Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 237 of 564 · 28179 messages matched

Re: [Doepfer_a100] a190 problem

2008-08-15 by macko

hi thanks for your response. now, i've tried this - i switch into performance mode, than i push one key and the pitch is working. but still - the sound is still playing and i'd like to play it from the beginning every time i push the key. how to make it? i've spent a lot of time

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] a190 problem

2008-08-15 by Ross Stapf

There is a midi learning procedure. Check the manual on the Doepfer website. It seemed complicated to me at first, but now after doing it a few times it is easy. Your keyboard probably isn't transmitting on the midi channel the A-190 is set to. This brings up a minor A-190 proble

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: A-188-1 BBD 4096 problem (probably just me)

2008-08-15 by Chidra_100@iinet.net.au

I suspect that my bbd is damaged, is there a sure way to check if it it working properly? I was having a go at the standard flanger patch from the bbd manual (page 12) and after playing around with the variables, it seems to not giving a bbd output... Now repatching it doesn't se

Thread view Attachments: 0

a190 problem

2008-08-15 by macko

hello i've just installed my new a190, but, unfortunately, i have some problems.. i've connected a keyboard to a190, but there is no response. it is written in the manual that gate and pitch are pre-installed on the bus, but pushing keys effects with nothing. no LEDs response. on

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: VC controlled delay

2008-08-15 by achtung_999

Sorry Richard, it wasn't personal.I just noticed a lot of people are asking for so many features. If Doepfer can keep the modules cheap and simple I can buy several copies of them and therby make my patches more complex.. That's just my train of thought.. greets, Ernst On Fri, Au

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: VC controlled delay

2008-08-15 by Richard Scott

of course experimentation is the name of the game: but this thread did come from me asking if there was anyone making modules with VC feedback and VC mix so don't shoot me for wanting to have them on a future doepfer module! I want something to mount it in a beauty case as an ind

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: VC controlled delay

2008-08-15 by achtung_999

I understand your point completely, and I would like VC feedback also.But I was mainly trying to push the people to think more before they start to inflate and overfeaturize cheap modules that Dieter suggests. ;-) On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Denis Gökdag wrote: > sure, i see

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: VC controlled delay

2008-08-15 by Denis Gökdag

sure, i see your point in general, but adding two sockets for the feedback insert isn't a lot of work/space/money and definitely no roland-JV-erising thing ;-) especially with VC feedback being a pretty common task you can save a lot of patching with these two sockets. all you ne

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: VC controlled delay

2008-08-15 by achtung_999

Come on.You have a modular synthesizer. Experiment! I'm getting a bit worried about the ongoing trend on this list. The trend of people wanting modules that have all the options build in. Too much build in features are beyond the scope of a modular. Independant feedback input mig

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: VC controlled delay

2008-08-15 by Denis Gökdag

Yes, with an insert on the feedback you can control feedback amount by patching in a VCA, but that is really the most basic possibility you get with an insert; filters, ringmodulators, waveshapers etc like living in the feedback path as well ;-) d On Aug 15, 2008, at 12:43 PM, Ri

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: VC controlled delay

2008-08-15 by Richard Scott

I haven't used a delay with an independent feedback output before. What are the consequences of this? Can it be used to modulate the amount/length of feedback a module where it is not possible to modulate the feedback with CV seems a bit boring Richard ----- Original Message ----

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: FS ADSR and Dig Noise

2008-08-15 by ilanode

All modules are spoken for by know. Thanks for interest and bandwith. --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "ilanode" wrote: > > A117 Dig Noise: 43 > A140 ADSR: 43 > A140 ADSR: 30 > > Prices in Euro plus the costs for shipping. Since I've no paypal > account I can only accept a ba

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Quantizer positive problem...

2008-08-15 by Bakis Sirros

so, what would the a129-3 do exactly in this situation? offset or attenuate or...? how this would help in the specific problem? ok, the a156 quantizes in semitones, but what would the a129-3 offset do? Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist [Doepfer_a100]

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Quantizer positive problem...

2008-08-15 by mark francombe

Explanation Please?? You are talking Offset here right? I had thought of that... but.. well wont that pitch my vcos right up or no.. oh i dont understand.. BTW, you spoke thus " If you have the A-156, you must acquire the A-129-3" As if every idiot knows that if you have a quanti

Thread view Attachments: 0

FS ADSR and Dig Noise

2008-08-15 by ilanode

A117 Dig Noise: 43 A140 ADSR: 43 A140 ADSR: 30 Prices in Euro plus the costs for shipping. Since I've no paypal account I can only accept a bank transfer (swift/iban), sorry. Thanks for bandwith, Ingo

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Quantizer positive problem...

2008-08-15 by selfoscillate

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "mark francombe" wrote: > > Explanation Please?? You are talking Offset here right? I had thought > of that... but.. well wont that pitch my vcos right up or no.. oh i > dont understand.. > > BTW, you spoke thus " If you have the A-156, you mu

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Quantizer positive problem...

2008-08-15 by selfoscillate

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "Doug" wrote: > > Please allow me to oversimplify. If you have the A-156, you must > acquire the A-129-3 to go along with it. Amen. > Doug > yes, if 10 volts of quantization are enough. since the blacet binary zone can output from -10 to +10 v

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: VC controlled delay

2008-08-14 by selfoscillate

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, wrote: > > > I would be interested in a cheap/affordable VC 8 bit or perhaps 12 bit > > delay. For the fancy stuff I would use Max/MSP anyway. So please keep it > > low cost. > > That's one of our main targets for this module. We try to keep i

Thread view Attachments: 0

Quantizer positive problem...

2008-08-14 by mark francombe

Hi list.. I was trying somthing last night and discovered that the quantizer only quantizes positive volts, checked in manual, and there its was.. damn. HERE WHAT I WAS DOING: I Love the Blacet Binary Zone (actually programmed some vst versions of this before I knew a hardware ve

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Quantizer positive problem...

2008-08-14 by selfoscillate

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, neil jendon wrote: > > for question #2: A-166 has two inverters. Invert-quantize-then invert again. Would that work? > not with the a166. the a166 inverters are digital, they just flip from zero to +10 volts and vise versa, they are no real an

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: joystick spring removal

2008-08-14 by bellenger_a

I used a knife to carefully open the little metal parts that are bent done and then take off the spring... i even managed to put them back afterwards... best a a--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "thomasborax" wrote: > > hullu there folks- > i got one answer to a question i had

Thread view Attachments: 0

joystick spring removal

2008-08-14 by thomasborax

hullu there folks- i got one answer to a question i had by searching for topics. but one question remains....how do i get the spring out of my joystick? to my reckoning, they are visible down small openings on the underside of the joystick box, yet i can't tell how to access them

Thread view Attachments: 0

A181 mod pictures - very easy mod

2008-08-14 by achtung_999

Hello, Yesterday I modded one of my A181s from the standard mono/stereo set up to a stereo/stereo set up. Both boards in the A181 are the same and the (mono) top part of the module also uses a stereo jack. So I got curious. The photos show my unmodded A181 with some circles aroun

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: FS: A120 low pass filter (62 euro) & A130 Linear VCA (41 euro)

2008-08-14 by achtung_999

The A130 is sold. The A120 is still for sale for 62 euros (+ 5 euro shipping in the EU) Paypal fees will be added if you wish to use paypal. Iban/bic payment is also possible. greetings, Ernst --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, achtung_999 wrote: > > Hello > I am selling my A12

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: VC controlled delay

2008-08-14 by hardware@doepfer.de

> the a112 can also be an 8 bit delay, right? (but, i guess in a > much more primitive form...) Yes, in a much more primitive form. The A-112 has no high-speed VCO (like the BBD modules) but a software generated clock. Thats not as smooth and fast as a high-speed VCO that generat

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: A147 not working anymore

2008-08-14 by bellenger_a

> Are you able to change the frequency with the manual frequency control ? NO > You may even try the lower TL064 instead of the TL084. For the final module > the upper should be an TL084 again but for testing you may use also the > TL064 instead of the TL084. changed all the comp

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: VC controlled delay

2008-08-14 by Bakis Sirros

ok, as long as all these can be done with other modules, no problem for me! include only features that are unique to the vc delay module and have to be achieved 'inside' the module then. the a112 can also be an 8 bit delay, right? (but, i guess in a much more primitive form...) B

Thread view Attachments: 0

AW: [Doepfer_a100] Re: VC controlled delay

2008-08-14 by hardware@doepfer.de

> I would be interested in a cheap/affordable VC 8 bit or perhaps 12 bit > delay. For the fancy stuff I would use Max/MSP anyway. So please keep it > low cost. That's one of our main targets for this module. We try to keep it in the Euro 100 range without VC feedback, VC mix or V

Thread view Attachments: 0

FS: A120 low pass filter (62 euro) & A130 Linear VCA (41 euro)

2008-08-14 by achtung_999

Hello I am selling my A120 low pass filter and one of my A130 Linear VCAs. Both modules are in fine working and cosmetic condition (except for some minor rack screw traces). It is important to mention that the A130 is an old version with the CEM3381 in there. (That is also the re

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: VC controlled delay

2008-08-14 by achtung_999

I would be interested in a cheap/affordable VC 8 bit or perhaps 12 bit delay. For the fancy stuff I would use Max/MSP anyway. So please keep it low cost. On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Stu Grimshaw wrote: > why all these mixing knobs on the module itself? these can be done, if

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: VC controlled delay

2008-08-14 by Stu Grimshaw

why all these mixing knobs on the module itself? these can be done, if needed, by other modules. the mix knob of my a188 bbd has never left the fully clockwise position, and i dare say that goes for most of us. knobs cost money and, more importantly for me, rackspace (i would lov

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: a doubt

2008-08-14 by floris vanhoof

sometimes when an lfo and bbd are in the same psu i can hear very silent lfo pulses in the output. i'm using the low cost psu. is the bbd also a sensitive audio processing module? (should i use a ring core psu for less noise?) + also, is it possible to build in a filter in the bb

Thread view Attachments: 0

A-126 Frequency Shifter Low Output?

2008-08-13 by madapples1

Hello, I just got an A-126 today and it seems to function as expected, except the output is lower than I expected. The processed output compared to the unprocessed signal or an oscillator etc. is quite a bit lower in volume. Is this normal behavior? Thanks.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Re: VC controlled delay

2008-08-13 by Richard Scott

great, so suddenly everybody seems to be making one it confirms my suspicion that VC delays are the new filters :) its a rich and relatively unexplored area I think Richard ----- Original Message ----- From: jalmari3 To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 20

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Doepfer_a100] input impedance

2008-08-13 by Anthony Rolando

Hello, what is the typical input impedance for Doepfer modules? What are the highest and lowest input impedances found in A-100? Thanx, Tony _________________________________________________________________ Get more from your digital life. Find out how. http://www.windowslive.com

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] VC controlled delay

2008-08-13 by James Husted

Of course the 8-bit/16-bit switch idea would also be a easy "Double delay time" feature. -James On Aug 13, 2008, at 10:33 AM, James Husted wrote: > If the delay could be made with standard SIMM memory modules for the > RAM that would be a real plus to me. You could sell it with a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] VC controlled delay

2008-08-13 by James Husted

If the delay could be made with standard SIMM memory modules for the RAM that would be a real plus to me. You could sell it with a standard size SIMM or without one so the user could supply their own. This way the delay time would be only dependent on the size of the SIMM install

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: VC controlled delay

2008-08-13 by selfoscillate

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, "jalmari3" wrote: > > Cwejman is going to make a VC delay: > http://www.cwejman.net/cwejman.net/del-4.htm > and i bet that this one has a "quad price" feature. aeehhhh, sorry ;-)

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Doepfer_a100] VC controlled delay

2008-08-13 by selfoscillate

with 8/16 bits switch and dry/wet crossfader this would probably be a "double price" feature too. best wishes ingo --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com, James Husted wrote: > > Of course the 8-bit/16-bit switch idea would also be a easy "Double > delay time" feature. > -James > >

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: AW: [Doepfer_a100] VC controlled delay

2008-08-13 by jared

Looking forward to this. 8 bit...at least 3 sec delay time.mix knob.VC of feedback and delay time would suit me. VC control of the mix would be a luxury.this would be a fantastic option.I wonder how much this would raise the cost? What would be really nice is two in/outs! -----Or

Thread view Attachments: 0

WTB: ASol Concussor drum modules etc.

2008-08-13 by ysinollaysi

Hi! I'm looking for Analogue Solutions' Concussor drum modules. Mainly BD88, SD88, HH88 but almost all modules can be concidered if the price is right. Secondarily looking for some VCOs too: Metasonix TM-3 Dual VCO Plan B model 15 VCO Moog Moogerfooger MF-107 FreqBox Answers to p

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] VC controlled delay

2008-08-13 by Bakis Sirros

that would be nice then! Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist [Doepfer_a100] group owner www. parallel - worlds - music. com www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic www. myspace. com/ memorygeist www. DiN. org. uk ww

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] VC controlled delay

2008-08-13 by Florian Anwander

Hi Bakis > i would prefer a 16bit vc delay module with a cv input and knob for changing Bit Depth (from 16bits to 2 bits or something...) > so, you can have everything (and changing in realtime if required) from super clear to super 'dirty' delays. I think the modulatable BIT-Dep

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] VC controlled delay

2008-08-13 by Richard Scott

i agree a 16 bit delay with modulateable bit depth would be great but as a hi end version - not to replace the idea a cheaper module Richard ----- Original Message ----- From: Bakis Sirros To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 1:14 PM Subject: Re: AW:

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] VC controlled delay

2008-08-13 by Bakis Sirros

i would prefer a 16bit vc delay module with a cv input and knob for changing Bit Depth (from 16bits to 2 bits or something...) so, you can have everything (and changing in realtime if required) from super clear to super 'dirty' delays. Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnec

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: AW: [Doepfer_a100] VC controlled delay

2008-08-13 by Florian Anwander

Hi Dieter > We are not yet sure. 8 bit would be much cheaper as the internal ADC of the > microcontroller could be used. 12 bit or more would increase the price as an > external ADC has to be used. The 8Bit Version is soundwise the more interesting version. 12Bit wouldn't be "nei

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.