Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 1890 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

8x16 bits:Looking for the author...

2002-05-22 by André Vallejo

Message: 9 Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 21:28:35 -0000 From: billy_iverson Subject: Re: The old 8 x 16 bits again...But worth reading! André,

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] 8x16 bits and BW

2002-05-22 by Austin Franklin

Hi Todd, ... Well, that is a problem. You need to see prints, not web images... Images can look fine on the screen, but when you print them, they are

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 8x16 bits and BW

2002-05-22 by Todd Flashner

... Okay Austin, It seems you are correct. Below was part of Dan s recent post, and as you said, he does indeed specify color : I therefore issued a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 8x16 bits and BW

2002-05-22 by Todd Flashner

Austin You may well be right that Dan excludes BW from his challenge, in which case I apologize. I m checking into it, I ll let you know. For the record, I

Thread view Attachments: 0

Tylers new VM curve experiences anyone?

2002-05-22 by jimhayes361

I m interested in two main areas for the 1280 pc for the new curves (4/22/02). BTW, I m using Eclipse Satine 190 gms: 1) About how does each curve print wrt

Thread view Attachments: 0

1160 capacity using MIS cartirges?

2002-05-22 by Richard Sintchak

Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 12:56:29 PM, Editor P.O.V. Image Service wrote: ... EPOVIS The process GENERALLY (in acid-free papers) is the result of either

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Wilhelm Imaging Web Site

2002-05-22 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service

... The process GENERALLY (in acid-free papers) is the result of either light or gaseous interactions. Light induced fading can be tested for by placing the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Choosing system

2002-05-22 by Lars Arned

Hi All I´m teaching art and photo at a high school. We are going to switch to a digital darkroom - Photoshop and Inkjet printing (B&W). When it comes to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] AN glass update.

2002-05-22 by Julian Thomas

Sorry hit send before I finished the sentence... Anyway... On the 1680 I did + and - steps in .2 increments and found that the full - setting (-1) was

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] AN glass update.

2002-05-22 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service

... I understand that.. BUT, it turns out that the defaults for the VueScan settings on the 2450 were NOT originally 0.. In fact, they were different for

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] AN glass update.

2002-05-22 by Julian Thomas

I went for -1! (see my last post) The vuescan setting have not relation to the Epson settings. In silverfast e.g. you have a choice of 0 and 2.5 which matches

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] AN glass update.

2002-05-22 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service

Now the question is, which focus setting will give you the best results using this method? I would try: 0.125, 0.25, 0.375, and 0.5 Care to run a quick test

Thread view Attachments: 0

[Digital BW] Wilhelm Imaging Web Site

2002-05-22 by Paul Roark

Jeff, ... Pardon my cynicism, but you may have answered the question. I suspect it is really hard to keep the big-money clients happy while still doing good

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] AN glass update.

2002-05-22 by Julian Thomas

OK, both of these taken from a 1600dpi 16bit scan of a 6x6cm neg. Changed to 8 bit, View as Pixels ,cropped to size, image size adjusted 600pixels at dpi,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Wilhelm Imaging Web Site

2002-05-22 by Jeff Magidson

Does anyone out there know what the story behind the Wilhelm Imaging Research, Inc. web site ? For the past 1 1/2 years or more I have periodically gone to

Thread view Attachments: 0

AN glass update.

2002-05-22 by Julian Thomas

Hi all, I ve been playing with some AN glass from Focal Point Ind. I got a 2mm sheet of 4x5 custom cut part no. STK-MS45AN2 (38USD) for my 1680pro. I ve been

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] AN glass update.

2002-05-22 by Alessandro Pardi

Julian, anything you can show us? You know, the usual pre vs. post cure comparison... Alex ... From: Julian Thomas [mailto:julianthomas@terra.es] Sent:

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] 8x16 bits and BW

2002-05-22 by Austin Franklin

... Hi Todd, Well, most ALL have done B&W images that posterize...and that disproves his claim. ... But, they are specifically talking about color, and for

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 8x16 bits and BW

2002-05-22 by Todd Flashner

... I fully agree with you that I d love fully functional 16-bit editing. And when that happens there ll be no funny little debates, and Dan s challenge will

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 8x16 bits and BW

2002-05-22 by Todd Flashner

... Austin Just keep one thing in mind, and as you don t monitor his list I don t expect you to know this. This topic, specifically as it relates to Dan

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] 8x16 bits and BW

2002-05-22 by Austin Franklin

... Hi Martin, Yes, and I agree with you completely too. It IS unfortunate, that, though Dan does know a lot about color, his misinformation/misunderstandings

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] 8x16 bits and BW

2002-05-22 by Martin Wesley

I agree with Austin. If you have a good scan, you can make small adjustments in 8-bit mode without problems. As you work with digital B&W, you will eventually

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] 8x16 bits and BW

2002-05-22 by Austin Franklin

... I find Dan s comments on this topic quite wrong. Doing tonal moves in 8 bit, CAN make a REAL difference. It s a fact. Here s one of the rubs of this

Thread view Attachments: 0

8x16 bits and BW

2002-05-22 by André Vallejo

As I promised,there goes the comment from Dan about this issue... André writes, ... came to my mind? Are the considerations you made valid for BW images, or

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.