RE: [Digital BW] Dimage 5400 vs Nikon Coolscan 4000
2003-10-01 by Daniel Staver
... Then they re quite similar.. The Minolta is a touch sharper than the Canon. ... The grain dissolver in the Minolta is a piece of glass put between the
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1482 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: Re: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic, but new question
2003-10-01 by Alan.Huntley@cox.net
Hi Don, I have the Minolta Scan Dual III, however, I don t have now or ever had any other 35mm film scanner so I really can t compare it to anything. Sorry. I
Minolta Scan Dual III
2003-10-01 by Nicholas Hartmann
... I just got one to replace my Scan Dual II (which after two years suddenly and inexplicably lost a sensor channel and therefore its ability to pick up thin
Re: [Digital BW] Photoshop CS - More info
2003-10-01 by Anthony Atkielski
... They want to make as much money as possible. They don t care about the individual programs, all of which have saturated their markets, anyway (except
Re: [Digital BW] Dimage 5400 vs Nikon Coolscan 4000
2003-10-01 by Anthony Atkielski
... Downsample the 5400 dpi to 4000 dpi and compare with original 4000 dpi scans. How do they compare then? ... Beware ... on the Nikon 8000, the grain
RE: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic
2003-10-01 by Austin Franklin
Hi Anthony, ... As far as I know, I have a fridge with quite a few rolls in it, that I bought over the past year... ... It s actually quite cheap, and stores
RE: [Digital BW] Photoshop CS - More info
2003-10-01 by Sam McCandless
Call me a wimp, but I never upgrade Photoshop until after I get the updated edition of the Real World Photoshop book. Even then I d wait if necessary for
RE: [Digital BW] OT: PS Elements guidance request.
2003-10-01 by TigerShark
There are some really nice images on your website. Making wet prints and scanning those is a very good alternative and in some cases I like the look better
C-41 BW films for scanning
2003-10-01 by Richard Smallfield
Hi, I gave up on C-41 films for fear of their lower archival life (in spite of liking the small grain and smooth flesh tones for a 400iso film). Recent posts
Re: [Digital BW] Dimage 5400 vs Nikon Coolscan 4000
2003-10-01 by Steven Karafyllakis
... Just a thought: has anyone tried glass slide holders for slides? I realize this would introduce other problems, but if you didn t get the dreaded newton
Re: [Digital BW] Dimage 5400 vs Nikon Coolscan 4000
2003-10-01 by digikdm
I used Fugi REALA 100 predominantly. The effect is especially noticeable at 200x. ... type ... negatives was ... here, ... course, ... the ... seem to ... than
printing with Mac OS X
2003-10-01 by Vincent Orlando
Need some help, just gat a new Mac G5. After using a pc for many years I find when trying to print I can get the Epson print control window to appear where you
RE: [Digital BW] Dimage 5400 vs Nikon Coolscan 4000
2003-10-01 by Daniel Staver
... I haven t noticed image degradation at all with ICE enabled. Which type of film did you scan? ... I ... with the Dig ... cleaning up the ... 5400dpi ... I
Re: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic
2003-10-01 by Anthony Atkielski
... I thought Plus-X was history? Or am I confusing it with something else? Is it available in both 135 and 120? ... I ll see if I can find it when I have a
RE: [Digital BW] Dimage 5400 vs Nikon Coolscan 4000
2003-10-01 by Alessandro Pardi
Kevin, you do not mention what software you used to drive the scanners. Software can make a huge difference (especially for contrast, blow-out highlights or
RE: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic
2003-10-01 by Alessandro Pardi
Hi Jeff, it is obviously correct that you give us unsharpened scans, yet I think the final evaluation should be done with the best you can get from each scan,
Re: [Digital BW] OT: PS Elements guidance request.
2003-10-01 by Joe's Mail
Try making an 8.5X11 low contrast conventional wet print , then scanning it on a flatbed scanner. I ve been doing that for all my b/w negs and the results are
Re: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic
2003-10-01 by jsinger986
The shot of the girl in the drum scan sample was Plus-x 125 @ 80, D76 1:1 for 9 min @ 68deg. The rest were Tri-x 400 @ 320, D76 1:1 @ 11:15 @ 68deg. Jeff
RE: [Digital BW] Photoshop CS - More info
2003-10-01 by Martin Wesley
* -----Original Message----- * From: johngeyles [mailto:jge@cs.unc.edu] * Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 12:33 PM * To:
OT: PS Elements guidance request.
2003-10-01 by sandersm@aol.com
I apologize for the off-topic post -- feel free to respond offlist to spare others irrelevant chatter. I at times find that I have a b+w negative that is
Re: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic
2003-10-01 by kenschuster
Try over exposing Tri-X Professional a stop (ISO 160) and under developing about 12% in your D76, but diluted 1:2 and keeping it cool enough to give you at
Re: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic
2003-10-01 by kenschuster
Interesting, Jeff. What 120 film did you use? Will you show us a side-by-side scans from your new Minolta and a drum?
Dimage 5400 vs Nikon Coolscan
2003-10-01 by digikdm
I forgot to mention that the scan times in my post were for color negatives with 8bit color/channel. B&W scans take about half as long.
Re: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic, but new question
2003-10-01 by D. Hill
Jeff, That is an impressive difference - as I love grain - big boulder grain - I may have to give drum scanning a look. Also, anyone using one of the newer
Re: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic
2003-10-01 by Avron L. Gordon
Is the one on the right the Epson? ... From: jsinger986 To: Sent: Tuesday, September 30,
levels and curves
2003-10-01 by Stephen Kobrin
This question may be rendered moot in Photoshop CS as according to Evening s introduction you can have a live historgram running while you use curves. As I
Dimage 5400 vs Nikon Coolscan 4000
2003-10-01 by digikdm
I have recently had the opportunity to compare these two film scanners and have found the following. I use a Mac 10.2.8, 1gigabyte of RAM and PS 7.0 1. The
RE: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic
2003-10-01 by Austin Franklin
Hi Anthony, ... I m glad to hear you re giving Tri-X a real try...and I strongly suggest trying D-76 1:1 and seeing how you like the reduced grain, and the
Re: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic
2003-10-01 by Anthony Atkielski
... So I ve discovered. When I first starting using Tri-X again after a decades-long hiatus, I had it developed at a one-hour lab. The results seemed terribly
RE: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic
2003-10-01 by Austin Franklin
Hi Anthony, ... The amount of grain really depends on how you expose it, and how you develop it. I shoot it at 200/400 and 800. Of course, the grain
Re: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic
2003-09-30 by Anthony Atkielski
... Looks like Tri-X. I love the tonality of Tri-X, but I m not at all keen on the grain. Especially in 35mm, you can forget about even the most conservative
Printer (sales pitch)
2003-09-30 by John Masello
I have an Epson 9600 printer purchased in Dec.03 with very little use for sale in the Orlando Florida area. I recently purchased 7 new 220 ml ink cartridges
Re: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic
2003-09-30 by Steve Kale
Thanks a lot this is very helpful From: jsinger986 Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003
Re: [Digital BW] feeding problems 2200
2003-09-30 by jymbo4600
... would ... regular ... august and ... amount ... through, ... the ... that the ... paper ... Since I ve been on this forum (mostly lurking)the timing has
Re: Paper with whiter base then PhotoRag?
2003-09-30 by Shilesh Jani
Soren, Try the MoabPaper Entrada from inkjetgoodies.com. It is quite a bit whiter than PhotoRag. Best. Shilesh ... to ... on
Re: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic
2003-09-30 by jsinger986
It wasn t from the same picture. I was just using that as another example of the 3200 vs drumscan. On that scan the person s face took up a large portion (all
Levels and Curves was Re: New Photoshop CS -- aka Photoshop 8
2003-09-30 by Mark Hahn
I think it is preferable to make one curve adjustment if at all possible. Each levels adjustment equals one curve adjustment no matter what you do. mark ...
Re: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic
2003-09-30 by johngeyles
... It it possible you have the wrong detail (of her eye) below each larger image ? John P.S. She is cute !
Paper with whiter base then PhotoRag?
2003-09-30 by soli004
Looking for a paper that is whiter in base than PhotoRag, similar to EAM but with PhotoRag quality? Any suggestions? Printed snowy pictures but PhotoRag is
Re: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic
2003-09-30 by jsinger986
The nikon image is more grainy because the nikon can resolve more informati= on than the epson. So, it is scanning the grain. The film was Tri-x 400, so its
Re: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic
2003-09-30 by Steve Kale
Jeff This is very helpful given my current purchasing dilemma. A couple of basic questions (and please excuse any ignorance): 1. In the first set of images (I
Re: [Digital BW] Photoshop CS - More info
2003-09-30 by Clayton Jones
... I upgraded from 4 to 7 without penalty or problem. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
RE: [Digital BW] VM-Inks on glossy Paper? PermaJet-Spray?
2003-09-30 by Paul Roark
Peter, ... I recommend that the cartridge parts of any CIS/CFS be changed if you use one of those. Other than that, the issue has been the Eboni black s
Re: [Digital BW] OT MF film sizes
2003-09-30 by Anthony Atkielski
... A high-resolution scan of a smaller film format isn t quite the same as a low-resolution scan of a larger film format. You can get the same number of
Re: Re: [Digital BW] New Photoshop CS -- aka Photoshop 8
2003-09-30 by Alan.Huntley@cox.net
Mark, I print 16-bit grayscale images on my 1160 all the time using Paul s curves and UT inks...PS 7.0.1 on a PC. Alan Huntley
Re: [Digital BW] Photoshop CS - More info
2003-09-30 by johngeyles
... How recent a version must you have already installed (or you simply have to have the code number ?) in order to be able to use the upgrade to the new
Re: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic
2003-09-30 by johngeyles
... I give you joy. Care to comment on why you choose the Minolta over the Nikon 8000 ? John
Re: [Digital BW] feeding problems 2200
2003-09-30 by Stephen Petegorsky
Mike - you might want to try cutting a piece of 1/4 fomecor or similar board to the exact size of the paper you re trying to print on. Put this board in the
Re: [Digital BW] feeding problems 2200
2003-09-30 by John Merrill
I have always had this problem on my 2200 after using Hahnemuhle or Somerset papers for awhile...so I use manual feed. I ve found if I use Epson papers for a
Levels and Curves was Re: New Photoshop CS -- aka Photoshop 8
2003-09-30 by Stephen Kobrin
What I actually do is to use levels to determine the black and white points using the historgram and then actually set them in curves. I gather from your post