Re: [lpc2000] ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by Onestone
I just went from the ir published price lists. At least it s got a manual over protel, but I ve just had a good look at Eagles web site, for a product that
Messages
Browse messages
Page 130 of 329 · 16407 messages matched
Re: [lpc2000] ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by Leon Heller
... From: Paul Curtis To: Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 6:59 PM Subject: RE: [lpc2000] ANN: New version of
Re: [lpc2000] ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by Robert Wood
... Schematic capture, library and package design tools, that are essential to even a basic working system, by the time you have even the basics you re
RE: [lpc2000] ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by Paul Curtis
Al, ... And EAGLE is written using Qt. Horray! -- Paul.
Re: [lpc2000] ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by Martin Maurer
Can we stop this discussion and come back to lpc2100 topics ? If you want further discussion, open your own yahoo mailing list :-) Regards, Martin
Re: [lpc2000] ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by Leon Heller
... From: Onestone To: Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 6:33 PM Subject: Re: [lpc2000] ANN: New version
Re: [lpc2000] ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by Onestone
This is even more expensive than protel! Then they ask extra for Schematic capture, library and package design tools, that are essential to even a basic
Re: [lpc2000] Re: ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by Onestone
What really ticks me off abour protel (I haven t used orcad for years) is that, despite the price you don t even get a printed manual, and, to make matters
Re: [lpc2000] LPC214x as an SD device controller
2005-11-03 by Matthias Hertel
Is there a special reason, why you want to do this? Using the SPI does not consume that much CPU time, and is quite fast. As long as you do not want to use
Re: Confirmed: U1DLL = 0x01 does not recieve on LPC2148 using fractional divisor
2005-11-03 by jp_thrower
The baud rate may be off by 1.7 %, however the PC still communicated correctly when I used the exact same baud rate, 117187, from other register configurations
Re: Confirmed: U1DLL = 0x01 does not recieve on LPC2148 using fractional divisor
2005-11-03 by jp_thrower
I actually used lpc2fdcalc to get the experimental values. It s a good tool. JP ... results to ... the
Re: [lpc2000] Re: ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by daedalworks@comcast.net
For Linux, check out gEDA (geda.seul.org). It is an open-source package with schematic capture, simulation, layout, etc. I haven t actually used it (yet),
Re: [lpc2000] Re: Confirmed: U1DLL = 0x01 does not recieve on LPC2148 using fractional divisor
2005-11-03 by Joel Winarske
JP, I m curious if this might help in any way. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpc2000/files/Tools/lpc2fdcalc.exe You enter your peripheral clock, desired baud,
Re: Confirmed: U1DLL = 0x01 does not recieve on LPC2148 using fractional divisor
2005-11-03 by rtstofer
You baud rate error is on the order of 1.7%. That the PC will accept it is to its credit. That the LPC won t is not a surprise. Assuming your PCLK is as
Re: Confirmed: U1DLL = 0x01 does not recieve on LPC2148 using fractional divisor
2005-11-03 by jp_thrower
Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, the result is same as before. I m looking at what effect doubling the PCLK will do to the board so that I can use
Re: [lpc2000] Re: board warranty
2005-11-03 by Rob Jansen
... A few more of these mail ans we ll all be milionairs :-) ... I like to dream. Bought a few boards from Embedded Artists and I definitely got more that what
RE: [lpc2000] board warranty
2005-11-03 by Dan Beadle
You get what you pay for is a terrible response. Reputable companies put out a quality product and stand behind them. When I look for an evaluation board, I
RE: [lpc2000] Re: ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by Matthew Kavalauskas
I have been using Eagle (www.cadsoft.de ) for years and it is does everything I need it to. Plus the price is extremely reasonable.
LPC2131 wont run .hex file
2005-11-03 by nealbrains
I am using LPC2131 dev board from new micros, and am trying to get some of the hex file examples to run, but I am running into problems. I am trying their
Re: [lpc2000] Re: ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by Alexandre Guimaraes
Take a look at www.holophase.com . Their Circad Software is really a pleasure to use and the us$ 995,00 is reasonable for the quality of the software. The only
Re: [lpc2000] Re: ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by Leon Heller
... From: Rob Jansen To: Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 4:04 PM Subject: Re: [lpc2000] Re: ANN: New version of
Re: [lpc2000] Confirmed: U1DLL = 0x01 does not recieve on LPC2148 using fractional divisor
2005-11-03 by Martin Maurer
Hello, ... Perhaps try U1FCR = 0x01 ! U1FCR seems to be a WriteOnly (WO) register, perhaps it is a problem, because |= is read-modify-write. Regards, Martin
Re: ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by charlesgrenz
Hi Rob, I would stay away from Orcad. How about Pads? regards, Charles ... Protel ... only ... about ... Protel is ... illegal ... design ... SMD and
Re: [lpc2000] Re: ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by Rob Jansen
... Same over here. I use (used) Protel as a hobbyist, board designs are only one-of and for my own personal use. Therefor I was not to concerned about using
RE: [lpc2000] simplest CAN test!
2005-11-03 by Gromann, Klaus
Hi Gus, Bit0 of the AFMR-register turns off all CAN messages, that means all messages are ignored. If you want to receive all messages you have to set only
Confirmed: U1DLL = 0x01 does not recieve on LPC2148 using fractional divisor
2005-11-03 by jp_thrower
This post is a followup to my original post number 9985. When U1DLL = 0x01, U1DLM=0x00, and is used with the fractional divisor U1FDR to set the baudrate, the
RE: [lpc2000] board warranty
2005-11-03 by Mike Ward
I have a couple of Olimex boards, and they are a very good company, and have a good philosophy of publishing lots of documentation on the web. I recently had
Re: [lpc2000] board warranty
2005-11-03 by rseku
Thanks Guido! I fully agree. robert
Re: [lpc2000] board warranty
2005-11-03 by Peter Jakacki
Yes Guido, without getting too deep into this thread, we all would like things corrected. Which reminds me, when will Windows ever be fully corrected? dream
Re: board warranty
2005-11-03 by Karl Olsen
... Shouldn t you send this to the Olimex support instead of the lpc2000 group? Karl Olsen
Re: board warranty
2005-11-03 by derbaier
... That is a really nice dream. At the prices most of us are willing to pay, it will probably always remain a dream too. One of the ways that corrected
RE: [lpc2000] board warranty
2005-11-03 by Soentgerath, Guido
Hello, I think the documentaion of a development board should be really accurate. And the design should be conform to the design specifiction of the chip
Re: [lpc2000] board warranty
2005-11-03 by Peter Jakacki
This forum is for genuine questions and problems, plenty of people are here to listen and help as you yourself know quite well. I was a little entertained by
Re: [lpc2000] board warranty
2005-11-03 by Michael Rubitschka
Is this the war from robert seczkowski against Olimex? What I know about Olimex is, that the sell great boards at a verry fair price. Cheers Michael
Re: board warranty
2005-11-03 by tsvetanusunov
I didn t want to bother all 2000+ members with something far away from LPC2000 stuff this is why yesterday I personally responded to your e-mail, but obviously
Re: [lpc2000] board warranty
2005-11-03 by rseku
I forgot to mention, that schematic contain supply voltage as misterious VCC, which can mean any value !!! I received response from olimex support, that they
Re: ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by charlesgrenz
I do not have to many complaints about DXP or even the older Protel 99. I am a manual type of routing guy anyway. I like the problem solving portion of laying
Re: [lpc2000] Re: ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by Leon Heller
... From: charlesgrenz To: Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 10:18 AM Subject: [lpc2000] Re: ANN:
Re: [lpc2000] Re: CS8900A question
2005-11-03 by rseku
What about TD? when writing You put TD_low TD_high Do You put nop between? When I initialize CS8900 with code like this: cs8900a_write(ADD_PORT, PP_SelfCTL);
Re: ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by charlesgrenz
Your right Leon, it is cheaper. I bought Protel 99 for 4K at the time, then they bought Tasking and changed to DXP, then DXP 2004. By the time we upgraded we
Re: [lpc2000] ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by Leon Heller
... From: Michael Rubitschka To: Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 8:30 AM Subject: RE: [lpc2000] ANN: New
Re: [lpc2000] crossworks gcc dissassembly
2005-11-03 by Rob Jansen
Robert, ... I think you mean different result and yes it is - and it s not that smart ... ... The ldr r2,[pc, #16] will load R2 with the content of PC + 16.
Re: [lpc2000] LPC214x as an SD device controller
2005-11-03 by Joel Winarske
... SD 1-bit SPI mode can be implemented at the max SD speed, of course dependent on your peripheral clk speed setting. You would need to bit bang the 4-bit
Re: crossworks gcc dissassembly
2005-11-03 by nospam@FreeRTOS.org
... PC will be diffrent in each case - therefore I cannot see a problem? Regards, Richard. http://www.FreeRTOS.org
RE: [lpc2000] ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by Michael Rubitschka
And really cheap , only 7k$ Sorry I could not resist.
crossworks gcc dissassembly
2005-11-03 by rseku
Below is a view of code received in crossworks dissassembly in interleaved mode: IO0CLR = IOW; // Toggle IOW-signal 4A10 ldr
LPC214x as an SD device controller
2005-11-03 by kukbelz
Dear LPC2000 group and Philips, Keils s MCB2140 Eval. Board demonstrates the use of the LPC214x as an SD host controller. On the other hand would it be
ANN: New version of Pulsonix PCB software
2005-11-03 by Leon Heller
Version 4.0 of the excellent Pulsonix PCB software is now available: http://www.pulsonix.com Lot s of new features, including track hugging , which was my
Re: [lpc2000] How to specify the location of an object in memory (GNU)
2005-11-03 by sig5534@hotmail.com
I do this a lot when I want to lock variables in RAM across different firmware versions. That way the data structures are at the same place no matter if the
Re: new to lpc 2000
2005-11-03 by Eric Engler
... I got this from an OKI representative at a recent class. IAR was supposed to have someone there but he didn t make it. I was hoping they did use the j-link