Just starting - Also
2007-02-02 by markebrauer
I ve been reading the recent Just Starting thread with interest but seeing I have different needs/questions/concerns, I m starting a new thread. I ve always
Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 525 of 2186 · 109257 messages matched
2007-02-02 by markebrauer
I ve been reading the recent Just Starting thread with interest but seeing I have different needs/questions/concerns, I m starting a new thread. I ve always
2007-02-02 by Fred59
This is my first post in the forum--by way of introduction, I ll simply say that I am an advanced amateur photographer, with a special interest in B&W
2007-02-02 by Adam Maas
... The Develop module is essentially identical to ACR 4. The other features will not make it over. -Adam
2007-02-02 by Stephen Kobrin
Does anyone know which features of Lightroom will be included in the new version of PS? I have been using the Lightroom Beta and am hooked on its Library mode
2007-02-02 by sagaface
I think it s wonderful you all took the time to check my site out and comment. Your comments, critiques and compliments have helped and encouraged me greatly.
2007-02-02 by reynoll_2000
Can someone post the link to Sarah s website please? I have cottoned onto this thread a bit late! (no pun intended). Paul. ... printing them?) ... apologies,
2007-02-02 by Gary Brown
Am I the only one that thinks a detailed discussion of a website has nothing to do with B&W printing. Sarah made a perfectly appropriate request to the list to
2007-02-02 by John Moody
Of course she is not going to lighten her work. The issue is that the images were in prophoto, a 1.8 gamma space, and will look darker when viewed in a 2.2
2007-02-02 by Richard Smallfield
Hi, I m just looking at your work again and you are a true artist - the lighting is great, the subject matter makes you think and the use of motion is great.
2007-02-02 by Richard Smallfield
... Sarah, that was meant as a compliment, not a sale inquiry - apologies, Great work. Richard -- http://smallfield.vze.com http://photos.smallfield.vze.com
2007-02-02 by Alan Kearney
... Sarah, late to this thread but I d agree with everyone else so far in that I d leave well enough alone. Your images are striking, thought provoking,
2007-02-02 by jason_copple
Thanks everyone. I ll let you know how this journey goes. GIDDY UP!
2007-02-02 by Barrett Benton
Sarah: as far as my PowerBook goes (tweaked and set at 1.8), the images look, subjectively, just fine to me. And the content is wonderful. The site is
2007-02-02 by Andrew Darlow
Hello: I recently wrote a newsletter that contains some tips for printing on a few of the fiber-based semi-gloss and gloss papers on the market. Though I
2007-02-02 by gcwagner
Sarah, I found your site to be very interesting. I would like to see more photos. GaryW. ... From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
2007-02-02 by Richard Smallfield
Sarah, there is a preponderance of unoriginal work online - well executed but bland landscapes for example. But you have an original voice - your work tells a
2007-02-02 by Daniel
ditto. theme is good but it s not the rule, it s just a common guideline. indeed many of sarah s individual pieces can stand on their own merits!
2007-02-02 by T
T again..:-) I support Clayton 100%. Do not change the photos. It is your individual style so stick with it. If you change, it is not your work any longer
2007-02-02 by djon43
Sarah, I find your images and their implied narratives so abstract (lacking story lines but possessing titles) that I doubt differences in monitor setups make
2007-02-02 by Gary W. Weaver
I don t mind posting images I can t print on photo forums, but I know better than to reference them on a printing forum. I m only 80% of the way to darkroom
2007-02-02 by CDTobie@aol.com
... Works fine from my IntelMac... C. David Tobie Product Technology Manager ColorVision Business Division DataColor Inc. CDTobie@colorvision.com
2007-02-02 by Nancy Wilson
Sarah, I found your images compelling. I thought I would browse one collection at a time but found myself going through each of them at once--and then back to
2007-02-02 by Sam McCandless
... I m a Mac user, Jason, but not yet a modern-Mac user: for reasons that have to do with my prospective use of the Mac more generally, as opposed to printing
2007-02-01 by Rick Colson
Sarah - Remarkable, original work. What a pleasure to see your stuff. Rick
2007-02-01 by Gary W. Weaver
There seems to be a gap in messages from 11:30am to 4pm. I m reposting my message from 2:18pm as it must have been routed to Mars.
2007-02-01 by kenc
I agree with Clayton, don t change a thing. Images look great on my calibrated monitor, the images are very excellent and evocative. Ken
2007-02-01 by sagaface
Thanks so much, Clayton. I was only going to lighten them up just a hair, no worries on me ever changing the overall look of my work. I refuse to ever do that.
2007-02-01 by Seth
other things being equal. Sorry Doug- Sensor size has absolutely, positively nothing to do with sensor size. Digital SLRs have the sensor at the film plane.
2007-02-01 by Clayton Jones
Sarah, ... Don t do it! Your pics look fine just as they are. And especially don t do something like that just because someone else thinks they should be
2007-02-01 by zonepeter
I am creating a series of ICCs for a Innova semi matte with create ICC. I am using a densitometer, so they are for density values only. The densities are very
2007-02-01 by Clayton Jones
Hello Jason, ... I really don t know. I use a PC so I haven t paid any attention to any of that. But offhand I don t recall reading about any 2400/Mac
2007-02-01 by Gary W. Weaver
Easy for you to say : ) Presumably, the artist found the web display to her liking. That s a lot of work to mess with - redoing the pics. On dial-up, I found
2007-02-01 by Larry Burk
... have found so much ... Images loked great to me. The one I downloaded to Photoshop, 8380, indicated it was in grayscale with 10% Dot Gain.
2007-02-01 by sagaface
T...thank you for that. And... ...Thanks to all of you so far, for your time to view my site and your suggestions and comments. I appreciate the feedback
2007-02-01 by T
Sarah, I am viewing your website on my calibrated laptop and trying to type. LOL (Keys are too small!) Just writing to say I don t find the photos too dark.
2007-02-01 by CDTobie@aol.com
... Don t post images in ProPhoto; its not a standard space. Use something simple, ideally sRGB for the web. And yes, use GrayGamma2.2 instead color, for
2007-02-01 by Daniel
everything so subjective. i ve learned to view other artists works through their eyes. sometimes i think i manage to see through another artist s eyes, and
2007-02-01 by deandadin@aol.com
Hello Sarah, I enjoyed looking at your site. I really liked the images in the tanning factory. I use a mac with a Lacie 22in monitor that is calibrated and I
2007-02-01 by sagaface
Very helpful...whoever is accusing you should bite their tongue! Thanks so much for your relpy. My Mac is calibrated to 2.2, though these images are in
2007-02-01 by CDTobie@aol.com
... Untagged images will be assumed as sRGB by PC browsers; this should also be true on Macs, unfortuantely there images are assumed to the users monitor
2007-02-01 by Gary W. Weaver
I thought they were fine images. Dark is dark. gar ... From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
2007-02-01 by sagaface
I have received a couple of emails letting me know that the photos look too dark on calibrated monitors (thank you!), and I wanted to address this issue for a
2007-02-01 by sagaface
Dan..thanks for your words...very thoughtful, and I appreciate your time looking at the site! Sarah ... to ... seem ... they
2007-02-01 by Daniel
hello sarah, that s a wonderful website. i think it s visually uncluttered or not distracting, and it s pleasing to my eyes. which is important because you
2007-02-01 by stasunas
I have been trying to print on my Epson 2200 using Condor BW and am getting error messages on the printer. The error message I get is that all of the ink
2007-02-01 by rgoldman2
At outbackphoto.com there is a recently posted tutorial about using qtr icc create written by Georgio Trucco. It s called Printing Insights 045, posted
2007-02-01 by CDTobie@aol.com
... Yes; its a mixed lot with the B9180 for B&W. HP had opted for pretinted neutral grays instead of warm carbon gray inks. And they have left the light gray
2007-02-01 by sagaface
Hi everyone, I finally created a website...what an endeavor, yikes! And since I have found so much invaluable help here, I thought I d share it. Thanks to all
2007-02-01 by scottkathe1
I hate to throw in a monkey wrench in here but has anyone tried the HP B9180 with black and white. I have heard very mixed reviews. On another note Epson is
2007-02-01 by jason_copple
Clayton, Once again thank you for your help. This is a printer I was looking seriously at and you have swayed me. One question; do you know of any troubles