2006-12-15 by Rob Puricelli
CD sales have indeed dropped, but that has NOTHING to do with whether they use a Fairlight, Emulator, S6000, Prophecy, Fusion or whatever. It\u2019s because music piracy is up, downloads are the preferred medium and the industry is on a downturn in general. It has nothing at all
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by paradyse_james
As I said , FORGET all the old Fairlight Presets as "orch3" they are outdated , overused and pure crap. Fairlights have a quality of sound that is still actually unsurpassed --- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, Hallvard Tangeraas wrote: > > I'm not going to add more heat to this
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by paradyse_james
I' m sorry but since 10 years the cd sales have dropped asn for everybody. If depeche mode were a new born music group , nobody would buy their album. They actually sell because of their PAST. --- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, "Rob Puricelli" wrote: > > > >>The sales of Depec
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Rob Puricelli
>> The sales of Depeche Mode have dropped the day they left all this >> good stuff, didn' t you noticed ? I\u2019m sorry, but that is, as we say in my country (the same country that Depeche Mode hail from) utter bollox !! Check the kit lists for stuff like Violator and you will s
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by paradyse_james
Recording Fairlight in a protools is a no sense; just like copying a HD DVD on a VHS. Do you know what multiplexing is ? Emu II and III were great despite a sound less punchy than the Fairlight. Emu 4 has just an anemic sound.Only the filter are ... interesting. Depeche Mode used
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Jean-Bernard EMOND
c'est lui... http://www.frenchflava.com/frenchtouch-forum/viewtopic.php? p=1846&sid=3f5cdd3505663bf8151fbb78f3d4965a Le 15 déc. 06 à 16:00, Laurent/LIFELIKE a écrit : > ok sorry u win...! > > it was great reward which is from 84 > i will eat myself now ;-) > > > Le 15 déc. 06 à 1
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Laurent/LIFELIKE
ok sorry u win...! it was great reward which is from 84 i will eat myself now ;-) Le 15 déc. 06 à 15:42, kevin kelley a écrit : It took two seconds to look that up Artist: Depeche Mode Album: Black Celebration - 6 reviews: Year: 1986 Stop now you have no creadability Also it is i
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by kevin kelley
It took two seconds to look that up Artist: Depeche Mode Album: Black Celebration - 6 reviews: Year: 1986 Stop now you have no creadability Also it is in there own words on the dvds they recently released. Good try. What is your point? LOL Kevin Kelley --- Laurent/LIFELIKE wrote:
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Peter Connelly
I thought Black Celebration was released in 1986? P On 12/15/06, Laurent/LIFELIKE lifelike@neuf.fr > wrote: A series III on Black Celebration then ... an album produced in 84 as the series III where released in 85, nice one... I like that kind of mister "i know everything", seems
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Laurent/LIFELIKE
A series III on Black Celebration then ... an album produced in 84 as the series III where released in 85, nice one... I like that kind of mister "i know everything", seems to be a lot in here LOL Le 15 déc. 06 à 14:50, kevin kelley a écrit : Funny that depeche mode would be in t
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by kevin kelley
Funny that depeche mode would be in this discussion. Depeche used a synclavier in the studio on Some great reward. They then used a series III in the studio on Black celebration. They used the emulators and emaxs for live only taking samples from the albums to play live. I work f
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Peter Connelly
Very interesting debate / thread. Just hope it doesn't become too heated ;-) P On 12/15/06, Lee ensnareyou@aol.com > wrote: The Depeche Mode sound is based more upon old analog synthesizers than samples. The lush strings, beds, leads, and musical bleeps and blips aren't samples,
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by dvdborn
To bring this subject back on topic. (but please do continue with the other debate...) My main question was how I could obtain the Series III library without owning one. I'd like to use the library with my EIII. Am I correct that the following procedure would work? 1. I purchase
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Laurent/LIFELIKE
Emu samplers... Depeche mode used them since ages for their albums and are today working on protools like everybody. Please talk about things you know. I did a entire single on Emulator IV it sounds great. The track is called Discopolis, you can even check it on itunes: Lifelike
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Lee
The Depeche Mode sound is based more upon old analog synthesizers than samples. The lush strings, beds, leads, and musical bleeps and blips aren't samples, they are real ARP, Moog, Roland, EMS, Oberheim, and other Modular synths. They did use the Emulators a lot (mostly EII), Fai
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by paradyse_james
Emu has nothing in common with Fairlight sounds, dynamic is poor. I only use my emu when I need more polyphony. I also noticed a big problem with emu and soft samplers: more you add voices , less it sounds good. Thanks to the multiplexing technology; THE big disease for sound qua
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Laurent/LIFELIKE
Well Im speaking about guys doing real records and selling them on the real market, not about guys owning the sampler for collection or to show to you girlfriend that u got a very big one (big sampler of course :-)))) Im open to check the record stores if u got a band/artist name
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-14 by paradyse_james
Well, when you already own a Fairlight ( and they are hundreds to be owned :)) you don' t care about the price or the weight ! If It' s there , in your studio, you just need to move your hand to use it. How did you established that nobody use the fairlight anymore ? Every week I
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-14 by billyrockplay
Hi to all Fairlight peeps. I use my Fairlight! thank goodness it works- i love my baby. i don't post much but i do check in regularly to see what you guys are up to. if you'd like to hear some fairlight check out "Alice" (version 1) @ billyrock.com. God bless to all- happ holiday
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-14 by dvdborn
Hi, To all who inquired about the EII sample library. For the moment I'm keeping this project private. The samples are converted, still need to create the programs with them. I didn't know that a lot of you are interested in this library. Of course if someone would care to trade
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-14 by Peter Connelly
How long you been back online, Colin? Good to have you back :-) On 12/13/06, Colin Ross colin.a.ross@btopenworld.com > wrote: Loads of Artists use Fairlights. I sold my Series III to Coldplay and I know they are useing it for their new album. Just listen to the Killers new single
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-13 by Rob Puricelli
David, Any chance you may make that converted EII library available ? ;o) Rob. _____ From: Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of dvdborn Sent: 13 December 2006 21:18 To: Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Fairlight-CMI] Re: Series
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-13 by dvdborn
Now, if only someone would take the time to resample the Fairlight Series III Library. I know that this will be a gigantic task. I recently converted the complete Emulator II sample library from 5 1/4 floppies to AIFF files, sample dumping them from an Oberheim DPX-1 into Alchemy
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-13 by Colin Ross
Loads of Artists use Fairlights. I sold my Series III to Coldplay and I know they are useing it for their new album. Just listen to the Killers new single tell me thats not a Fairlight play the Brass section. It sure is Regards Colin
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-13 by Laurent/LIFELIKE
well today nobody's doing records with a fairlight II or III; this is a heavy machine, cost a lot and the character is not what listeners are able to catch, they catch nice melodies and great compositions done with a fairlight or with a akai or on a zx spectrum, who cares is some
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-13 by Peter Connelly
I agree. The quality of the Fairlight is unique, but whether the samples are used in a track directly recorded from a Fairlight or a program, such as Kontakt, using a CD / DVD library (recorded with lab precision), I doubt anyone would be able to 'really' tell the difference. The
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-13 by Lee
The sound of the Fairlight CMI III is quite unique and nothing else compares to it. The AD/ DA's and Filtering are what make this instrument so exceptional. I've owned nearly every sampler made and have never been able to port or sample CMI sounds directly into another sampler an
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-11 by Hallvard Tangeraas
On 10/12/06 04:46, Laurent/LIFELIKE wrote: > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6QsusDS_8A > > > Page R demo with herbie Hancock and Quincy jones... > Enjoy Awesome! And in case someone doesn't already know, it is indeed possible to download and keep videos on Youtube, despite Y
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-10 by Harald Feldmann
Anyone interested in a really heavy Kurz 250 with expander, be very quick only 5 minutes to go.. 110062874256
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-10 by formula311dn
I think it's safe to say that the possibility of the Series III library becoming availible does not exist in the near future. The reason for this is the fact that poeple still buy Series III's because of their library (and other abilities). At this point in time, the library can'
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-10 by Laurent/LIFELIKE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6QsusDS_8A Page R demo with herbie Hancock and Quincy jones... Enjoy Laurent --
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-10 by Laurent/LIFELIKE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6QsusDS_8A Page R demo with herbie Hancock and Quincy jones... Enjoy Laurent --
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-09 by john945277
Interesting part at 2:30 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaJU0HMyW9M Regards John
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-08 by Peter Connelly
Hi, 1) This is how I believe it to be. Maybe Peter Vogel can elaborate on this one? It is a breathy sample, probably a characteristic of her voice. Some voices are breathy by nature are and maybe only a portion of the recording was used, missing out the attack possibly? It was 8
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-07 by my_list_address
--- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Connelly" wrote: > > Hi and welcome to the group. Thanks! > 1) AFAIK this was recorded direct using a Fairlight employee, called Sarah > Cohen So it's just Sarah singing "aaaaaah" into a mic? No manipulation, editing or anything? Is it
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-07 by dvdborn
Hi, Unfortunately I'm not a Fairlight user. But my main sampler is the Emulator III. How is it that no-one has ever released CD-ROM's in a contemporary audio format with the Fairlight Series III library on it? The EIII library CD-ROM's are widely available, The IIx library can be
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-06 by Peter Connelly
Hi and welcome to the group. I'll try to answer some of your questions... 1) AFAIK this was recorded direct using a Fairlight employee, called Sarah Cohen 2) Earlier Fairlights didn't have any special pitch shifting function, although I believe the MFX2 had a time stretch card op
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-05 by my_list_address
Unfortunately I don't own a Fairlight myself, but I joined this group because I've always been fascinated by the CMI. I have some (hopefully not too stupid) questions: 1) How was that fantastic and famous Fairlight-voice preset (http://www.ghservices.com/gregh/fairligh/examples/a
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-04 by big bloke
--- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Connelly" wrote: > > Thanks Peter. I'll check this out. > > Kind regards, > Peter > > > On 12/2/06, Peter Vogel wrote: > > > > It is "an exceedingly fantastic sound card", which does not use DSPs > > but provides: > > > > 230 Channel p
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-04 by Peter Connelly
Thanks Peter. I'll check this out. Kind regards, Peter On 12/2/06, Peter Vogel peter.vogel@vogelfamily.net > wrote: It is "an exceedingly fantastic sound card", which does not use DSPs but provides: 230 Channel paths; each with eight bands of EQ, 3 stage dynamics processing, 12 A
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-04 by Peter Connelly
it's at $100,000 at the moment :-D WOW On 12/2/06, Peter Vogel peter.vogel@vogelfamily.net > wrote: You can see also a video of the keyboard being signed by me and other Fairlight founders here: http://www.vogelross.com.au/downloads/fairlight1.wmv From: JOHN HOPKINS [mailto: john
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-04 by Lee
I have the following items for trade. I will also consider serious cash offers. Low ballers need not reply. I am looking to trade for analog synthesizers (Memorymoog (Lintronics version preferred), Roland Jupiter 8, Chroma, Yamaha CS80, Voyetra 8, etc.), vintage tube mics, compre
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-03 by Tobias Enhus
Hi all! Just to clarify reg the CC1. It only works within the Fairlight world right? Or can it also be used as a Logic frontend? Cheers! Tobias Enhus --- David Bulog wrote: > One thing the CC1 has got that Pro Tools hasn't is > VST Plugins which > is more the industry standard >
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-03 by David Bulog
One thing the CC1 has got that Pro Tools hasn't is VST Plugins which is more the industry standard On 3/12/2006, at 9:52 PM, big bloke wrote: I supose what I'm saying, is that given Slow tools has had the industry standard tag for quite a while now, It's nice as a punter to be pr
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-03 by big bloke
I supose what I'm saying, is that given Slow tools has had the industry standard tag for quite a while now, It's nice as a punter to be presented with a great bit of kit that puts presure on that mantle. I have also owned a Slow tools system, thus the name I have given it, as wel
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-02 by David Bulog
Adding to my post--I personally own a Pro Tools HD system I must say I was extremely disappointed and as were other posters that any posts about the Fairlight CC-1 on the Digidesign User Group http://duc.digidesign.com / is removed by the administrator so no one knows what is goi
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-02 by David Bulog
I was the original poster that made the statement that it is far to early to say that the CC-1 is better than Pro Tools HD I love the Fairlight but no matter how good the hardware is --what about the software--Pro Tools 7 is great software and it will take a lot to beat it and ge
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-02 by twharleyman
Hi Kevin, I have a system with what I believe is a faulty Master board. Please let me know if you are selling the one from your system and if so what revision number it is. Many Thanks. Tony. --- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, "Tim Curtis" wrote: > > Hi Kevin - > > I could rea
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-02 by big bloke
--- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, David Bulog wrote: > > I would say its far to early to say that CC-1 is better than Pro > Tools HD because its too new and has not been proven. > A good example is NIs KORE was released to much fanfare and the thing > was a Native Instruments
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-02 by Jean-Bernard EMOND
It's the same video (but extended) about Peter Gabriel (but with out French under title) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fiF0ii7wpOg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wg3bzd8BcKo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJ1BukFnORM
Thread view
Attachments: 0