Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 329 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2008-09-21 by Tyler Boley
unlike toned silver gelatin , Platinum , Kallitype , on and on, including all of the intaglio, silkscreen, stone lithography, etc etc.. .. it s not a very
2008-09-21 by jim kitchen
Dear Chris, On 9/20/08 6:42 PM, -= Chris =- wrote: I guess, artistic license , it also does have a slang connotation. It can...
2008-09-21 by Clayton Jones
Hello Tyler, ... Thanks for the good link. Here is the essence of the dictionary definition at the bottom: ...exact copy of an original work of art that was
2008-09-21 by -= Chris =-
... http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gicl%C3%A9e http://www.nakedtranslations.com/fr/2004/05/000157.php En 1991, Duganne a dû créer un mot pour désigner un type
2008-09-21 by jimcongleton
... I think that s a great idea: it certainly would speed up the process. It is difficult to center a print in the mat window when the print is fastened to
2008-09-21 by David Logan-Morrow
Just heard that someone, somewhere in a back room in Rochester, NY, is developing a camera that not only shoots digital but also film. Anyone else hear this?
2008-09-21 by David Logan-Morrow
Couldn t have been said simpler.
2008-09-20 by Gary Weaver
I still associate the word with the IRIS and the APLS 4000 era. Not at all with inkjet. gar *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
2008-09-20 by E Neilsen
I have my belief and you have your, but while Levis is a brand name, who made and sold the copyrighted print known as the “Giclee”. These are not Fresson
2008-09-20 by jim kitchen
Dear Chris, ... The French language definition means something completely different... :) This is an anglicized version of the French definition... jim k
2008-09-20 by Tyler Boley
http://www.dpandi.com/giclee/giclee.html Tyler http://www.custom-digital.com/
2008-09-20 by -= Chris =-
Giclee is nothing but the French term or word for Inkjet....
2008-09-20 by E Neilsen
Copyright issues are fairly straight forward and then again not, but to say that the term giclee is to inkjet as big mac is to burger is so far off to be
2008-09-20 by djon43
Eric, This is a matter for you and your attorney. You won t find a convincing answer unless you pay for it because you believe what you believe...always a
2008-09-20 by E Neilsen
There is no copyright violation to selling a Giclee. That would be like saying it a copyright violation to sell a photograph. There may be a group of people
2008-09-20 by Clayton Jones
Hello Jim, ... Bummer. I ve never had that happen (I use matte paper). ... Understood, I ve seen those kind of hinges. Only problem I have with that is it s
2008-09-20 by ben schneider
Frank in NJ, Right on. Magazines are lithographs, not photographs. The original transparency, or piece of film was the photograph. But the reproductions
2008-09-20 by djon43
Everybody here knows Giclee is a marketing system and bogus label, not a process. And it s a copywrite violation to use the term if one isn t paying to take
2008-09-20 by jimcongleton
... Clayton, I ve used a method similar to yours (tightly affixing the print to the back of the mat with two short pieces of archival tape) until recently.
2008-09-20 by Frank K
Of course people will see more value in a print that is called Giclee because a lot of people are stupid and think if it has a french name it is something
2008-09-19 by Clayton Jones
Hello Michael, ... I use two pieces of acid free linen hinge tape at the top of the print, taped to the back of the window mat. Then I hinge the back board
2008-09-19 by Roger
... Yes, that s very true and easy to see (lay one scan over the other in Photoshop, pin register and lower opacity and it s clear they aren t quite lined up).
2008-09-19 by Ernst Dinkla
... It is not just focus shift but there can be some shift of the film frame too between scans. That s what makes the difference between multisampling and
2008-09-19 by Roger
The long exposure is what I use for ... Just one comment- the artifacts you are seeing may relate to flaws with Vuescan rather than the scanner or negative
2008-09-19 by Gary Weaver
I really like folders !! If they can hold a film flat, it s the best thing since sliced bread. gar *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
2008-09-19 by Gary Weaver
I take a survival stance. Digital is another tool, but I don t bank on it (my hobby, I don t cater to buyers). gar *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
2008-09-19 by pr_roark
... It would have been better to say more symetrical lens. I m not sure there are exactly symetrical ones outside, perhaps, 1:1 copy lenses. The typical
2008-09-19 by Gary Weaver
My working outlook, too. I like to point out to people that the coffee table books seem to have reproductions they don t complain about. It s just a different
2008-09-19 by donbga
Eric and all, ... editing ... I and ... for ... Though I m not sure this is exactly pertinent to the discussion, I ran across this little tip that allows ACR
2008-09-19 by Ernst Dinkla
... I guess for true symmetrical wide angles you have to stay with film. None of the wide angle designs from Leica, Schneider, Rodenstock for digital sensors
2008-09-19 by Bruce Watson
... It s not a failure of color negative materials. People routinely blame poor scanner performance on color negative tonal compression. Yet, I routinely scan
2008-09-19 by Ernst Dinkla
... It isn t the dynamic range or Dmax not captured by the scanner but its problem with reproducing the tone values accurately from the compressed range of the
2008-09-19 by Stephen Kobrin
Thanks to all who replied on this thread. The learning curve never flattens which is one of the things that makes all of this fun. Steve
2008-09-19 by pr_roark
... I suspect you re right. If the cameras have 14 bit processing internally and we have 16 bits per channel in PS, isn t there more than enough headroom to
2008-09-19 by Roger
... I m surprised you see a reduction in scanner noise in *color* negative highlights using multiexposure scans. I usually find that if I set the overall
2008-09-19 by pr_roark
... http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08091901carl_zeiss_distagon_t_21mm.asp I love seeing competition with the OEM lenses by top optical companies. But, I
2008-09-19 by E Neilsen
Yes, Yes. This is basically my workflow, although I use ACR in Lightroom. AS it improves, or fixes the bugs in mask making and implementation, LR will give
2008-09-19 by Mark Savoia
And the upgrade costs :) Mark http://www.stillrivereditions.com ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2008-09-19 by Steve F
Steve, I agree with Tyler. I also do ALL global color and tone adjustments in ACR before taking the image into PS (as 16 bit). So besides the basic panel s
2008-09-19 by Carl Schofield
This lens may be one of the best wides available for the 5D II: http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08091901carl_zeiss_distagon_t_21mm.asp
2008-09-19 by Ernst Dinkla
... Or for example multisampling/long exposure with a Nikon 8000 on wet mounted color negative film like I do. Similar artefacts seen in digital HDR can show
2008-09-19 by Dana H. Myers
... There s something to be said for HDR scans of mainstream MF negative film... Dana
2008-09-19 by Ernst Dinkla
... If it has the dynamic range of a Fuji S5 then there isn t much left to stay with film. Although an MF folder camera fits better in a coat pocket. The Fuji
2008-09-19 by steveabrink
I also use the Microtek Artixscan 120tf with the SilverFast software but have not used the glass film holder. Did you see an improvement in edge to edge
2008-09-19 by pr_roark
Scott, ... My main camera is a Bronica RF 645 with the 45 mm lens. I expect it to remain in use for a while. For serious B&W landscape shooting where I want a
2008-09-19 by pr_roark
The camera I bought the 90 TS lens for: http://www.photokina-show.com/0584/canon/digitalslrcamera/eos-5d-mark-2/ Paul www.PaulRoark.com
2008-09-19 by Barrett Benton
Almost entirely 35mm film (the balance gets shot with an Olympus C-8080 digital). Scanning chores are split between a UMAX PowerLook 2100XL tabloid flatbed
2008-09-19 by David Logan-Morrow
Probably much longer.
2008-09-19 by Tom Baker
Yep. Not to forget that learning digital is not as easy as a mouse click. Think about how long it took to master the wet process. Digital will take you
2008-09-19 by Le Globe Trotteur
I love this forum...Keep me updated on the technology. So I still use film and I shoot only when I see is worth having because film is more expensive than