2006-12-20 by Laurent Lemaire
Dear Laurent, I'm sorry but I don't understand why you joined this group ? It seems you don't have any Fairlight and not interested to understand its technical difference with the technology available today. If you're only here expecting some Fairlight owners would spend some tim
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-20 by dvdborn
Too keep things organized here I'm in favor for some basic rules: - No reviews of music or comparisons of musical genres - being a producer/seller and dissing another producer/sellers David http://dvdborn.blogspot.com --- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, Laurent Lemaire wrote: >
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-19 by Laurent/LIFELIKE
darren hayes on itunes http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewAlbum?playlistId=24253800&selectedItemId=24253846&s=143442 Le 19 déc. 06 à 20:22, Laurent Lemaire a écrit : Thanks to James, I discovered this artist. His web site really worth a visit !!! -> http://www.
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-19 by Laurent/LIFELIKE
His music is specially horrible, between RnB and supercommercial cheesy pop. The fairlight didnt seems to help him to get nice sounds Probably you guys can help him and send him some new floppies ? LOL Le 19 déc. 06 à 20:22, Laurent Lemaire a écrit : Thanks to James, I discovered
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-19 by dvdborn
Harald & James, Thanks for clearing this out. Much appreciated. Cheers, David http://dvdborn.blogspot.com --- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, Harald Feldmann wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:08:31 -0000, you wrote: > > >1. The above mentioned site claims that the MFX3 still ha
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-19 by Laurent Lemaire
Thanks to James, I discovered this artist. His web site really worth a visit !!! -> http://www.darrenhayes.com/ I loved the Fairlight Lesson they made, really fun ! See you. Laurent.
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-18 by Harald Feldmann
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:08:31 -0000, you wrote: >1. The above mentioned site claims that the MFX3 still has full CMI functionality up untill >Rev 11. Is this correct? At other placed I read that the MFX2 was the last model that >supported CMI functionality. MFX3 is a different mac
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-18 by paradyse_james
Fairlight added on the mfx2 a sample and hold card on every DA to improve dynamic and high frequencies. Phase correlation has been improved for stereo cards too. More precise informations can be found in the service manual. You have the turbo scsi card that speed sound loading an
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-18 by dvdborn
I am trying to figure out the specifications of the MFX2 and MFX3. Specificaly the CMI similarities. There isn't a lot of info available on the net cc. the MFX2 & 3. The only usefull site I found was http://members.tripod.com/kmi9000/kmi_cmi.htm (although most of the external lin
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-18 by dvdborn
--- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, "paradyse_james" wrote: > > you' ll obtain .wav files. That's exactly what I'm after at the moment. I know that a lot of the character comes out of the D/A's but I'm mostly interested in the samples themselves. > Raw files will just give you
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-18 by tama_rat
I actually bought *two* of those 32Meg boards. :-) One for my 6.03 machine, and one "just in case." I can't recall how much memory the 6.03 machine came with; I *think* it was less than the full 14MB. I really liked the idea of someone creating a new board for this old machine, a
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-18 by Hallvard Tangeraas
Thanks to Peter Connely and Tomás for the response to my questions regarding the Fairlight and the "ARR1" origin. Please keep 'em coming ;-) Meanwhile, in my quest for more information surrounding these things I came across a thesis by Robert Fink of UCLA where he writes about th
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-18 by Tomás
I remember hearing that this sound was recorded via a Roland chorus unit. There was also an interview with Klaus Schulze from way back, where he claimed that he made the original sample. Unfortunately I have no references for these claims... There is also the SOS article where Pa
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-18 by Peter Connelly
Hi Hallvard, There could be a score of reasons why the Fairlight Arr sounds different to the other examples, the most obvious reason being source of sample, i.e. vocalist / choir. Maybe there was some filtering going on with the original voice and then re-synthesised, I'm not 100
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-18 by Hallvard Tangeraas
On 8/12/06 11:57, Peter Connelly wrote: (Fairlight "ARR1" choir/voice sample) > 1) This is how I believe it to be. Maybe Peter Vogel can elaborate on > this one? Is he here as well? Wow! Yes, that would be great. > It is a breathy sample, probably a characteristic of her > voice.
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-18 by Peter Connelly
Hi Laurent Ah, yes. I never thought of that. Thanks :-) Kind regards, Peter On 12/18/06, Laurent Lemaire llemaire1@free.fr > wrote: Hi Peter, Replacing the 7 CMI39 boards by the WFM32 is reducing a lot the power consumption and heat generation ... If I could I would do the same o
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-18 by Laurent Lemaire
Hi Peter, Replacing the 7 CMI39 boards by the WFM32 is reducing a lot the power consumption and heat generation ... If I could I would do the same on my rev 6.03 ... Best regards. Laurent.
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-18 by Peter Connelly
If you don't mind me asking, why did you get a 32 Meg board when you have a 6.03 machine? Do you intend to upgrade it and while these boards were available, decide to grab one while you could? Cheers, Peter On 12/18/06, tama_rat britt@danger.com > wrote: Hi, I bought the Series I
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-18 by tama_rat
Hi, I bought the Series III machine that came from PUK studios through the Greg Holmes site back in 1998 or 1999. I still have it, and it still works. It's a Rev6. Sadly, it didn't come with any DM samples or sequences. The only indicator that it came from PUK is a box of floppie
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-17 by Laurent/LIFELIKE
yes sure i know that its not mine... this is a part of my image im using to promote my music..; i hope u didnt believe that i was producing such music on a old Fairlight; because this wouldnt be possible anyway as you can hear my music is mostly developped on analog synth. but i
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-16 by Laurent Lemaire
The fairlight pictured on your page is mine... The original is there : -> http://www.myspace.com/l_etoile_noire
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-16 by Lars Johansson
Actually, they never used the Wave 2.2. It was a Wave 2. At the time when DM bought the Wave 2 they was promised the possibility to connect it to a Waveterm/Wavecomputer but that never happened. Instead PPG brought out the Wave 2.2 in 1982 which could connect to the Waveterm. DM
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-16 by antonyp69
I can see that this forum is becoming a division of the Fairlight haves and have nots. We all came to this post because the Fairlight CMI triggers something special for us. Whether it be its grandeur, technologicl brilliance, its sonic aura or that it gives us good memories of an
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-16 by Scott Kozicki
Kevin, did you ever complete the sale of your IIx from the museum? Cheers, Scott On Dec 15, 2006, at 7:01 PM, kevin kelley wrote: Due to today's run of emails I felt compelled to play my IIx for a while and see what it was that I love SO much about the IIx. The sound is amazing,
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-16 by kevin kelley
Due to today's run of emails I felt compelled to play my IIx for a while and see what it was that I love SO much about the IIx. The sound is amazing, No noise like my emax or mirage just great samples. Dark is a word I would use due to the fact that I am in a industrial/synth pop
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by kevin kelley
I apologize to James, With all of the recent posts and personal attacks on peoples credibility I confused him with the few individuals who have recently used this list to start a flame war. I hope that this list gets back to its intended purpose helping people who love the fairli
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by paradyse_james
Laurent you' re welcome in my studio to listen to some fairlights sounds and page R sequences. If you want, of course :) --- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, Laurent/LIFELIKE wrote: > > ok sorry u win...! > it was great reward which is from 84 > i will eat myself now ;-) > > > L
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Laurent/LIFELIKE
finally somebody catched me on myspace ;-)) you're all welcome ... even James ;-)) have a nice Weekend Le 15 déc. 06 à 22:17, paradyse_james a écrit : Att: Laurent on MYSPACE is that your fairlight ? http://viewmorepics .myspace. com/index. cfm? fuseaction=viewImag e&friendID= 27
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by kevin kelley
Would someone remove this flamer from the list? this is becoming annoying! Kevin Kelley --- paradyse_james wrote: > Att: Laurent on MYSPACE > > is that your fairlight ? > > http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm? > fuseaction=viewImage&friendID=27327957&imageID=1306833878 > >
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Jean-Bernard EMOND
Cool... here it's Fairlight forum, not FightClub forum ;) JB
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Colin Ross
Construction Time Again samples were recorded at a scrap yard close to the studio they used in Berlin. Alan Wilder and Daniel Millar did the sampling and these were put into a Synclavier. I asked Alan this about a year ago. They used the samples on tour, via a Emulator 1 used by
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by paradyse_james
you' ll obtain .wav files. Raw files will just give you the sound as it was originaly recorded by the Fairlight but not played by the Fairlight. You lose the Fairlight D/A converters, filters and vary frequency pitching... and they are replaced by the one you have in your emu. Yo
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Colin Ross
I'm going to email this once. A member is coming close to becoming banned from the forum. This is the first and last warning. Colin
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by paradyse_james
Att: Laurent on MYSPACE is that your fairlight ? http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm? fuseaction=viewImage&friendID=27327957&imageID=1306833878 I didn' t knew that sound engineer used samplers and synthesizers for their work. Do you know what a sound engineer is ? Anyway I'
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Laurent/LIFELIKE
Thanks James DO records and we will talk after, give me some records name you worked on, and we will discuss about the sound. Its not because u seems to be a sound engineer that every sound engineer are good. i know lots of weak sound engineers. Le 15 déc. 06 à 20:35, paradyse_ja
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by jbgrahame
Producer Daniel Miller was heavily into the Synclavier, not the Fairlight. Black Celebration is absolutely chock-full of Sync FM sounds. In fact, the distinctive FM synthesis of the Synclavier was all over Construction Time Again, Some Great Reward and Black Celebration. And even
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Marcin 'Rambo' Roguski
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:31:11 -0800 (PST) kevin kelley wrote: > I second this statement this thread is a waste of > time. Lets move back to helping the community of > fairlight users. Remember I am a know it all and > therefore I have spoken. Second, started to get bored :-D -- If
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by kevin kelley
I second this statement this thread is a waste of time. Lets move back to helping the community of fairlight users. Remember I am a know it all and therefore I have spoken. Kevin Kelley --- Rob Puricelli wrote: > Nothing more to say ?? I seriously doubt that. > > > > Listen, firs
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Rob Puricelli
>>> Roberto, I work with HD protools, apogee converters. I' ve worked >>> with 48 sony digital tape , or 2" analog tape. I' ve made hundreds of >>> sessions in well know studio. At the moment, you never worked >>> directly with fairlight , you have nothing more to say. >>> SPEAK
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by paradyse_james
anyway, to come back to the subject, the serie III library has no interest to be read in an other sampler. I converted it, but it lacks of presence, punch and "life" I' m very interested in the new CC1 fairlight card, at last I will perhaps have hundreds of polyphonic voices with
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Laurent/LIFELIKE
please james stop it with your 6years old jokes. we try to be serious and you come again with ur specs fight; Le 15 déc. 06 à 19:40, paradyse_james a écrit : are you comparing with your akai S6000, ROberto ? Loool www.hollowsun. com/cds/rob_ review.html nothing more to say --- In
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by paradyse_james
ALERT TROLL Laurent why are you lying ? you said you own a fairlight but in fact you just have a cd with old samples ( thanks to other users for relating this info ). LOooool Roberto, I work with HD protools, apogee converters. I' ve worked with 48 sony digital tape , or 2" analo
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Rob Puricelli
Nothing more to say ?? I seriously doubt that. Listen, first off, I have never compared an S6000 with a Fairlight and if I did, it wouldn't be in the form of some 20 line synopsis based on factual inaccuracies as you seem to offer. Many people who indulge in the "my dog is bigger
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Laurent/LIFELIKE
Def; i agree with Rob on all what he said. I think most of these users havent been out to see whats going on today since 1984, probably there's even dust on their ears, who knows LOL Le 15 déc. 06 à 18:57, Rob Puricelli a écrit : CD sales have indeed dropped, but that has NOTHING
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by paradyse_james
are you comparing with your akai S6000, ROberto ? Loool www.hollowsun.com/cds/rob_review.html nothing more to say --- In Fairlight-CMI@yahoogroups.com, "Rob Puricelli" wrote: > > > >>> Fairlights have a quality of sound that is still actually unsurpassed > > They have a unique qu
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Hallvard Tangeraas
I'm not going to add more heat to this discussion than already is, but I have a few thoughts.... As a mere hobby-musician (Fairlight-less I may add) I can't help think that there might be a distinction between "a Fairlight sound" (an instantly recognizable Fairlight preset such a
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by paradyse_james
For me , people who qualifie fairlight as a dark sound sampler have certainly dust in their ears :°) Especially when they are alone . Did you ever worked with cmi3, mfx2 or mfx3 ? or are you blinked to the protools narrow sounding ? Every people who listened to my fairlights want
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by paradyse_james
Music sales have dropped in the 90's , where was the music piracy at this moment ? Just observe the facts . Depeche mode will still sells albums , they could record only farts and fans would still buy their songs. Only because of their past I was a big fan of depeche mode in the
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by paradyse_james
what gear do you use ? give some precise exemple please I still never heard a better sounding hard disk recorder than my Fairlight MFX2 . Did you or Laurent worked with it . That would be good to discuss with people that REALLY worked with fairlights ( and not only the cmi 1 lol
Thread view
Attachments: 0
2006-12-15 by Rob Puricelli
>>> Fairlights have a quality of sound that is still actually unsurpassed They have a unique quality which is excellent, but to say they are unsurpassed is extremely blinkered and wholly inaccurate. Rob.
Thread view
Attachments: 0