RE: [Digital BW] The Holy Grail?
2003-12-12 by David R. Spielman
Martin, Yes, I do use an Inkjet print as a proof before I make a negative. I use the same Pictorico white film material to make both inkjet proof and inkjet
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1411 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: Epson Gray Balancer issue
2003-12-12 by sanfo2003
... I am unable to offer a suggestion on why the print problem but, having used Grey Balancer before, may I respectfully suggest that you save yourself
8 bit color -> 16 bit grayscale conversion
2003-12-12 by Manuel Toledo Quinones
Usually shoots digital raw to preserve 16 bits per channel and avoid deterioration when processing the images. However, it occurs to me that if one is shooting
[Digital BW] Re: Grayscale printing on the Epson 2200
2003-12-12 by sanfo2003
... You saw pretty much the same? Are you sure you re following the workflow as outlined? The prints that result from my machine come out cool-neutral with
Re: new holy grail
2003-12-12 by bruce greene
David, Could you share your technique with us? I d love to give this a go. -bruce On Thursday, December 11, 2003, at 04:33 PM,
RE: [Digital BW] The Holy Grail?
2003-12-12 by Ken Carney
I just got in the inkjet digital neg CD from Dan Burkholder, a supplement to his excellent book. I have used his technique in the past to make pt/pd prints
RE: [Digital BW] The Holy Grail?
2003-12-12 by Paul Roark
... Or is it the worst of both worlds. All the digital artifacts with the darkroom smells, non-buffered paper, non-washable gelatin coating, wavy paper from
Re: [Digital BW] Epson Gray Balancer issue
2003-12-12 by john eckenrode
i have no clue what that could mean. but if you are trying to use grey balancer to get neutral B&W out of a 2200, it will not work. believe me, many many many
Re: [Digital BW] Re: So what to buy for UT UT2's
2003-12-12 by john eckenrode
mike i think the original UT is more or less the same as UT-2 with a different mix. i don t think UT-2 is any more light stable, its just a different
Re: [Digital BW] Microbanding...one last suggestion, please!
2003-12-12 by john eckenrode
my shots in the dark 1. i had problems with microbanding with VM ink in my 1200, i switched to UT and it went away, i also use a MIS CFS. 2. okay this is a
Re: [Digital BW] Directions please.......
2003-12-12 by john eckenrode
my advice is go UT, it is a lot cheaper and the ink is just as good, the 1280 is a good choice for a quadtone printer. also roark s UT-2 is tailor made for a
Re: [Digital BW] The Holy Grail?
2003-12-12 by J Vee
I am a long time traditional ³Carbon² Printer. I shoot 4X5 or 11X14, drum scan, Photoshop, print a 20² X 24² glossy on Colorspan 11 color printer, mount
Re: Microbanding...one last suggestion, please!
2003-12-11 by Bob Michaels
Congratulations on discovering your banding problem was an ink feed problem related to the CFS and can stop working with cleaning the heads. I think too many
RE: [Digital BW] The Holy Grail?
2003-12-11 by Martin Wesley
* -----Original Message----- * From: David R. Spielman [mailto:david@spielman.com] * Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:12 PM * To:
Holy Grail, Double Standard, etc.
2003-12-11 by Martin Wesley
I just wanted to contribute my own thoughts on these issues. First, I don t think we are ever going to see any inkjet technology that produces a print
9600 setup?
2003-12-11 by Antara Scales
Sorry if this has already been discussed. Refer me to old listings if you wish. Could you give your opinions on the best ink and rip for the 9600? thanks,
Epson Gray Balancer issue
2003-12-11 by ned_otter
Greetings -- Perhaps someone out there can shed some light on this issue -- I have a new Epson 2200, and have downloaded the English Gray Balancer software,
RE: [Digital BW] The Holy Grail?
2003-12-11 by David R. Spielman
I have found a new Holy Grail. By making digital negatives with an inkjet printer, and taking them back into the traditional wet darkroom, I have made many
RE: [Digital BW] The Holy Grail?
2003-12-11 by David R. Spielman
I have found a new Holy Grail. By making digital negatives with an inkjet printer, and taking them back into the traditional wet darkroom, I have made many
RE: [Digital BW] The Holy Grail?
2003-12-11 by David R. Spielman
I have found a new Holy Grail. By making digital negatives with an inkjet printer, and taking them back into the traditional wet darkroom, I have made many
Re: [Digital BW] Re: So what to buy for UT UT2's
2003-12-11 by Mike Sommers
Paul, As anxious as I am to get started with a dedicated B&W 1280 and your ink/workflow process, what I ve read thus far leads me to believe that UT2 s are not
RE: [Digital BW] new Epson R800
2003-12-11 by Robbe Gibson
According to the article, the consumables cost($1.80) plus the glossing($0.30) feature put the print cost higher than most dye-subs. Robbe Gibson ... From: Tim
Re: 9600 with ImagePrint vs PiezographyBW
2003-12-11 by Tyler Boley
... UC inks are at least ... Fair enough? I would say barely fair enough, and only because I stopped by and saw your post. Otherwise it would certainly have
RE: [Digital BW] IP5.6 and metamerism
2003-12-11 by Tim Atherton
... Okay - using the 2200 + Epson Ultrachrome inks you aren t going to get a B&W profile. You need to either use third party inks or by the IP RIP (but seeing
Re: [Digital BW] PermaJet Papers from MIS....
2003-12-11 by D. Hill
Am I correct that the permajet papers are just rebadged hahnenmuhle? If so can somebody post a cross reference as to what the papers are. thanks, Don ...
Drum Scanner for sale - 5000dpi
2003-12-11 by cbaumwell
I have a working Scanview Scanmate 5000 available for sale. SCSI, 8 x 10, with film/paper mounting device. I am outside NYC in New Jersey. This thing is heavy
RE: [Digital BW] Re: So what to buy for UT UT2's
2003-12-11 by Paul Roark
Steve, ... No. I m pushing MIS as best I can. Calls from potential customers asking for it might also help. I m giving a short talk 12/20 to a genealogy
Re: 9600 with ImagePrint vs PiezographyBW
2003-12-11 by qdfb
I agree. I have sadly abandoned Piezography because it has become redundant with IP producing equally impressive results from my 7600, plus the obvious cost
Re: [Digital BW] Neutral Prints On 2200
2003-12-11 by janishilesh
Hello Richard, The 2200 driver used was version 5.40. When you go into the click advanced , the ICM option is bow available. Upon cliccking ICM , one of
Re: Microbanding...one last suggestion, please!
2003-12-11 by scrber
Ok, try a gravity purge to prove your theory. Increasing the height of the bottles increase the pressure in the lines and the inkflow. Try printing the MIS 6
RE: [Digital BW] IP5.6 and metamerism
2003-12-11 by Ken Carney
B&W ... From: Tim Atherton [mailto:timatherton@theedge.ca] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:44 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject:
Microbanding...one last suggestion, please!
2003-12-11 by flabes23
Hi group, just want to let you know about my efforts to eliminate the microbanding on my Epson 1290 with MIS VM-Hextones CFS. After having done everything that
Re: [Digital BW] RC papers
2003-12-11 by Carl Schofield
On Thursday, December 11, 2003, at 01:19 AM, claudej1@aol.com wrote: snip.. ... If you mean the Oriental Graphica FB Glossy, it is available now but it
Re: IP5.6 and metamerism
2003-12-11 by grdglass@aol.com
Are you inquiring about a profile in IP5.6? If so, it s under other, listed as PremierArt. I found the BW prints slighly greenish from that profile. I
Re: So what to buy for UT UT2's
2003-12-11 by scrber
Yep, that was me. I have the 1280 driver and 2 1290 printers (currently both running on the 1290 driver) so I have the luxury of comparing workflows. However,
Re: [Digital BW] Again Double standards
2003-12-11 by a.lemus
Dear Mr. ALan, All of waht you write is true. I to remeber those days of teadous work in the dark room to get a perfect print. it all starts from the lens
Re: [Digital BW] Grayscale printing on the Epson 2200
2003-12-11 by bernhardschuerlein
... I don t know about the other countries, but at least here in Germany their reputation is not the best. People complain about clogged printheads and anyway,
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Grayscale printing on the Epson 2200
2003-12-11 by Richard Sintchak
Wednesday, December 10, 2003, 10:19:27 PM, you wrote: s I s think this method brings out the best BW that an all stock 2200 s setup can give. I did not
Re: [Digital BW] PermaJet Papers from MIS....
2003-12-11 by borisw8
I tried the Instant Dry Glossy and was really impressed. Very nice performace with GP inks on my 1280 (and also very nice on my 7960.) Thumbs up from me.
Re: Studioprint and UT
2003-12-11 by soli004
Ingo, Yes I have Epson 7500 with StudioPrint and UT inks. I m sorry to tell, they do not support Hextone setup and I have asked techsupport two times if this
Directions please.......
2003-12-11 by ckayakman
Very happy to have found this forum as I am trying to decide which system to use for black and white art prints. I had about concluded that Cone Piezography
Re: Grayscale printing on the Epson 2200
2003-12-11 by sanfo2003
... opinion, the print was ... In my post I described the method as giving the best results so far using OEM inks without a RIP, and I still think that s true.
RC papers
2003-12-11 by claudej1@aol.com
In a message dated 12/10/2003 9:21:49 PM Pacific Standard Time, ... The significant reduction in the bronzing, along with proper RC paper selection -- like
Re: 9600 with ImagePrint vs PiezographyBW
2003-12-11 by alland20854
... Fair enough. I find that my ImagePrint B&W prints on the 7600 with UC inks are at least as good and often better than my Piezography prints on the 1160.
Re: [Digital BW] The Holy Grail?
2003-12-11 by Tom Baker
For many years I tried to produce silver prints in the darkroom that look like what I am getting on digital: something akin to platinum, but not quite. One of
Re: [Digital BW] The Holy Grail?
2003-12-11 by Tom Baker
Truman - I agree. And I believe that many of us are producing better presentations of the old silver images using digital. It is indeed different.
Steps ahead
2003-12-11 by claudej1@aol.com
In a message dated 12/10/2003 12:44:48 PM Pacific Standard Time, ... I m quoting you on this one, it s too good to pass up!! LOL Claude [Non-text portions of
Re: [Digital BW] Re: The Holy Grail?
2003-12-11 by Truman Prevatt
Given the physics of reflectivity involved for - different ink concentrations will have different reflectivity - I am wondering if the holy grail will ever be
RE: [Digital BW] IP5.6 and metamerism
2003-12-11 by Tim Atherton
... B&W or colour?
RE: [Digital BW] IP5.6 and metamerism
2003-12-11 by Ken Carney
I think the problem may be that the instructions for Epson PremierArt scrapbook paper (which I take to be PremierArt hot-press museum paper, of which a bunch