Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 1513 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

RE: [Digital BW] re: rip's 4 b&w

2003-08-16 by Paul Roark

Tim, ... I use a PC, the Epson driver, and Photoshop curves to get neutral/selenium prints from UT inks. That approach still works very well. Paul

Thread view Attachments: 0

re: rip's 4 b&w

2003-08-16 by c2c_ic

Paul, I m seeing a lot of ppl using rip s for b&w and switching to mac s. Is that necessary or will i b able to get good selenium to neutral prints with your

Thread view Attachments: 0

New camera category ?

2003-08-16 by Ernst Dinkla

Wonder where this new Sony digital camera will fit in. http://www.dpreview.com/articles/sonydscf828/ May also be more B&W suited as it relies on 4 colour

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Re: TechXactol

2003-08-16 by Paul Roark

Marc, ... I concur, but the old-style reciprocity failure was a problem. Also, by the time a traditional (non-enhanced red sensitivity) 25 ISO film is heavily

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Paul Roark's exhibit

2003-08-16 by A. Huntley

I wholeheartedly agree! Paul s service to the B&W digital printing community has been and is exemplary!! About 2 years ago, I finally gave up on Piezo and went

Thread view Attachments: 0

choice of film

2003-08-16 by lovelipp

I ve used Kodak Portra and T400 CN and scan on a Canon 2710. In scanning some old Fuji slides (provia 400), using channels and going to grayscale, I find the

Thread view Attachments: 0

IT8 target for Nikon 4000

2003-08-16 by mccarvill

Hi. I m a new VueScan user and wanted to use its scanner calibration utility but, while IT8 targets for flatbeds seem plentiful, I can t find one for a film

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: TechXactol

2003-08-16 by marcsien77

Hi Dirk, Thanks to you and all others for helpful replies to my initial enquiry. Like you, I preferred using the APX 25 in my traditional darkroom. I thought

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: QuadToneRIP / GIMP error msg meaning

2003-08-16 by J Michael Sullivan

It would appear the two things are unrelated: I *CAN* print on any size paper via GIMP -- just not through Photoshop, which I ve been told is a carbon-based

Thread view Attachments: 0

My BW Gallery is up at last:)

2003-08-16 by Richard Smallfield

Hi, I hope this isn t too off-topic. I m a long-term lurker and have learned a huge amount from all of you. Thanks for imparting so much information to people

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: TechXactol - SpeediBrews for TechPan

2003-08-16 by garethlock4472

Anyone tried this? Quote from Speedibrews site Technical Pan film is in a class of its own with resolution streets ahead of CCD/Digital. The snag is the harsh

Thread view Attachments: 0

UltraTone Sepia hexset?

2003-08-16 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service

Paul or anyone else... Any thoughts about a UT based replacement to the VM-S inkset? -- Just some guy, and caretaker of the Multiverse s largest EPSON

Thread view Attachments: 0

UltraTones and Red River Polacr Placid?

2003-08-16 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service

Anyone tried the UT Inkset with Red River s Polar Placid at: http://www.redrivercatalog.com/Pages/mattepaper ? The paper really DOES look like the

Thread view Attachments: 0

QuadToneRIP / GIMP error msg meaning

2003-08-16 by J Michael Sullivan

Installed QuadTOneRIP v2.0 on my Mac OS X 10.2.6 I can print letter size images but no other sizes (even though they show up in the list) Curiously, in my

Thread view Attachments: 0

Epson 3000 for sale

2003-08-15 by ckrochelle

Epson 3000 for sale, moving to london and is way too heavy to pay for shipping. Anyway, I ve been using a CFS with mis full spec inks. It s still under

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: B&W Printing . . . Polaroid SS4000

2003-08-15 by c2c_ic

I use the canon FS4000 and it seems to work fine using just the canon software. I m not an expert but 4 my purposes it is great. Tim ... point. ... software

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.