Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 542 of 564 · 28179 messages matched
2002-02-28 by duffnuff
--- In Doepfer_a100@y..., bakis Sirros wrote: > no,RM, > i mean that,if i connect one of the triggers output of > my a155 to the i/o jacks of the a150 ,that they pass > right thru the switch...not in the CV jack. > bakis. bakis, i dont have a 150 to see what you mean..but if you
2002-02-28 by duffnuff
> Why > not just use an A138a mixer and the CV source module, like I >do? > > Joe joe great suggestion (duh). makes sense for fine tuning vibratos, etc, such as moving a vibrato(lfo) to stay above the osc pitch rather than symmetrical all the time. but would this work for negativ
2002-02-28 by buechlerjoe
Hi Synthfreak > this group isn't about marketing for new modules. > this group is about EVERYTHING that has got to do with > the a100!!! (yes,i like the exclamation marks.) What I said was that the PRIMARY FOCUS (yes, I like the capitals) is on providing Doepfer with feedback on
2002-02-28 by buechlerjoe
>it would be nice if Doepfer released a >offsetgenerator-mixer-attenuator-like-module. The attenuator/offset for the vocoder is available, but expensive. Why not just use an A138a mixer and the CV source module, like I do? Joe
2002-02-28 by martin olson
Is it just me and Florian who like to see this module in production, i want some feedback please, maybe even a poll created on the subject. This is -in my point of view - the missing link in the Doepfer lineup. Activit't, por favor ///dnfn//// > Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com Flori
2002-02-28 by bakis Sirros
o.k.,i will create a new poll,but only if you explain to me what difference will this new module have from the a129/3??? thanks for your input synthfreak --- martin olson wrote: > Hi group/Bakis, i wonder if its just me or if anyone > else thinks that it would be nice if Doepfer
2002-02-28 by bakis Sirros
andreas, it's NOT my job to moderate this group,o.k.??? i do it because i like my modular.if any of you have better answers to some of the questions asked in this group,go ahead and write them!!! i have many other things to do during the day...so i hardly have the time for giving
2002-02-28 by bakis Sirros
andreas, we're only kidding... synthfreak --- Andreas Lindholm wrote: > If that is so? Who am I? Don Buchla? Rudolph the > raindeer? The only non > Doepfer PR-consultant? =) > > I find it irrelevant who ringmod45 is... why don't > you just leave him alone? > Ignore him if you you
2002-02-28 by bakis Sirros
no,RM, i mean that,if i connect one of the triggers output of my a155 to the i/o jacks of the a150 ,that they pass right thru the switch...not in the CV jack. bakis. --- ringmod45 wrote: > that is an issue that would be more clear if doepfer > would write the > values for the inp
2002-02-28 by bakis Sirros
NO joe, this group isn't about marketing for new modules. this group is about EVERYTHING that has got to do with the a100!!!(yes,i like the exclamation marks.) it's just that at the present time doepfer is about to release many new and(in my opinion)very interesting modules so,i
2002-02-28 by bakis Sirros
hello roel, my question is:is it possible to find the "macula transfer" cd or even lp???do you have this album??? it's the only one from edgar froese that i haven't listen to... synthfreak --- Roel Steverink wrote: > From: bakis Sirros > Date: Tue Feb 26, 2002 9:21 pm > Subject:
2002-02-28 by bakis Sirros
hi andreas, you think something is not nessecary,i think it is!!!something is vital for me but not for you.it's as simple as that. synthfreak --- Andreas Lindholm wrote: > No I don't think it is. It is just another set of > those "unnessecary > features that you think should be t
2002-02-28 by Florian Anwander
Hi martin > offsetgenerator-mixer-attenuator-like-module. Very good idea. We had this suggestion here already half a year ago. Until now, I modified my linear mixer module that way, that the lowest jack is connected via its switching contact to +5 Volts. This helps already a litt
2002-02-28 by Florian Anwander
Hi Andreas > No I don't think it is. It is just another set of those "unnessecary > features that you think should be there";-) Yes I think it is. To me this is basically a sequencer, where I can activate (or deactivate) the steps by pressing a key. > It just doesn't > make sense
2002-02-28 by martin olson
Hi group/Bakis, i wonder if its just me or if anyone else thinks that it would be nice if Doepfer released a offsetgenerator-mixer-attenuator-like-module. I need this to change the polarity of modulation signals (lfo's with only negative going voltage...etc), I know there's the A
2002-02-28 by david.salter@reuters.com
Hi Joe, I agree upto a point. Personally I do not expect my system to stop growing (although more slowly than it has over recent years) because I prefer to work in real-time and create whole pieces that move and evolve over time, rather than create a patch, record it and so on. T
2002-02-28 by david.salter@reuters.com
Hi Andreas, I do not mean to confuse. What I meant to say was that in an ideal world I would prefer to have a high quality controller and the option to incorporate a fully featured sequencer as an upgrade option to the touch keyboard. What ever the final production unit looks lik
2002-02-28 by ringmod45
the poll should have been more simple yes, maybe or no. that way people don't have to confuse themselves. kind of like the route of the touch seq. having a poll about jacks and knobs, makes it redundant and a waste of time . i have not even voted because it's about apples and ora
2002-02-28 by Andreas Lindholm
I just went thrugh the polls on the site and found that 10 people had cast their votes on To what extent do you think Doepfer should try to fix flaws and bugs in the product line?. 7 people say that it should be fixed in some way, but they range from "Nothing is more important" t
2002-02-28 by ringmod45
hi gang, i think there is a problem with yahoo groups tonight. it took more than 5 minutes before my posts got to message board, and then they posted them twice somehow. again, sorry about the doubles. cheers, RM
2002-02-28 by Andreas Lindholm
Glad you did voice your opionion Tris. We need more voices in here cause I feel it if only three or four people that do write stuff and I have pretty much nailed down what their response post different post will be in advance. It gets a bit dull waiting for the expected (we could
2002-02-28 by Andreas Lindholm
If that is so? Who am I? Don Buchla? Rudolph the raindeer? The only non Doepfer PR-consultant? =) I find it irrelevant who ringmod45 is... why don't you just leave him alone? Ignore him if you you like, but refrain from insults, please. /Andreas ----- Original Message ----- From:
2002-02-28 by ringmod45
well said, we need more of us to speak out in order for doepfer to realise it is a pressing issue. the issue of having a sequencer on the touch keyboard is somehow good and then not good. if you want achieve Serge TKB like functions one let alone two rows of pots will not do the
2002-02-28 by ringmod45
hi andreas, thanks for the support. does anyone really think that Dr. Robert Moog has the time to sit at a computer and write the stuff i wrote. some of these posts took well over an hour to write and edit. i wrote them to hear a real answer to this pressing issue. so i guess tha
2002-02-28 by ringmod45
hi andreas, thanks for the support. does anyone really think that Dr. Robert Moog has the time to sit at a computer and write the stuff i wrote. some of these posts took well over an hour to write and edit. i wrote them to hear a real answer to this pressing issue. so i guess tha
2002-02-28 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the Doepfer_a100 group: In what way should the Touch Sensitive Keyboard be designed? o It should be a Touch Sensitive Keyboard and one of the best Quality, no extras. o It should be a good TS Keyboard with basic extras includ
2002-02-28 by ringmod45
well said, we need more of us to speak out in order for doepfer to realise it is a pressing issue. the issue of having a sequencer on the touch keyboard is somehow good and then not good. if you want achieve Serge TKB like functions one let alone two rows of pots will not do the
2002-02-28 by ringmod45
that is an issue that would be more clear if doepfer would write the values for the input and output voltage range in their manuals. seems to me that the cv input needs a voltage longer than a trigger i.e. spike in order to react, therefore only gates do the job. because if you u
2002-02-27 by andrewdalio
OK, gang, I think I know the REAL truth: RM is none other than ROBERT MOOG. He is solely here to cause dissent amongst the Doepfer masses in an effort to launch the MiniMoog Voyager! -andrew bunny (no smiley necessary...)
2002-02-27 by bakis Sirros
hi list, by the way,the triggers from my a155 pass right thru my a150!!!!!!but the gates work o.k.!!!weird??? synthfreak --- Roel Steverink wrote: > Hi Joe, > > Thanks for your comment. I don't think that there's > something wrong with the A 150! I think that I made > some error
2002-02-27 by thepeak
Yes I agree -----Original Message----- From: buechlerjoe [mailto:buechlerjoe@toadmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 6:50 PM To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Doepfer_a100] Re: Gear philosophy I think the difference in Philosophy is directly related to the issue
2002-02-27 by thepeak
Hi everyone, I don't contribute all that often; I do make the time to read as much as I can with regards to this group. The touch sensor keyboard should surely be just that. No sequencer, simply a touch sensitive board. It is then up to the individual to incorporate it as they se
2002-02-27 by synth_freak_2000
please vote to our new poll with more features about the touch- sensor keyboard!!! if you want you can create an additional poll with more features/ideas of your!!! synthfreak [doepfer_a100] group moderator
2002-02-27 by Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the Doepfer_a100 group: What features would you like DOEPFER to include in the SENSOR KEYBOARD(part 2)?? o second 25-knob row(80 euros) o fourth socket row(additional cv outs)(40 euros) o midi out(5 euros) o pressure sensor f
2002-02-27 by Roel Steverink
Hi Joe, Thanks for your comment. I don't think that there's something wrong with the A 150! I think that I made some error along the way. I try again, let you know if I suceed. Roel. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2002-02-27 by buechlerjoe
I think the difference in Philosophy is directly related to the issue of new gear versus existing gear. Doepfer's business model is to continuosly develop and sell new gear, and this forum primarily serves as a marketing focus group for that effort. Which is fine, that's what the
2002-02-27 by buechlerjoe
Roel, a while ago I posted details of the 16-note patch for someone else. Do a search of the message archive, or take a look in the database. Joe --- In Doepfer_a100@y..., "Roel Steverink" wrote: > Hi Joe, > > Thanks for your comment. I don't think that there's something wrong wi
2002-02-27 by Roel Steverink
From: bakis Sirros Date: Tue Feb 26, 2002 9:21 pm Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Something in defence of the A 100 Hé Bakis, Thanks for reacting to my writing! It does make the time consuming typing worthwhile!! I'm glad you talk about the sound, cause I got the impression that on t
2002-02-27 by Andreas Lindholm
To what do you agree? That it should be built in or that it would better off as an expansion that has a new set of features that matches the rest of the TBK? Glad I am not Dieter D, there are a lot of disparent vishes here ;) /Andreas ----- Original Message ----- From: > > I agre
2002-02-27 by Roel Steverink
From: bakis Sirros Date: Tue Feb 26, 2002 9:21 pm Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Something in defence of the A 100 Hé Bakis, Thanks for reacting to my writing! It does make the time consuming typing worthwhile!! I'm glad you talk about the sound, cause I got the impression that on t
2002-02-27 by Andreas Lindholm
No I don't think it is. It is just another set of those "unnessecary features that you think should be there";-) I think you have been the most avid of the lot to keep things cheap and stripped down. Now you ask for things to be included again. It just doesn't make sense the way
2002-02-27 by david.salter@reuters.com
I agree that if a sequencer is to be incorporated into the touch keyboard it has to be fully integrated. The point that has been made by some people, myself included is that it can be an add on and it would have to offer more than a155 (just as you intimate). David bakis Sirros c
2002-02-27 by bakis Sirros
hi RM, thank you for the tips,but right now i have my a100 modules patched for a track that i'm working on,so,i can't try anything....but when i find the time i will!!!! thank you. synthfreak --- ringmod45 wrote: > hi bakis, have you tried any of the tips i descibed > to you in p
2002-02-27 by bakis Sirros
ooooooo.......don't you understand that this sequencer NEEDS to be with the sensor keyboard???the keys of the keyboard are used for activating steps/changing seq.lenght on the fly!!!so,it is nessessary to have a touch-sensor keyboard/sequencer!!!!!!!!! synthfreak --- davevosh@aol
2002-02-27 by bodego7
I was chatting yesterday with none other than Mr. Rex Probe of Sound Transform Systems, maker of the Serge synth, and commented on the new, upcoming Doeph KB, which will obviously become a major competitor for his TKB. He stated that he worries little, since he doubts the German
2002-02-27 by david.salter@reuters.com
I do like the idea of an expandable unit. Why? well it allows me & other to budget better, it means I get the features I need/want (after all I already own a MAQ16/3, 2 A155's and a 8 step A Solutions sequencer) which is the touch keyboard. Good idea indeed. David Andreas Lindhol
2002-02-27 by Florian Anwander
Hi Andreas > Touch sense keyboard... nah I don't care for that. The vote with "NO" or never complain again, that Doepfer (or any other brand) produces gear you don't want instead of producing things you want them to produce. Qui tacet consentire videtur. Florian -- Florian Anwand
2002-02-27 by ringmod45
a glaring omission i for got to include to the post below is portamento with a voltage control input. plus have a look the 221 photo in the buchla folder in the files section. above the keys, there are a row of smaller touch squares. it would good to have a pot then three these s
2002-02-27 by Andreas Lindholm
This is uncanny Bakis, activate and deactivate is the way regelwerk and shaltwerk works, then you can set notepitch and loop lenght and that's it. I fear that the same old chip is used again... please do ask doepfer if that is the case. It would be a sad day indeed if they decide
2002-02-27 by denshiblocks
just wanted to voice my support of the doepfer touch sensor keyboard. i dont offer much to the messageboard, but i dont want to let the chance of buying a new and affordable TKB slip away because of a lack of interest. please build this! thanks seth s. nemec denshiblocks@yahoo.co