RE: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-30 by Paul Roark
... I also try to do this. I call my prints, first and foremost, just Black and white photographs. It s only in the description of my work that I go further
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1599 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
RE: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-30 by capuozzo
I call my images Digital Archival Photographs because it is a selling point. Most patrons are surprised at the quality and the reference increases their
Re: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-30 by bgs
pictures of things. I ve put photos in shows and I just call them photographs because that s what they are. I guess I have no sense of morality but I can t
Re: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-30 by michael meyer
jerry- the carbon pigment prints i have seen are black and white. the national gallery had one of steiglitz s carbon prints up last summer and it was amazing.
Soft gloss paper for 2200?
2003-04-30 by eleanor77027
Does anyone know of a paper (that doesn t brongz badly) that comes very close to air dryed silver papers that I can use for black and white printing on my 2200
Re: What to call the prints...
2003-04-30 by Chris Hargens
Are you still using the name Epson Archival Matte for the paper? Has anyone asked questions about your choice of this paper over others that appear to have
Re: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-30 by wharfwalker
... us ... a ... http://www.archiveimages.com/Publishing/Prints/Process/AdvContinuousTo ... I don t want to lower the tone but every time I say Piezography it
Re: Can't use "ROLL PAPER" settings
2003-04-30 by Antonis Ricos
Dan, sounds like you need the service manual. http://www.visual-artists.com/manuals.htm And I think you got the right idea. It s probably a sensor that got
Re: simple B&W printing on Epson 2200 ?
2003-04-30 by Antonis Ricos
... John, there are two parts to it. OPM is free, IJC is $200. Without IJC you can t make your own profiles - or tweak existing ones. OPM by itself works with
Can't use "ROLL PAPER" settings
2003-04-30 by Daniel Smith
After taking apart my 9500 for cleaning and to resolve an ink problem, I now have a new problem. If I load any kind of roll paper, after hitting pause, the
Re: [Digital BW] Yet another fade test-VM 4.3 vs. Museum Black
2003-04-30 by Steven Karafyllakis
Paul, you wrote; ... for more ... densities in a ... 10 day ... send a ... system can t ... Thanks for checking... whatever the problem was, I just used up
Re: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-30 by sceptre12345
Alan, I ve heard that Adobe doesn t likes terms such as Photoshopping or Photoshoppers and that Googles is not too keen on googling . Maybe Cone Editions
Re: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-30 by Jerry Olson
Alan, wouldn t that work only if you used Cone s inks? How about us MIS users? Jerry Its not so much the photographer who doesn t like inkjet print, its his
Re: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-30 by Jerry Olson
But it s still carbon pigment. And isn t the other process color? Or did they do black and white also? Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-30 by Harry Saddler
In the spirit of calling prints by what s on the paper (e.g. silver, albumen, etc), how about ink prints ? Or if that s ambiguous, how about - digital ink -
Re: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-30 by Alan Zinn
... Andre, I think Cone Editions might like Piezography to become an almost-generic term like Iris. I was skeptical about that before but now maybe us users
RE: [Digital BW] Yet another fade test-VM 4.3 vs. Museum Black
2003-04-30 by Paul Roark
Steve, ... I just ran my 7500 with the VM 4.3 inks after it had been sitting for more than 10 days. The nozzle checks were perfect and the tones & densities
Re: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-30 by Ken Carney
... to know what ... Photographs? Nice pics BTW. Regards, --Ken Carney www.kencarney.com
Re: simple B&W printing on Epson 2200 ?
2003-04-29 by johngeyles
Antonis, Thanks for replying. Yes, I followed the discussion some months ago, and then got distracted especially with all the other discussions simultaneous
Re: Not strictly an 8 versus 16 question, but sort of
2003-04-29 by Steven Karafyllakis
... Theoreticaly yes, and this may be one of the few situations where you will probably see the results. What is even better, however, is to get your hands on
The Virtue of Patience--Unclogged
2003-04-29 by Thomas Keesling
... but ... removed ... to ... flashing ... no ... black ... tubing ... still ... purge ... might ... Thank you all (Art, Jim, Steve, et al) for your
Re: [Digital BW] Yet another fade test-VM 4.3 vs. Museum Black
2003-04-29 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: Ernst Dinkla To: Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 8:02 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW]
What to call the prints...
2003-04-29 by HPA
I call them Archival Ultrachrome prints and Digital Ultrachrome prints. On every photo page, I have a link to more info about the prints. That link takes
Re: simple B&W printing on Epson 2200 ?
2003-04-29 by Antonis Ricos
John, look at the archives here - we have discussed this way too many times, it seems. If you are on Mac OS 8 or 9 the simplest thing is OPM and its free.
Re: [Digital BW] micro-scratches on scans
2003-04-29 by James Klebau
Point source and condenser enlargers present the same problem -- very sharp, and mercilessly so with grain and scratches. Nikon scanners use a small point
RE: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-29 by Tim Atherton
... which can be a bit of a problem because there is already a (historic) carbon pigment print process for photographs - also practiced by some
Re: How to Make the Best B&W Prints on a 1280
2003-04-29 by bobby
I have to recommend the Selenium Piezotones as well. I had an 1160 that died - but before it went all the way out, I made some reference prints with the
Not strictly an 8 versus 16 question, but sort of
2003-04-29 by Garry Sarre
1/ is upsizing in PS Bicubic 16bit superior to upsizing in 8bit. 2/ Apart from levels and curves tonal adjustments, what else degrades image quality in 8bit
Re: [Digital BW] output size
2003-04-29 by Jerry Olson
Yes.
Re: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-29 by Jerry Olson
Carbon Pigment Prints. Jerry
micro-scratches on scans
2003-04-29 by digikdm
having scanned many of my B&W negatives recently with a Nikon 4000 coolscan( digital ICE is off), i noticed that many of my negatives have at least one and
RE: [Digital BW] Yet another fade test-VM 4.3 vs. Museum Black
2003-04-29 by Paul Roark
Steve, You wrote; ... The formula change was just a minor change in ratio of cyan and magenta to get a better average tone over a number of different papers.
Re: [Digital BW] Black Only - Epson 2100
2003-04-29 by Robert Morrison
Check previous posts on Ink Jet Control (IJC) or Open Print Maker. Currently these are Mac only options but they allow you to control individual channels in
Re: OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-29 by Garry Sarre
I call mine Rag Prints, I print on cotton though, not that plastic crap. Garry Sarre www.sarre.com.au
Re: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-29 by sceptre12345
... I need ... ImagePrint on ... Giclee? What about Beaux-Arts carbon inks on Fine Art paper. That should be pedantic enough to blow Giglee and Iris!!! BTW,
Black Only - Epson 2100
2003-04-29 by all ozzie
Hello all I m a new owner of an Epson 2100/2200 and like most of you, I m quite unhappy with the Black and White prints it produces. I have tried Black Only
RE: [Digital BW] output size
2003-04-29 by Graphikris
chris, we use 240ppi for all of our images. We found no difference when Evaluating the difference between 240 and 360. Also, the rip/print time increase due
Re[2]: [Digital BW] Arches Infinty Papers?
2003-04-29 by Richard Sintchak
Monday, April 28, 2003, 11:48:38 AM, Chris Hargens wrote: CH I ve thought about trying out some Arches soon on my 1160 (MIS VM set CH with Roark curves).
output size
2003-04-29 by ckrochelle
I m printing 16x24 quadtones (mis full spec/neut.) on the epson 3000. I m using the epson driver. At this size my output is 240 to 260 ppi. should i use
Re: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-29 by Robert Morrison
Then I guess I should call my silver prints archival quality enlarger prints? It seems that naming the art object by the medium is as common as naming by the
Re: [Digital BW] Yet another fade test-VM 4.3 vs. Museum Black
2003-04-29 by Steven Karafyllakis
Ernst, you wrote; ... after the first installation of the inks and before the 3 weeks rest. Just contamination with some leftover older ink or cleaning fluid
Re: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-29 by a.lemus
saw your web site. i like your fine art work. you interpretation of beauty. is differnt. sort of raw beauty. i m going to be purchasing a new 2200. how do you
RE: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-29 by capuozzo
I call mine archival digital images. FWIW, Capuozzo ... From: jsinger986 [mailto:jhsinger@telus.net] Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 2:12 PM To:
simple B&W printing on Epson 2200 ?
2003-04-28 by johngeyles
I was following a discussion here, months ago, about how to get the best B&W prints from the Epson 2100/2200 using the stock ink set. At the time, there
Re: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-28 by Hans Fiala
You Yanks are such a bunch of bloody snobs, it s unbelievable. Ink jet remains ink jet, like it or not. Anybody with 20x magnifying glass can immediately see
RE: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-28 by Seth Rossman
Jeff- Alan is right. And, I agree about the Giclee, but for a show it a commonly known term. This has been battered ad nauseum at DigitalFineArt and other
Re: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-28 by Alan Zinn
... Jeff, Better not call them Iris!!!! Giclee seems to have caught on most places - I hate it myself but don t get me started. NOBODY uses ink jet in the
RE: [Digital BW] OT: What to call the prints...
2003-04-28 by Paul Roark
... I was in a gallery with some Giclees and there was a French woman in there who knew the gallery owner. We started talking about this issue, including
Re: [Digital BW] top-off - wasRe: vacuum vs bottom filling
2003-04-28 by Alan Zinn
... Jim, I just jam some mat board shims between the carts. The tube is left open for equalization. I suppose each type of printer will need its own method.
Re: [Digital BW] top-off - wasRe: vacuum vs bottom filling
2003-04-28 by Alan Zinn
... Jim, I think new carts are so inexpensive they are the only sensible choice. The fill tubing is left open to equalize air pressure. I was printing today