Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 263 of 329 · 16407 messages matched

Re: FAT file system

2004-09-24 by Gus

Peter, Yes, board and chips are available. Why you don t want FAT32? did you think that at some point in the future you will need a larger media that is FAT32?

Thread view Attachments: 0

LPC2000 home page Soon to come

2004-09-24 by balazs_scherer

Hello, I have read at the LPC2000 home page that new 64-pin versions with extended on-chip memory, Brown Out Detect, RTC in Power Down, ADC and DAC will soon

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: GPIO documentation?

2004-09-23 by embeddedjanitor

... the ... so ... Peter This is not conclusive stuff from Philips, but the main reason I can see for the problem is that the GPIO is a peripheral hanging off

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: FAT file system ==>warning

2004-09-23 by embeddedjanitor

I have read parts of the thread on FAT file system, and feel some moral responsibility to raise a warning. If you re using FAT as a method of

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: FAT file system

2004-09-23 by bty639886

Gus, Is your dev board available? Is the ALFAT software available? I require compact flash read/write only (no need for fat32) Please advise, Kind Regards,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Idle mode power consumption

2004-09-23 by lpc2100_fan

Hi Yug, the device works perfectly well with PLL, just slower. The PLL alone is probably consuming around 1 mA and with the PLL disabled, the whole device is

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Idle mode power consumption

2004-09-23 by yugandhar_vasi

I observed that when PLL is on, I cannot bring down the power consumption equal, to that of when Boot loader is running, I wonder what boot loader is doing (if

Thread view Attachments: 0

GPIO documentation?

2004-09-23 by Peter Jakacki

Has anyone ever received a conclusive reply from Philips concerning the reason for the slow GPIO? I just would like to know why this port is so slow, I am

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: IAR interrupt problem

2004-09-22 by Leighton Rowe

... not ... that ... an ... the ... it ... I ... () and __disable_interrupt(). ... I remember this happening to me before, but at the time I wasn t sure why.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Constructors

2004-09-22 by dave_albert

You re absolutely right...thanks Karl! Clearly my constructors aren t doing any comparisons that set the zero flag (since this works for me) per Karl s

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Constructors

2004-09-22 by Karl Olsen

... Won t the called constructor likely modify the zero flag so that the bne Ctor_Loop might terminate the loop prematurely? Karl Olsen

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: IAR interrupt problem

2004-09-22 by ducatman2000

You are right, I made a mistake writing my previous mail, it was not __enable_intrinsic() but of course __enable_interrupt(). Now I have introduced the IRQ

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Constructors

2004-09-22 by dave_albert

Here s a snippet of code I use to call C++ constructors in crt0.S I call it after clearing .bss and initializing .data: /* Call global C++ object constructors

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Flash Security

2004-09-21 by samydan2003

hello, i see on this forum mess about the boot loader v1.61 is secure maibe is enough to rewrite your bootloader and you have cool protections . becouse if you

Thread view Attachments: 0

Simple tone generators for lpc

2004-09-21 by Curt Powell

Can anyone steer me towards some simple tone generators that can easily be interfaced to the lpc using gpio (as few pins as possible) or i2c? Nothing fancy,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: IAR interrupt problem

2004-09-21 by Leighton Rowe

I m curious about 2 things. 1. __enable_intrinsic() Is this really the function you used or do you really mean __enable_interrupt(). 2. Where is your IRQ

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] Constructors

2004-09-21 by Pawel Sikora

... Probably the startup code and linker script don t support .ctors and .dtors sections. The .ctors and .dtors sections are lists of function pointers to

Thread view Attachments: 0

IAR interrupt problem

2004-09-21 by ducatman2000

Hi, I m trying to enable interrupt with timer1 on the LPC2106. I configured Timer1 as IRQ source when its value correspond with the match register 0... but

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2000] Re: FAT file system

2004-09-20 by Lasse Madsen

Hi Robert It s a once pay license... once you have paid for the software you are free to use it. /* Software License The use of Progressive Resources LLC

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2000] Re: FAT file system

2004-09-20 by Robert Adsett

... These guys may win a prize for obscure licensing. It s not what they say, it s that they don t say anything (that I could find) about what you are

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2000] Re: FAT file system

2004-09-20 by Lasse Madsen

Hi Gus and others... Have a look at this from PRLLC (http://www.prllc.com/prllc_homemainFlash.htm) it s a 139 USD (ok maybe a little more than a pack of beer

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Watch dog funnies again

2004-09-20 by Mark Butcher

I also had a problem with the watchdog. When I was sending large amounts of data over the serial port (lots of character interrupts) the card would

Thread view Attachments: 0

Constructors

2004-09-20 by Rodrigo Cesar da Silva Martins

How can I use class constructors with gnu arm? I m using a LPC2129 and Keil development system. For example: //header file class SPI { public: SPI(char init);

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: FAT file system

2004-09-20 by Gus

implementing simple read file on FAT is not hard but when it comes to having FAT12, FAT16 and FAT32 where you do read and write is not a simple task.

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [lpc2000] FAT file system

2004-09-20 by Lasse Madsen

Hi Gus, What are your plans for this? to sell the code royalty free or the programmed IC as it seems to me a bad investment if you re selling the programmed IC

Thread view Attachments: 0

FAT file system

2004-09-20 by Gus

I have posted about this before but now I am finally done with ALFAT. I used LPC2114 chip and programmed it with full FAT file system where you can send SPI or

Thread view Attachments: 0

im Urlaub

2004-09-20 by Binzhang Zhao

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, vom 20. 09.2004 bis zum 29.09.2004 bin ich im Urlaub. Sie können die Nachrichten unter zhao@mv.uni-kl.de abschicken. Mit

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] Re: Flash Security

2004-09-20 by George Powell

Robert I guess we can put this one to bed. I do get security conscious when I see a device that is advertised as a copying machine for protected PICS, as

Thread view Attachments: 0

Development system question

2004-09-20 by Micron Engineering

I would like to know if 250 € may be a reasonable price for an ethernet to jtag adapter that may be interfaced to a gdb debugger. With the adapter there is

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: SPI maximum SCK

2004-09-20 by Karl Olsen

... The May 3, 2004 User Manual says on page 162: The following sequence describes how one should process a data transfer with the SPI block when it is set up

Thread view Attachments: 0

SPI maximum SCK

2004-09-20 by Gus

I can t find the maximum speed for SCK on SPI in SLAVE mode!!! Did anyone find info on that?

Thread view Attachments: 0

LPC2xxx with PC104 interface

2004-09-20 by bty639886

Hi Has anyone developed a PC104 interface for the LPC2xxx processor? If so then are any starter kits available, or do you have a schematic or similar to help

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Flash Security

2004-09-19 by philips_apps

George, on my honor and best knowledge (I sit about 20 yards away from the design team and we are in meetings almost every day), we have not build in a back

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] Re: Flash Security

2004-09-19 by George Powell

Robert You have evaded my question. Can you guarantee us on your honour that Philips have not engineered a way to read code from these chips that are protected

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Watch dog funnies again

2004-09-18 by lpc2100

This solution will cure problem only if an ISR is doing a write to the WD register space. Tom excerpt from the UM Watchdog Feed Register (WDFEED - 0xE0000008)

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Watch dog funnies again

2004-09-17 by Mark Butcher

Hi Owen Chance your watchdog routine as follows: void watchdogfeed(void){ __disable_interrupt(); WDFEED=0xAA; WDFEED=0x55; __enable_interrupt(); } This will

Thread view Attachments: 0

Raven JTAG interface with RTCK feature

2004-09-17 by larry_amontec

Hi Chameleon POD user, We have updated our Raven JTAG interface with RTCK feature. The rtck feature is for all ARM-s series like your LPC21xx. Our Raven JTAG

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Using External AD Converters

2004-09-17 by Leighton Rowe

Thanks ... this ... input ... reference ... ... because ... different ... using. ... there ... observed ... the ... respect ... connected

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Using External AD Converters

2004-09-17 by ebland_us

It sounds like your inputs aren t truly differential. You ve referenced the V- input as a reference 90mV.... which makes it a unipolar signal, essentially. A

Thread view Attachments: 0

LPC2114 - basic questions

2004-09-17 by Lasse Madsen

Hi all I have some basic questions concerning the LPC2114: 1. If I want to be able to JTAG debug my code RTCK has to be used as a dedicated JTAG enable/disable

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Flash Security

2004-09-17 by philips_apps

George and Armando, the missing security option for our first ARM devices, the LPC210x was not deliberately as a backdoor, it was at time of definition not

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [lpc2000] Re: Flash Security

2004-09-17 by George Powell

Hi All I would like to hear what Philips apps have to say on the question of a deliberate back door to read protected code. So far the silence is deafenning.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.