QuadToneRIP and OS 10.2.6 Help
2003-06-15 by Mr_Misty_44
I would really appreciate some help. I m a Windows guy afloat in a Mac world. I have a G3 which I use do drive my Leaf45. I just added OS 10.2.6 to my computer
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1553 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: Canon i9100
2003-06-15 by André Vallejo
Good to know. We re now expecting that someone try the 9100 with the piezoinks that are made for them,so you can compare with the Epson output. If equal or
RE: [Digital BW] RE: Suggestions on large black and white output?
2003-06-15 by David R. Spielman
Bruce, Check out the followig site: http://reedphoto.com/ They have a LightJet 5000 that images onto conventional B&W material. Best Regards, David R. Spielman
RE: Suggestions on large black and white output?
2003-06-15 by Bruce
on 6/15/2003 3:40 AM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at ... Thanks David. I wrote to them about 6 months ago and they hadn t sold any yet. I
Tom O'Connell's address
2003-06-15 by Barbara White
Does anyone have Tom O Connell s address for the print exchange? I either didn t get it or lost it and he s not replying to my email. Thanks! Barbara White
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1588
2003-06-15 by Bo Wrangborg
Ahh... You Wrote Austin: It s more than a formula, it s an understanding. OK! It s more than resisters, it s about understanding! Sorry... could not
RE: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1588
2003-06-15 by Austin Franklin
Claude, ... Yes, electronically, 100 ohms in parallel with 100 ohms does give you 50 ohms, but electronics are not the same as optics and film. Film records
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1588
2003-06-15 by claudej1@aol.com
In a message dated 6/15/2003 6:42:57 AM Eastern Daylight Time, ... Correct me if I m wrong, but historically, haven t we put the lens MTF in parallel with the
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1588
2003-06-15 by claudej1@aol.com
In a message dated 6/15/2003 6:42:57 AM Eastern Daylight Time, ... According to a conversation I just had with Bill Atkinson, the Dmax and tonal gradations
Epson Archival Matt again!
2003-06-14 by sceptre12345
Hi, I recently bought a pack of Epson 13x19 Archival Matt paper SO41339, thinking a got a good deal since it s no longer available. Well, when I openned the
Re: [Digital BW] UPDATE on JERRY OLSON memorial print exchange *****
2003-06-14 by Barbara White
Tom. I don t seem to have your address - how did this slip by me? Barbara White On Saturday, May 31, 2003, at 10:06 AM, Tom OConnell wrote: Barbara White
RE: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1587
2003-06-14 by Austin Franklin
Claude, ... The best you get is 100, the WORST you get is 50. In reality, you get a range of 50-100. The 50 would be called RELIABLY . Austin
Re: [Digital BW] Nikon lens mount changes
2003-06-14 by Jack M Kucy
It has something to do with the differences of acceptable light angle approaching the chip. Film take it from all directions. The digital chip however may
RE: [Digital BW] RE: Suggestions on large black and white output?
2003-06-14 by David R. Spielman
Bruce, By Conventional silver/gelatin printing paper I meant, NOT RA-4 processed Both RC paper and fiber paper use a silver/gelatin emulation, and are thus
Re: [Digital BW] RE: Suggestions on large black and white output?
2003-06-14 by Mark Savoia
Check that, I meant DeVere. ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Lines through my prints
2003-06-14 by Peter
Tony--what was their estimate to replace the heads? Thanks Peter
Re: [Digital BW] RE: Suggestions on large black and white output?
2003-06-14 by Mark Savoia
Durst makes such an enlarger, but caps out at 16x20. ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1587
2003-06-14 by claudej1@aol.com
In a message dated 6/14/2003 3:49:49 AM Pacific Daylight Time, ... with 100LPPMM for film and 100LPPMM for the lens, the best MTF you get is 50 LPPMM for the
Re: [Digital BW] RE: Suggestions on large black and white output?
2003-06-14 by Julian Thomas
checkout the company at http://www.odyssey-sales.co.uk/products/browse.asp?range=55 I m working on getting some 5x4 negs madeof 6x6 neg digital files. Still in
Re: [Digital BW] Nikon lens mount changes
2003-06-14 by Chris Mende
... stuff? If you ... let s move ... that it ... which ... Thank you, Martin. Between this topic and the asphalt politics, I m having a hard time finding
Lightjet vs. Ultracrhome was Re: [Digital BW] Suggestions on large black and white output?
2003-06-14 by Phil Bard
Robert, FWIW, I found an area at density 2.2 in a recent gloss LightJet I had done. It was NOT an area that was completely without detail, so I assume the
RE: Suggestions on large black and white output?
2003-06-14 by Bruce
on 6/14/2003 3:48 AM, DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com at ... I checked it out. RC paper only. Not Conventional silver/gelatin printing paper. I
Re: [Digital BW] Canon i9100
2003-06-14 by Ken Carney
Well, I bought the i950 to do color snapshots, since everything else was dedicated b&w. For that, at least, it is excellent. At the highest resolution
Re: Lightjet vs. Ultracrhome was Re: [Digital BW] Suggestions onlarge black and white output?
2003-06-14 by Julian Thomas
Robert - try this http://www.westcoastimaging.com/wci/page/info/articles/printercompare.html Julian ... From: Robert Morrison To:
Lightjet vs. Ultracrhome was Re: [Digital BW] Suggestions on large black and white output?
2003-06-14 by Robert Morrison
... I m curious about this comment. Does anyone know what a lightjet/RA-4 process is capable of with respect to dmax on RC papers? The dmax of silver papers
[Digital BW] Re: Lines through my prints
2003-06-14 by Tony Gonda
I took a couple of prints in to Tricera yesterday and the gentleman - I didn t get his name - took a look and said that I had a short in the printhead. So
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Inkjets meet the asphalt road of Politics
2003-06-14 by Lil
I ve read all the comments in the two lists I subscribe to wrt Keith s platform , and I am amazed by the number of entities who respond to a proposal with
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Lines through my prints
2003-06-14 by Gordon Clemett
Tony Try Tricera computers in Vancouver on 5th Ave Neil is very good , he was with Epson for a long time Gord Fort Langley ... From: Tony Gonda To:
RE: [Digital BW] Suggestions on large black and white output?
2003-06-14 by David R. Spielman
You might what to consider this option. Check out this site: http://reedphoto.com/ They have a LightJet 5000 that you can use to image onto CONVENTIONAL
Re: [Digital BW] Nikon lens mount changes
2003-06-14 by Martin Wesley
Okay guys, Where is the digital B&W printing in all this Nikon lens mount stuff? If you can t tie the thread into how lens mounts effect B&W output then let s
Workflow?? Using the image to reverse
2003-06-14 by Lyons Cox
Intuitively I often want to use the inverse of the image to tonally balance. Sometimes only part of an image. I am willing to read and have RealWorldPS,
Re: RIP Software Question
2003-06-14 by Bill
ADVERTISEMENT Yes, OS X does PDF s, very poorly indeed. Just try a bulleted list from MS Word and see what you get. With a rare few kinds of bullets, you
Re: RIP Software Question
2003-06-14 by Roy Harrington
... Boley wrote: I ve never used QXP so I might be missing the issue. But I think going to the OSX box you should be able to handle pdf and
RE: [Digital BW] Nikon lens mount changes
2003-06-14 by Austin Franklin
Hi Peter, ... To most people, no...it doesn t...but if you understood how digital imaging sensors worked, and a bit about sampling theory, it would make
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Inkjets meet the asphalt road of Politics
2003-06-14 by Austin Franklin
... ;-)
Re: Inkjets meet the asphalt road of Politics
2003-06-14 by Jon
... Is it just me, or is the irony of this post unbelievable?? Jon
Re: [Digital BW] Nikon lens mount changes
2003-06-14 by Peter Nelson
... digital ... The math doesn t make sense. The highest-res CCD s today don t come close to what fine-grain film can record - i.e., 100 LP/mm - that would
RE: [Digital BW] Nikon lens mount changes
2003-06-14 by Austin Franklin
... In fact, Anthony, digital imaging sensors are SHARPER than film. Sharpness and resolution are two different things. ... Obviously not. Austin
Re: [Digital BW] Nikon lens mount changes
2003-06-14 by Stephen Petegorsky
... Austin - It s my understanding that they were able to make this lens smaller (and thus cheaper than it might have been) by designing it to create a smaller
RE: [Digital BW] Nikon lens mount changes
2003-06-13 by Tim Atherton
Haa haa ha ... :-( Anthony and Austin - this could go on for a while...
Re: [Digital BW] Nikon lens mount changes
2003-06-13 by Anthony Atkielski
... A digital sensor that is much more blurry than film, that is. ... I understood it perfectly. I already know about those problems, anyway.
RE: [Digital BW] Whatever happened to UltraSmooth?
2003-06-13 by Paul Roark
... I m seeing 1.64 with UltraSmooth, the 1160, and MIS UT/Eboni K. EEM comes in at 1.65. The UltraSmooth non-brightened coating is a smooth, creamy tone that
RE: [Digital BW] Nikon lens mount changes
2003-06-13 by Seth Rossman
~ $999 street. $1049 list. Cheap? You decide. That s what my 14mm/2.8 cost three years ago. Seth =-----Original Message----- =From: Anthony Atkielski
Re: [Digital BW] Nikon lens mount changes
2003-06-13 by Peter Marquis-Kyle
... I don t have direct experience of this lens -- I am relying on this news story: http://www.dpreview.com/news/0302/03021800nikon1224dx.asp Here s a quote:
RE: [Digital BW] Nikon lens mount changes
2003-06-13 by Austin Franklin
Hi Peter, ... I was not aware from that. Are you sure? Regards, Austin
Re: RIP Software Question
2003-06-13 by Antonis Ricos
If you can t export a pdf, you can always export an .eps, then go to PShop and do as Tyler says... Antonis
RE: [Digital BW] Nikon lens mount changes
2003-06-13 by Austin Franklin
Anthony, ... No. Not so at all. It is designed to be SHARPER when used with a digital imaging senor. ... Read, yes...but obviously, didn t understand. ...
Re: [Digital BW] Nikon lens mount changes
2003-06-13 by Peter Marquis-Kyle
... It s all relative I suppose. Whatever it costs, I guess it would be a whole lot cheaper than a full-frame 12-24... Peter Marquis-Kyle
Re: [Digital BW] Nikon lens mount changes
2003-06-13 by Anthony Atkielski
... Is the 12-24DX inexpensive? I had heard just the opposite.
Re: [Digital BW] Nikon lens mount changes
2003-06-13 by Anthony Atkielski
... The lens is designed to be blurry, in other words. Yes, I read the Schneider paper. I suppose this workaround is fine if all you want to do is shoot