Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 1960 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched

Re: Quadtone ICC Profiles for IP4

2002-03-20 by antonisphoto

Mike, from talking to them (Daniel specifically, I think), I thought all along that bw profiles were at no cost to the user. A change of heart perhaps? Antonis

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Quadtone ICC Profiles for IP4

2002-03-20 by btmcelhaney

What a guy! Mike! Will look forward to seeing them on this site as they are some of the same papers I use. I hope that I can contribute to this forum as much

Thread view Attachments: 0

Putting out the foveon fires....

2002-03-20 by antonisphoto

Folks, I am posting this on list, (a) to let you know I am following all this, (b) to offer some suggestions, and (c) to say that I cannot in good faith engage

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Foveon camera

2002-03-20 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service

... Two possibilities... We know Gates wants to push embedded Windows OS s, the new tablet OS version of Windows, and whatever they call the PDA OS version

Thread view Attachments: 0

Foveon Thread

2002-03-20 by Martin Wesley

Let me try this again. The Foveon thread has gotten too far off topic for this group. While the discussion is of great interest to many people, I am again

Thread view Attachments: 0

Quadtone ICC Profiles for IP4

2002-03-20 by mkravit

I just got off of the phone with Daniel at Colorbyte Software. I asked them to profile a number of papers with the Cone/MIS FS inks and post them to their ICC

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Foveon camera

2002-03-20 by Austin Franklin

Hi Greg, ... No, not at all. I am saying the raw data from the Foveon camera is not [your list above], but that is true for even the Bayer pattern

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Foveon camera

2002-03-20 by Pics4U@en.com

So as just one examle, you are saying that the Foveon technology does not need to be white balanced? Setpoints and curves adjusted? I ll bet that just like

Thread view Attachments: 0

Group Manners and Courtesy

2002-03-20 by Martin Wesley

Things seem to be getting out of hand. Please watch what you say. Courtesy and good manners are not optional, they are a requirement for continued membership.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Thanks Austin!

2002-03-20 by Jason DeFontes

Austin, I just wanted to say thank you for taking the time to participate in this forum and share you technical knowledge with the rest of us. I know you go to

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Foveon camera

2002-03-20 by Austin Franklin

Hi Derek, It clearly IS a raw format, no doubt...I have no problem with that, but for Microsoft to claim they are providing native support for something that

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Foveon camera

2002-03-20 by Derek Clarke

Er it isn t foolish if the sensor delivers more than 8 bits per colour as then a non-24 bit colour format will be needed like 36-bit TIFF, and it would be

Thread view Attachments: 0

Foveon Thread

2002-03-20 by Martin Wesley

All, I have not been following this thread as it has no interest for me at the moment, but it really seems to have a slim link to Digital B&W Printing, the

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] OT: Hinging an overmat

2002-03-20 by Alan Zinn

... Daniel, With these sort of things there is the right way, the wrong way, and your way. Here is my way. 1. lay the over-mat and mount board edge to edge. 2.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [Digital BW] Scanner addition

2002-03-20 by Alan Zinn

... Keith, The program you know how to run is always the best one. I haven t tried ViewScan but hear it is good. There are image quality differences among

Thread view Attachments: 0

No true "black" in my hextones?

2002-03-20 by byronbulb

Hi guys - I m still experimenting and learning, but it seems to me that my prints are missing a true, rich black - midtones and highlights are really really

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [Digital BW] Foveon camera

2002-03-20 by Austin Franklin

... Let me clarify this so there is no misunderstanding. There is absolutely no relation between what you are calling the CURRENT digital camera RAW format

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.