Re: [Digital BW] Epson 2450 Scanner
2003-06-17 by Richard Sintchak
Monday, June 16, 2003, 11:25:07 AM, bfwoolner wrote: b I ve searched through untold numbers of Yahoo groups to find one b that addressed problems I am having
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1551 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: PosterPrint vs IJC vs ImagePrint vs PiezoBWPro vs....?
2003-06-17 by Amadou Diallo
... Antonis, Nice summary of options as seen through one s particular needs. The more choices the better, as I m sure listmembers won t ever fit into a
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Taking the plunge? The Real World
2003-06-17 by Anthony Atkielski
... Digital = quick and easy, and good quality, initially expensive but minimal continuing cost Film = slow and awkward, best possible quality, low initial
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge?
2003-06-17 by Anthony Atkielski
... That is my current recommendation, for what it s worth. The advantage of digital is speed and convenience. Image quality is an advantage of film. If you
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-17 by Anthony Atkielski
... Agreed. ... Also agreed. You can pay for your own scanner for the price of scanning just one roll of film at a lab (if you want _good_ scans), and often
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-17 by Anthony Atkielski
... So is a film scan. Both film and electronic photography involve an analog image capture and a conversion to digital form. The digicam does this inside
RE: [Digital BW] Re: StudioPrint Evaluation
2003-06-17 by Daniel Staver
Ernst, you can set up the linux machine as a print server and print to it directly from Photoshop on yur own PC. That way you don t need any additional
Re: [Digital BW] PosterPrint vs IJC vs ImagePrint vs PiezoBWPro vs....?
2003-06-17 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: Antonis Ricos To: Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 9:14 AM Subject: [Digital
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-17 by e8121
Been reading this thread with interest.... Lot s of interesting perspectives from both sides. One thing for sure is that digital isn t going away. Its
Re: [Digital BW] Re: StudioPrint Evaluation
2003-06-17 by Ernst Dinkla
... From: Roy Harrington To: Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 5:37 AM Subject: [Digital BW]
PosterPrint vs IJC vs ImagePrint vs PiezoBWPro vs....?
2003-06-17 by Antonis Ricos
Inspired by Phil s review and subsequent thread, I thought I would summarize how I see the picture for these contenders to the printing throne. My thanks to
Re: Taking the plunge? The Real World
2003-06-17 by Dave Tevis
Garry, My point exactly! If it works for you, great. But I get tired of the bashing when in reality it just doesn t fit your style. It has its place just as
Re: Taking the plunge? The Real World
2003-06-17 by Garry Sarre
Well after holding out, partly because of money, I m considering ... and ... D10 s Tim Hey,didn t Tim say Real World ? I have printed for 25 years starting
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-17 by Dave Tevis
... negatives won t ... likewise...you can simply ... camera...that s ... Every system has its limitations. If you shoot a Holga you can still get creative
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge?
2003-06-17 by Dave Tevis
... results obtainable ... method that ... results. ... You cannot ... and ... does it have ... as a digital vs. ... why you ... images. If someone ... have
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-17 by Jeff Magidson
... Austin; I am 100% sure that you know multiples more about this than I do.... but I think you missed the main thrust of my post, perhaps because I did not
RE: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-17 by Austin Franklin
Jeff, ... It, technically, isn t ANY generation . It is interpreted by the sensor, then by an A/D, then by some thresholding/levels adjustment/PRNU and then
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-17 by Jeff Magidson
In the debate over shooting digital -vs- shooting film and scanning there is one quality advantage to shooting digital that I don t see mentioned. When you
[Digital BW] Re: StudioPrint Evaluation
2003-06-17 by Roy Harrington
... automatic ... You are ... seven) different ... channels would be ... Yes, the 1.1 version that I think you tried was limited to CMYK, but the new 2.0
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-17 by Robert Morrison
... And it won t be outdated in another six months...and your negatives won t be obsolete either when the technology improves likewise...you can simply
[Digital BW] Re: LYSON QUAD BLACK WITH CANON S9000
2003-06-17 by Kip Babington
I ll contribute a bit to this thread, too. I ve used the Lyson Quad Blacks in cartridges in my S9000 a few times over the past few months (swapped them for
Re: [Digital BW] Re: StudioPrint Evaluation
2003-06-17 by Robert Morrison
... But, correct me if I m wrong, without single channel control. You are limited to a CYMK approach?...meaning if I wanted six (or seven) different inks or
Re: [Digital BW] which paper/coating to try ?
2003-06-17 by Diana York
If you liked Eclipse Satine, you will like our newest paper, Condor BriteWhite. 300GSM, 100% cotton, coated both sides. Each side with slightly different
RE: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1591
2003-06-17 by Austin Franklin
Oh Claude, ... You obviously haven t used one, or your film simply is really substandard. The SD-9 suffers from severe color balance problems, and low light
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge
2003-06-17 by Anthony Atkielski
... You can get an excellent film SLR for $250 or so.
[Digital BW] Re: StudioPrint Evaluation
2003-06-17 by Roy Harrington
... predefined? ... Fine Art in ... spent most of my life ... selling to ... ensure that your ... Ink Jet ... other ... Robert & Robert, With QuadToneRIP you
Re: [Digital BW] which paper/coating to try ?
2003-06-17 by Robert Morrison
... Yeap that s really weird. I just bought a bunch of it from inkjet mall last week and there was someone else on the list also selling it within the last
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1591
2003-06-17 by claudej1@aol.com
In a message dated 6/16/2003 7:06:38 PM Eastern Daylight Time, ... I agree with this. So what s differeent between this and traditional optical printing? The
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1591
2003-06-17 by claudej1@aol.com
In a message dated 6/16/2003 7:06:38 PM Eastern Daylight Time, ... Also not true. The Sigma SD-9 acts more like film than any other single shot digicam and
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1591
2003-06-17 by claudej1@aol.com
In a message dated 6/16/2003 7:06:38 PM Eastern Daylight Time, ... Not true for Scanbacks, Foveon I, Foveon II, or the Sigma SD-9 with the Foveon X3 chip,
Re: [Digital BW] which paper/coating to try ?
2003-06-17 by johngeyles
Thanks for the answers ! ... Gack, ok, I just tracked down some of the other stuff ... ... Inkjetart sez the Eclipse papers are permanently unavailable . The
Re: [Digital BW] which paper/coating to try ?
2003-06-17 by Robert Morrison
... It does this somewhat on the Ilford paper as well. ... Try the Krylon 1305 UV Resistant spray. This gives a better finish than the Kamar on the RC papers.
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge?
2003-06-17 by Anthony Atkielski
... You can get good results, but you can never reproduce the results obtainable with actual B&W photography. ... Correct. That s why you must use an original
Re: [Digital BW] Re: StudioPrint Evaluation
2003-06-16 by Robert Morrison
... I understand that all too well, I ve generated my own curves for Ink Jet Control...so realize that it is work...but it also affords a lot of other
Re: LYSON QUAD BLACK WITH CANON S9000
2003-06-16 by novamike88
Sonja, I just started using Lyson Quad Black for the Canon S9000 and am pretty impressed. There are probably better BW systems out there for Epson printers,
Frustrations with the Epson RIP for 2200
2003-06-16 by martin0022003
I ordered the Epson RIP driver for black and white based upon favorable comments in one review. However, I now realize that I have a limited understanding of
which paper/coating to try ?
2003-06-16 by johngeyles
I now have OPM working pretty well, and I must say I m impressed. I m using an Epson 2200 with stock UltraChrome inks to print on Epson Enhanced Matte and
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge?
2003-06-16 by Dave Tevis
... continuous spectrum ... red, green, ... grayscale ... been taken of the ... the necessary ... narrow-band ... color image ... spectral ... True, but you
LYSON QUAD BLACK WITH CANON S9000
2003-06-16 by cheshfen2001
Hi I m new to this group and am interested in printing B&W prints with my Canon S9000. I ve had pretty good luck using the color inks to get a B&W print in
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge?
2003-06-16 by Clayton Jones
Hello Jeff, ... Let me give it a try. I have found from actual experience that I can get a better 8x10 print from a 645 neg scanned on my 1600dpi flatbed than
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge?
2003-06-16 by Anthony Atkielski
... Two reasons: 1) All current digital cameras are color cameras. The continuous spectrum of light in the original scene is reduced to three numbers, for
Re: Epson 2450 Scanner
2003-06-16 by johngeyles
... Aw shucks - you must be talking about those other people. Many people are happier with Vuescan. Download it for free from www.hamrick.com. It will have a
Re: [Digital BW] Taking the plunge?
2003-06-16 by Anthony Atkielski
... You will certainly save on film and processing costs. But there are other disadvantages (such as a reduction in image quality) that also should be
Re: StudioPrint Evaluation
2003-06-16 by roberteversole
... Predefined for most, configurable for the sadisitic. Don t take that the wrong way. I went to Corcoran School of Fine Art in Washington DC so I have a
Re: [Digital BW] StudioPrint Evaluation
2003-06-16 by Robert Morrison
... Are the shapes of the curves also configurable...or these predefined? ... Right, similar to what you can do with the blender in IJC or the R9 software.
Re: [Digital BW] StudioPrint Evaluation
2003-06-16 by roberteversole
... You can control, what we call, the crossovers which allows you to define where a particular inks begins to cut in. I suspect that this is what you are
Re: [Digital BW] StudioPrint Evaluation
2003-06-16 by Robert Morrison
... No windows boxes here. I m just trying to get a feel for what the product can and can t do. It essentially sounds like imageprint...but with the
Re: Alternative 8 >16 bit conversion, Grey > CMYK conversion,
2003-06-16 by Roy Harrington
... Antonis Ricos ... Photoshop as well ... caveats. ... Photoshop, not sure ... why, ... with no ... Very true. PS really only uses 15 bits internally.
Re: [Digital BW] StudioPrint Evaluation
2003-06-16 by Phil Bard
Robert, First of all, this product is not the equivalent of IJC/OPM. There is no feature for controlling the how the partitions overlap that I m aware or.
RE: [Digital BW] Epson Archival Matt again!
2003-06-16 by Tim Atherton
... Oh, that independent company ... :-) PS - what s archival?