Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-18 by Robert Morrison
... Your results can be hugely biased by not having control over developer and processing. You don t need to do the processing yourself, but you do need to
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1550 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-18 by Robert Morrison
... They are excellent for digital. The Accros developed with Acufine is completely grainless. I believe Delta 100 in D76 1:1 is one of Austin s preferred
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-18 by Robert Morrison
... Why only 2000dpi, dosen t the Polaroid support 4000dpi for this format? ... If you only scan at 2000 on a 4000dpi scanner you are biasing the result
RE: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-18 by Ken Brookner
if you re good at processing bw film, then you can very probably do better than a lab--you control the whole process including the developer choice, time,
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-18 by B. Alex Pettit Jr.
Another short ( albeit OT ) extension of this thread .. I am currently having the film processed at a local lab. They recommended Tmax100 as being most
RE: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-18 by Ken Brookner
Alex, i shoot with a mamiya and a bronica 645 some and scan the output. one film i especially like is Scala, though getting it processed is more involved than
Walcom tablet
2003-06-18 by Stephen Kobrin
I now have a Walcom Saphire 4X5 tablet. While there is a bit of a learning curve, it seems to be a marked improvement over a mouse. I do have one question.
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-18 by Alan Zimmerman
Alex, you might want to include delta 100 and fuji Accros(100) in your bw evaluation.(Ultra fine grain, smooth tonal scale). They are my film of choice for
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-18 by B. Alex Pettit Jr.
I have just acquired a Mamiya 645. Once I pick a film, PlusX125, TMax100, PortraBW400, I plan to do some comparison shots between my 4 MP Olympus E-10 and the
Re: [Digital BW] Re: StudioPrint Evaluation
2003-06-18 by Ernst Dinkla
... 300-400mb ... printing ... running my ... is much ... I ve had my share of bad luck with Epson 9000 drivers on 2000 and XP, the longer the chain, the more
Re: [Digital BW] PosterPrint vs IJC vs ImagePrint vs PiezoBWPro vs....?
2003-06-18 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: roberteversole To: Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 11:52 PM Subject: Re:
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1593
2003-06-18 by Ernst Dinkla
... good 1.4 ... by a ... on ... wife ... Ken, I m not a pro or even a serious amateur in photography but thinking along the same lines as you have done I
Re: Epson 2450 Scanner
2003-06-18 by PhotoWorkshops Partnership
... Barbara I ve had exactly the same experience with our Epson 2450 Scanner. The only way you can work around the problem is to switch off the automatic
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-18 by Billy Cobb
Obviously the 10,000 images couldn t have been done by any single shooter using the old medium/largePOLAROID workflow. Coverage of the event with
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-18 by Anthony Atkielski
... So it actually couldn t be done before digital. But then again, the next question that arises is: If the overall purpose was still served by press cameras
Re: [Digital BW] Off-center prints on Epson 1200
2003-06-18 by Martin Wesley
... From: linwoodsmith To: Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 5:45 PM Subject: [Digital BW]
Re: [Digital BW] PosterPrint vs IJC vs ImagePrint vs PiezoBWPro vs....?
2003-06-18 by Julian Thomas
. My passion for what I do has made me (in)famous, for my rants have been ... invite him in to ... Robert, I ve also seen you on one of the lists tell someone
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-18 by Billy Cobb
... From: Anthony Atkielski To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:34 AM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-18 by Billy Cobb
It was done before by using medium/large format POLAROID! There are still scores of Chicago shooters using old Crown/Speed Graphics or BJs for type 59/559 film
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-18 by Anthony Atkielski
... Ten thousand Polaraoid images? How could that possibly be cost-effective?
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-18 by Anthony Atkielski
... A non-convinced wife is justified in her skepticism. Digital is not justifiable on the basis of image quality or price. Speed and convenience can justify
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-18 by Anthony Atkielski
... If the camera was that hot, I d expect that you d have an increasing problem with thermal noise, especially in low light. Did you? ... It sounds well
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-18 by Anthony Atkielski
... I ve never seen a comparison that wasn t trying to prove that one is better than the other. Furthermore, there are so many variables in such comparisons
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1593
2003-06-18 by kentho1937
Hi Claude, I agree with you - to a point. With film the critical factor of capturing is the quality of the lens. With digital it is a professional type
Off-center prints on Epson 1200
2003-06-18 by linwoodsmith
After reading up on quadtone inks, I decided to pick up a used 1200 and start making B&W prints. I am probably making a newbie mistake, but every print I ve
Off-center prints on Epson 1200
2003-06-18 by linwoodsmith
After reading up on quadtone inks, I decided to pick up a used 1200 and start making B&W prints. I am probably making a newbie mistake, but every print I ve
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1592
2003-06-18 by Claude
... time. ... how long ... unless you ... you went
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1592
2003-06-18 by Claude
... time. It was live national dance competition on stage by available light12 hour days, and a new act about every 3 minutes, about 50 shots per act. There
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-18 by Ken Carney
I also know little or nothing of digital capture (I do use an Olympus C4000 for digital infrared b&w), but am interested. Out of boredom, I have been placing
Re: [Digital BW] PosterPrint vs IJC vs ImagePrint vs PiezoBWPro vs....?
2003-06-17 by roberteversole
... If it makes you feel any better, I was killing myself in third party color management solutions at that time so you stayed way under my radar screen. I
RE: [Digital BW] Re: StudioPrint Evaluation
2003-06-17 by Daniel Staver
... Yes, any application that can print from windows would do fine. ... I don t think the size of the print matters - I ve printed 300-400mb files from
Re: 100% Rag Paper Sharpness
2003-06-17 by bu88ahu88a
Thanks for the speedy replies - I guess I ll order a Hahnemuhle sampler. Brian
Re: [Digital BW] Re: StudioPrint Evaluation
2003-06-17 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: Daniel Staver To: Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:39 AM Subject: RE: [Digital
Lyson Monochrome Gloss Paper
2003-06-17 by Kip Babington
Does anyone have experience with the Lyson Monochrome Gloss or Satin papers? Now that I ve found an affordable way (bulk/refill) to use Lyson Quad Black inks
Re: [Digital BW] 100% Rag Paper Sharpness
2003-06-17 by Robert Morrison
Hahnemuhle Photo Rag. This paper is frequently rebranded with other names, but it is carried by most of the major internet venders. Check
Re: 100% Rag Paper Sharpness
2003-06-17 by Shilesh Jani
Brian, Try Hahnemuhle PhotoRag from InkjetGoodies.Com, also sold as Royal Rennaisance at MediaStreet.Com. The new Arches Infinity is also better than either
100% Rag Paper Sharpness
2003-06-17 by bu88ahu88a
Hi, I m looking for recommendations on a 100% rag paper that will print as sharp as EEM. (I m using MIS VM inks) I tested a sample pack from MIS with Crane
Mount Large Prints
2003-06-17 by J Vee
I believe there has been some discussion but can t find my records re proper mounting for archival purposes of very large prints, say up to 50 by 72 ?
QuadtoneRIP vs. IJC/OPM was Re: [Digital BW] Re: StudioPrint Evaluation
2003-06-17 by Roy Harrington
... You are ... seven) ... them ... channels ... seems Here s my post about QuadToneRIP: I m not much for pre-announcing things -- but I guess I ve got to say
RE: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1592
2003-06-17 by Austin Franklin
... But there is supporting fact, your erroneous statements that are completely contrary to other people s use and report of use. ... But you can t! I ve seen
Subject: RE: Epson Archival Matt again!
2003-06-17 by HPA
Perhaps some introduction of Henry Wilhelm is in order. I became aware of him around 1973, when he wrote his first book about B&W print permanence. Wilhelm
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1592
2003-06-17 by Anthony Atkielski
... That s one photo every thirty seconds, for two straight weeks, full-time. What exactly were you shooting that required 10,000 images? And how long did it
QuadtoneRIP vs. IJC/OPM was Re: [Digital BW] Re: StudioPrint Evaluation
2003-06-17 by Robert Morrison
... Thanks for the clarification, I must have missed the update. It seems then that only remaining difference between the Quadtone RIP and IJC/OPM are then
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1593
2003-06-17 by claudej1@aol.com
In a message dated 6/17/2003 4:24:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time, ... Great post and I agree with your assertions. I have lost my chemical dependency since 1999
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1592
2003-06-17 by claudej1@aol.com
In a message dated 6/16/2003 11:09:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ... Film gets outdated the same way that digicams do. I have some frozen VPS or Ektachrome 64
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1592
2003-06-17 by claudej1@aol.com
In a message dated 6/16/2003 11:09:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ... How can you make these obviously type statments without any supporting facts? I actually
RE: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1589
2003-06-17 by Austin Franklin
Claude, ... Some things ARE 1/x + 1/x etc (like the resistors), and some things are not, and understanding enough to know when some are and some aren t is the
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1591
2003-06-17 by Clayton Jones
Hello Claude, ... Nothing. I thought it was so obvious it didn t need to be stated. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1589
2003-06-17 by claudej1@aol.com
In a message dated 6/16/2003 3:48:46 AM Pacific Daylight Time, ... The electronic analogy was merely to point out the classic formula used to figure out system
Re: PosterPrint vs IJC vs ImagePrint vs PiezoBWPro vs....?
2003-06-17 by Phil Bard
Antonis, Let me add compliments for a nice balanced summary... ... Besides, to keep continuity with the ProRIP in moving to the 76/9600, one would have to