Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 2061 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

ImagePrint 4.0 Interim update

2001-12-05 by mkravit

Ifinally installed ImagePrint 4.0 here in the office today. It has been a busy week so far and this new project had to take a back seat. ImagePrint 4 is a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by mtucker508

Austin, Todd, Anybody Else, Would it be correct to think about it this way: An 8-bit file is like a 1/8 thick piece of glass. A 16-bit file is like a 1/2

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by Todd Flashner

... Yes and no. There is a misconception that if you have a stack of adjustment layers they are somehow combined first, and then applied to the image as one

Thread view Attachments: 0

To Scott Hendershot

2001-12-05 by Jerry Olson

Scott, Sorry to get in touch with you this way, but I can t seem to find your email address, although I know I saved it. I sent out my group of 31 photos

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by Todd Flashner

Austin I ve combined two of your posts into one. ... I m tempted to pull an Austin and say, then you must be doing something wrong, or something is wrong with

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by Martin Glader

... Isn t it also so, that you get more posterization problems if you apply several adjustments at a pixel level through Image - Adjust than what you get if

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by tzinzunzan2000

35mm negs with SS4000 at 4000. My statement about the softness of scans is not based so much on my own experience, however, as what I ve read in books, the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by Bill Morse

Hi Chris- What are you scanning with? At what resolution? Bill on 12/5/01 12:13 PM, tzinzunzan2000 wrote: According to my understanding, scanned images are by

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by pbard2002

Sorry for the long post, but I thought I might add what I ve discovered with my images. After reading through this thread about high bit image editing, I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by tzinzunzan2000

I forgot to point out the very important fact that my duplicate file was 8-bit. Chris ... you ... very ... how ... in ... scanned ... image ... I ve ...

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by tzinzunzan2000

According to my understanding, scanned images are by their nature somewhat soft and that some degree of sharpening is usually required and is done as a matter

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by tzinzunzan2000

First, some questions. By combed histogram do you mean only a histogram that contains gaps all the way from bottom to top or do you include those those

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by Bill Morse

Austin, I don t normally sharpen either, I just scan at the highest resolution I can get, then wait while the file opens in PS [g]. Sharpening can, however,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by Stephen Jennings

Exactly right. You ve lost some of the 256 levels, and the blank spots in the histogram indicate possible posterization. STEPHEN JENNINGS P h o t o g r a p

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.

Austin, I think your off-list message was right on the head - Dan s position is one taken in dealing with color photographs. When working in the B&W world

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by Austin Franklin

Hi Bruce, ... I ve delved into that quite a bit...having designed a lot of digital audio gear... ... Initially and up until about 7 years ago, I completely

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: FrankWard in PhotoEye

2001-12-05 by mtucker508

... the web. The interview is only in the printed magazine, I guess. Maybe it s better that way; my mother is the only person who s actually read the article

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by mtucker508

... you loose tonal ... Would these tones moving around and getting shifted be responsible for a histogram that had holes in it? (Not that I ve ever had one,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: FrankWard in PhotoEye

2001-12-05 by culturalvisions

Thanks for the post, Mark.. I could not find your interview with PhotoInsider Magazine on the web. In fact, their website stinks. Shutterbug Magazine (Web

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by Bruce Kinch

... I can t help wondering if there s a corollary here to digital audio, if I can drift off-topic. The standard CD format, unchanged since 1980 or so, is 16

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: review of the Minolti multi pro

2001-12-05 by culturalvisions

Mahesi, Thanks for the Rockwell link. I ve had my Minolta scanner for a month or so now and am not quite as gushy about it. I ve really got to run some test

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by Austin Franklin

Hi Mark, ... Pretty much, yes. ... Well, um, I may not be the best person to explain this in simple English. It does require SOME technical background to

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by Austin Franklin

Hi Bill, You may very well be right, since sharpening certainly can change tonal values! I do NOT sharpen, nor do I advocate it...but I do understand some

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by Austin Franklin

Maris, ... Yes, absolutely. ... I don t see how that follows my analogy...nor do I understand the analogy. Perhaps you could explain. ... I don t know, but I m

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] 16-bit Scanning: Why?

2001-12-05 by Austin Franklin

Todd, ... But I DO see it all the time...most any time I try to do moves to 8 bit files, and then print them using Piezo, I end up with posterization. If I

Thread view Attachments: 0

OT: User name/ email adress

2001-12-05 by Bernhard.Schuerlein@t-online.de

Can anyone give me a hint? I´d like to send away with this email adress because the other pop3 server I use to send with is often blocked. Now my email adress

Thread view Attachments: 0

German Etching question

2001-12-05 by shashinka@aol.com

Hello: After recently viewing the first travel portfolio(Bravo to all!), I noticed that one individual used German Etching(AKA Lysonic Fine Art). The image

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.