Re: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200
2003-06-20 by Robert Morrison
... To bet the best possible results with the 2100/2200 you will need to use either the QuadToneRIP or Ink Jet Control/Open Printmaker to drive the individual
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1548 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] MIS Ultra-tone inks
2003-06-20 by dirkhobman
I have been using the Ultratone inks for some time now and have found them to be a significant improvement over the old VM inks. I print with an 1160 printer
RE: [Digital BW] MIS Ultra-tone inks
2003-06-20 by BOB KRAMER
Jeff, you might consider buying the small 2 oz. bottles of the Ultratone inks and a set of virgin cartridges. It won t cost you much more than a set of
MIS UltraTone Inks/Curves for 1280/Macintosh
2003-06-20 by mgvonk
I have used the MIS VM ink cartridges to print to my Epson 1280 from my Macintosh and been very happy (until the ink ran out). I am now considering ordering
QuadToneRIP on PC
2003-06-20 by Peter Marquis-Kyle
Is anyone using Roy Harrington s QuadToneRIP with Linux on a PC? How s it going? Do you need to be a Linux boffin to get it working? [I have been using
Re: [Digital BW] Boping Xie/Epson is out of the office.
2003-06-20 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: To: Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:00 AM Subject: [Digital BW] Boping
Re: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200
2003-06-20 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: Roy Harrington To: Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 9:41 AM Subject: Re: [Digital
Boping Xie/Epson is out of the office.
2003-06-20 by boping_xie@ea.epson.com
I will be out of the office starting 06/19/2003 and will not return until 06/23/2003. I will respond to your message when I return. You can reach me with my
Re: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200
2003-06-20 by Roy Harrington
... two ... Ernst, I m not completely sure but it seems to me that 1440x720 and 720x720 have the same single droplet size. 720x360 has a larger droplet size
color or quad inks to test 1280 (to Jack)
2003-06-20 by Antonis Ricos
... Jack, you ll get peace of mind using the color inks to check the printer and align the heads. The latter cannot be done as well with gray inks anyway.
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Alternative 8 >16 bit conversion, Grey > CMYK conversion,
2003-06-20 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: Ernst Dinkla To: Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:45 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW]
RE: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200
2003-06-20 by Daniel Staver
I entered a print in the technical exchange using iProof PowerRIP, which I ve since abandoned in favor of the Ultratones. The dot pattern from PowerRIP is
Re: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200
2003-06-20 by Ernst Dinkla
I m also going to be sending Clayton a print ... dotsize ... Roy, As far as I know the 7500 (and 9000,9500,7000) should have two droplet sizes at 720 dpi but
Re: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200 and/was 1280 or 2200 for BW?
2003-06-20 by Robert Morrison
No I would suggest modifying the 2200 load to: Matte Black (Epson OEM) Photo Black (Epson OEM) Light Black (Epson OEM) Light Gray (MIS Ultratone Yellow) Light
Re: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200 and/was 1280 or 2200 for BW?
2003-06-20 by Bill
... Is this using all 7 inks?
Re: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200 and/was 1280 or 2200 for BW?
2003-06-20 by Robert Morrison
The 2200 is the best piece of hardware...but the the hilights using the OEM ink set is much grainer than the 1280 and 1160, but this is purely the result of
Re: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200 and/was 1280 or 2200 for BW?
2003-06-20 by Bill
I find it hard to believe that a 1280 is more dottie than a 2200. And one was not printing with black only I presume? Also Sundance inks (the maker of the
Re: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200 and/was 1280 or 2200 for BW?
2003-06-20 by Jack M Kucy
It looks like this thread contains the answer to my former question: 1280 or 220 for BW. I am buying 1280 (second - first I use for color), load the quad
Re: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200
2003-06-20 by John/Julie Gittins
Shilesh, The conclusion you note regarding a 2200 vs 1160/1280 comparison puzzles me. When I ve matched up prints from my 2200 vs my 1160, using the Epson
Re: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200
2003-06-20 by john eckenrode
... for what its worth I don t get dots printing with OPM on my 2200, my prints so far have been very smooth. Black only is very dotty of course, but I don t
StudioPrint caution note
2003-06-20 by Phil Bard
In case anyone on the list is trying out StudioPrint you will want to read this... I ve just recently discovered an issue in the loading of images into
Re: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200
2003-06-20 by Roy Harrington
... 1260 and ... dottiness. ... printer ... 1260, ... I have ... summary plus some ... performed the 2200? ... step forward ... factors that ... constant. ...
Re: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200
2003-06-20 by Martin Wesley
... From: Shilesh Jani To: Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 3:01 PM Subject: Re:
Re: [Digital BW] JULY PRINT EXCHANGE - 3 new openings
2003-06-20 by Mitch Abate
What are the details of print size,etc..thanks.. Tom OConnell wrote:Hi all- Three of our stalwarts have run into changes of plans and need
JULY PRINT EXCHANGE - 3 new openings
2003-06-20 by Tom OConnell
Hi all- Three of our stalwarts have run into changes of plans and need to drop out of the JULY PRINT EXCHANGE. Prints are due to my by July 8 (but I can
RE: [Digital BW] MIS Ultra-tone inks
2003-06-20 by Paul Roark
Jeff, ... I don t know when MIS will be loading carts. I use the Ultra Tone (UT) inks regularly. Most of my show was done with them. I think they are far
Re: [Digital BW] MIS Ultra-tone inks
2003-06-19 by Edward Wiseman
Jeff.. MIS has their NEW Ebony for the black position that should cure any fading problems you may have had with the original black psition co-solvent ink
MIS Ultra-tone inks
2003-06-19 by Jeff Magidson
Hey Everyone; Does anyone know what the status of the MIS ultra-tone inks are? On the MIS web site they are still listed as experimental and only available
Re: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200
2003-06-19 by Shilesh Jani
Bob, I agree with Martin. The 1280 is a good choice. I recently participated in a Technical Print Exchange. Comparing the 1260 and 1280, the prints were
Re: [Digital BW] Re:10,000 images (was.....plunge)
2003-06-19 by Billy Cobb
The more common tool was a 4x5 press camera or Polaroid/Mamiya 600SE rather than 8x10/Type 108, but those were the tools used PRIOR to the existance of dit
Re: [Digital BW] Re:10,000 images (was.....plunge)
2003-06-19 by Stan McQueen
... Yeah, yeah, yeah. That rushing sound you hear is the stampede of event photographers hurrying out to replace their digital cameras and dye sub printers for
Re: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200
2003-06-19 by Martin Wesley
... From: BOB KRAMER To: Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 7:37 AM Subject: RE:
Re: [Digital BW] Re:10,000 images (was.....plunge)
2003-06-19 by Billy Cobb
Polaropid Type 108 ... From: Anthony Atkielski To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 4:03 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW]
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Vuescan Profiles
2003-06-19 by Stan McQueen
... No, I m not saying that anybody should or shouldn t do anything. I have Bruce s book, I have read it, and it is very good and I learned a lot from it. But
Re: [Digital BW] Re:10,000 images (was.....plunge)
2003-06-19 by Anthony Atkielski
... Except for contact prints, which has just been pointed out. That could conceivably be done on the spot. Another possibilty would be transparencies.
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Vuescan Profiles
2003-06-19 by Julian Thomas
OK, I stand corrected. Julian ... From: Jeff Randall To: Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Vuescan Profiles
2003-06-19 by Julian Thomas
OK, well I was only trying to help. Didn t you say you weren t getting accurate results? Now are you REALLY trying to say that you shouldn t profile your
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1598
2003-06-19 by claudej1@aol.com
In a message dated 6/19/2003 1:15:20 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ... It would have been. The Zone VI was my third 4x5, right after Calumet, and before Sinars,
RE: [Digital BW] Re:10,000 images (was.....plunge)
2003-06-19 by Stan McQueen
... The history of the Zone VI camera was written up in two consecutive issues of View Camera Magazine. I don t have them with me at the moment, but my
RE: [Digital BW] Re:10,000 images (was.....plunge)
2003-06-19 by Roger L Sopher
Hi Tim, I think you are largely right although he did have significant input in the design of a number of items. Fred was anything but flexible or a raging
RE: [Digital BW] Re:10,000 images (was.....plunge)
2003-06-19 by Tim Atherton
... He didn t invent the Zone VI (if you are talking about the camera). Picker was a good entrepreneur in a small niche market, but I don t think he ever
RE: [Digital BW] Re:10,000 images (was.....plunge)
2003-06-19 by Stan McQueen
... Wow, that is totally awesome! In that case, I stand corrected. Notwithstanding, I don t think I d want to shoot sports with an 8x10. Just imagine the size
RE: [Digital BW] Re:10,000 images (was.....plunge)
2003-06-19 by Roger L Sopher
Hi Stan, That was long enough ago that my memory is pretty fuzzy but I as I remember he said he was set up to do contact prints on site and therefore could get
Re: [Digital BW] Re:10,000 images (was.....plunge)
2003-06-19 by Stan McQueen
... Oh, I have no doubt about that. Buyers are usually much _more_ willing to buy on the spot rather than order later. My point was that an 8x10 camera is not
Re: [Digital BW] Re:10,000 images (was.....plunge)
2003-06-19 by Anthony Atkielski
... Probably not, but even if he was, he d still sell at least as many. If they were willing to buy after the fact, they d be all the more willing to buy on
Re: [Digital BW] Re:10,000 images (was.....plunge)
2003-06-19 by Anthony Atkielski
... Now there s a photographer with guts, I think.
Re: [Digital BW] Re:10,000 images (was.....plunge)
2003-06-19 by Anthony Atkielski
... Understood. But if he managed to sell all 10,000 photos to proud and pleased parents, he must have retired permanently after that one gig. Either that, or
Re: [Digital BW] Re:10,000 images (was.....plunge)
2003-06-19 by Stan McQueen
... Yes, but was Fred selling and delivering the prints on the spot to the horse s owners/riders? I think not. By the way, one of Fred s Zone VI 4x5 field
[Digital BW] Re: Vuescan Profiles
2003-06-19 by Jeff Randall
Julian: I think you are confusing Vuescan s built in profile (that Ed created on his scanner) or the IT8 profile (created on your scanner) with Vuescan s film
Re: [Digital BW] Re:10,000 images (was.....plunge)
2003-06-19 by Billy Cobb
Good point ... bravo! BC ... From: Roger L Sopher To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 2:06 PM Subject: RE: [Digital