Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 497
2002-02-22 by André Vallejo
Any quad experiences with the Epson 980??? Very curious about it... [ ],André
Messages
Browse messages
Page 1986 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
Re: [Digital BW] Bye,bye perfect nozzle checks?
2002-02-22 by Steadman Uhlich
Piotr, 1. Light a candle and put by your printer 2. Say a prayer 3. Spray some windex (I prefer Iso Alcohol) on the parking pad (sponge) (and saturate
a 'maintenance/tune-up' checklist for the 1160 ?
2002-02-22 by frankg_photo
can anyone share a list of what I should be doing on a regular basis to keep my 1160 humming ? There s the obvious software utilities to check the nozzle &
RE: [Digital BW] Re: The Digital Revolution - WAS - AIPAD Galleries List
2002-02-22 by Tim Atherton
... Yeah Austin, prove it s not flat - where do get this stuff from? tim a ... http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Please visit the Group Homepage to check the
Re: [Digital BW] Re: The Digital Revolution - WAS - AIPAD Galleries List
2002-02-22 by Jerry Olson
What do you mean the earth WAS flat? Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] Re:Seattle Ink get together
2002-02-22 by sdmey4@aol.com
I met Ken Last year, and spoke to him as well and exchanged a couple e-mails. I was very interested in doing platinum of my xray images. I still haven t found
Re: Epson 3000, MIS FS/Piezo, EAM Partitioned Workflow
2002-02-21 by tboleyyh
... Image ... One imagines something more like this- I was able to slightly modify Tyler s Eclipse curves for the 3000 and Piezo inks (thank you Carolyn) to
RE: [Digital BW] Re: New to the group
2002-02-21 by David J. Bookbinder
Hi. I must have missed the Boston meeting notice (or had not yet joined the list). Can anyone in the Boston area let me know, please, if future meetings are to
Re: New guy from Houston
2002-02-21 by John Schubert
Hi Bill: I m in Houston, work down near the Galleria and live up north off of 59. Are there any other Houstonians here? We ve done wet b/w work and we re
Bye,bye perfect nozzle checks?
2002-02-21 by piotrjanowski
Here is what happened, I have been now printing over a month on my 1160 with a newly installed CFS and MIS VM inks. I already forgot what a bad nozzle check
Re: Digital Zone system plug in for Photoshop
2002-02-21 by marktuckerdotcom
... wondering if anybody knew anything about it??? This is more direct: http://www.digitalfilmtools.com/html/ozone.html
Digital Zone system plug in for Photoshop
2002-02-21 by Don Rooney
I was surfing and found this, it looks very interesting and was wondering if anybody knew anything about it???
RE: [Digital BW] Re: The Digital Revolution - WAS - AIPAD Galleries List
2002-02-21 by Austin Franklin
Hi Tom, ... Yeah, and many argued the earth was flat, sun revolved around earth etc. ;-) ... I agree with that, but it won t come about because of smaller
Re: The Digital Revolution - WAS - AIPAD Galleries List
2002-02-21 by tomoc
... came ... Never say never... I was one of the goofy buyers (and paid upgraders) of all the iterations of the Apple Quicktakes... a joke compared to today s
Re: New to the group
2002-02-21 by Jon Zax
Tom O connell wrote; Welcome to the group. I think you will find that we have just recently started any type of meeting of groups. NYC was first, then Boston,
Re: [Digital BW] PMA
2002-02-21 by Paul Butterfield
Hi Diana, See you there! ... -- Paul Butterfield
Re:Seattle Ink get together
2002-02-21 by Sanders-Herring
Steven, I guess it really is a small planet. Yes, I know Kenny. (his last name is spelled Osthimer, BTW) and he is the local platinum guru. I m actually
New guy from Houston
2002-02-21 by Bill Giffen
Thanks Tom, I hope to meet some B&W printers here in Houston, and possibly have a group meeting. I am off to PMA Saturday to mull over my decisions to purchase
RE: [Digital BW] Hahnemuhle Copper Plate Board 310?
2002-02-21 by Nij
I forgot to mention before, Mike, that we must not forget that mould-made papers change in texture as the mould wears out, so the surface feel of the papers
Re: New to the group
2002-02-21 by tomoc
Bill - Welcome to the group. I think you will find that we have just recently started any type of meeting of groups. NYC was first, then Boston, last nite SF
[Digital BW] Re: Photoshop 7, was Photoshop 5.0
2002-02-21 by johnvphoto
... like ... or ... With OS X, the operating system itself takes advantage of the dual chips, while OS 9 does not. But there are some functions in Photoshop
Re: [Digital BW] To Martin & Antonis
2002-02-21 by Martin Wesley
Daniel, Thank you! The feeling is definitely mutual. I am very glad you have enjoyed the group and appreciate your and everyone else s contributions that have
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Photoshop 7, was Photoshop 5.0
2002-02-21 by Peter Marquis-Kyle
marktuckerdotcom wrote ... ...which fits the image I glimpsed the other day, of Mark loaded down with Polaroid film packs and buckets of soup. Peter
Re: [Digital BW] dry mounting
2002-02-21 by Paul Roark
Tom, I dry-mounted a few Generations 3 color images on Epson Photo Quality Photo Paper. I would think this paper and ink combo would be more sensitive to heat
Re: [Digital BW] Indelible Inks fade test - Initial results
2002-02-21 by Paul Roark
Tom, Gen 4 Enhanced black is darker than MIS VM black. Paul ___________
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Photoshop 7, was Photoshop 5.0
2002-02-21 by Jeff Magidson
marktuckerdotcom wrote: ? ... Mark; FYI.... That option can be shut off in X. -Jeff
[Digital BW] Re: Photoshop 7, was Photoshop 5.0
2002-02-21 by marktuckerdotcom
I read somewhere that PS7 was to fully address the dual-processor factor on the Mac. Would that be something like native DP, for the first time? I wonder if
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Photoshop 7, was Photoshop 5.0
2002-02-21 by Jon
Jerry, Try indexing over night. My Mac always says it will take 45+ hours, but that number falls away and it usually takes an hour. Yeah, it does look like
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Photoshop 7, was Photoshop 5.0
2002-02-21 by Jerry Olson
Hi Jeff, I don t like System 10.1 because it is not at all intuitive, and the fonts on screen are way too small for me to read comfortably, and there s no way
DRY MOUNTAING PRINTS
2002-02-21 by ed021us
Hello All I have been dry mounting ink jet prints using EAM and Somerset Photo papers at 200 Deg f using Seal MT5 paper with no problem at all. Ed Blake blake
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Photoshop 7, was Photoshop 5.0
2002-02-21 by Jeff Magidson
... Jerry; I recently bought a new g4 and it has both 9.2 & 10 on it. I have played a bit with 10 but I m still doing all my work on 9.2. So far.... I like 9.2
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Photoshop 7, was Photoshop 5.0
2002-02-21 by Jerry Olson
Thanks Carolyn. I ll be subscribing right away. Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Photoshop 7, was Photoshop 5.0
2002-02-21 by Jerry Olson
Tim, If it s like Illustrator, it will require at least system 9.2 to run. Note, not system 9, but Nine point TWO. After working with system 10 for about 2
Re: [Digital BW] Indelible Inks fade test - Initial results
2002-02-21 by Paul Roark
Andrew, ... They are getting so many positive reviews, I ll have to give them a run along with an EAM for comparison. ... No, DD black was also in this test
To Martin & Antonis
2002-02-21 by elgha2001
To Martin & Antonis Congratulations on your 10000 hit It is a privilege to be among this group Daniel Elghanayan Cleveland Ohio
Re: [Digital BW] Hahnemuhle Copper Plate Board 310?
2002-02-21 by mkravit
Nigel, It seems like what I received was in reality Photo Rag 308. I cut a sheet and took it home with me thei evening. Side by side I can see no difference
Re: [Digital BW] transfer function?
2002-02-21 by cpr
on 2/19/02 4:56 PM, Bill Morse at willym@bellatlantic.net wrote: Thanks Martin and Bill I did download the file with Paul s tips on working on curves and was
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Photoshop 7, was Photoshop 5.0
2002-02-20 by Carolyn Frayn
Hi Jerry... It s Photoshop User Magazine. You have to become a member of their association (National Association of Photopshop Professionals) which is of
Re: Photoshop 7, was Photoshop 5.0
2002-02-20 by John Schubert
Is the photoshop 7.0 coming out in March a Mac OS/X only version I m not sure if there is a parallel release for both platforms, or whether the usual method is
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Photoshop 7, was Photoshop 5.0
2002-02-20 by Tim Atherton
... I think it s just that a lot of mac users are graphics people and so PS and other graphics programmes get discussed a lot more on those sites. As I recall
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Photoshop 7, was Photoshop 5.0
2002-02-20 by Jerry Olson
Carolyn, is it Photoshop USER or Photoshop INSIDER that is the real magazine and not the 8 page newsletter? Jerry
Re: [Digital BW] where to buy 13x19 EAM w/out watermark?
2002-02-20 by Jerry Olson
Epson has had hundreds of complaints about that watermark. One of Epson s reps said they are removing it and the paper will be rebranded endurance. If it goes
MIS-VM and 1290 & 1280 drivers!
2002-02-20 by sm7bxd
Hi, Warning????? I have had a wonderful time with Pauls VM. I have a 1290 (not a1280) but have used the 1280 drivers as suggested in this forum and they worked
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Photoshop version 5.0 ok for newbie?
2002-02-20 by Carolyn Frayn
... yup email. ... Nothing wrong with that! ... Very true. ... There ya go... Carolyn
[Digital BW] Re: Photoshop 7, was Photoshop 5.0
2002-02-20 by johnvphoto
... Check out half-way down the page - it mentions this Monday is the release - but who knows for sure! http://osx.macnn.com/ Best, John V
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Photoshop 7, was Photoshop 5.0
2002-02-20 by Carolyn Frayn
http://www.macosx.org/ps7.html seems like a good read, but probably nothing further to what you saw on the demo. Thought there would be an article in photoshop
[Digital BW] Re: Photoshop 7, was Photoshop 5.0
2002-02-20 by marktuckerdotcom
I looked at a G4 in NYC last weekend, and Photoshop 7 (beta) was installed on that demo machine. Does this mean that the final release is soon? What is
[Digital BW] Re: Photoshop version 5.0 ok for newbie?
2002-02-20 by johnvphoto
... Man...this is taking too much energy to explain! It was not rude when refering for John Schubert s post but I thought Antonis s post was refering to my
where to buy 13x19 EAM w/out watermark?
2002-02-20 by Daniel Perez
I just got off the phone with Atlex support and they said all of their 13x19 EAM paper has watermarks on it. Has anyone recently ordered 13x19 EAM *without*
First meeting in San Francisco area results
2002-02-20 by Don Rooney
Hi If anyone is interested I have a short review of the first meeting of the San Francisco area group. I d be willing to send it to you off list. Just email me