Re: HP Z3200 New Large Format Printer
2008-09-23 by sinar001
So what s new in this printer? Chromatic Red ink??? Wonder if that will be available for the Z3100? John Nollendorfs
Messages
Browse messages
Page 328 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-23 by Bill Morse
Hi Berel While I agree with the first part of your post (don t exceed the capabilities of your scanner), I don t believe that prints at 150 DPI (What you get
Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-23 by Berel Lutsky
... Whatever school of thought one belongs to it is never a good idea to scan beyond the optical scan capabilities of what ever scanner you are using - many
Re: [Digital BW] Re: OT: Film or digital
2008-09-23 by Bruce Watson
... There are plenty of purely symmetrical lenses out there. The view camera world is loaded with them. The classic dialyte, planar, and dagor designs come to
HP Z3200 New Large Format Printer
2008-09-23 by Wayne J. Cosshall
Hi All, HP has announced a new large format printer: http://www.dimagemaker.com/article.php?articleID=1459 Cheers, Wayne Wayne J. Cosshall Publisher, The
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-23 by john castronovo
If this is a real fluid mounted drum scan, there should be no difference at all in the cost for these resolutions, so there s no reason not to go for the 300
[Digital BW] Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-23 by Tyler Boley
yes, though I m not sure there s a software move that is the same as opening the aperture, assuming anyone wants that. On the other hand, some of the work I ve
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-23 by E Neilsen
From chruchy, is it not always easier to make soft than the other way round? Eric Eric Neilsen Photo 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 214
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-23 by E Neilsen
And now try and offer noise reduction help across the board when many professional users think sRGB is a great color space for all work, Don t You . Many
[Digital BW] Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-23 by Tyler Boley
John, I believe we have the same setup? Give it a try with those 4000 ppi scans, sometimes even open 2. How helpful it is depends on the image and grain. I
[Digital BW] Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-23 by john dean
That s very useful Bruce, regarding the opening up of the aperture to reduce grain. There is a Gain setting with Silverfast that I m using but I never use it.
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-23 by Bruce Watson
... Not surprising. Graininess is directly related to density. With trannies, the density is in the shadows. The highlights of trannies therefore have the much
[Digital BW] Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-22 by john dean
Bruce, I pretty much agree with your conclusions. However, I find color transparencies to scan at the higher ppi resolutions MUCH smoother than film does, like
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-22 by Bruce Watson
... I ve studied this for a number of years now. Listened to lots of arguments on the various lists and groups. Asked a bunch of questions and gotten all kinds
Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-22 by Roger
... Isn t that true for any film and why we have 4000dpi desktop scanners for 35mm? I ll agree that a 16 bit 4000dpi scan of 4x5 inch film is ridiculously
Re: Print NamesRE: Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting
2008-09-22 by Ernst Dinkla
... That s what the print side of Photoshop CS4 will look like then :-) A paint ball is in a way an encapsulated pigment particle. -- Met vriendelijke
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-22 by Ernst Dinkla
... Yes, it looks like they scan the 4x5 at 1200 PPI in best case. One wonders if that actually is done on a drum scanner then. -- Met vriendelijke groeten,
Re: Epson Re-fill Kits, Cutting Plastic, Was: 1800 & Eboni-6
2008-09-22 by Nick H. Nugent
Hi Robert, ... Just snap into place. The plastic is rather durable as I have worked with a set at least several dozen times without any problem. There s no
Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-22 by steveabrink
4X5 Black and White Negatives can hold a tremendous amount of information --on the order of 2000+ ppi optical to capture all the potential data. Yes, it takes
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-22 by don.swanson
The Epson 2200/2400/3600 printers can use all of the information in a 56mb file. That is the resolution that I use for my 2200. ... From:
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-22 by Bill Morse
I would try to avoid service bureaus that talk in those terms. They really aren t telling you what you need to know. For an inkjet print you want 240-600 DPI
Re: Print NamesRE: Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting
2008-09-22 by Bill Morse
I can see a whole new industry! (just not sure what is it good, for; UHH!) Bill ... -- Regards, Bill Morse Wm. Morse Editions http://www.MorseEditions.com/
Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-22 by ag000002002
You are right, those were the output resolutions. For a 12x18 print, the service bureau offers: 100 dpi (1200x1800) which is a 6 MB file; 200 dpi (2400x3600)
Re: Print NamesRE: Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital prints?
2008-09-22 by Bill Morse
Ouch! [BG] I try to educate my customers (both artists buying limited editions, and end-user print buyers) to not call them Giclee, but if they insist, that s
Re: Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-22 by blueto49
Andrew, When talking to service bureaus or other companies to have negatives scanned they generally are giving you an output resolution at the size you want to
Scan Resolution for a 4X5 Black and White Negatives
2008-09-21 by ag000002002
I wish to scan some of my old work and print approximately 12 X 15 prints on an Epson Photo 2200. I can get a drum scan locally at 100 dpi, 200 dpi and 300
Re:Dry mounting digital prints?
2008-09-21 by Jules
What s this got to do with Dry Mounting Digital Prints? Jules
How about trademark?
2008-09-21 by Michael-K
A name cannot be copyrighted, it can be trademarked. Here s some info: http://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-general.html#what What is copyright?
Re:Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting dig
2008-09-21 by Barrett Benton
I just refer to my prints as archival inkjet prints , and let it go at that. If the prints are good, what use is a smokescreen? (And, when a prospective buyer
Print NamesRE: Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting
2008-09-21 by Tyler Boley
... I can t resist passing this on, Bruce Watson sent me the link. YOu have to watch to the end. I gotta get me one of these!
Re:Dry mounting digital prints?
2008-09-21 by the_des_bois
... form, needing a great amount of skill. One could develop a whole line of precision squirt guns. Make tons of money selling them. Especially in
giclee or not to giclee
2008-09-21 by Jack
Tis but thy name that is my enemy; Thou art thyself, though not a Montague. What s Montague? it is nor hand, nor foot, Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part
Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital prints?
2008-09-21 by handyman856
YES! I think the clueless noobs who invented the word had no idea of the other connotations of it. And it is, AFAIK, why it as fallen into such disfavor.
Re:Dry mounting digital prints?
2008-09-21 by ben schneider
Since I am the bastard that started this Photograph thing, I thought I would add the following Wikipedia definition: ******************** A photograph (often
Print NamesRE: Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital prints?
2008-09-21 by E Neilsen
Bob, I too find it an odd behavior, but it is out there none the less. And again, I don t think that they were going for that context but the one set in motion
Epson Re-fill Kits, Cutting Plastic, Was: 1800 & Eboni-6
2008-09-21 by robert49brake
... Are you still around Nick? I read your exchange with a great deal of interest and have some questions. I can see the plastic block on the Epson carts, is
Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital prints?
2008-09-21 by handyman856
Incorrecto-mundo my friend! It is the French word for Spurt (or similar) and was brought about around 2000 to make the process sound more arty - a more
Re: Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital prints?
2008-09-21 by Bob Frost
I think Harald Johnson describes the origins and use of the word well http://www.dpandi.com/giclee/giclee.html Bob Frost. ... From: E Neilsen
Re: Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital prints?
2008-09-21 by Bob Frost
... an inkjet an inkjet with pride but there are many out there that are still calling inkjet prints Giclee in order to improve the perception of them in
Re: Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital ...
2008-09-21 by CorrPro96@aol.com
In a message dated 9/20/2008 10:29:45 PM Eastern Daylight Time, cj@cjcom.net ... No, not at all. A copy, or reproduction, of the original would look just
RE: Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital ...
2008-09-21 by E Neilsen
I think I ll be coming but I haven t planned it for sure. If I do, I ll let you know. Eric Neilsen Photo 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 214
Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital ...
2008-09-21 by Clayton Jones
Hello Richard, ... No, not at all. A copy, or reproduction, of the original would look just like the original. A copy of a neg or a tranny (if it s a good
Re: Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital ...
2008-09-21 by CorrPro96@aol.com
In a message dated 9/20/2008 10:01:19 PM Eastern Daylight Time, e.neilsen2@worldnet.att.net writes: And I believe that it is that dubious selling of prints,
Re: Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital ...
2008-09-21 by CorrPro96@aol.com
In a message dated 9/20/2008 10:01:19 PM Eastern Daylight Time, e.neilsen2@worldnet.att.net writes: And I believe that it is that dubious selling of prints,
RE: Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital ...
2008-09-21 by E Neilsen
They are original prints; each one being different than the last or next. Even reproduction can vary, but they are not stuck from the master. The context of
Re: Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital ...
2008-09-21 by CorrPro96@aol.com
In a message dated 9/20/2008 9:33:54 PM Eastern Daylight Time, thedesbois@videotron.ca writes: So Richard you are telling me that all the photographs I saw at
Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital ...
2008-09-21 by the_des_bois
So Richard you are telling me that all the photographs I saw at exhibitions where reproductions? So sad I feel now knowing this. Should I have asked to see the
Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital prints?
2008-09-21 by the_des_bois
I agree. So not descriptive of anything. Might have been needed at the beginning... but today? Me not think so. Hey I just loaded my water gun with some dye
Re: Dry mounting digital prints?/waviness
2008-09-21 by Frank K
That waviness can happen because of different reasons. 1. The thickness of the paper. 2. The tightness of the frame s backing which, if too loose, will not
Re: Copyright enough misinformation RE: [Digital BW] Re:Dry mounting digital ...
2008-09-21 by CorrPro96@aol.com
Aren t ALL photographic prints, prints of a photograph... whatever the printing process is? The photograph could be shown as a transparency, or any of a number