Re: [Digital BW] Re: Am I destroying image quality
2008-01-07 by Mark Gilvey
I went to a Scott Kelby Lightroom Seminar in DC and he says, what ever you CAN do in Lightroom, you SHOULD do in Lightroom because it does it so much better
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 400 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2008-01-07 by Mark Gilvey
I went to a Scott Kelby Lightroom Seminar in DC and he says, what ever you CAN do in Lightroom, you SHOULD do in Lightroom because it does it so much better
2008-01-07 by Mike
I used to deal with these issues but now Lightroom addresses many of them with speed and efficiency. It takes lots of time to process RAW files. My PC hates
2008-01-07 by Clayton Price
Hi Paul - I m glad to see that your bottom line is where it ought to be :-))) The back and forth discussions were becoming confusing enough to make one wonder
2008-01-07 by Tony Sleep
... Absolutely. ... Yes. There s only a minority of older kit I think won t do it. -- Regards Tony Sleep http://tonysleep.co.uk
2008-01-07 by Peter Marshall
I ve read that suggestion many times before, and it may well be the best way if you use the software supplied with your scanner. However when I ve tested it,
2008-01-07 by jalvasurg
Hello everyone, I currently print with a 2200 and Imageprint RIP for B&W and have gotten excellent results. Anyone out there with experience of printing B&W
2008-01-07 by Paul Grant
I would always scan as a positive and let your photo editing software do the conversion. Regards, Paul ... [Non-text portions of this message have been
2008-01-07 by Carl Schofield
Gloss enhancer, used to remove gloss differential on RC prints. Carl Schofield http://photos.schophoto.com ... [Non-text portions of this message have been
2008-01-07 by Paul Whiting
Umm, Carl, what s a glop cart ? Thanks, Paul
2008-01-07 by Tony Bonanno
Bob, I m using the GFS on both an Epson 3800 and a Canon iPF5000. You might want to try a different rendering intent and see if that helps. I m quite pleased
2008-01-07 by Robert Lee
I can t believe that I ve been scanning film for over a year and I still haven t tried vuescan. Sounds like it might give me a fighting chance with those
2008-01-06 by Carl Schofield
I have tried it for refilling R1800 Epson OEM carts and it works fine, as shown in the video. Really not any more of a mess than refilling 3rd party carts
2008-01-06 by Ernst Dinkla
... Vuescan uses the increased blue-green sensor output to compensate the mask. This isn t a hardware feature but a driver feature. Vuescan also has a variety
2008-01-06 by Gary Weaver
Thank you, I had thought about this somewhat - specially when I heard MIS was dropping the original Quads. I don t want to mess around with ink selections, I
2008-01-06 by Paul D. DeRocco
... As far as I know, no Adobe program ever modifies a camera s raw file; instead, it stores the edits made in the raw converter in XML form either to a
2008-01-06 by dlruckus
Yes. It works as well for one ink as it does for 8 since each is independently controlled. Regards Duane ... would like to know if that is a valid approach.
2008-01-06 by njfranknj
Interesting, Tony, does that mean that it makes more sense to scan as color neg and allow the software to make the color channel adjustment, rather than
2008-01-06 by Clayton Price
Dear Paul, pglombick glombick@gmail.com pglombick wrote:
2008-01-06 by Gary Weaver
Hello All, It s easy to miss something here. And, I can t seem to wrap my head around this. My brain has labeled my 1270 as BO using MIS black, and, my 3000 as
2008-01-06 by Gary Weaver
The mask is a problem. When I was doing negs with a hand scanner, I had to make my own color masks and they can be quite different - by MFG, batch and by
2008-01-06 by Mark Savoia
From watching their video of how to refill with it, it still looks like it makes a bit of a mess. Why wouldn t a syringe be easier? Mark
2008-01-06 by Mr_Misty_44
With all this conversation concerning the ruleing on Epson carts and the possible absence in the future of 3rd party refillables I d like to know if anyone has
2008-01-06 by pr_roark
I m told by MIS that they have plenty of cartridges to respond to the expected demand from the Shutterbug R1800 3-MK article. As to the CISs, I m hoping the
2008-01-06 by Kurt Kramer
... Can the tubes not be connected to an empty EPSON cartridge? Apparently the CIS-makers manufacture their own carts?
2008-01-06 by Mitch Greenwald
Bob . . By the six months . . do you mean the period during which the ink is supposed to be used? (And you were right about the rubbish . . apologies to all!)
2008-01-06 by Tony Sleep
... Better filmscanners increase the exposure (sampling time) in the blue + green channels to cancel the orange mask optically. Without that, a lot of dynamic
2008-01-06 by Bob Frost
Mitch, ... No dearer if you take the extra ink into account. BUT, it all depends on how much printing you do. If you are going to empty all the 3800 carts
2008-01-06 by Ernst Dinkla
... Enough threads on the QTR list on the dithering but I ... Hello Ernst, ... different Dither ... printing and may ... most alike the ... I ve been
2008-01-06 by Steven Karafyllakis
... I ve recently purchased 4 CIS units on eBay (China import) that have inserts different enough from cartridges per se, that they might not be affected.
2008-01-06 by Robert Paup
I am trying this paper and find that the profile from Ilford makes prints that are too dark as compared to prints on Epson semi-matte or Epson lustre. Do I
2008-01-06 by pr_roark
... Yes. ... Yes. ... Most of there CIS systems simply run a tube to an empty cart that has been imported and arguably violates an Epson patent. A CIS,
2008-01-05 by Kurt Kramer
I m new to this. Carts are cartridges, right? Does CIS mean continuous ink supply? With CIS, and in the absence of cartridges, do the Epson patents not
2008-01-05 by Gary Weaver
Hi Duane, I choose to ignore the trend and went with a problem 3000 from eBait. It now works fine and looks to be robust, but it s no Spinwriter. I really
2008-01-05 by Robert Lee
... Hello AnnMarie, I have the same problem with an older, lower-spec flatbed, though I have gotten lucky sometimes. Underexposed negatives scan worse than
2008-01-05 by Peter De Smidt
I ve recently started testing out QTR, and so far, so good. I haven t found any explanation of the various dithering options, though. Anyone know what these
2008-01-05 by Louis Dina
Evan, I wrote the user s manual for IJC/OPM. Loved the interface for building curves, but the support was lacking and the user community small. To the best
2008-01-05 by pr_roark
... I hope not. There are still carts and CISs available. In the worst case scenario that all 1800 compatible carts dissappear, there is still, I believe, at
2008-01-05 by pr_roark
... wrote: ... If you want them. I ve never used all of the QTR points, whereas I found myself wanting more points in IJC. ... Yes. ... Yes. ...
2008-01-05 by Michael
... individual ... The digest option is terrific since you get ONE email per day and all the new posts are grouped by subject. It s very well put together and
2008-01-05 by Paul D. DeRocco
... TIFF is just a file format. Whether you save your image as a TIFF file after opening the raw file is totally separate from whether you print it. When you
2008-01-05 by Kurt Kramer
In the February 2008 issue of Shutterbug, David Brooks writes an article about printing in B&W with MIS Carbon inks and QTR in an Epson R1800 or R800. Brooks
2008-01-05 by evanj1969
thanks Paul, that is the kind of info I m looking for. and yes, I m a windows user (at least at home) ... is ... would ... so if I understand correctly: YES, I
2008-01-05 by pr_roark
The bad news is that the president went ahead and signed off on the ITC decision despite this contrary PTO ruling. The PTO ruling, however, appears to be in
2008-01-05 by pr_roark
... I initially prefered the IJC curves interface also. ... Actually, QTR allows for better control. I now use the QTR point list, which allows up to 51
2008-01-05 by Peter De Smidt
2008-01-05 by evanj1969
can anyone comment on this? I am looking at possibly purchasing an Epson 3800 as opposed to a R2400. the only issues that concerns me are this, the 3800 has
2008-01-05 by gcwagner
Thanks for everyone s thought on the issue of print surface durability. Maybe I was expecting to much. Gary Wagner ... From:
2008-01-05 by pglombick
I think it depends on what you ultimately want to use the image for. If you plan on doing more than just elementary adjustments in PS or plan to use the image
2008-01-05 by Clayton Jones
It really shouldn t matter how different people choose to read the list. Trimming the irrelevant stuff is just good practice and helpful to everyone. Regards,
2008-01-05 by dlruckus
I can t speak to the 2200 but I have used the original 1200 I bought for over 9 years now. It has never seen OEM inks. I ve used all manner of third party inks