similar to
2004-04-13 by Paul D. DeRocco
... That s certainly true if your goal is to make small and large versions of the same image, both for display. But if, as in the original post, you re making
2004-04-13 by sandersm@aol.com
... Why not? Inquiring minds want to know. Please continue. :-) Sanders McNew www.mcnew.net [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2004-04-13 by John Vitollo
... of an image and print it full size rather than re-sizing the whole image to make a small print. Bob I m with Bob on this one! A few weeks ago I did a