Epson 3000 FSN, with 1280 FSN inkset
2002-11-05 by Bo Wrangborg
Hallo, I have some inks left, MIS 1280 FSN - and I want to use them so they don t get too old on the 3000. Just to be sure, as I see it I can use the FSN inks
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1740 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] Archival Storage Boxes
2002-11-05 by Jerry Olson
This is a question for anyone who used the original lyson dye inks, the neutral set. Have any of your prints faded yet? I do remember their sample inks on
Re: [Digital BW] OT: Yousuf Karsh at Oswald Gallery here in Austin
2002-11-05 by Jerry Olson
You can, if you use dye inks on glossy papers. But that isn t fine art print quality to me. Jerry
Test
2002-11-05 by Keith Krebs
test
Epson Velvet Fine Art (was Best matte paper for Matte Black)
2002-11-05 by Tim Atherton
anyone using Epson Velvet Fine Art for quadtones? Is it coated? Is it Epson version of the really nice velvety Somerset Photo Enhanced that was only made for a
Re: Best matte paper for Matte Black
2002-11-05 by chipcarterdc
I really like the Velvet Fine Art. I think the blacks are very good. Can t compare to Photo Rag as I ve never used that paper. Also, my black and white
Just discovered this site.....very nice B&W's
2002-11-05 by wanda72482
I too enjoy taking black and white shots with my digital camera.....Not that I m just great at it, but it s fun to try...How do I submit a photo for everyone
Re: Killer 7600/9600 problem(2200?)
2002-11-05 by bryanwhitney
I suspect that the original post is bogus. Firstly, the post says that the person had the problem with somersest velvet: and now Hanamuhle is dragged in. All I
Re: Killer 7600/9600 problem(2200?)
2002-11-05 by jim hayes
So has anyone had a chance yet to check this out yet? I don t want to start any rumors, but the source says that Epson did confirm it on both the 7600 and 9600
Re: [Digital BW] Digital Rave / PhotoEast Meeting
2002-11-05 by Val Brunell
Jerry...Try this... http://www.iconusa.com/online/index.html Val Brunell ... about 50 ... clear ... placed ... than the ... prints, and ... correct sizes.
Re: Best matte paper for Matte Black
2002-11-05 by jim hayes
... Epson ... See my post, Killer 7600/9600 problem before you decide. I don t know if it s a red herring or not so I don t want to start rumors, but the
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Simen Johan: strong work
2002-11-05 by bgs
I would like to know who s being exploited. ... From: Sanford Barnes To: Sent:
Re: Dumb question about Hahnemühle photo rag...
2002-11-05 by Antonis Ricos
... There is a version of PhotoRag called Duo with both sides coated for printing. Otherwise the sticky side is the printable side as it is for most coated
Re: [Digital BW] B&W Mag on Collecting Prints
2002-11-05 by Tom O'Connell
Jerry- That is the one...and I was outraged at his first response...I cancelled my subscription...but he was so eager to follow up and explain his view and how
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Simen Johan: strong work
2002-11-05 by Sanford Barnes
Seems like one could make the same assertions about Samaras, Serrano, Mapplethorp, Sherman, Gursky, etc, etc, etc. From: grdglass@aol.com Reply-To:
Re: [Digital BW] Best matte paper for Matte Black
2002-11-04 by Bill Morse
Mitch, where did you see the quote from Bruce? Thanks Bill Morse PhotoProspect Cambridge, Mass. USA
Best matte paper for Matte Black
2002-11-04 by Mitch Alland
Reading the recent post on the lack of punch of the balcks of Matte Black ink, I m still trying to decide whether postpone buying an Epson 7600 and ImagePrint
Re: [Digital BW] OT: Yousuf Karsh at Oswald Gallery here in Austin
2002-11-04 by Tim Atherton
... I know! I saw some stuff like that recently, (contact pritns opn old contact paper, AZO and such) including some Karsh work we have in the collection here
OT: Yousuf Karsh at Oswald Gallery here in Austin
2002-11-04 by andrewmbiggs
OT: Yousuf Karsh at Oswald Gallery here in Austin. Absolutely stunning work. I have only seen his work in books until now. Absolutely a master. Wouldn t it be
Re: misplaced dots
2002-11-04 by gaberegalbuto
I have the same problem with my 740. I haven t been able to come up with a fix. I think that there is something wrong with the printer itself which is
Re: [Digital BW] Dumb question about Hahnemühle photo rag...
2002-11-04 by treadwinkle
Thanks! ... paper and slowly remove your fingers. One fingertip will stick to one side more than the other. That is the side to print on.
RE: [Digital BW] Dumb question about Hahnemuhle photo ra g...
2002-11-04 by Tim Atherton
there is also a double sided version though, I think?
Re: [Digital BW] Dumb question about Hahnemühle photo rag...
2002-11-04 by Mark Savoia
You can print on the back but it will look like you printed on the back, looks like s**t
Re: [Digital BW] Dumb question about Hahnemühle phot o rag...
2002-11-04 by Simon Lamb
One side only. Lick your index fingertip and thumb tip, grab the paper and slowly remove your fingers. One fingertip will stick to one side more than the
Dumb question about Hahnemühle photo rag...
2002-11-04 by treadwinkle
Are both sides printable sides or is one side the only printable surface. Duh! Thanks. treadwinkle
Re: [Digital BW] OT: Virtual Centerfilter for Photoshop ??
2002-11-04 by Jim Coffee
Bernd... Try the Panorama Tool. It can be downloaded from http://www.fh-furtwangen.de/~dersch/ Please note that the website is down with a note to check back
OT: Virtual Centerfilter for Photoshop ??
2002-11-04 by Ruhrfoto/Bernd L.
Sorry, this is a bit OT, but I´ve been looking for a virtual centerfilter for Photoshop to compensate wide angle lens problems - didn´t find any. Suggestions
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Simen Johan: strong work
2002-11-04 by Luke Granfield
... myself. ... Ditto. Hegemony of the technical. Luke
Re: Simen Johan: strong work
2002-11-04 by grdglass@aol.com
I call that kind of work hmmm...let s see how I can make a name for myself. The text is gobbledygook, artspeak bs. Very exploitative. Helene ... [Non-text
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1109
2002-11-04 by grdglass@aol.com
You could try www.universityproducts.com . However, their product pricing usually is comparable to Light Impressions.
Re: [Digital BW] solvent?
2002-11-04 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: Ernst Dinkla To: Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 9:30 AM Subject: Re: [Digital
Re: [Digital BW] solvent?
2002-11-04 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: Paul Roark To: DigitalB&WPrint Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:04 AM
Re: [Digital BW] Simen Johan: strong work
2002-11-04 by Sanford Barnes
WOW!!! Pediatric chimera a la Cindy Sherman as a cultural nightmare. Fascinating. From: Mark Tucker Reply-To:
Simen Johan: strong work
2002-11-04 by Mark Tucker
http://www.yossimilogallery.com/simenjohan1/ Sit down, open your brain, relax your rules, and drink up some delicious work.
Re: Used 7500--Should I buy?
2002-11-04 by photon_arts
Thanks for all the replies. Since I posted, I was offline for a few days, and when I logged on, I found many useful responses on the group, and others in my
[Digital BW] solvent?
2002-11-04 by Paul Roark
Matt, ... The black ink has been described to me as a co-solvent ink. It has a strong smell. There is a volatile solvent in there, probably in addition to
Get-together in New York
2002-11-03 by Olaf Ringdahl
I want to testify that everything that has been said so far about the New York meeting is true. This was a perfect model of an informal gathering of
Re: misplaced dots
2002-11-03 by jim hayes
... sharp, ... text, ... 740) ... Okay Matt, thanks for the clarification. I ve had a lot of clogging issues, more than I care to think about, but never
misplaced dots
2002-11-03 by Matt Haber
(quoted text *below*) jim-- for the example, if i printed text, the text would be reasonably sharp, but there would be discreet dots of ink outside the body of
Re: solvent?
2002-11-03 by jim hayes
... However you define solvent you must agree that there has to be a carrier to the ink to get it on the paper and keep the pigment particles suspended until
solvent?
2002-11-03 by Matt Haber
I ve just got myself up and running with the MIS FS inks on an epson 740. Thanks to David for the curves for that. One question and one observation and one
Re: [Digital BW] Digital Rave / PhotoEast Meeting
2002-11-03 by Jerry Olson
Does anyone know where one could get inexpensive boxes to hold about 50 to 100 letter size and 13x19 inch prints that have been placed in clear storage
Group Meeting: Photo Site Posted
2002-11-03 by Mark Tucker
Here are the photos. Sorry for the oversharpening of some of the images. I got in too much of a hurry. The group meeting was very fun:
Re: [Digital BW] Digital Rave / PhotoEast Meeting
2002-11-03 by culturalvisions
First, Bryan and Mark s group meeting of this and the 9000 s digital dogs was the highlight of the whole Expo. I was very fortunate to be in a room with two
RE: [Digital BW] Luminous Landscape and Michael Reichmann review the Hasselblad H1...
2002-11-03 by Austin Franklin
... Hi Moreno, Well, the 80/2.8 IS the fastest lense they plan on offering as far as I know, so if any lense should have good bokeh, it should be this
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1108
2002-11-03 by Jerry Olson
To greatly improve flaking problems, get a very soft cloth and rub down the paper before printing. If the cloth is soft, you can rub fairly hard before any
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1108
2002-11-03 by grdglass@aol.com
I cannot recall anyone on this list ever mentioning flaking on PhotoRag. I have had terrible problems with it lately but only on 13x19. Then, I wasn t
Re: [Digital BW] Luminous Landscape and Michael Reichmann review the Hasselblad H1...
2002-11-03 by Moreno Polloni
... The H1 lenses were spec d by Hasselblad and designed by Fuji (with the exception of the zoom). This is mentioned by Reichmann, but a lot of the comments
Re: [Digital BW] Digital Rave / PhotoEast Meeting
2002-11-03 by Carl Schofield
... dynamic ... will ... Sounds great. Any suggestions for framing/mounting unglazed prints for display?
Re: Used 7500--Should I buy?
2002-11-03 by charlesrozier
... Well, actually I had an 1160 with quads and CFS but unfortunately its paper feed failed while I was initially calibrating it on thick stocks. Got worried