Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 128 of 168 · 8362 messages matched
2004-07-07 by scd
on 07-07-2004 15:04, Julian at julian@22host24.com wrote: Besides, one buys a piece of gear for what it does at *that* moment, not for what it's next generation will do one day... Boele > Its not an issue for me. > > Whatever you buy itll be superseded. Just cause there's a 300gh
2004-07-07 by Julian
Its not an issue for me. Whatever you buy itll be superseded. Just cause there's a 300ghz machine on the horizon, that doesn't mean that your humble p2 266 doesn't do what it used to. And, besides, from what i understand, the p4 will be an addition, rather then a direct replaceme
2004-07-07 by Paul Nagle
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 12:24:25 +0100, "Colin f" wrote: >It'll either be 8 or 16, but tracks will be linkable so the events from >another track can be 're-directed' to another. There's a small possibility >this feature may appear in P3 - it depends on the ROM space. You teaser you! P
2004-07-07 by Paul Nagle
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 12:07:00 +0100, "Colin f" wrote: >In the random and brownian direction modes, a separate count of the number >of steps played is held. The pattern is considered to have 'wrapped' when >the number of steps played is equal to the number of unskipped steps in the
2004-07-07 by Hans Greuber
Hi; What features will have the P4 not incluided in the P3? I feel myself a bit tricked with my P3 , is like when you buy the gti edition and the next month the gti 16 v comes up I hope I´m not Hans _________________________________________________________________ Descarga gratis
2004-07-07 by Colin f
> i've been playing around with masks combined with the AUX D acc, and > i've come up with some questions i can't find answers to in the > manual. does the AUX D accumulator value start at 0 by default? Yes - aux D acc is reset to 0 when a new pattern is selected. > so secondly,
2004-07-07 by Gert van Santen
Colin f wrote: >> Will the P3 sequencer be upgradeable by a P4 engine? If so, how? > > The P4 user interface will be significantly larger, so it's not going > to be just a brain transplant. I don't see P4 as a replacement for P3 > - I'll continue to build P3 for the foreseeable f
2004-07-07 by Colin f
> Will the P3 sequencer be upgradeable by a P4 engine? If so, how? The P4 user interface will be significantly larger, so it's not going to be just a brain transplant. I don't see P4 as a replacement for P3 - I'll continue to build P3 for the foreseeable future. And there's no ET
2004-07-07 by Gert van Santen
Say, Colin, Will the P3 sequencer be upgradeable by a P4 engine? If so, how? Gert (complete layman on electronics) www.waveworld.tv
2004-07-07 by Colin f
> P4 needs 16 aux events per track at least. It'll either be 8 or 16, but tracks will be linkable so the events from another track can be 're-directed' to another. There's a small possibility this feature may appear in P3 - it depends on the ROM space. Cheers, Colin f ___________
2004-07-07 by Colin f
> It's my goal to exceed any limit that you set... The 32 bit processor slated for P4 will theoretically allow gbars up to 4,294,967,296. I make that 17 years for one gbar loop at 120BPM ;-) Roughly. Cheers, Colin f ________________________________________________ Message sent us
2004-07-07 by Sayer
--- In analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com, scd wrote: > on 07-07-2004 15:04, Julian at julian@2... wrote: > > Besides, one buys a piece of gear for what it does at *that* moment, not for > what it's next generation will do one day... Has this turned into the Waldorf forum???? Thi
2004-07-07 by Colin f
> Not wanting to throw a spanner in the works but how would you > determine one pass of a pattern if the direction is "random"? > > Just thinking outloud cos I don't know the answer... In the random and brownian direction modes, a separate count of the number of steps played is h
2004-07-07 by ch.³l
hi Colin, i've been playing around with masks combined with the AUX D acc, and i've come up with some questions i can't find answers to in the manual. does the AUX D accumulator value start at 0 by default? as i was using the 'offset aux D REL' event without actually using the AU
2004-07-07 by Paul Nagle
Not wanting to throw a spanner in the works but how would you determine one pass of a pattern if the direction is "random"? Just thinking outloud cos I don't know the answer... Personally, I'd love to be able to "schedule" some Aux events to happen based on criteria such as "note
2004-07-07 by Gene Schwartz
designing a pattern that has an aux event assigning various probabilities to aux b, which assigns the last step to the sequence. God, this is fun. Load pattern with aux events, put controllers on another track. That's the way to go here. I need something varying the pitch in the
2004-07-07 by Gene Schwartz
> From: "Colin f" > Reply-To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com > Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:04:57 +0100 > To: > Subject: RE: [analogue-sequencer] another question: triggering a pattern > >> I'm confused. >> "The 'global bar length', GBar, is the number of 16th note >> steps that
2004-07-07 by Colin f
> I'm confused. > "The 'global bar length', GBar, is the number of 16th note > steps that the P3 will use as the length of one cycle of the > current part." So, if I set gbar to 16, won't the pattern > reset well before I want it to without ever reaching step 16? > Suppose it act
2004-07-06 by implode7@comcast.net
-------------- Original message -------------- > > No - that's the whole idea. I want the pattern to reach step > > 16 for one repeat. If it counts 16 steps, then it would reset > > even earlier than setting chng = P. > > Right, I think I understand. You have a pattern that is ch
2004-07-06 by Colin f
> No - that's the whole idea. I want the pattern to reach step > 16 for one repeat. If it counts 16 steps, then it would reset > even earlier than setting chng = P. Right, I think I understand. You have a pattern that is changing length under aux control and each time the pattern
2004-07-06 by implode7@comcast.net
No - that's the whole idea. I want the pattern to reach step 16 for one repeat. If it counts 16 steps, then it would reset even earlier than setting chng = P. -------------- Original message -------------- > > Actually, I think that it would be less confusing, but that's > > just
2004-07-06 by Colin f
> Actually, I think that it would be less confusing, but that's > just the way I think... > I am so used to overriding the gbar, I never even thought of > that. If I always override it, I can use it for just these > patterns. Now, having not used the gbar yet > (intentionally...)
2004-07-06 by implode7@comcast.net
Actually, I think that it would be less confusing, but that's just the way I think... I am so used to overriding the gbar, I never even thought of that. If I always override it, I can use it for just these patterns. Now, having not used the gbar yet (intentionally...), will it wo
2004-07-06 by Colin f
> ok - so then it is using the temporary last step as set in > the aux event, rather than the one at the pattern level? That > is what seems to be happening....but I'll have to look again > later tonight. If it looks at the aux event last step to > determine one repeat, then it s
2004-07-06 by implode7@comcast.net
ok - so then it is using the temporary last step as set in the aux event, rather than the one at the pattern level? That is what seems to be happening....but I'll have to look again later tonight. If it looks at the aux event last step to determine one repeat, then it seems to me
2004-07-06 by Colin f
> Reading back over it, I'm still not sure I understand your > (Colin's) explanation of how one repeat is determined > exactly, but it seems to me that the sequence could move on > before an elaborate pattern of steps is completed, which > somehow seems wrong to me. It forces you
2004-07-06 by Colin f
> Considering the P3's background and original remit, it's a UI that I > still find surprisingly quick once you're over that learning curve. The original remit was just for a dead-simple performance step sequencer. It was Nagle that made me add all the tricksy stuff, honest ! I f
2004-07-06 by implode7@comcast.net
-------------- Original message -------------- > > > Well, I had thought that what this meant was that the 'entire pattern' was > > determined by when it reached the last step in the pattern. But it isn't. > > It can't be - you might have skipped the last step, so it would never
2004-07-06 by scd
Op 6-jul-04 om 19:37 heeft darkstr1746@comcast.net het volgende geschreven: > > That said, i can't wait to get my hands on a machine that seems to be > tailor made to reinforce my "how the hell did that happen" approach to > composition. LMAO!!! Right on!! Boele
2004-07-06 by Paul Nagle
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 17:51:20 +0000, implode7@comcast.net wrote: >When you first get it, I'd recommend using Paul's tutorials. They're pretty short, but I think should get you started pretty quickly. I'm gonna do more and put in more details - just as soon as I stop messing with t
2004-07-06 by implode7@comcast.net
I don't think of the p3 as exclusively a performance device...some of the confusion with the more esoteric functions, I think, has to do with the fact that the documentation really doesn't go far enough in explaining how exactly certain of the functions work, and that there isn't
2004-07-06 by darkstr1746@comcast.net
the discussions going on have led me to some goofy conclussions about this instrument even though i dont have one yet. some of the functions described sound an awful lot like the functions found in the old oberheim Cyclones. A tasty beast to be sure but the UI was despicable cons
2004-07-06 by ch.³l
> I believe once you know how to use it, > you'll find it logical and easy to get on with. If experienced users > disagree with that, please let me know... hrm.. well i guess i fall in the 'experienced user' category. Colin & Paul are right in saying that once you're over the lea
2004-07-06 by Mark Pulver
(play catch-up after being off the 'net for 4 days) Gene Schwartz (06:13 PM 7/3/2004) wrote: >>> http://www.soundart-hot.com/images/Chameleon%20mkII.jpg > >wow - I was just considering ordering the original. I think I will preorder >one of these! And I _JUST _received one of the
2004-07-06 by Colin f
> And it's great that the Aux events are not implemented with any > specific constraints - so it's feasible for anyone to have to stop and > think what's going on... 8-) And that frequently includes me... ;-) Cheers, Colin f
2004-07-06 by Paul Nagle
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 15:28:05 +0000, implode7@comcast.net wrote: >Actually, it was Paul who said that he didn't understand the question. I don't think that I expressed it very well the first time around. There is much I don't understand. And it's great that the Aux events are not
2004-07-06 by allanjhall
I'm just about to build my P3, pcb's arrived today :-) I have all of the parts except for the 62256 SRAM chip, Farnell and Maplin are out of stock, ESR just seem to have the narrow (0.3") 28pin dip version rather than the required 0.6" 28pin DIP item. Anyone have any ideas on whe
2004-07-06 by implode7@comcast.net
Actually, it was Paul who said that he didn't understand the question. I don't think that I expressed it very well the first time around. -------------- Original message -------------- > on 06-07-2004 16:31, Colin f at colin@colinfraser.com wrote: > > LOL! The OS became SO deep t
2004-07-06 by implode7@comcast.net
I think the price is supposed to be about $2500. -------------- Original message -------------- > Hi, > > I too think it would be interesting to learn more about the spectralis. > Most importantly - have you got any indication of the price?? If they want to > include REX file sup
2004-07-06 by Paul Nagle
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 06:45:02 -0700 (PDT), fm_xtk wrote: >Hi, > >I too think it would be interesting to learn more about the spectralis. >Most importantly - have you got any indication of the price?? If they want to >include REX file support, then there must learly be a computer in
2004-07-06 by scd
on 06-07-2004 16:31, Colin f at colin@colinfraser.com wrote: LOL! The OS became SO deep that even Colin can't explain it anymore :-))))) Boele >> Let me try to explain the other question. When you set up a playlist, you >> determine how many repeats you want for each step in the
2004-07-06 by Colin f
> Let me try to explain the other question. When you set up a playlist, you > determine how many repeats you want for each step in the playlist. If you > select 'P' for the chg parameter, then it will play through the entire > pattern, rather than change at the global bar. Check.
2004-07-06 by fm_xtk
Hi, I too think it would be interesting to learn more about the spectralis. Most importantly - have you got any indication of the price?? If they want to include REX file support, then there must learly be a computer interface and software updateable OS??? --- privat_joy wrote: >
2004-07-06 by Gene Schwartz
> From: "Colin f" > Reply-To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com > Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 8:36:44 +0100 > To: analogue-sequencer@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [analogue-sequencer] question about pattern repeats in a playlist > >> If you have a pattern where aux events are set up
2004-07-06 by Gene Schwartz
ok - it does sound like using parts is the easiest way to go here. If there were room for one more request, I guess mine would be the remote triggering of patterns and/or internal triggering of patterns by other patterns on other tracks. Let me try to explain the other question.
2004-07-06 by Colin f
> If you have a pattern where aux events are set up to influence the last step > and time base, how is the length of a repeat determined? A combined function based on relative humidity, phase of the moon and the length of a piece of string... > I have a pattern > which takes quit
2004-07-06 by Paul Nagle
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 19:12:56 -0700, Gene Schwartz wrote: >Is there an easy way of doing the following: >I want to start a certain pattern, say on track 6, at a certain point in >time - based on when another pattern on another track is finishing up. Is >there any way of doing this
2004-07-06 by Gene Schwartz
Is there an easy way of doing the following: I want to start a certain pattern, say on track 6, at a certain point in time - based on when another pattern on another track is finishing up. Is there any way of doing this simply and starting the pattern based on, say an aux event o
2004-07-06 by Gene Schwartz
If you have a pattern where aux events are set up to influence the last step and time base, how is the length of a repeat determined? I have a pattern which takes quite awhile to reach the end at step 16, and this is what I was hoping one iteration would be, but that's not the ca
2004-07-05 by Hans Greuber
> > > I have heard that you finished the P3 project. > >Not quite finsihed yet, but there is only 3k of space left in the ROM so >it will be soon... Hi again; Please don´t forget the way you can choose the octaves from 1 to 5 ( to at last sell the doepfer sequencer) When are you