test (was [Digital BW] Re: OT: User name/ email adress)
2001-12-06 by Sam A. McCandless
testing ... .
Messages
Browse messages
Page 2060 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-06 by Austin Franklin
Hi Todd, ... No. Actually, it s the opposite! Oversampling does the OPPOSITE of sharpening, it smooth out the transitions between samples...where sharpening
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Varnishes, was Beyond the name
2001-12-06 by Steadman Uhlich
Canvases are generally stretched for appearance sake...but the changes in humidity can affect canvas dimensions (if loose...not stretched) and consequently
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Beyond the name: selling prints/print quality of old vs new
2001-12-06 by Steadman Uhlich
Mon Mark, You shouldn t have told....but thanks anyway. Just so everyone in the eworld knows....I admire your style and your sense of humor...two things of
Re: [Digital BW] Cone Drivers
2001-12-06 by Julian Thomas
Don, the latest Piezo cd has drivers for all the desktop units. Julian ... From: donbga To:
Re: Beyond the name: selling prints/print quality of old vs new
2001-12-06 by inteldes
Mark, would you be willing to divulge the type of canvas you re working with? And, have you tried other canvases that didn t measure up? Tom Keesling ... I ve
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Beyond the name: selling prints/print quality of old vs new
2001-12-06 by ternahan
Re: Cone Drivers
2001-12-06 by ruhrfoto
... Yes, ... keeping in mind that the Piezo Pro 24 Rip for the 7000 is another animal... Bernd
Re: Cone Drivers
2001-12-06 by ruhrfoto
... used ... Yes again, Don, the latest version offers (optional) printer choosing during the installing-procedure. For Quadtone printing (Cone inks or MIS FS)
MT's show/lecture at RIT
2001-12-06 by Mark Carpenter
... Mark, Drat! I have plans for tomorrow. How long does the show run? If the prints are only going to be there the one night, I may skip out on my friends and
Re: Cone Drivers
2001-12-06 by donbga
... So if the Cone driver for the 1160 were purchased could it be used later for a hextone printer like the 1270 or 1280? I m confused. Thanks, Don Bryant
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-06 by Todd Flashner
... Isn t this similar to the argument for sharpening? I ve always heard the need for sharpening explained something like, all CCD scans require some kind
Workshop on Digital Printmaking
2001-12-06 by Stephen Harrison
... Stephen Harrison
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-06 by Bill Morse
My experience has been with a Polaroid 4500, a Scitex and a Howtek- with 35mm, MF and 4x5 negs, and prints. None of them in my opinion needed routine
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Varnishes, was Beyond the name
2001-12-06 by shashinka@aol.com
Great info Mark: I smell a canvas print exchange somewhere in the future. I mean that literally, with all the crazy coatings! -Andy Darlow
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-06 by Austin Franklin
Hi Bruce, ... Not a bandaid at all. ALL digital output requires some kind of filter to smooth out the stepping, it s just part of digital to analog
Re: OT: User name/ email adress
2001-12-06 by mtucker508
... checked my ... Antonis, I think what he s talking about is related to all this wacky Yahoo business lately. The name that shows up on my posts also changed
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-06 by Austin Franklin
... I scan 35mm at 5080 and do not sharpen. I shoot with Leica and Contax (Zeiss) lenses, and find I do not have a need to sharpen. I expose and also develop
Re: OT: User name/ email adress
2001-12-06 by antonisphoto
... o profile: Your name instead of a partial email address on posts . http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/List-relat= ed
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-06 by sunshine_1451
I agree that it is essentially an aesthetic decision. However, if it is the case that the Kodak, Nikon, and Polaroid scanners in the 4000dpi range are bit soft
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Beyond the name: selling prints/print quality of old vs new
2001-12-06 by Scott Hendershot
Mark, I will try to make it for the lecture. I am only about 20 minutes away. Are you going to be lecturing? Scott ... From: mtucker508
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-06 by Bill Morse
Typically need sharpening... See, this is what I was trying to get at in my earlier post about Martin s photo of the chimney- It s all an aesthetic, and
[Digital BW] Re: Beyond the name: selling prints/print quality of old vs new
2001-12-06 by mtucker508
... Right now, I m sitting here in Nashville, sweaty after raquetball, and drinking a Corona. But my rep went to school at RIT, and we re going there tomorrow
RE: [Digital BW] Cone Drivers
2001-12-06 by Nij
Hi Don, Yes ;) Nij
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Beyond the name: selling prints/print quality of old vs new
2001-12-06 by Scott Hendershot
Mark, Are you in Rochester, NY ? Scott ... From: mtucker508 To: Sent: Wednesday,
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-06 by Bruce Kinch
HI Austin- ... Yeah, attracts similar types:-) ... No, I meant 48 or 96 to 44, and 20-24 to 8. Oversampling and upsampling has always seemed like just more
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-06 by Bruce Kinch
HI Austin- ... Yeah, attracts similar types:-) ... No, I meant 48 or 96 to 44, and 20-24 to 8. Oversampling and upsampling has always seemed like just more
[Digital BW] Re: Beyond the name: selling prints/print quality of old vs new
2001-12-06 by mtucker508
... sent) to get that aged look was that the image on canvas with varnish? Steadman, You know I love you and all. But sometimes a guy just needs his
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-06 by sunshine_1451
Thanks, Bill, for the information. I d be interested in hearing whether others who work from 35mm scanned images (let s say scanned at 3600dpi or above) make a
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Beyond the name: selling prints/print quality of old vs new
2001-12-05 by Steadman Uhlich
Mark, I can hear that music now.... .....24 hours a day....I wanna be sedated (Ramones) Your new website looks great. What did you do to that image on the
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by Austin Franklin
Hi Todd, ... Well, my images DON T posterize, since I know what to do so I don t get posterization ;-) ... Most are, but my 800ASA+ images usually have visible
Cone Drivers
2001-12-05 by donbga
Hi Folks, Over the past few days I have been thinking about purchasing an Epson 3000 printer. I currently own an 1160 printer. If I purchase the Cone
Re: Varnishes, was Beyond the name
2001-12-05 by mtucker508
... , or is it the varnish? ... I m loving playing around with these sprays on this MediaStreet canvas. Here s the status report: When the liquid varnish hits
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by Austin Franklin
Hi Bill, ... Thank you. ... Shot with a Hasselblad 110/2 AT f2. Depth of field is 0.018 meters (.7 ) at a distance of 1 meter...that s reasonably shallow. ...
Re: SelectiveFocus, was, Beyond the name
2001-12-05 by mtucker508
... in ... That particular picture was shot with this homemade camera that I made, which is a magnifying loupe rigged onto a Hasselblad. It s basically a $3000
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by Todd Flashner
... I don t know what really happens numerically when you do an 8-bit to 16-bit conversion, but I don t think it helps. When you do a rotation, or an
Re: Beyond the name: selling prints/print quality of old vs new
2001-12-05 by grdglass@aol.com
Mark,
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by Bill Morse
Hi Austin, nice image- In looking at the photo, I assume that the selective focus is from depth-of-field? Let me know if I am missing anything Bill on 12/5/01
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by Austin Franklin
Hi Bob, ... I don t know what you mean. No matter what the scanner bit depth, if it is above 8, it returns 16 bit data...you even though you get 16 bits from
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by Austin Franklin
Hi Bill, ... I get that without sharpening...: http://www.darkroom.com/Images/LABOWL02w.jpg Regards, Austin
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by Austin Franklin
Hi Phil, ... ALL that happens when you convert from 16 bit to 8 bits is the bottom 8 bits is lopped off and the top 8 is used...NO real processing at all
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by Bob Frost
Austin, But if your scanner only scans at 10, 12, or 14 bit, you would surely be much better to do the scans at 16bit in PS, even if it means going from 8bit
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by Austin Franklin
Hi, I do NOT EVER sharpen any of my images at any point, not does my scanner sharpen at all. I do not have soft images either. Austin
Re: [Digital BW] MIS VM print tip, Inkjet proofing tips and workshop announcement
2001-12-05 by Scott Hendershot
Andy, To the best of my knowledge they transfer function you describe would only cause some of the shadow values to be pushed farther down reducing shadow
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by Austin Franklin
... Maris, For color, I won t dispute that at this point, but for B&W, which is exclusively what we are talking about on this list, I DO dispute that. I
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by Austin Franklin
... I can agree with that, that s why I specifically said that if you have combing, you MAY get posterization, but if you get posterization you WILL have
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by Austin Franklin
... Hi, Quality of printer doesn t matter. I believe he (being Dan Margulis) is talking about color, and WE, as in this list, are talking about B&W ONLY. You
Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by Bill Morse
Chris, I believe this comes from the pre-press world, and in addition is several years out-of-date- when scanning at lower resolution, with file size limited
RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?
2001-12-05 by Austin Franklin
... If you do your tone curves in the scanner driver, it will be done on high bit data, no matter whether you are getting 8 bit or high bit data out. My
Re: [Digital BW] ImagePrint 4.0 Interim update
2001-12-05 by Scott Hendershot
Mike, What kind of price tag does this RIP have? ... From: mkravit To: Sent: Wednesday,