Yahoo Groups archive

Wiardgroup

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:41 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 28 of 81 · 4015 messages matched

Re: Wiard JAG

2007-02-13 by drmabuce

Hi Professor --- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "Grant Richter" wrote: > The "Dome" function indicator is the Yellow LED in the middle. The "Edge" function is the > inverse of dome (more or less). > my apologies...the center yellow LED slipped my memory... i stand corrected > It

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Re: Wiard JAG

2007-02-13 by don hassler

> Rest assured, all Wiard product produce waveforms of > apotropaic complexity, and can only > be good for you! > > I am only kidding around, so don't send the guys > from the Funny Farm. Don't worry, not calling anyone, and I leave the Wogglebug free running at all times to keep

Thread view Attachments: 0

apotropaic modules

2007-02-13 by Michael A. Firman

If the Ba-Gua/Feng Shui inspired JAG will ward off evil spirits then the WoggleBug must conjure up Demons! Was it inspired by Anton LaVey or Aleister Crowley, or perhaps the Dark One himself? Michael A. Firman

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiard JAG

2007-02-12 by Grant Richter

> The JAG turns the TWO vectors of control at the X & Y inputs into ten > INDEPENDENT output vectors , at each LED (and the two 'invisible > vectors of "dome" and "edge") The "Dome" function indicator is the Yellow LED in the middle. The "Edge" function is the inverse of dome (mo

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Re: Wiard JAG

2007-02-12 by Tyler Harwood

Doc, you rule. If I didn't live thousands of miles away I would make you a pie. On Feb 12, 2007, at 10:32 AM, drmabuce wrote: Hi cray --- In wiardgroup@yahoogro ups.com , "cray5656" wrote: > > hi all > > I have 2 doepfer joysticks that are banana jacked I can control 12 > VC's.Is

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiard JAG

2007-02-12 by drmabuce

Hi cray --- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "cray5656" wrote: > > hi all > > I have 2 doepfer joysticks that are banana jacked I can control 12 > VC's.Is this basically what the JAG does or am I missing something? > (BTW i assumed you are referring to Dieter's A-174 joysticks) wel

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Wiard JAG

2007-02-12 by Bryan Carrigan

On Feb 12, 2007, at 2:52 AM, cray5656 wrote: > hi all > > I have 2 doepfer joysticks that are banana jacked I can control 12 > VC's.Is this basically what the JAG does or am I missing something? A joystick only gives you 2 cv outs, X and Y where all of the parameters you are mult

Thread view Attachments: 0

Wiard JAG

2007-02-12 by cray5656

hi all I have 2 doepfer joysticks that are banana jacked I can control 12 VC's.Is this basically what the JAG does or am I missing something?

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [SergeModular] nature ish

2007-02-12 by Chris Sawyer

Turn two arms into twenty with a Wiard dual joystick / dual JAG combo! ----- Original Message ----- From: amnesia To: SergeModular@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 6:00 PM Subject: [SergeModular] nature ish hi all Just did a live recording with my Serge last night

Thread view Attachments: 0

Wogglebug mod errata!

2007-02-10 by drmabuce

Hi All Dan Schierl spotted some errors and ambiguities in my schematics for the Wogglebug #3 standard. Romeo Fahl's words echo in my cobwebbed mind ..."Scham Dich Alter Mann!".... Indeed. first to business: i posted corrected updated schematics in the files section: WBug3Mods-DrM

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive

2007-02-04 by drmabuce

Hi Matieu (et all) --- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "matthieuvandiepen" wrote: > thanks very much for your wonderfull lecture on analog/digital noise. > Thank YOU for raising an issue about what's BEHIND the panel. That's my FAVORITE part of the synthesizer! ;] > yes i am indee

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive

2007-02-03 by matthieuvandiepen

Hi Doc, thanks very much for your wonderfull lecture on analog/digital noise. yes i am indeed from the noisy netherlands. And i agree with you, Dutch isn't that different from German. It just has some more distortion in the pronunciation. So i guess we now are all a lot wiser on

Thread view Attachments: 0

AHMW 2007 (Forward)

2007-02-02 by Michael A. Firman

Hi, I got this from Andrew and thought I'd pass it along. Michael A. Firman ------------------------------------------------------ Midwestern Analogguers and Long Distance Synth Travellers (ie. Cary Roberts) - The Ninth annual Analogue Heaven MidWest Get Together will be Saturday

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] ugly american erratum!

2007-02-01 by Romeo Fahl

Schäm dich, alter Mann! (o; On 2/1/07, drmabuce drmabuce@yahoo.com > wrote: OOPS! my profound and embarrassed apologies to all the German and the Dutch folks out there in Wiardo-land in my post # 2637 i said: "***2 On the MM5437, the interval was minutes long, the MM5837 beat the

Thread view Attachments: 0

ugly american erratum!

2007-02-01 by drmabuce

OOPS! my profound and embarrassed apologies to all the German and the Dutch folks out there in Wiardo-land in my post # 2637 i said: "***2 On the MM5437, the interval was minutes long, the MM5837 beat the problem to a degree. Theres a good explanation at http://www.vego.nl/8/08/0

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive

2007-01-31 by drmabuce

Hi Matthieu --- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "matthieuvandiepen" wrote: > > Thank you all very much for the response! Especially Doc,still i'm > wondering one thing: both modules use analog and digital noise, why > is that? What is the difference? And why both use these differe

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive

2007-01-31 by Grant Richter

> Thank you all very much for the response! Especially Doc,still i'm > wondering one thing: both modules use analog and digital noise, why > is that? What is the difference? And why both use these different > noise sources for different applications? > Because analog and digital

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive

2007-01-31 by drmabuce

Hi Mike ... a quibble to keep the record straight, based on your post, i suspect that, like me, you have a REV 1 noise ring. As I understand it, all new customers would get the REV 2 , which bears on one of your points... to wit: --- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, mmcgrath@... wr

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive

2007-01-31 by matthieuvandiepen

Thank you all very much for the response! Especially Doc,still i'm wondering one thing: both modules use analog and digital noise, why is that? What is the difference? And why both use these different noise sources for different applications? Thanks Matthieu --- In wiardgroup@yah

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive

2007-01-31 by mmcgrath@synercard.com

This has been a great discussion! Thanks everyone for all the details on these RVG modules (UVG?) While I cannot technically dissect these units to the levels of the good doc and others, nor place them well within the pantheon of historical electronic music tools, I can offer up

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive

2007-01-30 by plord@there.org

drmabuce wrote: > The point he always stresses is biology's affinity for > phase-discrimination in perception. That is, nature overwhelmingly > favors two sensor structures that differ in either vantage-point or type > and the neural structures they stimulate process the DIFFEREN

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive

2007-01-30 by drmabuce

Hi Grant --- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "Grant Richter" wrote: > The ear uses a kind of "battery" system > to supply the ear, because blood flow would be too noisy. The ear uses "hairs" to sense > both level and frequency information. IF an excited cell uses more "current" th

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive

2007-01-29 by Grant Richter

> > The Buchla "Sources of Uncertainty' is the seminal circuit that > employs a similar use of noise (as a modulator of the sampled source, > rather than the noise being the sampled source itself), and a > recursive structure that can create suprisingly musical patterns in > the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive

2007-01-29 by Gary Chang

"drmabuce" wrote: > The method of > pattern generation just described is very different than the > sample/hold method used by the I.D. (and MANY other RVG is modular > synth history). > Most importantly, this method yields a very different character of > output patterns than a sa

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive

2007-01-29 by HDibrell@aol.com

Wow! Great explanation, Doc. I've been going round and around as to whether I really needed a Noise Ring or not. Part of the problem was that I didn't really understand what it does and the demos on the Wiard site didn't help me much. Your explanation helped a lot. The Noise Ring

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive

2007-01-28 by davevosh@aol.com

bobble-head doll of Spiro Agnew doc, just because he was a *fired for past corruption* vice-president, a republican, a fascist and nixon`s running dog lackey, is no reason to make fun of my former governor ! :^) best, dave p.s. - your exposition on the noise question was a deligh

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive

2007-01-28 by Mark Griffiths

Well Doc, as a new comer to this kind of thing who is not so technical, I'm very grateful for this full and simple explanation. Many thanks regards, Mark www.inspiringsounds.com drmabuce wrote: Hi Mathieu In order to avoid re-inventing the wheel, please read the circuit desciptio

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive

2007-01-28 by drmabuce

Hi Mathieu In order to avoid re-inventing the wheel, please read the circuit desciption Grant posted at: http://www.wiard.com/1200/NR/Noise_Ring.html i will be referring to the block diagram he posted. but first.... regarding digital noise: If we force a feature-by-feature compar

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive

2007-01-28 by Gary Chang

After Doc responds, I will add something as well.... gary "matthieuvandiepen" wrote: > > Hi Doc, > > > While i realize that the I.D. and the N.R. are both considered > > random voltage generators, under the hood, they are VERY different > > devices. But let me ask a couple of bas

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive

2007-01-27 by matthieuvandiepen

Hi Doc, > While i realize that the I.D. and the N.R. are both considered > random voltage generators, under the hood, they are VERY different > devices. But let me ask a couple of basic questions before i spew a > bunch of information that may be of no interest to you at all... W

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive

2007-01-25 by drmabuce

Hi Matthieu i own a noiz ring (and a primitive ancestor to the noiz ring) and i've built two I.D. kits for friends. Also i'm an RVG fetishist and always tinkering with DIY RVG circuits. While i realize that the I.D. and the N.R. are both considered random voltage generators, unde

Thread view Attachments: 0

Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive

2007-01-25 by matthieuvandiepen

Does anybody know the differences, the pros, the cons of the two noise units: Wiard noise ring versus Blacet improbability drive - if you have the noise ring, can you do without the ID? Or does it have some sides which the noise ring doesn't cover? Thanks very much, Matthieu

Thread view Attachments: 0

wiard's modules uses

2007-01-21 by stefanbonnet

Sorry...no demos, just the few (obvious) tricks I've tried so far : I'd always used the boogie and the two borgs in serie before last week (boogie as "multimode" filter, one borg as tone/formant shaper or bp/hp filter, the other as vca), but : Running two borgs in parallel produc

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: I was thinking...

2007-01-20 by luther rochester

> well, Synthesizers.com makes a dern good normal keyboard style > controller, Doepfer's got a > ribbon controller..and then there's the Haken Continuum, which of > course is amazing but > unobtainable till I stumble upon a hefty load of > cash.....but,,,,,,,,,,, > are there any

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: I was thinking...

2007-01-20 by stefanbonnet

An esthetical portable casing could be nice, ultimately, but before that, I wish grant would find an ergonomic alternative that would make obsolete the use of multiples, mixers, and vcas...those anonymous hiding-knobs-patch-cords are confusing, and the few times I've used an "opt

Thread view Attachments: 0

With all due respect to my kidneys...

2007-01-20 by Gary Chang

"shari_en_jin" wrote: > .but,,,,,,,,,,, > are there any touch-plate style Buchla-esque beasts out there that wouldn't require a black- > market kidney sale? > Ti_ > I am afraid that I have not been able to find a durable and playable tactile input device that is worthy of the tim

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: I was thinking...

2007-01-20 by shari_en_jin

well, Synthesizers.com makes a dern good normal keyboard style controller, Doepfer's got a ribbon controller..and then there's the Haken Continuum, which of course is amazing but unobtainable till I stumble upon a hefty load of cash.....but,,,,,,,,,,, are there any touch-plate st

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: I was thinking...

2007-01-20 by paradigmshiftbeats

--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "drmabuce" wrote: > > The problem with large-scale integration designs is that they > impose a choice between catering to the 'bug-music' (sic) > aficionados or the 1V/oct. fans (with their DVMs). While I agree that 'Please all please none' is a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Re: I was thinking...

2007-01-19 by Dennis Verschoor

Yeah when the new vco and the new woggle is done then we need to convince Prof. Richter. :) On 1/19/07, r_a_quirk r_a_quirk@yahoo.co.uk > wrote: --- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com , "Dennis Verschoor" wrote: > > I've been dreaming about a Wiard Easel to lately. > > :) that's exact

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: I was thinking...

2007-01-19 by drmabuce

a few times over the years... (look back around message 152) Prof. Richter has experimented with designs for complete integrated instruments. These have ranged in scale from a very low cost (but surprisingly well-appointed) 'microwiard'*** with an on on-board stylus controller, t

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: I was thinking...

2007-01-19 by r_a_quirk

--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "Dennis Verschoor" wrote: > > I've been dreaming about a Wiard Easel to lately. > > :) that's exactly what I have in mind, just add a few other modules and a controller, but it in a pelican briefcase and it can go anywhere. we've nearly got the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Status of the Envelooper MARF

2007-01-19 by stefanbonnet

doc, >i also know that there are devices that will fake the EPROM socket on >a miniwave into believing it is reading an EPROM chip when it is in >fact accessing a PC file directly through a ribbon cable but that's >about as close to a direct graphic interface as i believe can be

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: will 2007 see a Wiard complete system for sale?

2007-01-19 by stefanbonnet

--- In wiardgroup@yahoogroups.com, "Grant Richter" wrote: > > Look on eBay for a used Needham EMP-10. There are two models, an ISA card that plugs in > an old computer, or a standalone model. In any case you will need a computer for file > transfer. > > The EMP-10 support up to a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Re: I was thinking...

2007-01-18 by watson

yeah man, if the woggle and anti(auntie?) comes out this year i will be in heaven, i have been looking forward to the osc. since grant told me about it a while back on the phone, this thing sounds wicked. and the wogglebug is nearly infamous at this point, well infamous to those

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Re: More MARFs and Waveform Software

2007-01-18 by watson

yeah if you can do this, even if its a little more money, it would be a great thing. i got a rack that has a lot of spaces free in expectations of new wiard modules, the marf is def going to be starting the filling of this rack. i also want to get some of the banalog stuff to get

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [wiardgroup] Re: I was thinking...

2007-01-18 by Dennis Verschoor

I've been dreaming about a Wiard Easel to lately. :) On 4/14/06, Gary Chang gchang@calarts.edu > wrote: When Grant finally gets the Auntie Oscillator into production is when I will be turning one of my old thin line Haliburton Briefcases into a nifty Wiard synth - all behind a Fr

Thread view Attachments: 0

Complete system with a lot of wiard

2007-01-18 by r_a_quirk

> If you use other manufacturer's stuff (such as the Blacet VCOs and > the Miniwave, which are modules that Grant had a hand in creating) to supplement what Wiard stuff you get, you can certainly get going right now. my only problem with having the blacet in a portable system is

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.