EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:25 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 180 of 329 · 16439 messages matched

Re: [exs] Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-12 by Eli Krantzberg

... Easy dude; I don t swing both ways :-) -- Eli Krantzberg Nightshift Orchestra / Almat Productions http://www.nightshiftorchestra.com

Thread view Attachments: 0

REX/ Phat / EXS??

2003-01-12 by teddybut

Does it bother anyone else that Propellerheads put REX2 (and not REX1) into Recycle 2.0 and only let certain companies license that format from them. I own

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] Re: Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-12 by Murray McDowall

Perhaps you analogists would like to have some fun with this. If any of you actually downloaded Majectic -- take a look at the folders full of aiffs it puts

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-12 by teddybut

... Eli, I just wanted to say, I m secretly in love with you... (just adding to the other praise you ve been getting lately) please, tell the nice folks at YT

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-12 by teddybut

ewald_kegel wrote ... true. wine goes away once it s used... samples stay on your hard drive and you can use them again and again. in fact,

Thread view Attachments: 0

[exs] Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-12 by spectrumep <PersingEP@aol.com>

No problem Eli....thanks for your message! A Final Note on the subject: The main reason we instigated the crediting thing with libraries was so that our

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by Eli Krantzberg

... I see your point. Can we agree that it s a matter of perspective? I have already backed down from my original arguement, so I m not really interested in

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by Dan Chapman

You are saying that they would be paying more as Free Advertising simply by giving credit. ... With your reasoning, they are paying less. on 1/11/03 4:08 AM,

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] Re: Rate of change cc?

2003-01-11 by HELP@MusicBootCamp.com

Are you saying it currently supports the rate measurement? I forget from your other posts whether you mentioned it. -Jer

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by Eli Krantzberg

... Hi Dan, Are you really advocating a sliding scale payment model. Because that s a whole other can of worms. What about those (probably a signifigant

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by Eli Krantzberg

... [deep blush] Thank you for the kind sentiments. FWIW I appreciate your contributions as well, both here and on the LUG. ... Thank you, although I humbly

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Rate of change cc?

2003-01-11 by Nick Batzdorf

... From: ... It works very effectively, but what I m suggesting (a rate of controller change controller) could do more - not that

Thread view Attachments: 0

[exs] Re: Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by john plumridge

... Wine purveyors have bottled the wine from the manufacturer, who may have developed a vine. They do acknowledge the vine a bit. The sellers of sampled

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] Re: Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by HELP@MusicBootCamp.com

Wow, perhaps I was thinking of Urdu in my comments about Eli. I seem to remember positive vibes about both names. What I mean to say is, I sympathize with your

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by HELP@MusicBootCamp.com

I agree. Eli is a great contributor to this forum. I get sick of the tangents too, but I inevitably get drawn into them, so I guess I m ok with it. That s why

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] Re: Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by HELP@MusicBootCamp.com

The bottom line for me in this matter is that the license agreement in question doesn t have the proper legal language (whether admissible in court or not) to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by Urdu

I don t want to filter subjects (I thought this group has a moderator) but I just don t like to read messages dragging on and on and that are OT in IMHO. Why

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by Shane Fawkes

Eli, Just wanted to drop a note of appreciation your way. Your posts are helpful and your discussion comments provoke (in a good way) thought. There are many

Thread view Attachments: 0

Delete sampler instrument question

2003-01-11 by Ned Bouhalassa

I know that this was possible in the first version of EXS: When I select Delete Instrument, can I have EXS delete the sample files associated that instrument?

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by Dan Chapman

on 1/11/03 4:08 AM, Eli Krantzberg at elik@colba.net wrote: The customers ... The customers who end up using their products on commercial releases are in fact

Thread view Attachments: 0

[exs] Re: Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra

... Okay, it might be possible to have such a condition in a license agreement. That would still be completely silly though imo. As if anyone can ever check

Thread view Attachments: 0

[exs] Re: Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by ewald_kegel <ekegel@cone.nl>

I think it s unfair to compare digital bits to wine :), but the manufacturer of this product determines the conditions under which the user may USE his

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by teddybut

well, thank you very much, Mr. analogy, that really means a lot to me. I d like to thank my manager..... teddybut

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by teddybut

... no offense taken and none intended but, you are the one being pfff.... please don t even think about trying to move this subject to a new bright and shiny

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] Re: Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by Eli Krantzberg

... No, but the wine manufacturer isn t in the delivery system business. They are selling you the contents of the bottle. The bottle itself is not intended

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] EXS24 mk II: Only 32 layers?

2003-01-11 by S C A R B E E

Yeah it goes bananas! And I m only into 1/8 of the basic programming. Just shows how powerful Giga is. (converting my bass lib) It looks as it can t be done...

Thread view Attachments: 0

[exs] Re: Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra

... Quite irrelevant imo as you still need to purchase the YT product (or download the demo) in order to be able to use the samples. So there s no competition

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] EXS24 mk II: Only 32 layers?

2003-01-11 by Murray McDowall

... Hi Thomas, This was happening to me when I was trying to build some large instruments (ahem) recently -- eg paste in too many zones/groups and they

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] Rate of change cc?

2003-01-11 by john plumridge

... I use breath control wx5 and a vl70-m. It is expressive. The vl70-m only allows one voice, built as a lead instrument. sometimes I want a polyphonic

Thread view Attachments: 0

EXS24 mk II: Only 32 layers?

2003-01-11 by Thomas Hansen Skarbye <thomas@scarbee.co

Hi, There seem to be a limit of 32 layers? Is this really true? If I take a zone and repeat that 32 times, then number 33 will be on top of number 1. Any

Thread view Attachments: 0

[exs] Re: Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by ewald_kegel <ekegel@cone.nl>

The obvious difference between your 1st example (FileMaker) and the 2nd (EXS) is that in the first you are not (instantly) re-using the samples to create/

Thread view Attachments: 0

[exs] Re: Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra

... I have the feeling that by now this discussion is not related to the YT- problem at all anymore. AFAI can see, the YT-thing has nothing at all to do with

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by Eli Krantzberg

... Eric; I am really sorry about my post. I really should have taken a deep breath and counted to ten before I sent it. I hadn t read your response yet. I of

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by Eli Krantzberg

... This does strike me as a little bit odd as well. They get no additional money from having their name/products credited on recordings. But they get free

Thread view Attachments: 0

[exs] Re: Crediting

2003-01-11 by spectrumep <PersingEP@aol.com>

Just FYI, we dropped the crediting requirement when we started doing virtual instruments.....obviously, it would be impractical, because the instruments are so

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-11 by HELP@MusicBootCamp.com

I find that I quite agree with this. No offense to EP, but I was surprised that Spectrasonics asks for a credit on a CD. I might do so anyway, but asking for

Thread view Attachments: 0

[exs] Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-10 by john plumridge

... I wont let anyone pay for performance rights of my sound or use them free either. I am thinking of releasing a sample, well THE sample, A SOUND like no

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] Re: Majestic/Culture

2003-01-10 by HELP@MusicBootCamp.com

I ve contributed to that legacy to be sure. I ve thought about this, but to be honest, these are the very people I d like to hear from on all of these

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [exs] Rate of change cc?

2003-01-10 by HELP@MusicBootCamp.com

I ve worked with breath control. You re right. They are incredibly agile in controlling data. You have reminded me how much I would like to get a really good

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.