Re: [Digital BW] 8x16 bits and BW
2002-05-23 by Jerry Olson
Why does my scanner have the option to scan in either 16 or 8 bits then? What would be the point? I m only talking about large tonal adjustments when I say the
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 1889 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2002-05-23 by Jerry Olson
Why does my scanner have the option to scan in either 16 or 8 bits then? What would be the point? I m only talking about large tonal adjustments when I say the
2002-05-23 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... No.. What will happen is that printers will be price realistically instead of having the cost shifted to the inks.. That will allow more diversification
2002-05-23 by Austin Franklin
Todd, ... I knew you did some tests, but I do not remember what the results were. I am very busy, and have a LOT of things going on, so I m sorry if I don t
2002-05-23 by Martin Wesley
Tim, I have used the Ultrabase with my Linoscan 1400 with 4x5 negs and it seems to work fine in terms of no Newton rings. I do wish it was a bit heavier
2002-05-23 by Austin Franklin
... Hi Jerry, That claim doesn t match their Kodachrome 25 data sheet, and there are many issues that are really misleading WRT that claim. Do you know the
2002-05-23 by Austin Franklin
Hi Allesandro, ... It depends on when you do your tonal curves. Remember, most every scanner is going to scan in ONLY high bit, it s how they work.
2002-05-23 by Todd Flashner
... Jerry I think the discussion always assumes that if one is making side by side comparisons one is manipulating files of equal quality, just different bit
2002-05-23 by Robert Rose
Jeff, I am glad someone finally asked the question. I thought that maybe you had to have a secret code to unlock the information. Or, the information was only
2002-05-23 by Alessandro Pardi
Jerry, I probably didn t explain enough my workflow: I never do 8 bit scans, I always use 16 bit raw scans (i.e., with no curves/levels/other tweaks made by
2002-05-23 by Todd Flashner
Austin Why do you keep suggesting I conduct tests you know I ve conducted many times over. You don t want to show your results, fine, just admit it, but please
2002-05-23 by Jerry Olson
A long time ago I called Kodak s digital division and asked a few questions, one of them being, how many pixels would it take to equal the information on a
2002-05-23 by Tim Atherton
Has anyone actually tried this stuff instead of glass and/or mounting fluid? with what results? http://www.mediastreet.com/cgi-bin/tame/mediastreet/ultra.tam
2002-05-23 by Jerry Olson
Hi Allessandro, Well on my images the noise in the shadows on the monitor is very obvious when I scan a slide in 8 bits. If you make a large tone adjustment in
2002-05-23 by Jerry Olson
Lloyd, lets hope that someone will make a CIS for it right away! Jerry Buying 7 carts at once will probably be more
2002-05-23 by Mike Stone
... From: Julian Thomas To: Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:38 PM Subject: Re: [Digital
2002-05-23 by Julian Thomas
so what do you use to wet mount?? all that cleaning up?? I ve just done another patch of tests - this time scanning an unexposed neg, so all I get is grain.
2002-05-23 by klog221
Totally Agree. Their prices are great, and their shipping costs are real costs, not inflated. Kevin ... Epson ... ground from ... prices around ... shipping
2002-05-23 by Mike Stone
... From: Julian Thomas ... today ... I used to think that I was not getting Newtons Rings with my B&W scans but when I looked more
2002-05-23 by Don Eby
... Jason, Thanks for the help. I didn t even realize that was happening. I have more issues than I even knew! Don Eby ===== http://www.DonEby.com
2002-05-23 by Don Eby
Thanks Richard, for the kind words. BTW, I did not think about the fact that everyone out there is not a mind reader. The Panoramic image that I included in
2002-05-23 by Julian Thomas
Hmm just come across something weird, started scanning some colour neg today using AN glass (all my tests had been with BW ) and I m getting newton rings - but
2002-05-23 by Doug Fisher
I just wanted to pass along what appears to be a good source for Epson papers. The company is called atlex.com. They shipped via UPS ground from FL to
2002-05-23 by Austin Franklin
Hi Sam, ... Not that I am aware of. There is typically IR glass, but that isn t the same thing. I know of no low-pass/anti-aliasing filter used in my
2002-05-23 by Sam A. McCandless
Is a functional equivalent of this low-pass/anti-aliasing filtering also occurring when film is scanned? Will we also, for example, not get the benefit of the
2002-05-23 by Austin Franklin
Hi Steadman, I know that the Canon D30 and D60 use a CMOS imaging sensor, not a CCD, but that s not relevant to any of the comments I made. Everything I said
2002-05-23 by Truman Prevatt
As long as your operations are linear and you have maximal dynamic range there will be no difference between processing in 8 bits and processing in 16 bits and
2002-05-23 by Austin Franklin
Hi Nij, ... I would say any scanner *SHOULD* do this... I know my Leafscan 45 and 35 do this. The requirement is that the scanner have LUTs (Look Up Tables)
2002-05-23 by Steadman Uhlich
Austin, The D30 and D60 use a CMOS chip and not a CCD. Steadman ... From: Austin Franklin To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, May
2002-05-23 by Austin Franklin
Hi Todd, ... Not waffling at all! Why should I spend my time proving something to someone who can easily, with a little work on their own, do the experiment
2002-05-23 by CDTobie@aol.com
... No B&W inkjet system currently meets your list of requirements, and the 1160 is an out of production machine. Consider waiting for the upcoming 2200, so
2002-05-23 by klog221
... curves has ... BTW: Thank you VERY MUCH Paul, for your wonderful work !!!! I am going to CC Bob Zeiss, as I have been speaking with him RE: trouble I was
2002-05-23 by klog221
... curves has ... No question about it, these new curves are terrific. I am using however: 1280 on PC with MIS CFS. Additionally, so far, I find the Premium
2002-05-23 by Bob Frost
Loyd, Hang on a minute. If the EU does stop printer manufacturers trying to make their customers use their ink, all that will happen is that the prices of
2002-05-23 by Alessandro Pardi
Jerry, I m one of those you address, but my usual workflow is not what you suggest: I *do* scan in 16 bits, actually I start with a raw scan from Vuescan. But
2002-05-23 by Alessandro Pardi
Thanks Julian, images speak for themselves. Alex ... http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
2002-05-23 by Martin Wesley
... From: jimhayes361 To: Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:25 PM Subject: [Digital BW]
2002-05-23 by Lloyd O'Daniel
I m hoping that the 2200 will be like previous desktop designs with the ink carts riding on the head. With 7 carts, I m not sure they do. If so, there should
2002-05-23 by Todd Flashner
Austin Sorry I lost my cool. As I said I brought pre-existing frustration to the conversation. Please don t take it personally! Todd
2002-05-23 by Jerry Olson
Austin, I have Canon macro lenses, and also the 28-135mm IS Canon. And I can tell you for a 100 percent positive certainty that the macro lenses are sharper.
2002-05-23 by ednmetrodc
... wrote: I m on a Mac with an 870 and the new curves are definitely better than the old ones (ver. 6). All curves are much smoother, especially in the
2002-05-23 by Todd Flashner
Whatever Austin. You keep saying how easily your images can posterize and if Dan want s to see it, or for lunch at Le Cirque, no problemo, you have images
2002-05-23 by Jerry Olson
To all who think 8 bit color correcting is identical to 16. Just try it yourself with one of your own images. One scanned in 16 bit, and one in 8. Make
2002-05-23 by Austin Franklin
Hi Jerry, ... Of course. Line art images are extremely sharp too, but they have no detail or tonality ;-) To me, sharpness isn t an indication of good or
2002-05-23 by Jerry Olson
Hi Austin, ... Certainly NOT! Austin, you obviously see quality in scans I don t see. My D30 gives me extremely sharp, detailed closeups. It equals provia 100,
2002-05-23 by Austin Franklin
... Well, that really doesn t work either... Seeing the prints does, so why waste your time futzing around with anything else? I guess I don t understand
2002-05-23 by Paul Roark
Keith, Do you use a Mac or PC? Paul ... [Keith]
2002-05-23 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... PC, unfortunately, in this case.. [Keith] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2002-05-23 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
... Some farcical ad copy: EPSON introduces the EPSON Stylus Pro Bulimic 7600 and 9600.. Printers that purge unnecessarily. Anyone know if the 2200 suffers
2002-05-23 by Todd Flashner
Hey Austin You and I are in great agreement over everything but one. I believe such discussions are MOST informative when people demonstrate what they are
2002-05-22 by Lloyd O'Daniel
This is good news. Perhaps it will discourage Epson from extending this sculduggery to the large-format printers, and curtail it with the small ones. Their